Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Let’s Make Planned Parenthood Great Again?

 

trump-planned-parenthood-miniSaturday night’s debate wasn’t short on fireworks. Whether it was Trump and Bush exchanging fire on bankruptcy, Cruz and Rubio on immigration, or Cruz and Trump on the Supreme Court, there were a number of heated exchanges.

But arguably the most stunning moment was Donald Trump defending Planned Parenthood against Senator Ted Cruz at a Republican debate in front of 13.5 million people.

What makes this continued defense of the abortion provider so troubling is that it’s almost verbatim the case made by the organization’s CEO, Cecile Richards, for maintaining taxpayer funding and indirectly forcing every taxpayer to pay for abortions. To put it another way, Trump called Cruz a liar for claiming Trump wanted Planned Parenthood to receive taxpayer funding. Trump then mimicked Cecile Richards’ argument for the funding of Planned Parenthood by taxpayers.

Conservative writer Katie Pavlich touched on this issue:

Trump said Planned Parenthood does “many wonderful things for women’s health” while trying at the same time to dismiss abortion. Keep in mind Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards makes this same argument in order to keep $500 million in taxpayer funding each year. The abortion giant repeatedly claims it only uses taxpayer money for women’s health, not for abortion, ignoring the fact that money is fungible. Trump made that argument for Planned Parenthood tonight from the Republican, pro-life debate stage.

Beyond this, his defense of Planned Parenthood distracts from the plethora of videos and mounting evidence that indicates the organization has undertaken the illegal practice of selling fetal tissue.

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and others have called for an investigation into Planned Parenthood based on the evidence provided in the aforementioned videos. Instead, the current administration has moved to arrest the activists responsible for creating the videos.

This is a clear, obvious, and outrageous example of the corruption within the current administration and the DOJ.

The following question remains: If Trump gains the nomination and, eventually, the presidency, will he tackle the blatant, obvious corruption within the nation’s largest abortion provider, or will he simply make Planned Parenthood great again?

There are 36 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Man With the Axe Member

    You are absolutely right, and Trump’s supporters, on Ricochet and elsewhere, don’t care. They used to care. Not anymore.

    • #1
    • February 14, 2016, at 2:50 PM PST
    • Like
  2. Lucy Pevensie Inactive

    MWTA, I have good reason to believe that, at least in South Carolina, they do care about this.

    • #2
    • February 14, 2016, at 3:13 PM PST
    • Like
  3. Man With the Axe Member

    Lucy Pevensie:MWTA, I have good reason to believe that, at least in South Carolina, they do care about this.

    I hope you are right. Wouldn’t that be great?

    • #3
    • February 14, 2016, at 3:18 PM PST
    • Like
  4. Lucy Pevensie Inactive

    In fact, I think it’s really, really important to get the facts of what Trump said in front of the South Carolina voters.

    Edited to say, I’m really glad to see it on the Main Feed. I personally trust that the voters of South Carolina do care about Planned Parenthood. They should know, also, that this is the kind of attitude that will influence the judges a President Trump would appoint, not just at the Supreme Court, but at all the lower levels, and those are the judges that got us where we are with gay marriage, and will oppose any state legislation designed to limit abortion.

    • #4
    • February 14, 2016, at 3:23 PM PST
    • Like
  5. Jamie Lockett Inactive

    “I don’t care if @realDonaldTrump wants to perform abortions in White House after this immigration policy paper,” – Ann Coulter

    Such is the commitment to principle of the average Trump supporter.

    • #5
    • February 14, 2016, at 3:29 PM PST
    • Like
  6. Lucy Pevensie Inactive

    Jamie Lockett:“I don’t care if @realDonaldTrump wants to perform abortions in White House after this immigration policy paper,” – Ann Coulter

    Such is the commitment to principle of the average Trump supporter.

    Yes, but Ann Coulter is not a South Carolinian. And right now we don’t care about the average Trump voter as much as we care about the average South Carolinian Trump voter.

