So, Should I Caucus?

 

635501804068694446-2016IowaCaucus-720x163The Iowa caucuses will come to their tumultuous conclusion Monday. I live in Sioux County, here in the northwest corner of the state, and from what I can tell, Cruz, Trump, and Carson are the candidates of choice here. Carson will probably do very well, as this area is both very conservative and very religious. The various precincts will have large public rooms or gyms assigned for meeting, and the Democrats will probably gather in someone’s basement. My pastor encouraged everyone this morning to participate in the caucus and make their voice heard. I do believe in fulfilling one’s civic duty, and my vote and advocacy (primarily against Trump) would have some non-zero value.

Problem is, I’m not a Republican.

I dropped out of the GOP about a decade ago, because they failed in their responsibilities too often. They simply didn’t seem to be worth supporting any longer, and the party pays only the barest lip service to my values and beliefs. To paraphrase Reagan, it’s not so much that I left the party, but they left me. I’m officially declared as “No Party” in the voter rolls. (Not that this has in the least dissuaded the GOP from sending me stacks of junk mail.)

I have zero affection for or loyalty to the GOP. I also have no strong opinion for anyone left in the field, though I do despise Trump. Right now, I’m nearly certain that I’m not going to bother showing up tomorrow night.

But still, this is a civic duty, and the primaries this year are consequential. What does Ricochet think? Should I show up at the caucus, re-register as a Republican, and participate in the process?

Published in General
Tags: ,

Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 50 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    Leigh: A Trump nomination could have serious consequences for this country I love and people I love in it.

    Objectively speaking, today you’re one of the most powerful people in the world. There’s probably not a person on this planet whose life is apt to be completely unaffected by things the United States does or doesn’t do in the coming four years: by the decisions we make about war and peace, by the technologies we develop, by our economy, by the norms we set, by our culture. Assume a record turnout and 350,000 people in Iowa caucus. There are seven billion people on the planet. This is probably the most powerful day of your life. I wouldn’t waste it.

    • #31
  2. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    Mixed feelings.   I greatly resent the Democrats who vote in Republican  primaries to saddle the right with the worst possible candidates,  but it sounds like you are more interested in having a good candidate saddle up.

    • #32
  3. Guruforhire Inactive
    Guruforhire
    @Guruforhire

    Saint Augustine:

    Guruforhire:If you are not a Republican it would be dishonest to participate in the proceedings of their club.

    The gentleman explicitly tells us he is considering rejoining the club. Your remark, even if true, is entirely inapplicable.

    If he rejoins then taking part in the proceedings of the club is not dishonest.

    • #33
  4. Commodore BTC Inactive
    Commodore BTC
    @CommodoreBTC

    it is your duty to stop Trump

    he is an existential threat to conservatism and limited government

    his election would set conservatism back a generation

    Regardless of who you would prefer as the nominee, the best way to stop Trump is to stop him in Iowa, and the only way to do that is to vote for Cruz.

    • #34
  5. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.: Assume a record turnout and 350,000 people in Iowa caucus. There are seven billion people on the planet.

    You’re freaking me out.

    • #35
  6. Concretevol Thatcher
    Concretevol
    @Concretevol

    Bucky Boz:Yes. Voting is good. Do it as often as you can. You won’t regret it.

    Where do you live?  Chicago?  “Vote early and often!”

    • #36
  7. Father B. Inactive
    Father B.
    @FatherB

    Please go. I live in New York and won’t be able to participate in the primary process until it probably means nothing. You don’t know what I would give to have your power right now. You have a chance to strike a blow against Trump when you still can, and you might not do it?

    I can’t even fathom.

    • #37
  8. Jason Allen Inactive
    Jason Allen
    @JasonAllen

    Please go and caucus! You can help determine the GOP nominee and start clawing the party back to where you stand.

    • #38
  9. Jackal Inactive
    Jackal
    @Jackal

    Come with me and caucus for Rand!

    • #39
  10. The Question Inactive
    The Question
    @TheQuestion

    I think the most important priority in voting is to stop bad actors from getting power.  In the primaries, I think our most important priority should be stopping Trump from getting the nomination.

    I gave Ted Cruz a small donation, mainly because I’m worried about Trump.  I like Ted Cruz a lot, but my worries about Trump are more compelling.  I didn’t expect to be donating any money in primary season, but Trump motivated me to do so.

    I think most of the Republican candidates would make fine presidents, but I don’t think Trump is a good choice.

    It might be worthwhile to participate in the Democratic caucus, but personally I don’t think either of the Democratic candidates is that much worse than the other.

    • #40
  11. The Question Inactive
    The Question
    @TheQuestion

    Phil Turmel:if the two biggest parties won’t do the things you feel necessary, the only real option, however difficult, is to pick one of those parties and help change it.

    That means at least participating in caucus/primary events, and even better, participating in local precinct events. It also means committing to that party for the general, even if you didn’t get everything you wanted.

    Progressives figured this out decades ago, and control the Dems today. Small government advocates aka tea partiers have started the process to take over the Republicans. It’s a messy, nasty, depressing, but ultimately necessary task. Suck it up and go. Your grandchildren will thank you. {They’ll probably still be working on it, though.}

    I like this comment a lot.  We need to remember that political change is almost always gradual, and virtually invisible when it’s happening, both on the social level and on the personal level.  While I can actually remember the moment I stopped being a Democrat, it was a very gradual process that led up to that tipping point.  The people who persuaded me to become conservative don’t know the fruits of their efforts, and likewise I know that if I ever succeed in changing someone’s mind, I won’t actually have the pleasure of seeing it happen.  We have to have faith.

