Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
To those who say that it is inevitable that Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic Party nominee, I have a two word rebuttal: Paul Martin. My American readers will respond “Who?” My Canadian readers will immediately know what I am talking about.
I remember reading about Martin. I remember because his collapse so completely predicted Gordon Brown’s.
If you’ve never heard of Gordon Brown, he was the would-be Labour Party leader who ended up serving as Tony Blair’s Chancellor of the Exchequer and heir-apparent for much longer than he would have wished. Blair hung on until things were beginning to go downhill for Labour, and thus partly things simply didn’t go Brown’s way. Partly, he just fizzled.
He managed to become the most unpopular Prime Minister since polling began.
There is a difficulty in comparison, though. Hillary Clinton isn’t seeking the leadership of a small group of parliamentarians but of an incredibly large and scattered group of activists. She has some key things other than an aura of invincibility: she has name recognition, massive amounts of money, and organization. (I haven’t read up on her actual ground game, but I assume she has in the works whatever one needs to win a primary campaign — at least several steps ahead of anyone else.)
But yes, Obama 2008 proves all we need to know about her actual invincibility.
Mr. Dithers. Poor fella’
This is exactly what I think will happen to Hil. I read an article today arguing that 2008 was her year, and since it didn’t happen then, it’s over now. The Bush and Clinton names are so 90’s. It’s time to move on and I’m betting the country sees that. Blech on Warren, but I think the country will see that too–a finger-shaking faux- Indian school marm, that’s Warren. She and Hil are the national scolds. Anyway, the mess in the Middle East will work to Republicans’ advantage, perhaps especially to Marco Rubio’s. He’s so articulate on foreign policy. The Canadian and British analogies sound about right.
I remember Blair, Brown, and Cameron (though I can’t remember why I remember Cameron). And I remember Chretien and Harper. Somehow Paul Martin didn’t stick in my brain at all. I could have sworn Harper succeeded Chretien.
God bless the Canadian members of Ricochet. I learn more about the history and current events of the Land of My Youth on this site than I do anywhere else.
When I vote, it’s to express how I want the country to be governed. My vote is a reflection of me, and the country’s vote is an expression of how the majority wants the country to be run. A vote is supposed to be about the voters.
So many politicians, however, stray from that simple premise. They view the election as an affirmation of them personally, as if the election was a method of paying them homage for their sheer wonderfulness.
I’m currently leaning toward Scott Walker for president, not for his sake, but for mine. I’m leaning toward him because he’s shown competence in executive office, and I want that, and a vote for him expresses that. He’s shown a willingness to fight back against the standard interest groups who hold America hostage, and I want that. He’s shown a number of qualities that advertise how he would govern, and those are qualities I want. I’m leaning for Scott Walker for my own sake, to express how I think the country should be governed. It actually has little to do with Scott Walker personally. I don’t know Scott Walker personally. For all I know he could be a jerk.
What does Hillary Clinton represent? Is there anything about her that would make me think, yeah, she represents something that would express something I want?
No. The only thing she represents is being a manipulative, scheming, privileged woman. She’s running because she thinks she deserves it, nothing more.
What happened was that when he was Finance Minister the Liberals had a majority in Parliament, but when he became Prime Minister they were reduced to a minority.
As such, he was “forced” to solicit support in Parliament from the socialist NDP.
When the Liberals had a majority, Martin gained a reputation as a fiscal conservative, but once they were reduced to a minority he wasted all that political capital on ridiculous spending boondoggles, like Universal Daycare and billions in new
bribesfunding for First Nations.But, historically-speaking, how much money a Canadian government wastes is far less dependent on which party is in power and far more dependent on whether they have a majority or not.
Ever since at least Lester Pearson, every single majority government reduced the amount of federal debt, and every single minority government increased the amount of federal debt, regardless of the party in power.
On the other hand, I have a slight soft-spot for Paul Martin because his bachelor’s degree is in philosophy. Gotta respect a philosophy grad rising so high in society!
That observation reveals a deep truth about consensual government in this brief age of plenty.
Thhppt. A bachelor’s degree in philosophy is a mark of an education wasted on callow youth. No wonder Martin was lionized by the press, and such a failure when he rose to a position of high authority.
I join you, my brother Mulville: Walker and either Fiorina or Rubio! And, it makes me happy to know that Walker has built a successful life as a college “dropout”, bereft if the ticket that the liberal gatekeepers consider essential to admission to the governing class.