    • #6
    • February 14, 2016, at 3:39 PM PST
    • 1 like
  7. Profile Photo Member

    Man With the Axe:You are absolutely right, and Trump’s supporters, on Ricochet and elsewhere, don’t care. They used to care. Not anymore.

    You’re right.

    Once upon a time I would care, but I’ve since noticed that the gop has done essentially nothing to actually end planned parenthood money, make a case to end it, etc.

    They have, as usual, commenced the typical failure theater intended to make the people concerned about planned parenthood think the party will actually do something about it.

    You know- if they could win the presidency, a super majority in the Senate and the House, and could convince NPR to stop saying mean things about them.

    Which won’t happen. So if president Trump won’t defund planned parenthood, neither would anyone else.

    Null issue.

    • #7
    • February 14, 2016, at 4:54 PM PST
    • Like
  8. Black Prince Inactive

    Xennady:So if president Trump won’t defund planned parenthood, neither would anyone else.

    Null issue.

    That’s pretty much the way I see things too. The GOP has taught me that saying the right thing doesn’t mean doing the right thing and I’m not going to let myself get burned again. I liked your use of the phrase “null issue”. I’m currently reading Robert Heinlein’s “The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress” and one of the main characters, “Mannie” (a computer specialist), is fond of the phrase “null program” to indicate that something was irrelevant, useless or futile—a pertinent example being that “…oratory is a null program”.

    • #8
    • February 14, 2016, at 5:37 PM PST
    • Like
  9. Lucy Pevensie Inactive

    It’s not so much about defunding Planned Parenthood. It’s about the dozens and dozens of appellate court judges a President Trump would appoint, judges who have an impact on what state laws are allowed to stand and which ones are knocked down. President Trump has said he thinks his sister, the rabid pro-abortion judge, is a great judge. He may have been joking about putting her on the Supreme Court, but it does not change that he thinks she’s great. Clearly, she would be a model for all his lower level judicial appointments.

    • #9
    • February 14, 2016, at 5:58 PM PST
    • Like
  10. dbeck Inactive

    The majority of the country is numb to this genocide for a variety of reasons. The location of 35% of these “clinics” is quite telling in itself. All this is allowed by law and the sheepole tolerate it. Nuff said.

    • #10
    • February 14, 2016, at 6:29 PM PST
    • Like
  11. Amy Schley, Longcat Shrinker Moderator

    Man With the Axe:You are absolutely right, and Trump’s supporters, on Ricochet and elsewhere, don’t care. They used to care. Not anymore.

    Assuming facts not in evidence.

    Quite frankly, I don’t think they care. The Mexican menace trumps all in their mind, and Mr. “I was for amnesty until talking about a wall made me a viable candidate” is their chosen one.

    • #11
    • February 14, 2016, at 6:36 PM PST
    • Like
  12. Profile Photo Member

    Trump may have cratered his campaign on Saturday. If he doesn’t, it means a ton of people who never vote in Republican primaries are now voting in Republican primaries. Whether this increased turnout is desirable and sustainable remains to be seen.

    • #12
    • February 14, 2016, at 8:16 PM PST
    • Like
  13. Tom Meyer, Common Citizen Contributor

    T. McGee: What makes this continued defense of the abortion provider so troubling is that it’s almost verbatim the case made by the organization’s CEO, Cecile Richards, for maintaining taxpayer funding and indirectly forcing every taxpayer to pay for abortions.

    Yes. I think the best way of putting this is that Planned Parenthood holds its women health services hostage to its abortion practice. The remedy seems to be to call their bluff: tell them to spin the abortion services off into a completely separate entity from the contraceptives and pap smears. How to do that legally, I’m not sure, but I’m open to suggestions.

