Paul Krugman: Poster Boy for Income Inequality — Pejman Yousefzadeh


You cannot make this up:

In late February, the City University of New York announced that it had tapped Princeton economist and New York Times blogger Paul Krugman for a distinguished professorship at CUNY’s Graduate Center and its Luxembourg Income Study Center, a research arm devoted to studying income patterns and their effect on inequality.

About that. According to a formal offer letter obtained under New York’s Freedom of Information Law, CUNY intends to pay Krugman $225,000, or $25,000 per month (over two semesters), to “play a modest role in our public events” and “contribute to the build-up” of a new “inequality initiative.” It is not clear, and neither CUNY nor Krugman was able to explain, what “contribute to the build-up” entails.

It’s certainly not teaching. “You will not be expected to teach or supervise students,” the letter informs Professor Krugman, who replies: “I admit that I had to read it several times to be clear … it’s remarkably generous.” (After his first year, Krugman will be required to host a single seminar.)

Ordinarily, I would not care in the least about this little bit of news. Krugman won the Nobel prize in Economics, he is a widely read pundit, he is deeply respected in academic and punditry circles, and it stands to reason that he is going to command a high salary. But given Krugman’s frequent jeremiads against income inequality, it is more than a little hilarious that he is going to be paid “$25,000 per month (over two semesters)” and “$225,000 per year” (note that if Krugman is getting $25,000 per month for a year, he would actually gross a cool $300,000 for the year) in order to “play a modest role” in public events about income inequality and “contribute to the build-up” of an “inequality initiative.” I wonder if Krugman stays up at night worrying that he might be contributing to the very problem that he is decrying — and being paid to decry. Probably not.

Oh, and there is this as well:

CUNY, which is publicly funded, pays adjunct professors approximately $3,000 per course. The annual salaries of tenured (but undistinguished) professors, meanwhile, top out at $116,364, according to the most recent salary schedule negotiated by the university system’s faculty union. And those professors are expected to teach and publish. Even David Petraeus, whom CUNY initially offered $150,000, conducted a weekly 3-hour seminar.

Any chance that people like Corey Robin–who raised such a fuss about David Petraeus’s teaching gig–will object to Krugman’s far more lucrative (and far less demanding) deal? Somehow, I doubt it.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 6 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. raycon and lindacon Inactive
    raycon and lindacon

    People of superior intellect must receive commensurate compensation to supervise the equalizing of equality for the masses.  Don’chaknow?

    • #1
  2. Misthiocracy Member

    I thought he had not yet accepted the offer. Was I misinformed?

    • #2
  3. user_138562 Moderator

    This reminds me of Prince Charles flying a private jet (with his entourage) around the world to accept awards for his conservation efforts.  Well, not so much his own conservation, but for badgering the rest of us to stop consuming so much energy.

    • #3
  4. bagodonuts Member

    This story made my day. The salary from this alone puts an individual in the top 1%. Thank you, Pejman.

    • #4
  5. A Beleaguered Conservative Member
    A Beleaguered Conservative

    Why does Krugman persist in perpetuating the rule of the top 1% by participating in sleep-inducing programs on inequality? Why does he persist in supporting white privilege by accepting these risible invitations?   Krugman’s activities are intended to keep the people silent by creating a narrative that someone is doing something about the pervasive inequality and injustice that defines America.   Krugman is the worst kind of Privilegecat.  We of the 99% should start a Facebook page calling him out.  Are you with me?

    • #5
  6. Howellis Inactive

    We’ve all heard stories about how Paul Krugman is an effete and insufferable hypocrite; these stories are false.— Paul Krugman

    • #6
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.