Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 40 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The Administration Freezes $2.2 Billion of Federal Funding from Harvard
The Joint Task Force to Combat Antisemitism has announced a funding freeze on $2.2 billion of federal multi-year grants and a $60 million contract with Harvard University after the college announced it would not comply with the government’s demands for reform.
On April 11th officials from the General Services Administration, Health and Human Services, and the Department of Education issued a letter to university president Dr. Alan Garber and Penny Pritzker, Senior Fellow of the Harvard Corporation, indicating that federal funding will be contingent upon governance and disciplinary reforms, overhauling programs with “egregious records of anti-semitism and other bias,” screening to ensure that international students accepted would not engage in activities contrary to American values, merit-based hiring and admissions, along with proactive measures to foster intellectual diversity. The letter included an outline of auditing procedures for monitoring the efforts and protections for whistleblowers to safely report compliance failures.
“The United States has invested in Harvard University’s operations because of the value to the country of scholarly discovery and academic excellence. But an investment is not an entitlement. It depends on Harvard upholding federal civil rights laws, and it only makes sense if Harvard fosters the kind of environment that produces intellectual creativity and scholarly rigor, both of which are antithetical to ideological capture,” the authors said.
Harvard’s response, penned by lawyers William Burck and Robert Hur, was issued on Monday.
Harvard has made, and will continue to make, lasting and robust structural, policy, and programmatic changes to ensure that the university is a welcoming and supportive learning environment for all students and continues to abide in all respects with federal law across its academic programs and operations, while fostering open inquiry in a pluralistic community free from intimidation and open to challenging orthodoxies, whatever their source.
The university’s lawyers defended Harvard’s efforts over the past 15 months to undertake “substantial policy and programmatic measures” to discipline disruptive students, stimulate ideological openness, and engender civil discourse. “As a result, Harvard is in a very different place today from where it was a year ago,” the response reads.
The letter accuses the task force of ignoring the success of these efforts and called the administration’s efforts illegal.
The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. Neither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by the federal government. Accordingly, Harvard will not accept the government’s terms as an agreement in principle.
The letter concluded that Harvard would be open to further dialogue with the administration.
Within hours, the announcement was made that Harvard’s funding would come to a halt.
“Harvard’s statement today reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation’s most prestigious universities and colleges – that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws,” read the official statement of the joint task force.
This morning, President Trump upped the ante on Truth Social:
Published in GeneralPerhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting “Sickness?” Remember, Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST!
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.There are 10 comments.
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
Like much of the academic community, Harvard has declined in both the quality of its instruction and the quality of its student body. The DEI/Affirmative Action admissions, the denial of Asian students admissions, and the fact that they have admitted to having to offer remedial instruction to freshmen who have entered with submarginal skills are all factors that speak to Harvard’s inability or unwillingness “to continue to make, lasting and robust structural, policy, and programmatic changes”. The anti-Semitic demonstrations that were allowed to continue through much of last year that kept students from attending classes, and, in many cases. to safely transit the campus clearly demonstrated this.
My suspicion is that given its enormous endowment they think that they can wait out the remain three plus years of the Trump administration and work for a more friendly one to come to office. Making changes more permanent through congressional action, as with much of the current Trump agenda, must be achieved to make the real effect felt. The arrogance of Leftist Academia is enormous and needs to be swatted down. Removing the taxfree status of organizations which have political agendas like schools and Public radio and television is a long overdue need.
You’re right. Congress should pass a law making it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race.
There seems to be some sort of law in place. Public spaces like supermarkets or lunch counters can’t restrict entrance on the basis of race.
Where exactly is it legal to discriminate on the basis of race, and where is it not?
Newsflash, Harvard. If you’re taking federal $$$ you’re not independent.
Harvard was doing so against Asian students who applied for entry. It was illegal, but they did it anyway and used absurd racial stereotypes to justify the choices. They continue to accept DEI students into their freshman class over whites far more qualified. That is racial discrimination which is illegal, but, again, they invent nonsense excuses for their admissions choices. If you have ever applied for position in a public service, as I did many years ago at the Seattle Aquarium, and a minority person with far fewer qualifications is chosen instead of you you rapidly learn that, though it is illegal, it continues to be done and will continue until real teeth are put in the law.
The wisdom of the Hillsdale/Grove City position becomes more obvious all the time. If Congress does not make a law, someday your favorite local Conservative /Christian college or university might find itself in Harvard’s position. ( Or maybe it has already).
I just saw this article that seems to explain a bit of how Harvard and others got where they are. What saved us in WWII seems to be undoing us today. Any thoughts?
I keep hearing that, as a private university, it’s legal. It’s the fact that they accept federal funds that’s the fly in the ointment. From what I can see, the Justice Department isn’t charging them, either civilly or criminally, for civil rights violations, where the status of their federal funding is moot.
A private university can pretty much do what it wants. However, as you state, when you accept federal money you are required to act within the regulations set up under the Department of Education and the Civil Rights division. Havard gets somewhere around $8 Billion in federal money for various services they provide. So, in a reverse of you pay the piper, you name the song, Harvard is required to remain within federal guidelines or it can lose its federal funds and grants. Biden’s administration paid about as much attention to that as they did to the border. It is just one more thing that Trump and his team has to correct. The incompetence or, simply stated, deliberate neglect of the Biden administration of riding herd on institutions and agencies that were favorable to them was well beyond the pale. Biden should have been impeached several times over for failure to do his job, to administer the laws of the country as established by congress. He will, hopefully, be remembered in history as among the worst American presidents, if not the worst. However, as a foil for Trump he makes Trump’s falabilities seem somewhat minor by comparison which is not a bad thing in the end.
It doesn’t answer my question. The Trump Administration is withholding federal funds based on Title [whatever] violations. What it’s not doing is criminally or civil suing Harvard, or individuals at Harvard with racial discrimination. Leaving out the issue of federal funding, Harvard is a private institution.
If they were to go the Hillsdale route, and not accept any federal funding, would it then be legal for them to discriminate on the basis of race?
If it is still illegal, then why aren’t the Feds going after them beyond the federal funding hook?