    • #13
    • February 15, 2016, at 4:59 AM PST
    • Like
  14. Columbo Member

    I cannot think of any more conservative issue than the defense of life. It is the cornerstone of the “unalienable rights” enumerated in the Declaration of Independence.

    This organization not only takes the life of these defenseless children, it then SELLS their body parts for PROFIT. And it also covers up for sex traffickers. This evil enterprise truly has the dark soul of Margaret Sanger.

    This should end the campaign of Donald Trump. I welcome any Trump supporter to counter the argument.

    • #14
    • February 15, 2016, at 5:12 AM PST
    • Like
  15. Polyphemus Inactive

    Xennady:

    Man With the Axe:You are absolutely right, and Trump’s supporters, on Ricochet and elsewhere, don’t care. They used to care. Not anymore.

    You’re right.

    Once upon a time I would care, but I’ve since noticed that the gop has done essentially nothing to actually end planned parenthood money, make a case to end it, etc.

    They have, as usual, commenced the typical failure theater intended to make the people concerned about planned parenthood think the party will actually do something about it.

    You know- if they could win the presidency, a super majority in the Senate and the House, and could convince NPR to stop saying mean things about them.

    Which won’t happen. So if president Trump won’t defund planned parenthood, neither would anyone else.

    Null issue.

    Thinking like this from otherwise sensible, engaged citizens is what scares me the most. This is cynicism and surrender. “What does it matter anyway?” is the prelude to all kinds of self-destructive activities.

    I used to work with alcoholics and drug addicts. I noticed that they liked to grab onto the feeling that some situation couldn’t get any worse. This enabled them to drink or use because, “what does it matter anyway?” The problem is that it can always get worse. If conservative, pro-life voters are following this line of thinking about Planned Parenthood itself, then we are in deeper trouble than I thought.

    • #15
    • February 15, 2016, at 5:18 AM PST
    • Like
  16. Tom Meyer, Common Citizen Contributor

    Charles Cooke offers a partial answer regarding how we go about this:

    Especially given that the Senate was elected more recently than the president. Moreover, Obama himself set a precedent for rejecting nominees on ideological grounds with Roberts.

    • #16
    • February 15, 2016, at 6:07 AM PST
    • Like
  17. GrannyDude Member

    Polyphemus:

    Xennady:

    Man With the Axe:You are absolutely right, and Trump’s supporters, on Ricochet and elsewhere, don’t care. They used to care. Not anymore.

    You’re right.

    Once upon a time I would care, but I’ve since noticed that the gop has done essentially nothing to actually end planned parenthood money, make a case to end it, etc.

    They have, as usual, commenced the typical failure theater intended to make the people concerned about planned parenthood think the party will actually do something about it.

    You know- if they could win the presidency, a super majority in the Senate and the House, and could convince NPR to stop saying mean things about them.

    Which won’t happen. So if president Trump won’t defund planned parenthood, neither would anyone else.

    Null issue.

    Thinking like this from otherwise sensible, engaged citizens is what scares me the most. This is cynicism and surrender. “What does it matter anyway?” is the prelude to all kinds of self-destructive activities.

    I used to work with alcoholics and drug addicts. I noticed that they liked to grab onto the feeling that some situation couldn’t get any worse. This enabled them to drink or use because, “what does it matter anyway?” The problem is that it can always get worse. If conservative, pro-life voters are following this line of thinking about Planned Parenthood itself, then we are in deeper trouble than I thought.

    It is the temptation to despair— and always, if I may say so, a little self-indulgent.

    • #17
    • February 15, 2016, at 6:16 AM PST
    • Like
  18. livingtheLoneStarlife Inactive

    I’m not so sure some Trump supporters want him to be president. They seem to desire a dictator.

    • #18
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:18 AM PST
    • Like
  19. Richard Fulmer Member

    Xennady:

    Man With the Axe:You are absolutely right, and Trump’s supporters, on Ricochet and elsewhere, don’t care. They used to care. Not anymore.

    You’re right.