    • #41
  12. Albert Arthur Coolidge
    Albert Arthur
    @AlbertArthur

    Saint Augustine:

    Albert Arthur:No.

    You abdicated your civic responsibility “about a decade ago.” Now you’re feeling slightly uncomfortable with how things are going. Maybe you should have thought about that before hand. You reap what you (don’t) sow. :-P

    If this makes any sense, I can’t find it.

    You wanna blame this gentleman for not taking responsibility? Ok, I get that.

    But you can’t get from “You did some wrong” to “You shouldn’t do right now.”

    Belt should have the courage to stick to his convictions. Don’t caucus tonight, Belt. You gave up on the GOP and by doing so abdicated any right to complain about the way things have turned out.

    • #42
  13. Belt Inactive
    Belt
    @Belt

    Well, I’m back.  I’m a Republican again, though I don’t know how long that will last.  Turnout was exceptionally large tonight.  Carson did fairly well, but I’m pretty sure he’ll be an afterthought.  Trump did fairly poorly here in Orange City.  The interesting thing is that Rubio was the clear winner, with Cruz (my pick) in second place.

    I’ll be checking out the Ace of Spades Decision Desk for details on how the state ends up.

    I can say this: My lack of enthusiasm has not abated a whit.

    • #43
  14. Leigh Inactive
    Leigh
    @Leigh

    Belt:Well, I’m back. I’m a Republican again, though I don’t know how long that will last. Turnout was exceptionally large tonight. Carson did fairly well, but I’m pretty sure he’ll be an afterthought. Trump did fairly poorly here in Orange City. The interesting thing is that Rubio was the clear winner, with Cruz (my pick) in second place.

    I’ll be checking out the Ace of Spades Decision Desk for details on how the state ends up.

    I can say this: My lack of enthusiasm has not abated a whit.

    Thank you.

    • #44
  15. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Belt:Well, I’m back. I’m a Republican again, though I don’t know how long that will last. Turnout was exceptionally large tonight. Carson did fairly well, but I’m pretty sure he’ll be an afterthought. Trump did fairly poorly here in Orange City. The interesting thing is that Rubio was the clear winner, with Cruz (my pick) in second place.

    I’ll be checking out the Ace of Spades Decision Desk for details on how the state ends up.

    I can say this: My lack of enthusiasm has not abated a whit.

    Good work, Belt.

    • #45
  16. katievs Inactive
    katievs
    @katievs

    Belt:Well, I’m back. I’m a Republican again, though I don’t know how long that will last. Turnout was exceptionally large tonight. Carson did fairly well, but I’m pretty sure he’ll be an afterthought. Trump did fairly poorly here in Orange City. The interesting thing is that Rubio was the clear winner, with Cruz (my pick) in second place.

    I’ll be checking out the Ace of Spades Decision Desk for details on how the state ends up.

    I can say this: My lack of enthusiasm has not abated a whit.

    Well done, you.

    • #46
  17. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    Belt:The interesting thing is that Rubio was the clear winner, with Cruz (my pick) in second place.

    Maybe it doesn’t feel like it, but you played a bigger role in giving the whole world a bit of faith that Americans still think that’s a serious office than most people will in a lifetime. Still early days, but how often do you contribute to an event that makes the front page in India, Europe, and the Middle East, with everyone, pretty much, saying in so many words that they respect Americans a lot more today than they did yesterday? Even the Sanders turnout is a healthy sign. To me it suggests that people in Iowa don’t think that private server was “no big deal.”

    My gut says the world’s a little bit safer today. The “inevitable” Trump story was making Putin salivate, and I reckon he’s been thinking, “Obama plus an inevitable Trump means now’s my chance — Obama won’t do anything and Trump will approve of my strong leadership.”

    I feel safer today knowing that Vladimir Putin woke up, saw this news, and cursed.

    Thank you.

    • #47
  18. Belt Inactive
    Belt
    @Belt

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    Belt:The interesting thing is that Rubio was the clear winner, with Cruz (my pick) in second place.

    My gut says the world’s a little bit safer today.

    Stop getting your optimism in my pessimism!

    I feel safer today knowing that Vladimir Putin woke up, saw this news, and cursed.

    Eh, I don’t know about this.  Even if Putin thinks that Trump sincerely admires him and his rule in Russia, do foreign leaders and governments think that Trump can be trusted or relied on?  Politics is politics, still.

    • #48
  19. Eric Hines Inactive
    Eric Hines
    @EricHines

    Belt: Even if Putin thinks that Trump sincerely admires him and his rule in Russia, do foreign leaders and governments think that Trump can be trusted or relied on? Politics is politics, still.

    Not entirely.  But guys like Putin understand that guys like Trump can be just as easily manipulated as guys like Obama.  It’s just a different set of actions with which to take advantage of the imbalances inherent in each.

    Putin dabbles in judo, but the principles of opponent balance manipulation are just as applicable in political and military settings.

    Eric Hines

    • #49
  20. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    Eric Hines: Not entirely. But guys like Putin understand that guys like Trump can be just as easily manipulated as guys like Obama. It’s just a different set of actions with which to take advantage of the imbalances inherent in each.

    I agree with this assessment, and this is what I meant.

    • #50
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.