The Myth of “Tax Cuts For Billionaires”

 

The US income tax system is still a progressive tax system, where those with the most income pay not only the most taxes but also the highest tax rates.

I went to the IRS website (You can Google IRS TAX STATS) and found the breakdowns for income taxes paid for several years. Let’s look at 2020, Trump’s last full year in office…

The richest Americans — those with incomes over 2 million dollars in 2020 — paid an effective tax rate of 26.68%.

The middle class — those with incomes between 75,000 and 200,000 dollars — paid an effective tax rate of 10.12%.

The poorest — those with incomes less than 25,000 dollars — paid an effective rate of 1.04%.

How does this compare to, say, Obama’s last year? Let’s look at 2016…

The poorest Americans paid an effective tax rate of 1.7%. Between 2016 & 2020, their effective tax rate went down by almost half, from 1.7% to 1%.

The middle class paid an effective rate of 11.69% in 2016. Their taxes also went down, but not nearly by almost half. They went from an effective tax rate of 11.69% in 2016 to 10.01% in 2020.

And the richest? They got a break too. But a tiny one. Their effective tax rate went from a rate of 27.0% to 26.67%.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 36 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    Old Bathos (View Comment):
    The goal of raising revenue equitably and efficiently is at odds with using the tax code to engineer incentives for other policy goals.  

    Truth!

    • #31
  2. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Many lobbyists opposed the seminal 1986 tax reform even though it effectively lowered taxes on their clients. Their motives were (a) pride of authorship and sustained (lucrative) defense of special provisions in the code and (b) a belief that the rates would inevitably go back up whenever Democrats got the chance and the increase would hurt more with all the protections removed.

    The goal of raising revenue equitably and efficiently is at odds with using the tax code to engineer incentives for other policy goals.

    Recall the embarrassment of Sen. George Mitchell who was proud of pushing through a “luxury tax” on the rich only to discover that punishing yacht purchases was an economic blow to his own state where a lot of yachts were made (Maine, no duh, George) as he unsuccessfully scrambled to carve out a quick exemption.

    That actually sums up the legislative process. Declare that The Rich and Corporations need to pay their fair share with a big rate and then craft thousands of tailored provisions to keep from killing the golden goose. The middle and upper middle income taxpayers don’t have a trade association or big firm representing them, so they (we) tend to get socked.

    The tax code is over 6,000 pages and the regs to implement the code are 70,000 pages. Maybe we ought to rethink this.

    We can rethink it, but simplifying the tax code is counter the selfish interests of 1) politicians and 2) lobbyists.

    Politicians have an interest in maintaining complexity so they can sell favors for “campaign contributions” and other bribery. 

    Lobbyists (and in a perverse manner tax accountants) have an interest in maintaining complexity so they can sell to clients their services in navigating the complexity. 

    • #32
  3. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    We can rethink it, but simplifying the tax code is counter the selfish interests of 1) politicians and 2) lobbyists.

    Politicians have an interest in maintaining complexity so they can sell favors for “campaign contributions” and other bribery. 

    Lobbyists (and in a perverse manner tax accountants) have an interest in maintaining complexity so they can sell to clients their services in navigating the complexity. 

    Preach!

    • #33
  4. TBA, sometimes known as 'Teebs'. Coolidge
    TBA, sometimes known as 'Teebs'.
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    I’m so sick of attacks on the billionaires. I think the complainers are simply jealous and work hard to demonize them.

    When the government robs Peter to pay Paul it helps if Paul hates Peter. 

    • #34
  5. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    TBA, sometimes known as 'Teebs… (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    I’m so sick of attacks on the billionaires. I think the complainers are simply jealous and work hard to demonize them.

    When the government robs Peter to pay Paul it helps if Paul hates Peter.

    I roll my eyes when I see some pundit declare that raising taxes on the rich and giving money to others is popular.  Gee, you think so, Professor?  Free booze is popular, too, but declaring that everyone is authorized to steal whatever they want from their local liquor store is not going to lead to happy long-term results.

    • #35
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    TBA, sometimes known as ‘Teebs… (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    I’m so sick of attacks on the billionaires. I think the complainers are simply jealous and work hard to demonize them.

    When the government robs Peter to pay Paul it helps if Paul hates Peter.

    I roll my eyes when I see some pundit declare that raising taxes on the rich and giving money to others is popular. Gee, you think so, Professor? Free booze is popular, too, but declaring that everyone is authorized to steal whatever they want from their local liquor store is not going to lead to happy long-term results.

    That’s why you get the government to steal it instead.

    • #36
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.