Dispatches from the War on Cash

 

kronerOnce upon a time, thieves gave you a choice: your money or your life. Not the government: it wants bothAs if it is not enough that the state knows absolutely everything you do electronically, it’s moving to make the last private vestige of our lives digital as well. “The war on cash is advancing on all fronts,” reports Zerohedge in “First they came for the pennies“. The consequences of going cashless are manifold and hard to overstate, especially in terms of loss of privacy and autonomy.

Sweden’s citizens have become willing guinea pigs in an experiment consisting of negative interest rates in a near cashless society. Even homeless vendors of street newspapers carry mobile card readers. The situation is similar in Denmark. In sub-Saharan Africa, going cashless is nearly a matter of survival, not convenience, as few have bank accounts, but nearly everyone has a mobile phone. (Side note: is this the solution to voter ID in the United State?) Western NGOs such as the Gates Foundation are working with governments, banks, and credit card companies to replace cash with mobile money platforms. India hopes to do the same.

Consequences include banks taking a cut of every transaction and keeping extensive, eternal records of who you are and what you do. Going cashless is likely the only strategy that allows central planners to continue Negative Interest Rate Policy (NIRP), since rational savers will take cash out of the banking system under such circumstances. It is nothing more than legal theft by the authorities. It seems the general public sees only the “convenience” of going cashless.

As I see it, the most dangerous and durable form of totalitarianism is the one in which the fatted herd enjoys many diversions, right up until to door of the abattoir.

Published in Culture, Economics
Tags: ,

Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 26 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    I pay cash for anything about $50 and down.  It’s no one’s business what I buy.  I’d do it for larger purchases, too, but all that cash is bulky.

    • #1
  2. civil westman Inactive
    civil westman
    @user_646399

    Randy Webster:I pay cash for anything about $50 and down. It’s no one’s business what I buy. I’d do it for larger purchases, too, but all that cash is bulky.

    That is just why, despite 97% loss of purchasing power of the dollar since 1913, there are no longer $1000 bills. Bulky cash is more difficult to hide from those who believe it is all their money.

    • #2
  3. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    I was an election judge in Texas this year.  Photo ID required to vote. One woman tried to vote using a picture of her drivers license on her Iphone. I refused to let her vote conventionally with it.

    “But the picture looks just like me,” she said. I pointed out photoshop let you do that, and Texas law stated a valid Texas driver’s license was acceptable picture ID, not a picture of a valid Texas driver’s license. I told her she could vote provisionally, but she didn’t bother.

    A question to police officers – Would you accept a photo of a driver’s license at a traffic stop?

    Seawriter

    • #3
  4. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    anonymous:Here is a dystopian view of the future, Unicard, I wrote in 1994. Everybody thought I was paranoid. It is rapidly becoming reality.

    Sounds a lot like the world Mack Reynolds was writing about back in the 1950s and 1960s.

    Seawriter

    • #4
  5. civil westman Inactive
    civil westman
    @user_646399

    anonymous:Here is a dystopian view of the future, Unicard, I wrote in 1994. Everybody thought I was paranoid. It is rapidly becoming reality.

    Gee, John, Claire has a post asking for  geopolitical predictions. Unicard was prescient to the max. Want to try your mind on the world at large? I’m pretty sure it will come apart in very unpleasant ways. I’m just not sure which catalyst or what route to max entropy.

    • #5
  6. Sandy Member
    Sandy
    @Sandy

    Oh great, one more item for my worry list.  I love the privacy of spending cash, and I suspect that many legislators and bureaucrats take the view that using cash is the same as money laundering.  I mean what have you got to fear, anyway, if you aren’t doing anything naughty with the cash, eh?

    Should this hit the U.S. in a big way, there will be lots of very annoyed waiters, but I suppose that the numismatists will flourish.

    • #6
  7. wilber forge Inactive
    wilber forge
    @wilberforge

    A cashless society is not having Credits as in a Star Trek life but rather a truly  dystopian anomaly. The money laundering laws are a stretch as well. As it stands, you are guilty until – Good luck.

    Try purchasing a big ticket ítem such as a new car via cash or wire transfer. Gets interesting and very telling. Quatloos anyone ?

    • #7
  8. Addiction Is A Choice Member
    Addiction Is A Choice
    @AddictionIsAChoice

    anonymous:Here is a dystopian view of the future, Unicard, I wrote in 1994. Everybody thought I was paranoid. It is rapidly becoming reality.

    I just read “Unicard.” Memo to self: Never read dystopic, highly-plausible imaginings from one of the most fertile minds on Ricochet before having a second cup of coffee!

    On second thought, I think I’ll pass on the second cup of coffee and go directly to the soma.

    • #8
  9. Z in MT Member
    Z in MT
    @ZinMT

    Ironically, I have recently decided to start using cash more.

    What I think drives the cashless society more than the government is the convenience. With almost all large employers and banks requiring direct deposit of paychecks it is inconvenient to go the the bank (or even an ATM to get cash). When you had to go to the bank to deposit your check anyway, it was a simple matter to get part of your paycheck in cash.

    • #9
  10. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Add in the IRS propensity for asset seizure based on ‘large’ cash transactions approaching 5 figures.

    • #10
  11. Mister Magic Inactive
    Mister Magic
    @MisterMagic

    Zerohedge? The 9-11 truther, GMO-fearing blog? Perhaps pick a less muddled source next time?

    • #11
  12. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    wilber forge:A cashless society is not having Credits as in a Star Trek life but rather a truly dystopian anomaly. The money laundering laws are a stretch as well. As it stands, you are guilty until – Good luck.

