Bolton’s Swan Song

 

BOLTONIn something of a surprise (given that few Republicans have taken a pass), former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton declared yesterday that he won’t run for president, begging the question of which Michael Bolton song best describes a courtship that won’t be: 1) “A Time For Letting Go”; 2) “I’m Not Ready”; 3) “Nowhere To Run”; 4) “You Don’t Want Me Bad Enough.” At least the late Tom Dewey can rest in peace — he’s the last GOP presidential nominee to have sported a mustache, as does Bolton. Dewey’s last run was in 1948; there hasn’t been a presidential nominee with facial hair since then.

Bolton’s announcement continues what amounted to “foreign policy week” for the Republican hopefuls. That includes Marco Rubio outlining a approach that at least one conservative writer likened to the Truman Doctrine, Jeb Bush continuing to clarify his 20/20 hindsight answer on the Iraq invasion, plus Chris ChristieTed Cruz and Rand Paul all piling on Bush.

If that sounds like a lot of bodies in motion . . . well, it is. About enough to fill a 40-man baseball roster.

Earlier this week, the Republican National Committee launched a straw poll on its website asking this simple question: “who would you like to see as the Republican nominee in the 2016 presidential election?”

The choices (brace yourself, it’ll take a while to get through this):

1) Kelly Ayotte

2) Haley Barbour

3) John Bolton

4) Jeb Bush

5) Herman Cain

6) Ben Carson

7) Chris Christie

8) Ted Cruz

9) Mitch Daniels

10) Mark Everson

11) Carly Fiorina

12) Newt Gingrich

13) Lindsey Graham

14) Nikki Haley

15) Mike Huckabee

16) Bobby Jindal

17) John Kasich

18) Peter King

congratulations, you’re halfway there . . .

19) Susana Martinez

20) Sarah Palin

21) George Pataki

22) Rand Paul

23) Ron Paul

24) Tim Pawlenty

25) Mike Pence

26) Rick Perry

27) Condoleezza Rice

28) Mitt Romney

29) Marco Rubio

30) Brian Sandoval

31) Rick Santorum

32) Tim Scott

33) John Thune

34) Donald Trump

35) Scott Walker

36) Alan West

Two things to note about this list: a) it’s a compilation not meant to offend, which explains a lot of folks who aren’t interested in running; b) what, no Paul Ryan? (Or, for that matter, Greg Abbott)?

Meanwhile, there’s the question of how the GOP is going to pull off the televised spectacle of a dozen-or-so candidates crowding one debate stage for the first gathering in August, in Cleveland. Does the party exclude all candidates polling at 1% or less? Or, as some back-in-the-pack candidates would prefer, split the field in half and holding not one but two debates over consecutive nights?

That, and the question of format, which The New York Times examines here:

“It is not entirely clear who will be in charge of devising or enforcing the debate criteria — that is, if there are criteria. One member of the national committee panel charged with overseeing the debates said its members had discussed ceding the decision entirely to Fox News.

At issue is how to stage a substantive discussion that is fair to viewers and the campaigns. The party has little appetite for a forum so thick with candidates that it allows for not much more than an extended “lightning round” of questions. One Republican involved in the process said a 90-minute forum with 10 candidates would offer each candidate only four to five minutes, after subtracting commercials and moderator time.”

Sounds like there’s a good debate awaiting Republicans . . . in advance of that first Republican debate.

There are 9 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. user_1065645 Podcaster
    user_1065645
    @DaveSussman

    Wilford Brimley John Bolton was a great UN Ambassador. He didn’t pull punches and was the only Ambassador in recent memory who publicly called the UN on their leftist controlled ideology and biases.

    But a sharp tongued Ambassador does not a good President make. I am not disappointed.

    That list is ridiculous… which your demonstration proves. Why not add David Lee Roth and Screech?

    • #1
  2. Aaron Miller Member
    Aaron Miller
    @AaronMiller

    If the Republican party was really interested in campaign fairness, state primaries would occur simultaneously so that every state got to vote on the full spectrum of candidates.

    They are evidently not interested in fairness, so the likely outcome is that some candidates will be excluded from the TV debates.

    • #2
  3. user_1065645 Podcaster
    user_1065645
    @DaveSussman

    Aaron Miller:If the Republican party was really interested in campaign fairness, state primaries would occur simultaneously so that every state got to vote on the full spectrum of candidates.

    They are evidently not interested in fairness, so the likely outcome is that some candidates will be excluded from the TV debates.

    Aaron I wondered that myself. I know a political consultant who explained a reasoned justification why the primaries start the way they do.

    If every state had their primary the same day politicians would not be able to afford to get their message out. When you are a lesser known candidate, it’s hard enough to raise money just to stand above the crowd in Iowa or New Hampshire. If it went to national primary day we would only end up with corporate owned politicians. (which arguable, isn’t far off from what we have now).

    • #3
  4. Ricochet Moderator
    Ricochet
    @OmegaPaladin

    John Bolton should be the next secretary of state, not the next president.

    • #4
  5. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    John Bolton for Secretary of State in the Republican administration. First task at State: purge all the liberal political appointees, every single one. No more State thwarting the Administration’s work.

    • #5
  6. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    OmegaPaladin, were you reading my mind? We must have pressed the POST button at the same time!

    • #6
  7. Ricochet Inactive
    Ricochet
    @Martel

    I Said I Love You but I Lied

    • #7
  8. user_3444 Coolidge
    user_3444
    @JosephStanko

    I guess he’d rather remain President of Red Eye.

    • #8
  9. Jim Kearney Contributor
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    First we learn that Harry Shearer will no longer be voicing Ned Flanders. Now this.

    A devastating week for the bushy mustache set.

    • #9

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.