Steyn on Free Expression

 

Should the validity of scientific proposals be decided in a court of law? Should policy be decided the same way? The great Mark Steyn has posted a new video interview on the most important free speech case of our time:

This is the difference between the rest of the English-speaking world and the United States: There’s a constitutional, absolute right to free expression. But that’s of limited value in a litigious society where people can tie you up in court for five to ten years. And it’s of even less value if actually you lose the spirit of vigorous public discourse. And that’s my concern, too: That on climate change and many other issues, there’s no point in having absolute freedom of speech if, as a practical matter, public discourse shrivels to an ever-narrower range of public opinion.

Published in Law, Science & Technology
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 37 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Titus Techera Contributor
    Titus Techera
    @TitusTechera

    Here’s my writing on the matter. NR used to take a very different attitude to these kinds of lawsuits-

    • #31
  2. Look Away Inactive
    Look Away
    @LookAway

    Betcha we won’t see Mark on Uncommon Knowledge any time soon.

    • #32
  3. aardo vozz Member
    aardo vozz
    @aardovozz

    Susan Quinn:”Mama Toad, I admire Steyn’s determination in spite of the forces trying literally to destroy him and his arguments. I hope he continues to fight the good fight and doesn’t run out of money…”

    Which begs the question, who is providing the funding for Dr. Mann’s lawyers? He must be running up some pretty hefty fees,considering all the people/organizations he is suing. Also, I don’t know about NR,but Mark Steyn is actually also countersuing Mann.

    “The behavior of the scientific community is beyond reprehensible. Why should we trust scientists on any issue…”

    Exactly!!! Between this case(and I’m sure Mr. Steyn could provide other examples) and the East Anglia emails(remember “hide the decline”?), the scientific community risks looking less like objective seekers of truth through free inquiry and more like a self-interested group of partisan hacks.

    Excellent comment Susan. It has given me a lot of food for thought.

    • #33
  4. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    drlorentz:

    The Reticulator: I wonder if anybody saved any of those McCarthyite tracts from the 1950s that listed communists and fellow-travelers, mostly in the entertainment industry. One thing that makes them different from this list is that they were usually printed in red ink, and had a lot of words in all-caps.

    I especially enjoyed the wacko conspiracy chart on p.38 with red arrows connecting the miscreants:

    conspiracy

    Definitely the same methodology as was used for determining who were commie fellow travelers back in the 1950s.

    • #34
  5. CB Toder aka Mama Toad Member
    CB Toder aka Mama Toad
    @CBToderakaMamaToad

    aardo vozz:Exactly!!! Between this case(and I’m sure Mr. Steyn could provide other examples) and the East Anglia emails(remember “hide the decline”?), the scientific community risks looking less like objective seekers of truth through free inquiry and more like a self-interested group of partisan hacks.

    aardo vozz, if you don’t know it already, Steyn has a book out called Climate Change: The Facts with essays from many prominent scientists on the scientific questions at hand.

    Even more fun is his collection “A Disgrace to the Profession”: The World’s Scientists, In Their Own Words, On Michael E. Mann, His Hockey Stick, And Their Damage To Science in which Steyn gives the context and then allows the other scientists to speak for themselves. With cartoons!… As Daily Kos says, “Most people would refrain from adding fuel to the fire if being sued by someone for attacking them. Steyn, however, is not most people.”

    • #35
  6. aardo vozz Member
    aardo vozz
    @aardovozz

    CB Toder aka Mama Toad:

    aardo vozz:Exactly!!! Between this case(and I’m sure Mr. Steyn could provide other examples) and the East Anglia emails(remember “hide the decline”?), the scientific community risks looking less like objective seekers of truth through free inquiry and more like a self-interested group of partisan hacks.

    aardo vozz, if you don’t know it already, Steyn has a book out called Climate Change: The Facts with essays from many prominent scientists on the scientific questions at hand.

    Even more fun is his collection “A Disgrace to the Profession”: The World’s Scientists, In Their Own Words, On Michael E. Mann, His Hockey Stick, And Their Damage To Science in which Steyn gives the context and then allows the other scientists to speak for themselves. With cartoons!… As Daily Kos says, “Most people would refrain from adding fuel to the fire if being sued by someone for attacking them. Steyn, however, is not most people.”

    Thank you. I am aware of the books and look forward to ordering them and reading them. :)

    • #36
  7. Tedley Member
    Tedley
    @Tedley

    MamaT,

    thanks for the post, I always enjoy Mark’s handiwork.  Probably time to buy another book.

    • #37
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.