    Try purchasing a big ticket ítem such as a new car via cash or wire transfer. Gets interesting and very telling. Quatloos anyone ?

    Seizure of large amounts of cash is now common in law enforcement. “Where did you get this $10,000? Did you steal it? Are you a drug courier?”.

    Cops can now seize your cash, and the burden is on you to prove that it’s legitimate money. Further, some police departments see this is a revenue opportunity.

    • #12
  13. Bartholomew Xerxes Ogilvie, Jr. Coolidge
    Bartholomew Xerxes Ogilvie, Jr.
    @BartholomewXerxesOgilvieJr

    These two issues (cash versus electronic and privacy) don’t have to go together. Bitcoin is entirely electronic and entirely anonymous, which is why governments tend to hate it. Admittedly it’s not widely accepted, but it does exist as an alternative.

    • #13
  14. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Might as well carry signs.

    Cashless

    Your entire life will be an open book. To your government, to employers, to hackers.

    Mister Magic: Zerohedge?

    Well, not to toot my own horn, but we talked about this in May when I first brought it up…

    • #14
  15. Lazy_Millennial Inactive
    Lazy_Millennial
    @LazyMillennial

    Also of note, officials somewhere within the government are looking at getting tracking devices (probably passive RFID chips, at first) into paper money as part of the security upgrades. Source: my father, several years ago, who worked in the financial industry and attended a small talk on cash-handling security. I forget which department the government official worked in, though I’d guess it’s somewhere in the treasury.

    • #15
  16. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    civil westman: “First they came for the pennies”

    Plastic Pennies Worth Over Three Cents Each

    • #16
  17. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    Bah! Cash is for chumps, and drug dealers. The convenience of electronic payments is so great. Furthermore electronic payments offer clear benefits in the case of fraud and theft. Someone steals your wallet all your cash is gone. Someone steals your credit card you shut it down and all they have is worthless plastic. In a world where your transactions are recorded you have full control over improper transactions.

    In a world where you carry untraceable currency on you in vast quantities the benefit of robbery is vast. No one is going to hold up a credit card reader.

    • #17
  18. hokiecon Inactive
    hokiecon
    @hokiecon

    As someone concerned with privacy online, ironically I almost never use cash. But then again, I have nothing to hide. To me, cash is a liability, and more often than not, your cash is safer in a bank.

    • #18
  19. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    Z in MT:Ironically, I have recently decided to start using cash more.

    What I think drives the cashless society more than the government is the convenience. With almost all large employers and banks requiring direct deposit of paychecks it is inconvenient to go the the bank (or even an ATM to get cash). When you had to go to the bank to deposit your check anyway, it was a simple matter to get part of your paycheck in cash.

    I am using cash a lot more as well.

    One of the reasons is I work for a mortgage broker a couple afternoons a week. Lenders pour over account statements questioning deposits and checks written, then require a “letter of explanation”.

    If my sister pays me cash for something or other, that cash is going right back out at the grocery store or at the bank to make the car payment.

    Nobody’s business if my sister owes me money, or vice versa.

    • #19
  20. Matt Upton Inactive
    Matt Upton
    @MattUpton

    Ever gone out to eat with a group of twenty-somethings? The government doesn’t need to design a cashless society. It will move there on its own. If one extensively buys online (as do I), cash isn’t even an option.

    • #20
  21. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    Matt Upton:Ever gone out to eat with a group of twenty-somethings? The government doesn’t need to design a cashless society. It will move there on its own. If one extensively buys online (as do I), cash isn’t even an option.

    There are a lot of things governments do that they don’t need to do.

    That’s the biggest problem.

    • #21
  22. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Valiuth:Bah! Cash is for chumps, and drug dealers. The convenience of electronic payments is so great. Furthermore electronic payments offer clear benefits in the case of fraud and theft. Someone steals your wallet all your cash is gone. Someone steals your credit card you shut it down and all they have is worthless plastic. In a world where your transactions are recorded you have full control over improper transactions.

    In a world where you carry untraceable currency on you in vast quantities the benefit of robbery is vast. No one is going to hold up a credit card reader.

    Best count me among the chumps, I guess, since I’m not a drug dealer.  But not many people carry vast sums of cash.  I generally have around $100 on me.  If I get robbed, I’m out $100.  Big whoop.  The privacy is worth it.

    • #22
  23. DialMforMurder Inactive
    DialMforMurder
    @DialMforMurder

    Matt Upton:Ever gone out to eat with a group of twenty-somethings? The government doesn’t need to design a cashless society. It will move there on its own. If one extensively buys online (as do I), cash isn’t even an option.

    Poor naive youths

    They’ll learn once they experience their first bank-wide ATM malfunction

    • #23
  24. AIG Inactive
    AIG
    @AIG

    civil westman: reports Zerohedge

    Oh dear. Seriously, Ricochet?

    • #24
  25. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    civil westman: As if it is not enough that the state knows absolutely everything you do electronically, it’s moving to make the last private vestige of our lives digital as well. “The war on cash is advancing on all fronts,” reports Zerohedge in “First they came for the pennies”. The consequences of going cashless are manifold and hard to overstate, especially in terms of loss of privacy and autonomy.

    I think we should trust the government that allowed 20 million people’s records to be hacked.  It will take care of us.

    • #25
  26. captainpower Inactive
    captainpower
    @captainpower

    DialMforMurder: Poor naive youths They’ll learn once they experience their first bank-wide ATM malfunction

    Credit cards are not dependent on ATMs.

    • #26
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.