Can Kate Steinle Get Justice in “Jim Crow” San Francisco?

 
MIRKARIMI
San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi was arrested for domestic violence, which, through San Francisco cronyism, he pled down to misdemeanor false imprisonment and then got expunged from his record.

We remember the Jim Crow South, where sheriffs’ departments routinely colluded with prosecutors, judges, and defense attorneys to slow-walk investigations involving white officers harming blacks. They routinely “softly” prosecuted whites who injured blacks. All-white juries handed out perfunctory acquittals based on “reasonable doubt.” It was the good ‘ol boy network at its finest.

We are in danger of witnessing this trend (Jim Crow, West Coast style) right here in San Francisco. Local politicians are circling the wagons to take the focus off Kate Steinle’s tragic murder, and protect their sanctuary city policies—and one another. Only this isn’t about race. It isn’t about people of color turning the tables on the white power structure. It’s about people in power not wanting to own up to their responsibilities, and closing ranks to protect their own.

This week, Public Defender Jeff Adachi appointed San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi’s former client, Matt Gonzalez, to defend Kate’s killer.

In 2003, Gonzalez ran for mayor. His campaign manager? None other than the sheriff who is at the vortex of this horrible tragedy, Mirkarimi. Is this not a conflict of interest? Or does it not at least reek of the appearance of impropriety?

While San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee has been vocal in his criticisms of Mirkarimi (his longtime enemy), the Sheriff’s department, the Public Defender’s office, and D.A’s office are all now suspect.

The D.A., George Gascon (a supporter of Prop 47, which released thousands of drug offenders), has been silent. According to former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, Gascon “opposes turning anyone over to immigration enforcement unless the feds come across with a court order.”

This prosecution shouldn’t be about sanctuary cities, ICE, the Sheriff’s department, or comprehensive immigration reform.

The despicable act of one man does not taint an entire ethnic group, and Mr. Trump should zip it.

Right now this is a murder case and should be treated like one — based on facts and facts alone.

But this is an election year — or, as was said to Jack Nicholson in the classic movie of the same name, “Forget it, Jake; It’s Chinatown.” Accepted rules of propriety don’t apply here.

As a result, Mirkarimi, instead of trying to get to the bottom of this murder, is blaming ICE, though the San Francisco Chronicle reported that, on March 9th, “two weeks before Sanchez was sent to San Francisco — the sheriff issued an order to his staff banning “all holds of inmates for federal immigration authorities.”

ICE is blaming Mirkarimi.

Public Defender Adachi is clearly using this as a referendum on sanctuary cities. His choice of Gonzales, a staunch immigration advocate, speaks for itself.

Under our system, the defendant is entitled to a vigorous defense. But appointing a public defender who is best buddies with the sheriff who released the defendant onto the streets?

The power structure is now promoting the “tragic accident” meme. Currently, just as there is no evidence that the gun went off accidentally, (remember, the killer, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, at first said he fired three shots at sea lions), there is likewise no evidence of gang involvement. Yet, a heroin dealer with seven felony convictions, over 30 known aliases, and substantial time on the inside has had a lot of exposure to Mexican gangs and drug cartels. The absence of any mention anywhere of Surenos or Nortenos has been jarring.

Someone helped him along the way. Where did he get the gun? Where did he get the heroin he peddled? Who helped him secure the I.D. cards? Who helped him get back in the country six times? Who did he hang with in federal prison? Or could he have been a police informant, let loose by Mirkarimi to report on drug activity in the city? If Mr. Gonzalez learns any of this from the defendant, he is likely to keep it under wraps to protect his crony.

This is speculation, of course — and all the speculation in the world will not bring Kate back. The family has been steadfast and gracious in avoiding turning this political. “We are in the middle,” said Kate’s tearful brother Brad on TV last night.

But they don’t want others to undergo the horror of what they are going through now and will endure the rest of their lives. They are convinced some things can be fixed to decrease the likelihood of this happening again.

Sheriff Mirkarimi has blood on his hands. Public Defender Adachi has just dirtied his. The fact that D. A. Gascon has not made a strong statement in defense of the family and condemned the senseless killing speaks volumes and may portend a less-than-vigorous prosecution.

Here’s the $64,000 question: If the homicide investigation is inadequate; if the prosecution is not vigorous; if the sanctuary city concept or immigration is put on trial instead of the defendant; if the Sheriff’s Department is not held accountable–will the Department of Justice come in as it did in Ferguson and Baltimore? Or will the West Coast version of Jim Crow prevail in San Francisco?

 

 

 

 

There are 10 comments.

