Powell Aide: Snowden “Pure as a Driven Snow”

 

SnowdenSnowden “more helpful than dangerous” says ex-Colin Powell Chief of Staff:

The leaks from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden about US worldwide surveillance have helped rather than harmed America, and the leaks haven’t endangered lives.

Lawrence “Larry” Wilkerson, the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell in the last Bush administration, said that he believed Snowden’s assertions that he leaked out of concern for the US breaking both domestic and international law.

“I think Snowden has done a service. I wouldn’t have had the courage, and maybe not even the intellectual capacity, to do it the way he did it,” he told Salon magazine.

“There’s a logic to what he has done that is impressive. He really has refrained from anything that was truly dangerous, with regard to our security – regardless of what people say.

Wilkerson, who played a key role in gathering intelligence to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, said that Snowden and the journalists working with him had been “circumspect” in what data they had released, and thinks the fugitive’s decision to go public was driven by “altruistic” reasons.

“Snowden seems to me to be pure as a driven snow,” he said. “You can be dangerous if you’re that way, but you can also be helpful. And I think he’s been more helpful than dangerous.”

Despite his apparent admiration for Snowden, Wilkerson said that the former NSA worker had made his bed and now would have to lie in it.

“I credit Snowden for having a great deal of courage, because he’s ruined himself forever,” he said. “I don’t think he has a future. He has a future so long as he can continue to co-exist with all the restraints and pressures around him. But I’m not sure that’s being long-lived. And I don’t see him ever being accepted back here.”

“Regardless of what people say?”

What people might that be?

Maybe people like Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper – the falsehood of whose testimony before Congress was outed by Snowden.

The director of National Intelligence apologized in June to the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee for lying during a hearing, according to a letter published on the DNI website on Tuesday.

Director James Clapper appeared before the committee in March, where Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., asked him specifically if NSA spies on millions of Americans. Clapper answered, “No.”

Since then, Edward Snowden reportedly leaked government documents that unveiled a secretive government program that did precisely what Wyden suggested in collecting meta data for cell phone and internet records of hundreds of millions of Americans.

Snowden is still on the run. Clapper still has his job. Isn’t it wonderful what a really sincere apology can do?

Published in Foreign Policy, Law, Military
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 38 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Klaatu Inactive
    Klaatu
    @Klaatu

    Z in MT:

    Klaatu:I am generally against the death penalty but I would gladly serve as Snowden’s executioner and sleep peacefully after.

    I think this is out of line. Despite his defection to Russia, I don’t think that Snowden was a motivated to hurt the US. I think he was motivated by privacy rights. That being said the way he went about it was illegal and wrong. He should be prosecuted, but I wouldn’t support a treason charge.

    Is motivation an element in treason?

    • #31
  2. Brian McMenomy Inactive
    Brian McMenomy
    @BrianMcMenomy

    James Lileks:If there’s one thing that removes any doubts about someone’s motivations or character, it’s defecting to Russia.

    Exactly, he’s essentially downloaded to Putin’s goons.  People think this is a good thing?

    • #32
  3. hokiecon Inactive
    hokiecon
    @hokiecon

    Mark: It is certain that he was a tool of Glenn Greenwald, who has boasted of his role, as well as of his hatred of America.

    I have held that opinion since this all broke out.

    Relevant reading: http://quillette.com/2015/12/19/glenn-greenwald-fascisms-fellow-traveller/

    • #33
  4. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Klaatu:

    Z in MT:

    Klaatu:I am generally against the death penalty but I would gladly serve as Snowden’s executioner and sleep peacefully after.

    I think this is out of line. Despite his defection to Russia, I don’t think that Snowden was a motivated to hurt the US. I think he was motivated by privacy rights. That being said the way he went about it was illegal and wrong. He should be prosecuted, but I wouldn’t support a treason charge.

    Is motivation an element in treason?

    Especially where he did more than focus attention on the meta-data program.  Within the realm of what we can be told, it seems fairly settled that the information he stole went beyond what could be justified if privacy was his main concern.  I don’t give him a pass in any event, but the “whistleblower” narrative takes a very narrow view of what he actually did.

    • #34
  5. Redneck Desi Inactive
    Redneck Desi
    @RedneckDesi

    Powell has definitely gone native and should be considered a liberal. Do people really think a traitor like Snowden is a hero?

    • #35
  6. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Hoyacon: Markus Wolf would be green with envy over having to get a court order?

    Over the comprehensive reach into every form of communication, over the ability to automate much of the work, and the ability to use big data to discern patterns. Also over a legal apparatus that is approaching Beria’s “show me the man and I will find you the crime.”

    When Gordon Crovitz reviewed Harvey Silverglate’s Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent for the WSJ, he wrote:

    Under the English common law we inherited, a crime requires intent. This protection is disappearing in the U.S. As Mr. Silverglate writes, “Since the New Deal era, Congress has delegated to various administrative agencies the task of writing the regulations,” even as “Congress has demonstrated a growing dysfunction in crafting legislation that can in fact be understood.” Prosecutors identify defendants to go after instead of finding a law that was broken and figuring out who did it. Expect more such prosecutions as Washington adds regulations.

    • #36
  7. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Brian McMenomy:

    James Lileks:If there’s one thing that removes any doubts about someone’s motivations or character, it’s defecting to Russia.

    Exactly, he’s essentially downloaded to Putin’s goons. People think this is a good thing?

    I don’t think that would be a good thing, but so far I haven’t been given reason to think he’s done so.

    • #37
  8. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Ontheleftcoast:

    Hoyacon: Markus Wolf would be green with envy over having to get a court order?

    Over the comprehensive reach into every form of communication, over the ability to automate much of the work, and the ability to use big data to discern patterns. Also over a legal apparatus that is approaching Beria’s “show me the man and I will find you the crime.”

    When Gordon Crovitz reviewed Harvey Silverglate’s Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent for the WSJ, he wrote:

    Under the English common law we inherited, a crime requires intent. This protection is disappearing in the U.S. As Mr. Silverglate writes, “Since the New Deal era, Congress has delegated to various administrative agencies the task of writing the regulations,” even as “Congress has demonstrated a growing dysfunction in crafting legislation that can in fact be understood.” Prosecutors identify defendants to go after instead of finding a law that was broken and figuring out who did it. Expect more such prosecutions as Washington adds regulations.

    Can we agree that this has nothing to do with what I said (or, in fact, with your original comment)?  I hope so.

    • #38
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.