Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Obama’s ‘Platitudes’ for ISIS

 

I read the transcript of President Obama’s statement today on the murder of journalist James Foley and a few phrases really jumped out: “Their ideology is bankrupt.” “…a group like ISIL has no place in the 21st century.” “…we share a common security and a common set of values.”

How about just calling the terrorists what they are — evil incarnate — and then pledging to obliterate them? (Because as far as I can tell, the most we’re doing is “containing” the caliphate today.) 

I talked today with Foundation for Defense of Democracies Senior Fellow Tom Joscelyn on the subject. Here’s his take:

There are 23 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Seawriter Contributor

    Mary Kissel, WSJ Editorial Board: How about just calling the terrorists what they are — evil incarnate — and then pledging to obliterate them?

     Nah. Too Reagan for Obama, and not nearly enough nuance. Must have nuance.

    Seawriter

    • #1
    • August 20, 2014, at 1:32 PM PDT
    • Like
  2. Done Contributor

    Platitude is the right word. If ISIL really has no place in the 21st century, Obama would be planning to remove them from it. Otherwise their place in the 21st century lies in the indifference of the civilized world.

    • #2
    • August 20, 2014, at 1:34 PM PDT
    • Like
  3. MarciN Member

    Mary Kissel, WSJ Editorial Board: How about just calling the terrorists what they are — evil incarnate — and then pledging to obliterate them?

     Exactly. 

    • #3
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:05 PM PDT
    • Like
  4. Roberto, Crusty Old Timer LLC Member
    Roberto, Crusty Old Timer LLC Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Frank Soto:

    Platitude is the right word. If ISIL really has no place in the 21st century, Obama would be planning to remove them from it. Otherwise their place in the 21st century lies in the indifference of the civilized world.

     It is worse than platitude, it is a complete denial of reality:

    More British citizens signed up to fight in Iraq and Syria than joined the Army Reserve last year, it can be revealed.

    Just 170 extra reservists enlisted over the past year – despite a Government target to boost the stand-by force by 11,000 by 2018.

    But at the same time the brutal al-Qaeda inspired ISIS forces tearing through Iraq have been boosted by ‘several hundred’ Brits, ministers told MailOnline.

    The President is living in a fantasy land while this increasingly formidable threat metastasizes

    .

    • #4
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:16 PM PDT
    • Like
  5. David Williamson Inactive

    That’s like the Russians living in the 19th Century, right?

    Mr Obama needs to to take his own advice – “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”.

    Last time I checked, the future is the 21st Century.

    • #5
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:34 PM PDT
    • Like
  6. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    The bit about how we don’t do this in the 21st century seems to be a common platitude for the Obama administration. The same rhetorical construction was used to dismiss Russia’s excursions into the Ukraine.

    He also made a comment about how ISIS represents a collapse of “civilized behavior.” He keeps making these appeals to civilized behavior, the 21st century and “how we do things” today. But he’s appealing to people for whom such things hold no appeal.

    I just picture Obama as the dissipated aristocrat who sighs languidly as the barbarians come over the hill, and tut-tuts that they’re treading on the roses.

    • #6
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:34 PM PDT
    • Like
  7. The Question Inactive

    “no place in the 21st century” Wow. Progressives really believe that people are going to be nicer just because calender pages have turned. I’m in the academic world, so I’ve met a lot of people who believe this craziness, but I never imagined us actually electing (and re-electing) one of them President.

    • #7
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:35 PM PDT
    • Like
  8. Tim H. Member

    Mel Gibson’s video speech in Ransom comes to mind.

    I want them to know that with this beheading, they’ve gotten our attention. And that while up til now, we’ve limited our concern to blocking the siege on the Yazidis, we will now commit ourselves to war against ISIS until they are destroyed.

    I am so sick of these barbarians.

    • #8
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:40 PM PDT
    • Like
  9. Mary Kissel Contributor
    Mary Kissel

    Check out British PM David Cameron’s reaction (worth reading in full): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/11038121/David-Cameron-Isil-poses-a-direct-and-deadly-threat-to-Britain.html

    • #9
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:45 PM PDT
    • Like
  10. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Statement from President Roosevelt:

    This morning the Imperial Japanese Navy destroyed or damaged most of our Pacific Fleet. People like this ultimately fail. They fail because the future is won by those who build and not destroy.

