Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Jim Webb has been a senator, Secretary of the Navy, combat Marine, filmmaker, and successful author. But his most unlikely role is campaigning to be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2016.
And the election just keeps getting weirder…
I love that guy. (Full disclosure, I know him—he was a friend of my father’s.)
This.
I’d think about giving him $10, as that $10 will likely do $100 of damage to the Democrat nominee.
I will have to think about who he would actually draw votes from….maybe some blue collar Dems that are still left in the unions would take a look at him. If hell froze over and Trump wins the nomination I would. Overall I don’t think the media will allow him to hurt the Dems = zero coverage
Kate,I think Webb is a decent guy and I like his military and defense experience.
But I’d like to know more about him and you seem to be a good candidate to provide that information. Mind sharing?
Democrats would probably welcome this, as they would see it eating more into Republican votes than their own. They’re probably right.
What I know is that he is exactly what he appears to be. Cantankerous and brave. Not PC. One of the best, if not the best, novelist to come out of the Vietnam War, which argues an imagination. The real deal when it comes to heroism.
Also, I got into a big argument with him when I was an 11? 12? year old feminist, and rendered him speechless by saying “oh yeah? then why do men have nipples?”
Which he thought was really cool.
More recently, I went to visit him at his office as a Senator in DC, and he was really interested in my son’s forthcoming book. Also, he called my dad “the Vietnam War’s unsung Ernie Pyle.”
Not exactly inside scoop. But I would definitely, definitely vote for him.
Would he? I know the Dem party has moved far to the left but have they taken their voters with them? All of them?
Jim Webb may be a great guy, but if he becomes president we still get all the Democrat domestic crap from the last 8 years, minus a few superficial changes and a somewhat different foreign policy. I mean where would he find non-crazy, non-liberal democrats for staff and agency positions these days?
Webb is a macaca.
Perhaps bold or italics might be a more CoC compliant way of communicating the same sound message? I correct in part to highlight my agreement.
The left absolutely gushed over this man when he ran for the Senate back in ’06.
And they had reason to; it’s not like he votes particularly conservatively.
Sadly, while that might seem like he was an electoral asset for us if he ran third party, his electoral appeal seems likely to have little overlap with Clinton’s; people don’t vote on policy, and his tribal affiliations are all set to steal from us.
I agree.
Indeed. He was the beloved son of the Washington Post.
I will leave this Earth without ever having voted for Donald Trump. Sorry, but he is not the lesser of two evils. If the nominees of the major parties were Trump & Clinton I would enthusiastically vote for Jim Webb.
Really? Are you not supposed to use capitals? Oh dear. (My daughter just told me that you’re not supposed to use periods at the ends of your sentences when you text-message people…sorry!)
I think the Left regards his voting as a happy bonus. His real value was that he was a highly-decorated war hero with a son headed to Iraq who adamantly opposed Bushitler’s illegal war for oil,
Third party candidates drain votes from both main parties in the general election. I think that all Douglas is saying is that Webb is such a misfit in the Dem Party that he will attract fewer votes from that party than from the Republicans.
Jim Webb voted with Harry Reid 87% of the time.
Including:
I understood what he meant; I was questioning the statement. I think of my father… 82 yo, blue-collar union member… I’ve always thought of him as a Kennedy Democrat. When Kennedy was elected, he was a young guy with four kids, hopeful for the bright future being promised.
Obama was too far left for him and Obama was pretending to be a centrist. I can’t see him voting for Sanders, maybe not Hillary if she keeps up with the leftward lurch.
He isn’t really a party man, so founding his own Curmudgeon Party makes sense ideologically, but as a practical matter, what does he hope to gain? Having read his book on the Scots-Irish in America, Born Fighting, I’m wondering if he’s just in it for the fight. Any impact is better than no impact.
All those facts about Webb’s liberalism are reminding me a little of all the facts about Trump’s: they probably won’t matter.
He would steal votes Republicans need.
On the other hand, he’s not an idiot.
Or a crook.
Ah, I see. I think you have a point.
You make me wonder if your father had been voting for the Republican candidate since Clinton?
I think that there is a certain subset of registered Democrats who have been voting for the Republican candidate for the last few presidential elections because they could not accept the Democratic nominee. Arguably in 2016 some of these could vote for Webb instead of the Republican. But if these registered Democrats–who had been voting for the Republican nominee for the last few elections–vote for Webb this time then doesn’t it still mean that Webb is draining votes from the Republican vote?
Or do I continue to miss your point.
You got mine. As to yours, you might be correct, or then again, not. I wouldn’t be willing to bet either way.
I’d rather see Webb dealing with Iran than Trump, for sure.
But I think the distaste for Bush in particular is strong enough that (assuming no Trump run) Webb would have some appeal. And seeing he’s quite possibly no more liberal than Trump, he could easily pick up some of those votes.
On the other hand, he seems like an actually serious person. So if the Republican nominee were Trump, Webb could have appeal to conservatives who are serious about foreign policy, for instance.
Well it would certainly be somewhat more rational than his current course of action where he seemed to be under the impression his quest for the Democratic nomination was not clearly doomed to fail.
The real question is still unanswered, why run at all?
The motivation for him even attempting this run for the Presidency is rather unclear. The effort seems detached from all reality.