Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 40 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Columbia University Could Lose Accreditation
What would that mean for Columbia?
First, they wouldn’t have to close down. No private college in the U.S. can be forced to be closed down by the government, at least not over political speech, even antisemitism. Graduates can still be hired based on the reputation of a Columbia degree. If anything, Ivy League schools could easily forgo accreditation with no hits to their reputations.
Accreditation is more valuable for mid-tier schools. For example, the University of Michigan, “The Harvard of the Midwest,” wouldn’t really need it, but Michigan State might not survive without it. Both are public schools, but if the state of Michigan didn’t require them to get accreditation, they wouldn’t have to.
Bob Jones University, a private school, was not accredited until 2006. Before that, in 1983, they lost their federal tax-exempt status, which meant that donors could not deduct their contributions from their taxes. Bob Jones University sued, and the case made it to the Supreme Court. They lost. The university was possibly taxed by the federal government as well. The reason they lost their tax-exempt status was their admissions policies based on race, which were very specific. Basically, they would not admit blacks until 1971, and even then, they had to be married “within their race.” Over time, the restriction was relaxed so that single blacks could be admitted, but interracial dating was banned. It wasn’t until 2000 that Bob Jones University completely ended all racial restrictions.
As recently as nineteen years ago, Bob Jones did not have accreditation, yet they still admitted students, and their graduates were getting jobs. Despite all the hostility of the federal government, they were never in danger of being forcibly closed down. All the pressure was financial.
Most conservatives are aware of Hillsdale College’s refusal to accept federal funding so they aren’t subject to federal monitoring on race which most colleges are subject to. To my knowledge, there has been no credible accusation that Hillsdale discriminates based on race. On the other hand, they don’t have to hire extra staff to administer the reporting requirements the feds demand for Title IX compliance. Nor did Hillsdale change its disciplinary procedures to comply with Obama’s Department of Education requirements that essentially set up kangaroo courts when a male student was accused of loosely defined sexual intimidation or assault.
For a while, the Obama Administration toyed with the idea of taking away Hillsdale’s accreditation. I don’t know the details, but the idea was dropped in the end. Probably it was because the federal government couldn’t prove racial discrimination, which is a higher bar than it is for a college that accepts federal funding. Those federally funded colleges end up having to prove their innocence, whereas with Hillsdale and other colleges that refuse federal funding, the burden of proof is on the government. They have to be proven guilty.
It would probably be useful to look at the history of college accreditation in the U.S. Accreditation associations actually started in the late 19th century as peer-review-based organizations. And it wasn’t really until the 1950s that the federal government got involved. At that point, the federal government had been putting a lot of money into the G.I. Bill as World War II veterans returned to civilian life and struggled to find jobs. To be fair, a lot of veterans were getting cheated by diploma mills, and the feds wanted to stop that.
So what started as a way for colleges to police each other for academic integrity has slippery-sloped its way to the federal government having the power to infringe on a college’s freedom to admit whomever they want.
In the recent past, progressive academics figured they could influence the federal government to use its funding mechanism to discriminate against conservatives and their values. And even when Republican administrations were elected, presidents like George H.W. Bush and his son wouldn’t turn around and use that power against them. They figured that Republicans would continue to govern this way so as not to retaliate against them.
And it’s not that what Trump is doing against colleges is unpopular. He’s unleashed a lot of pent-up resentment against them. Perhaps a silver lining in all this is that the universities in the U.S. could end their dependence on the federal government.
But probably not, and that would be a shame.
Published in General
Excellent article, thanks Al.
I went to Denison University, in Ohio.
At Denison, we referred to Harvard as, “The Denison of the east coast”.
I went to Case Western Reserve University, also in Ohio.
When I was a student, the push was on to identify CWRU as “The Harvard of the Midwest”. It never caught on, although I used to have a T shirt with that motto on it.
One accreditation company meddled in the hiring of a university president. Wanted them to pick a DEI hire.
Given the various demographic trends going against higher education, I think it would be quite wise if the bottom 30% or whatever would just tell the accreditation people to take a hike. Then sell your education à la carte.
I’ve said this before. I went to college a million years ago and I was just blown away by all of the smart people that thought liberal arts were stupid and they thought you were stupid if you didn’t think they were stupid. All of those guys turned out really good and made great money.
NO! Say it ain’t so. I’m shocked that a well intentioned government program tuned into a boondoggle. Why can’t things like this have a hard sunset date. I can appreciate the reason for it in the first place, but like anything else, it just lends itself to fraud and abuse.
Don’t many student loan sources require accreditation?
Accepting students who are using government guaranteed student loans is considered accepting federal funding under Title IX. So Hillsdale doesn’t allow it.
On the other hand, they do have their own scholarship infrastructure in place.
Right, but, as I recall from my own college days, all the loan programs I looked at required an accredited school. Even if it was barber school or something.
Sure. And if a school like Columbia that loses accreditation wants students to be able to take out student loans, they’ll have to come up with a funding source, and they do have the resources to do it. A barber school can’t afford to do without accreditation. Columbia actually can, though it will cost them.
Accreditation is a mafia-style racket.
I went to University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) which is located by Carnegie-Mellon University (a MIT level engineering school) – CMU students used to tease us with “If you can’t go to college, go to Pitt.
Accreditation is a farce. Places issuing advanced degrees for intersectional street theater studies and even hiring such people as faculty members cannot claim to be serious institutions of research and higher learning.
That must have been very humbling for you, Doc.
She was also known for slandering a boy on campus and falsely accusing him of rape after that boy wanted to permanently cut ties with her. I can’t blame the guy, she seemed unstable and would make an awkward introduction to your mother at Christmas. As I recall Columbia railroaded the male student in some fashion and wanted to violate his civil rights w/o due process which was encouraged under the Obama Administration. However, the case was so demonstrably bad and clear cut, that the slandered male student successfully sued Columbia.
Now Columbia might be best known for supporting anti-Jewish mobs and those who take over school buildings. Columbia even has a special Pro-Palestine studies program evidently. It has certificates from the webpage. Get some Free, Freeing of the Palestine going there. All accredited. Apply for Fall classes.
Ha, Still better than Point Park or La Roach
Very well done on #15 Eb Snider.
Companies need to pan Ivy grads when hiring.