  1. Aaron Miller Member

    You say this isn’t about race. But under Attorney General Eric Holder, the Department of Justice very clearly was devoted to supporting racial vendettas. Assuming that the President who appointed Holder expects the same of his new AG, you know the answer.

    • #1
    • July 16, 2015, at 1:23 PM PDT
    • Like
  2. DocJay Inactive

    She will never have any justice. Sorry, I have no optimism about this tragic issue at all.

    • #2
    • July 16, 2015, at 4:41 PM PDT
    • Like
  3. Paul A. Rahe Contributor

    As long as Barack Obama is President, the Department of Justice will do nothing. It says a lot that he has uttered not one word about this murder. All the new that fits he mentions . . . and no other news at all.

    • #3
    • July 16, 2015, at 4:47 PM PDT
    • Like
  4. Retail Lawyer Member

    I agree with Aaron Miller above (I think). This may not “be about” race, but race lurks all over it. Recall the hierarchy of grievance: Blacks, Latinos, women, Asians, Whites. Kate Steinle is lower on the hierarchy, so this is just bad luck, tragic, whatever. Shouldn’t even be a news story, really.

    You are correct stating that the politicians who gave the sanctuary policy to San Francisco have blood on their hands. But they are not about to change the law. The voters of San Francisco want the sanctuary policy, they are quite willing to put up with the increased crime and homelessness. The voters of San Francisco have Kate’s blood on their hands.

    • #4
    • July 16, 2015, at 6:24 PM PDT
    • Like
  5. Kay of MT Member

    Jeff, it’s okay to be angry and it’s okay to cry. At age 17, my daughter’s best friend was murdered by Gerald and Charlene Gallego, and she came close to being part of the group. Even tho Gallego was sentenced to death 3 times, from 1984 he stayed alive until 2002 and died of cancer. His wife was released in 1997. This was considered justice for the abuse and slaughter of 10 people. Your anger and pain will never go away, you will simply learn to live with it.

    • #5
    • July 16, 2015, at 6:50 PM PDT
    • Like
  6. Funeral Guy Member

    The Steinle family has been a lot more magnanimous than I would have been. Politically the family states they are in the middle and that’s fine, but make no mistake. The blood of Kate Steinle is first on the hands of her scumbag murderer, but the responsibility is shared by those moral preeners in San Francisco. (And I count the people of San Francisco with that. You get the government you vote for. I saw one of FOX’s producers trying to corral one of the Board of Supervisors to ask him a question and all he could say was “FOX is not a real news station. I only talk to real news stations” over and over again. No humanity whatsoever. All I could think of was, “Go back to breaking your eggs, you clueless buffoon. You have some omelettes to make.”

    • #6
    • July 16, 2015, at 7:31 PM PDT
    • Like
  7. Freesmith Inactive

    The trial is a local issue. Sanctuary cities, however, is a national one. It would be better if someone of unimpeachable moral authority (a sane version of Cindy Sheehan) volunteered to wave the bloody shirt of Kate Steinle 24/7/365 at every venue possible and to recruit hundreds, thousands of other victims of immigration to do the same.

    Our candidates running for president should be made to promise that they will set up a special branch in the justice department specially charged to indict, arrest, prosecute and bankrupt any official, locality or government-funded organization that refuses to follow and cooperate with US immigration law.

    We’ve had enough of these secessionists.

    If you want to stop people from doing something they enjoy you don’t ignore it. You make it hurt.

    • #7
    • July 16, 2015, at 7:37 PM PDT
    • Like
  8. Ansonia Member

    Mr. Warren,
    I’m sickened by this story and so sorry for your loss.

    • #8
    • July 16, 2015, at 7:51 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  9. Doug Watt Member

    The story that Mr. Lopez told has changed. He claimed that the gun was wrapped in a t-shirt he found underneath a bench. When he picked up the shirt the gun discharged. Now we have the story that he was shooting at sea lions, by the way I believe shooting at sea lions is a federal offense. Both stories are a lie. You have to put your finger on the trigger to fire the gun. His story stinks and unfortunately his story is not the only thing that stinks in San Francisco.

    • #9
    • July 17, 2015, at 4:27 AM PDT
    • Like
  10. EndOfPatience Member

    “We remember the Jim Crow South, where Democrat run sheriffs’ departments routinely colluded with Democrat prosecutors, judges, and defense attorneys to slow-walk investigations involving white officers harming blacks.”

    FIFY. And with those critical details added, I think the answer to the headline is obviously “No”.

    • #10
    • July 17, 2015, at 6:12 AM PDT
    • Like