Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Last year, I was appointed to a
A thousand thank-yous.
This is act is so important. I hope it gets picked up everywhere.
Please send it to every state in the Union as a model.
Thanks folks. We’re working on it. :-)
Sounds good.
Too bad we are still stuck with FERPA at the federal level where parents have no right to know the grades their children are receiving.
Also, seems a shame that this had to be attached to another bill. All this omnibus bill stuff seems to remove some of the accountability from our elected representatives.
Now, if only we could get something similar for the NSA. Only half kidding.
No it won’t. No mere law can make anything secure. It can only impose penalties for violating that thing’s security.
As I’ve argued about collecting healthcare information, the devil is not in the collection but in the interpretation.
I used to work as a database developer for a major insurance brokerage firm. The data were collected and broken out into various averages, and deviations from the mean. But then, the “averages” became tyrannical. Claims were challenged wherever the doctors performed procedures deviated from the “norm.” Instead of doctors on the spot being given the leeway to treat their patients, taking into account all of the variables that statistical models couldn’t contemplate, the pressure was applied for every doctor to follow the “best practice,” i.e., what the statistical model recommended.
When a doctor recommended anything that the model didn’t consider a “best practice,” the model became a legal weapon used against him as liability.
When mass information is used improperly, it inevitably triggers an assembly line, one-size-fits-all mentality. But certain functions really can’t be assembly-lined; some things require individual attention, like healthcare and teaching.
Thanks for posting your report. I see that your aim is to move toward establishment of a set of state standards. Does that imply a move away from PARCC? I liked your observation that turning Title I, Special Ed and Nutrition programs into block grants would lessen the pressure being exerted by the Federal government to stay the course with Common Core. Not to mention the fact that the state, with the cooperation of the local districts, will certainly have a better handle on how to efficiently spend that money. I hope you’ll continue to provide updates on your progress, and best of luck.
P.S. It’s nice to see that someone who graduated from the North Avenue Trade School can put that behind him and make something of himself. – Illiniguy (UGA Law, 1980, Go Dawgs)
We can’t all be perfect, so I won’t hold your attendance at UGA Law school against you. ;)
Georgia got out of the PARCC tests and has developed their own. This is the first year they were used so I’m sure changes will need to be made. We also made substantial changes to our state standards and will make more as time goes on.
The school lunch program is a big problem. We heard many complaints, not so much about the food, but that the new requirements gave every student the same amount of food. So the offensive lineman for the football team, and the scrawny 90 pound weakling receive the same amount of food. But, it’s about $1 billion each year from the Feds – a lot of money to come up with on our own.
$1 billion boils down to about $6.5 million per county (about 154) and would be less per school. With the strings attached of not being able give each student the appropriate amount of calories, or to distribute left overs that the kids won’t eat, and with lunches thrown in the trash at least half of that goes in to waste. About $3 million per county going to land fills. I would suggest that about 1/2 the kids or more are bringing their lunches from home. Do you really think the Georgia kids will go hungry if they opt out of that program? I went to Arkansas schools for 2 years in the 1940s, and nobody went hungry. I have family in GA, and all my AR family came from GA in 1879-1880. Very resourceful people.
Sounds very good that “we get a billion $$ from the feds,” but the amount per school isn’t all that much and most of it wasted, along with the kids actually going hungry. Shames me that the Georgia “powers that be” haven’t got more pride than submitting and subjecting their children to this program for any amount of money. Maybe the “powers” get a hefty cut for administering the program. Sounds to me like greed. And the person who instigated this ridiculous program with ridiculous rules, sends her children to a private school that feeds them gourmet foods.
Thanks so much for doing this, Buck. The protection (even though government systems are not known for their excellent execution) is significant, and the focus on non-extraneous information is also a big win. I’m delighted to see this (as well as getting out from under PARCC) in my home state!
Also, not surprised that good ideas come from a Yellow Jacket!
(Ga Tech – left in ’86, 1.6 GPA…but I had a good time in my three years there and learned valuable lessons about class attendance and deadlines)
Which, if given back to the State in the form of a block grant, would go much further than it does now. What’s your Congressional delegation’s attitude about doing that?
Some are in favor of block grants. We need to push harder on that front. As someone mentioned above, a lot of food is being thrown away while other kids don’t get enough to eat. Give us a block grant and let us handle it.
There is indeed a lot of waste. But you’d be surprised how few kids bring lunch to school anymore. The school lunch program is means tested so the poorest kids get it for free but even middle income kids get a discount. Thus it’s very appealing, even to those who can afford to send their child to school with a lunch from home.
As mentioned below, let’s block grant it to the states and let the states manage it. States would restructure it to help the truly needy, make sure kids are properly fed, and reduce waste. Then we can cut the program at the federal level and put money back in taxpayer’s pockets.
This needs to be revamped. When I had my grandson, age 9, with special diet problems (celiac), the school lunch programs were useless for us even tho we qualified. On my meager income I made sure he had a health lunch every day, and even sent extra snacks for his classmates, so he wouldn’t be tempted to eat any of their food. What do children with special diet needs do now under the rules? I read someplace that teachers were inspecting lunches brought from home and disposing of what “they” thought was inappropriate.
Our political class (present company excepted) has turned “Eligibility Creep” into one of the best ways to assure support. What starts out as a noble effort to help the truly poor or disadvantaged soon morphs into a program that covers everyone. It’s not only wasteful, it can’t help but encourage dependency. The people most hurt are those who are most in need. But, once the program has been expanded, it’s almost impossible to scale it back.