Heating Up


We’re in the middle of a hair-wilting, energy-sapping, crop-shriveling heat wave here in Israel. But that’s not what this post is about.

This is a photograph of the result of a direct hit by a Qassam rocket on the roof of a rehabilitation center for special-needs children in Sderot, a city inside sovereign Israel whose citizens have been targeted by Hamas for years.

This photo was not taken around the time of Operation Cast Lead, nor during any of the other periods of conflict between Gaza and Israel that have been deemed sufficiently interesting to warrant attention beyond these shores. It was taken two days ago. A cease-fire has supposedly been in effect since 2009, but Hamas still retains the right to launch rockets into the middle of Israeli civilian populations.

To wit: the attack on Sderot took place twenty-four hours after an Iranian Grad missile, also fired from Gaza, landed in Ashkelon, a city even deeper inside sovereign Israel. It should be noted that in addition to containing 125,000 Israeli civilians, Ashkelon contains the power plants that provide 70% of Gaza’s electricity. Attacks like this might therefore seem counterproductive, but ratcheting up the misery level at home in Gaza via an attack on Israeli civilians is a win-win for Hamas. Images of Gazans without electricity or other basic needs play extremely well abroad; they feed a carefully constructed narrative that enables those so inclined to justify their distaste for Israelis and Jews. And the response of the IDF to the attack on Israelis — whatever that response may be — enables the shifting of blame for all Gazan misery to Israel while providing a justification to continue attacking Israelis inside Israel. If you’re telling yourself that that isn’t entirely logical, you’re right. But in the absence of any substantive foreign or domestic policy other than jihad, it works as a default modus operandi.

There are many reasons why Hamas is apparently trying to provoke the IDF at this particular moment: to derail the efforts of its blood rival, the Palestinian Authority, to inch towards accommodation with Israel; to reply to the Arab League, which on Thursday greenlit direct peace talks between the Palestinians and the Israelis; to take advantage of residual bad feeling against the IDF in the wake of the flotilla imbroglio; to distract attention from its own abysmal failure to build a functioning society for Gazans; and so on. And there is, perhaps, a certain grim logic to the argument that we should simply ride out the violence, since upticks like this indicate that Hamas is under pressure. If they’re feeling the heat, that can only be a good thing.

Fair enough, but there are nine-year-old kids in Sderot who have spent their entire lives on the front line. Hamas is believed to possess thousands of rockets, including at least a couple of dozen that can reach Tel Aviv, which is all of 44 miles away. Hamas is, and has always been, on a war footing with us. And should they manage to do to us what they intend, there is no question but that their next target will be the Palestinian Authority.

Netanyahu and Abbas have a common enemy in Hamas. Hamas might have Iran behind it, but an Israeli/Palestinian alliance has the backing of both the United States and the Arab League. The latter might not be willing at this stage to go any farther than make the occasional statement, but that in and of itself is highly significant. Much can be made of this historical moment, I believe, if the parties involved have the courage to state the obvious on a world stage: that the Palestinians are not monolithic. Israel can and should make peace with the Palestinian Authority, but it is madness to expect her to make peace with the jihadists in Gaza.

I am deeply sympathetic to Abbas’s reluctance to label himself and the entire population of the West Bank as collaborators, which would surely result if he stated outright that Hamas is as much his enemy as it is Israel’s. But as the pace of rocket attacks inside Israel begins to accelerate, it might be time for him to take a stand — not against his brother Palestinians, but in their defense. He can stand openly against tyranny, against oppression, against the willful rolling back of all progress.

It’s in his interest to do so, before Gazan rockets start landing in Ramallah. And in the meantime, the various voices that keep rising up imploring the Israelis to include Hamas in the peace process can stuff it. You have something to say about Hamas’s peaceable intentions? Go tell it to Sderot.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 5 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Profile Photo Member


    • #1
  2. Profile Photo Member

    Yes, bravo.

    And where is the media reportage of this incident – of these many incidents? It is a travesty that the harassment of Israel by Hamas continues while criticism of the conduct of Hamas pales in comparison to that of the Israeli government, particularly when it retaliates. I suspect that the collectivist mentality is behind this asymmetry.

    Israel, though it certainly has its fair share of problems, is essentially a flourishing, juridically secular, relatively capitalistic economy flanked by stagnant, poverty-stricken countries reduced to abjection by authoritarian, theocratic governments. According to the prevalent collectivist mentality, this contrast must be the product of exploitation on the part of the flourishing side aimed against the stagnating side. As such, those who represent the flourishing side, Israeli, must be ostracized and opposed.

    • #2
  3. Profile Photo Member

    I don’t suggest that my explanation is exhaustive – its just complementary.

    • #3
  4. Profile Photo Inactive

    I’m wondering why Israel doesn’t keep predator drones over Gaza 24/7. It seems to me that some of these rocket attacks can be preempted. Maybe the terrorists will realize that a random shot over the fence is not worth the risk of instant death from the above.

    • #4
  5. Profile Photo Member

    One point of correction, of interest probably only to insiders. “Predator” is basically a brand name of the most common and most successfully unmanned aerial vehicle. It is not a drone- the difference between a drone and a UAV is that a drone is nothing more than a remotely piloted vehicle, requiring hands-on control at all times.

    A UAV has its own central processor and its own autopilot, and can operate on its own for extended periods, pre-processing target acquisition- then it can “call up” the human operators for mermission to look closer, fire, etc. In most cases, one UAV “pilot” can control several airships at once.

    The system I was working on had 4 ten-foot wingspan aircraft towed in a trailer behind a Hummer, two guys could assemble them by snapping them together, they’d take off and land on any reasonable dirt road or runway, and one guy could control all 4 while they were in the air.

    My Israel comment is that if there were actually a real UN, it would be a perfect mission for them to operate a military unit to go in and find/destroy the rocket stashes. Sadly…..

    • #5
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.