    Once upon a time I would care, but I’ve since noticed that the gop has done essentially nothing to actually end planned parenthood money, make a case to end it, etc.

    They have, as usual, commenced the typical failure theater intended to make the people concerned about planned parenthood think the party will actually do something about it.

    You know- if they could win the presidency, a super majority in the Senate and the House, and could convince NPR to stop saying mean things about them.

    Which won’t happen. So if president Trump won’t defund planned parenthood, neither would anyone else.

    Null issue.

    More and more people – especially millennials – are being won over to the pro-life view. This may be driven, at least in part, by science. Sonograms allow people to see fetuses as they develop and see that they are, in fact, human beings. Moreover, babies are becoming “viable” outside the womb earlier in the pregnancy than ever before. This seems to me to be an odd time to raise the white flag.

    • #19
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:30 AM PST
    • Like
  20. Lucy Pevensie Inactive

    livingthehighlife:I’m not so sure some Trump supporters want him to be president. They seem to desire a dictator.

    In fairness to them, I think they’re tired of feeling “dictated to.” They think Trump will be their dictator and do some dictating back on their behalf. That’s why it’s important that they see that Trump may tend toward the dictatorial, but he’s not necessarily going to dictate their values, because he fundamentally does not share any of their values.

    • #20
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:35 AM PST
    • Like
  21. James Gawron Thatcher
    James Gawron Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    T.,

    I personally think that his blanket support for Planned Parenthood plus his endorsement of his sister for a Supreme Court nomination with her abortion absolutism on partial birth abortion is a deal breaker. No one who holds these views should be considered conservative. If Trump wants to recant like Rubio was forced to do over Immigration then one could consider it. Without that there is no guarantee he wouldn’t appoint people to the left of the middle completely sinking an already compromised Supreme Court.

    One problem, Donald Trump is never wrong and never admits it when he is wrong. So don’t hold your breath.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #21
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:35 AM PST
    • Like
  22. Tom Meyer, Common Citizen Contributor

    Richard Fulmer:

    More and more people – especially millennials – are being won over to the pro-life view. This may be driven, at least in part, by science. Sonograms allow people to see fetuses as they develop and see that they are, in fact, human beings. Moreover, babies are becoming “viable” outside the womb earlier in the pregnancy than ever before. This seems to me to be an odd time to raise the white flag.

    This is a quibble, but I don’t think that’s quite right; rather, it seems to me that millennials have much less tolerance for the Democrats’ pro-abortion absolutism.

    I count that as a very good thing, but it doesn’t necessarily follow that it’s equally wrong to abort a 24-week old fetus as taking Plan B.

    • #22
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:36 AM PST
    • Like
  23. Profile Photo Member

    Richard Fulmer:More and more people – especially millennials – are being won over to the pro-life view. This may be driven, at least in part, by science. Sonograms allow people to see fetuses as they develop and see that they are, in fact, human beings. Moreover, babies are becoming “viable” outside the womb earlier in the pregnancy than ever before. This seems to me to be an odd time to raise the white flag.

    This is something I am very curious about. Republican but pro-choice friends just had a VERY premature baby about two months ago. The child is doing well so far. I hope to ask them at some point in the future (when the child is much more stable) if their opinions on abortion have changed. My guess is that they will not only be pro-life, but will probably deny, to some extent, their previous pro-choice position.

    I see no harm in hammering the point home. These are the moments in life where minds can be changed.

    • #23
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:45 AM PST
    • Like
  24. Profile Photo Member

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Richard Fulmer:

    More and more people – especially millennials – are being won over to the pro-life view. This may be driven, at least in part, by science. Sonograms allow people to see fetuses as they develop and see that they are, in fact, human beings. Moreover, babies are becoming “viable” outside the womb earlier in the pregnancy than ever before. This seems to me to be an odd time to raise the white flag.