    Eleanor and I are appalled. We will continue to do what we must do to protect our people. We will be vigilant and we will be relentless. When people harm Americans anywhere, we do what’s necessary to see that justice is done. The people of the Philippines, who with our support are taking the fight to Japanese, must continue coming together to expel these terrorists from their community. They have our support in their pursuit of a future rooted in dignity.

    For peoples across Asia, there has to be a common effort to extract this cancer so that it does not spread. One thing we can all agree on is that a country like Japan has no place in the 20th century. Friends and allies around the world, we share a common security and a common set of values that are rooted in the opposite of what we saw this morning.

     Not exactly “…the inevitable triumph, so help us God!” , is it?

    • #10
    • August 20, 2014, at 2:52 PM PDT
    • Like
  11. Seawriter Contributor

    I’m sure once the President realizes the inadequacy of his response he will come up with a really crushing hashtag to put ISIS in its place.

    Seawriter

    • #11
    • August 20, 2014, at 3:36 PM PDT
    • Like
  12. Joe Boyle Member

    Makes my ears hurt every time I hear the “no place in the 21st century”. It’s as if evil is can be cured by evolution or Obama’s superior brain power.

    • #12
    • August 20, 2014, at 4:06 PM PDT
    • Like
  13. Trinity Waters Inactive

    Frank Soto:

    Platitude is the right word. If ISIL really has no place in the 21st century, Obama would be planning to remove them from it. Otherwise their place in the 21st century lies in the indifference of the civilized world.

     Frank, I just hope we don’t have to wait until 2017 to begin eliminating these barbarian savages.

    • #13
    • August 20, 2014, at 4:13 PM PDT
    • Like
  14. ctlaw Coolidge

    Mary Kissel, WSJ Editorial Board:

    Check out British PM David Cameron’s reaction (worth reading in full): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/11038121/David-Cameron-Isil-poses-a-direct-and-deadly-threat-to-Britain.html

     Was this any better:

    “Here in Britain we have recently introduced stronger powers through our Immigration Act to deprive naturalised Britons of their citizenship if they are suspected of being involved in terrorist activities. We have taken down 28,000 pieces of terrorist-related material from the web, including 46 Isil-related videos. And I have also discussed the police response to this growing threat of extremism with the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe. The position is clear. If people are walking around with Isil flags or trying to recruit people to their terrorist cause, they will be arrested and their materials will be seized.”

    In a sane world, these activities should earn a blindfold and a bullet; some of them not even the blindfold.

    • #14
    • August 20, 2014, at 4:18 PM PDT
    • Like
  15. The Question Inactive

    Tom Riehl:

    Frank Soto:

    Platitude is the right word. If ISIL really has no place in the 21st century, Obama would be planning to remove them from it. Otherwise their place in the 21st century lies in the indifference of the civilized world.

    Frank, I just hope we don’t have to wait until 2017 to begin eliminating these barbarian savages.

     I hope not too, but I expect that is what will happen. I think we will effectively have no commander in chief for the next two and a half years.

    • #15
    • August 20, 2014, at 5:13 PM PDT
    • Like
  16. Paul Dougherty Member

    The Whitehouse just released the following transcript from the speechwriting meetings-

    Valerie Jarrett:

    *#$@ing ISIS. Nothing changes. *#$@ing Nazis!

    Josh Earnest:

    They were Nazis, Barry?

    Valerie Jarrett:

    Oh, come on Earnie, they were threatening beheadings! Are we gonna split hairs here? Am I wrong?

    Pres. Obama:

    They weren’t Nazis, Earnie, they were nihilists!!

    Valerie Jarrett:

    Nihilists!

    *#$@ me… I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, Barry, at least it’s an ethos.

    (apologies to The Big Lebowski)

    • #16
    • August 20, 2014, at 5:16 PM PDT
    • Like
  17. James Gawron Thatcher
    James Gawron Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Mary,

    Obama would not accept the Bust of Churchill in the Whitehouse.

    “What kind of people do they think we are?!”

    ..walk together in Majesty, in Justice, and Peace.


