Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Before he ran for president a second time, Richard Nixon met with many world leaders. The Vietnam war was still simmering, and it was naturally a focus of many of his conversations. Discussing the assassination of South Vietnam’s leader, Ngo Dinh Diem, Pakistan President Ayub Khan told Nixon, “Diem’s murder meant three things to many Asian leaders: that it is dangerous to be a friend of the United States; that it pays to be neutral; and that sometimes it helps to be an enemy.”
Some things, alas, haven’t changed.
Yep.
National Honor is a reason to do a lot of things we don’t do. That is because our leaders are dishonerable. Honor is pase’
Completely agree. Plus in my opinion we most definitely have a national interest in a stable middle east in addition to honor. Iraq is in the very center stretching from the west Asia to central Asia. Shaping the Islamic culture to our values is critical to the next several decades, and not being there physically is a significant liability.
Ugh. Nice way to start off the day, Tom! ;)
Not a big mover with democratic peoples, honor. It is far more impressive among warlike races. Start talking about honor & soon you’ll be doing lots more than your interest. It may not be in your interest to say that honor is in your interest. Among Americans, who talks up honor like Southerners?
Indignation is a bigger mover–not fear of shameful things future, but awareness of recent shameful things. Maybe you can work with that? WWII worked out ok so far as popular sentiment is concerned.
Honor may be likelier to effect good ends so far as the people involved in foreign policy are concerned. They should know, like capitalists with brands–your reputation precedes you.
But you run into the problem with democracy all over again: People might be satisfied with a fantasy of their goodliness rather than the harder to earn, easier to squander reputation for doing well what you consider good.
How do you make these distinctions? It seems like a basic education to make judgments about interest & reputation is missing. I regret I have no solutions to offer-