    This is a quibble, but I don’t think that’s quite right; rather, it seems to me that millennials have much less tolerance for the Democrats’ pro-abortion absolutism.

    I count that as a very good thing, but it doesn’t necessarily follow that it’s equally wrong to abort a 24-week old fetus as taking Plan B.

    This is correct. And as Millennials continue to eschew religion, it will be harder and harder to convince them that an embryo merits any consideration as a human being worthy of protection. The innate sanctity of life is a foreign concept to them.

    • #24
    • February 15, 2016, at 7:54 AM PST
    • Like
  25. James Gawron Thatcher
    James Gawron Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Bob Laing:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Richard Fulmer:

    More and more people – especially millennials – are being won over to the pro-life view. This may be driven, at least in part, by science. Sonograms allow people to see fetuses as they develop and see that they are, in fact, human beings. Moreover, babies are becoming “viable” outside the womb earlier in the pregnancy than ever before. This seems to me to be an odd time to raise the white flag.

    This is a quibble, but I don’t think that’s quite right; rather, it seems to me that millennials have much less tolerance for the Democrats’ pro-abortion absolutism.

    I count that as a very good thing, but it doesn’t necessarily follow that it’s equally wrong to abort a 24-week old fetus as taking Plan B.

    This is correct. And as Millennials continue to eschew religion, it will be harder and harder to convince them that an embryo merits any consideration as a human being worthy of protection. The innate sanctity of life is a foreign concept to them.

    Bob,

    Life is the matter of morality and the subject of all rights, whether you are talking from a religious or secular point of view. The kiddies better wake up. The junk that clogs their brain is worth nothing.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #25
    • February 15, 2016, at 8:02 AM PST
    • Like
  26. Manny Member

    I just don’t understand where Donald Trump’s support is coming from inside the Republican Party. On issue after issue he’s either a johnny-come-lately where he once held the categorically opposite view or he’s shown to be a complete phony. Why is this man still leading the Republican nomination?

    • #26
    • February 15, 2016, at 10:18 AM PST
    • Like
  27. Lucy Pevensie Inactive

    Manny:I just don’t understand where Donald Trump’s support is coming from inside the Republican Party. On issue after issue he’s either a johnny-come-lately where he once held the categorically opposite view or he’s shown to be a complete phony. Why is this man still leading the Republican nomination?

    I don’t think I’ve ever linked to a Daily Beast article before, but I think it’s this: “We Now Join the U.S. Class War Already in Progress.” Also, see Charles Murray’s article in the WSJ, making much the same point.

    • #27
    • February 15, 2016, at 10:22 AM PST
    • Like
  28. carcat74 Member

    Lucy Pevensie:In fact, I think it’s really, really important to get the facts of what Trump said in front of the South Carolina voters.

    Edited to say, I’m really glad to see it on the Main Feed. I personally trust that the voters of South Carolina do care about Planned Parenthood. They should know, also, that this is the kind of attitude that will influence the judges a President Trump would appoint, not just at the Supreme Court, but at all the lower levels, and those are the judges that got us where we are with gay marriage, and will oppose any state legislation designed to limit abortion.

    Yes, remember what he said about appointing his sister, the partial-birth abortion supporter, to the Supreme Court….

    • #28
    • February 15, 2016, at 10:32 AM PST
    • Like
  29. ParisParamus Member
    ParisParamus Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    All I want to say is that you cannot unring the Truther Bell.

    • #29
    • February 15, 2016, at 10:45 AM PST
    • Like
  30. Man With the Axe Member

    Pretty much all of the “defense” of Trump’s amazing performance at the debate, which appears in various threads, has taken the form of “the other guys are just as bad or worse, and even Reagan wasn’t perfect…”

    I have not heard much to justify his support of Planned Parenthood, because it would require admitting he’s not smart enough to know about the fungibility of taxpayer’s money ostensibly used to support their other activities.

    • #30
    • February 15, 2016, at 11:22 AM PST
    • Like

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.