    Regards,

    Jim

    • #17
    • August 20, 2014, at 6:06 PM PDT
    • Like
  18. Retail Lawyer Member

    When Obama stated that European countries just don’t invade other European countries in the 21st Century, I was bothered because obviously, they do now. It seemed delusional, and a pathetic attempt to shame Putin. He obviously has no conception of what motivates Putin, I thought. As the ISIS threat grew geometrically over the last few months, I was relieved that Obama had not used that ridiculous line, he was at least aware that his vision of the 21st Century held no motivational power for ISIS, for they are shame proof. Now I think his 21st Century reference means he is disappointed in ISIS (along with D.C., America, Iraq . . . the whole world). Well, disappointment is not an appropriate response to this development! He is just phoning it in, hasn’t really thought about it too much, and anybody clever enough to rise to a leadership position in any country or jihadist organization can see that. This is not good. It is very bad.

    And it reminds me of Bill Clinton’s nitwit slogan, that he and Al Gore would build a bridge to the 21st Century. Great. So here we are.

    • #18
    • August 20, 2014, at 6:31 PM PDT
    • Like
  19. Carey J. Inactive

    Frank Soto:

    Platitude is the right word. If ISIL really has no place in the 21st century, Obama would be planning to remove them from it. Otherwise their place in the 21st century lies in the indifference of the civilized world.

     Be careful what you ask for. If Obama were to start “removing” groups he thinks have no place in the 21st century, gun-owning, Republican, Christians would be at the top of his list.

    • #19
    • August 20, 2014, at 7:20 PM PDT
    • Like
  20. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist Joined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Mary Kissel, WSJ Editorial Board:

    Check out British PM David Cameron’s reaction (worth reading in full): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/11038121/David-Cameron-Isil-poses-a-direct-and-deadly-threat-to-Britain.html

    Are Muslims condemning ISIL, as Cameron says? Do you have evidence to share, Mary?

    I think these democratic socialists (Cameron and Obama) suffer god-delusions. They believe they can create reality by speaking words. I know that’s the case with Obama: “I will not tolerate it.” Therefore, it is not so? 

    It’d be an interesting psycho-social tic if these guys weren’t running “the free world.” Instead, it’s terrifying.

    • #20
    • August 20, 2014, at 7:27 PM PDT
    • Like
  21. Doctor Bass Monkey Inactive

    We cannot begin to consider defeating our enemies if we cannot even bring ourselves to properly recognize them as willfully evil men who have no interest in talk or reason.

    • #21
    • August 20, 2014, at 9:00 PM PDT
    • Like
  22. Gazpacho Grande' Coolidge

    Sissified college “professors” who believe that simply by dint of them speaking, things will magically fix themselves, evil will cease to exist, and that zipping off to the golf course as frequently possible is a demonstration of leadership and work ethic have no place in the 21st century.

    Or any century, if we don’t want our way of life to get stomped flat by people whose fanaticism is completely misinterpreted by our current “leadership”.

    I really thought it was telling when Big Boy Pants Barry sent Churchill’s bust home. Apparently the man who foresaw evil for what it was before most people did does not have a place in the 21st century.

    • #22
    • August 21, 2014, at 4:09 AM PDT
    • Like
  23. liberal jim Inactive

    O’s blah, blah, blah, has provoked the WSJ Ed, Bd, blah, blah blah and comments from a Sr. Fellow of the blah, blah, blah institute. I am impressed.
    From a Jr. Fellow at The Get Your Head Out of Your Rear Inst. Problem One: The last four liberal presidents have been abysmal failures. Being clear that is 2 Bushes, a Clinton and O. The last one has made the other 3 look almost competent, when you think about it that is quite an accomplishment. Failure to recognize this is problem one. Problem Two: Viewing ISIS in its current posture as a problem. Having 15-20k terrorist in a relatively limited, flat open space is a golden opportunity not a problem. The major Problem: The US has never had a clear workable antiterrorist strategy. Unless you begin with a clear workable strategy you will most likely never developed a successful strategy. The following are not strategies: Have the military do stuff, nation building, talking them to death, ignoring them while you chase an intern or two around the office, ignoring them and not chasing, declaring victory. There’s more, but I am running out of words.

    • #23
    • August 21, 2014, at 5:37 AM PDT
    • Like

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.