The Invisible Gorilla, Nuclear Edition

 

One of my favorite psychological parlor tricks is the Invisible Gorilla. A subject is shown a video in which a few people pass around a ball. The subject is told to count the number of passes. In the process of counting, the subject completely misses the fact that a man in a gorilla suit walks through the frame. The phenomenon is called “inattentional blindness”. When you focus your attention on one thing in particular, it can blind you to significant things that occur right in front of your nose.

Keep your eye on the ball: We must be evenhanded in pursuing Middle East peace. Via the Daily Caller:

In the latest step in a war of attrition with Israel, Hamas targeted one of the country’s nuclear reactors with rockets — an act which escalates the recent outburst of violence in the area to the level of nuclear combat.

An act of terrorism against a nuclear reactor in any form is defined as terrorism, as set out by the United Nation’s 2005 International Convention for the Suspicion of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism.

According to the United Nations, “any nuclear reactor, including reactors installed on vessels, vehicles, aircraft or space objects for use as an energy source in order to propel such vessels, vehicles, aircraft or space objects or for any other purpose,” or “any plant or conveyance being used for the production, storage, processing or transport of radioactive material.”

Three rockets were fired towards Israel’s nuclear reactor in Dimona, but the rockets were intercepted, and there are no signs of damage to the reactor.

Immediately after the attack, Hamas claimed responsibility for the rockets, stating that they launched long range M-75 rockets towards the reactor in southern Israel.

Keep your eye on the ball: We must avoid getting embroiled in Iraq (or Syria) once again. Via Reuters:

Insurgents in Iraq have seized nuclear materials used for scientific research at a university in the country’s north, Iraq told the United Nations in a letter appealing for help to “stave off the threat of their use by terrorists in Iraq or abroad.”

Nearly 40 kilograms (88 pounds) of uranium compounds were kept at Mosul University, Iraq’s U.N. Ambassador Mohamed Ali Alhakim told U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in the July 8 letter obtained by Reuters on Wednesday.

“Terrorist groups have seized control of nuclear material at the sites that came out of the control of the state,” Alhakim wrote, adding that such materials “can be used in manufacturing weapons of mass destruction.”

“These nuclear materials, despite the limited amounts mentioned, can enable terrorist groups, with the availability of the required expertise, to use it separate or in combination with other materials in its terrorist acts,” said Alhakim.

He warned that they could also be smuggled out of Iraq.

A U.S. government source familiar with the matter said the materials were not believed to be enriched uranium and therefore would be difficult to use to manufacture into a weapon. Another U.S. official familiar with security matters said he was unaware of this development raising any alarm among U.S. authorities.

The last paragraph in the Reuters piece hints at the U.S. government’s inattentional blindness. Further evidence comes from Bryan Preston, who compares two versions of the AP’s story and notes: “The new version of the story is more than twice as long as the original. It adds several paragraphs written to play down the threat that ISIS’ seizure of the Saddam-era weapons facility poses. It’s clear from the above, and other edits that follow, that the AP published, then discussed the issue with the Obama administration and the United Nations, and then made very significant edits to its original story.”

Keep your eye on the ball: We must not limit immigration over the southern border. What would we do without Michael Ramirez?

RAMclr-070914-border-IBD-COLOR-FINAL[1]

So the question is: Will we notice the invisible gorilla in time to stop him before he leaves the frame?

There are 7 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Devereaux Inactive
    Devereaux
    @Devereaux

    Good. ?And where were you and all the others when the US shipped out 550 metric TONS of yellow cake found in Iraq.

    ?Isn’t the meme still that there were no WMD’s found in Iraq.

    • #1
  2. Mike H Coolidge
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    Fear of the unknown is used to justify almost everything we do without accounting for the costs of the action vs. the likely risks of inaction. Like we must always be “doing something” less something bad happen when we’re not doing something.

    • #2
  3. Son of Spengler Contributor
    Son of Spengler
    @SonofSpengler

    Mike H:

    Fear of the unknown is used to justify almost everything we do without accounting for the costs of the action vs. the likely risks of inaction. Like we must always be “doing something” less something bad happen when we’re not doing something.

     That’s fine if the risks are considered carefully, with both eyes open. It’s not good to allow an agenda to cloud your judgment — whether that agenda is the Palestinian cause, preventing the president from looking bad, or unfettered immigration.

    • #3
  4. Mike H Coolidge
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    Son of Spengler:

    Mike H:

    Fear of the unknown is used to justify almost everything we do without accounting for the costs of the action vs. the likely risks of inaction. Like we must always be “doing something” less something bad happen when we’re not doing something.

    That’s fine if the risks are considered carefully, with both eyes open. It’s not good to allow an agenda to cloud your judgment — whether that agenda is the Palestinian cause, preventing the president from looking bad, or unfettered immigration.

     True, it’s interesting how large disagreement in risks can be between people with all their eyes open.

    • #4
  5. user_1184 Member
    user_1184
    @MarkWilson

    Son of Spengler: inattentional intentional blindness

     There, fixed it for you.

    Edit: I guess strikethrough formatting doesn’t show up.  Everyone just imagine “inattentional” has a line through it.

    • #5
  6. Pencilvania Inactive
    Pencilvania
    @Pencilvania

    Very worrisome –  and one gorilla may have dropped his hanky while he walked through.
    And Ramirez hits another bullseye.

    • #6
  7. user_989419 Inactive
    user_989419
    @ProbableCause

    Snopes makes clear that the “yellowcake removed from Iraq in 2008 was material that had long since been identified, documented, and stored in sealed containers under the supervision of U.N. inspectors.  It was not a ‘secret’ cache that was recently ‘discovered’ by the U.S.”

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp

    However, Snopes, being who they are, follow the leftist narrative and twist the Bush administration’s claim that the Iraqis attempted to purchase uranium from Niger, into a different claim, that the Iraqis purchased uranium from Niger.  Then they disprove the latter claim, one which the administration never made.

    • #7

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.