Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 40 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The Gordian Knot: Actually Defunding the Left
Back when I was a lobbyist for business groups, a pet peeve was the assumption, prevalent at dinner parties, that I must be working for Goliath against heroically underfunded Davids like environmentalists and other ‘public interest’ groups. The notion that the network of leftists in rather expensive downtown office spaces was somehow a shoestring enterprise was always misguided and annoying. It was never just the largesse of ultra-wealthy liberals that sustains some very powerful groups but the complex maze of federal funding sources that empowers leftist movements and provides sinecures for defeated Democratic politicians as well as former and future staffers, makes some players wealthy—and insulates so much policy power from the impact of public choice and elections.
For example, on a small scale, I sometimes had to join efforts to combat the litigation kabuki in which the EPA or some other agency expands its powers by losing in court:
1. An agency provides grants and contracts tailored for a favored activist group to empower and staff with former agency executives.
2. Activist group demands the agency do something.
3. The agency says (correctly) that Congress did not authorize that.
4. Activist group sues in federal court.
5. The agency surrenders in court, Gosh, your honor, they were right all long so if you would be kind enough to sign this order telling us we do need to regulate with these new powers so that we can settle this case.
6. The agency then pays the legal fees of the activist group, which funds its own in-house lawyers to rinse and repeat.
But that form of subsidy is nothing compared to the magnitudes larger complex of grants, consulting, and giveaways from almost every federal department. But even that broad departmental partisan grift support is less brazen and penny-ante compared to the grift-fest that is USAID.
I always thought that defunding the left could never happen because (a) it would take a herculean research effort to track and identify the grift and separate it from legitimate uses, and (b) the Democrats would never be sufficiently removed from power to permit such an effort. I was looking for an algorithm to untie the Gordian knot when the real solution was for Trump to hand Elon a sword to just cut it, after which, when we noticed good stuff going unfunded, we could restore that and only that.
If their financial insulation is removed, meaning leftist groups have to rely on transparent, voluntary contributions, and the Deep State cannot help divert public funds or even maintain its own grift, elections would matter once again and our government would look, act and sound a heck of a lot more like it was working for the American people. Hack away at that knot, Elon.
Published in General
If it isn’t obvious to everyone, I am certain that Elon is using AI to untangle and de-obfuscate the maze of grants and funding being laundered to favored entities. It started when Elon used AI to decipher Biden’s last attempt to fund various leftist skulduggery. It appears that AI is good for something, and if only to track down concealed government spending, that is a major point in it’s favor.
And it isn’t seasoned politicians, smart staffers, and experienced lobbyists who are wielding this sword. It is young programmers who can direct AI on what to scrutinize.
Of course the left is encouraging it’s base to, in the words of Hakeem Jeffries, “fight it in the streets.”
WIRED Doxxed DOGE Engineers; Now They Are Being Hunted
God bless this effort. The other task is whether the instances of grift identified were specifically authorized by Congress. If so, are we doing some form of an executive impoundment to halt the outflow? What is the authority or do we need Congress to redress? If some stream is entirely discretionary, does it have to be spent but on better things? I suspect that various NGOs and grant hustlers are conferring with some very high-priced lawyers about how to get a federal judge to open their particular spigot. Nobody walks away from 8 figures without a fight. Congress needs to join the battle at some point soon.
@oldbathos Senators Lee and Ernst were in the X-discussion last night with Elon and Vivek.
Back in the 90s, WIRED was cool. Are they getting USAID money, do you think? Maybe a check or two from George Soros?
We knew it was the tight relationship between elements in the State Department and the CIA that fostered the work that was done in Ukraine over the last three decades since the fall of the USSR. That led to President Trump’s first impeachment where the interested parties began to be identified along with the financial sources but most of the detail was hidden by using the security classification of information which then made it a crime to reveal this to those without a security clearance and a need to know. Now there is no information that can be kept from Trump and those he designates.
Many Trump acolytes were working in the trenches identifying the corruptors while he was fighting all the charges brought trying to make sure he would not be able to run again for POTUS. No wonder the Democrats, actually all of the federal bureaucracy and politicians from both parties, were excluded from the transition for so long and are crazy now.
These two weeks also have confirmed the reasoning behind Trump supporters being relentless in not accepting other candidates in the Republican primaries. We would not being seeing this if we had failed.
Some people seem to overlook that if Trump’s people knew where the illegals/gang members/etc were, so did FJB’s people. But THEY did NOTHING.
An important battle was won (?) today against the Left – analogous to Midway or Vicksburg.
WIRED has been a leftist fashion rag for many years.
Not in 1991 when they started.
It was a brilliant move to have someone outside government leading the effort to slash government. Musk is not subject to all the civil service restrictions or congressional appropriations. Leftists were complaining that DOGE should be subject to government rules on blue-ribbon panels, but Trump and Musk just ignored them and moved on.
So I take it you will not be taking out the tiny violin for The Clinton Foundation and its upcoming losses now that USAID will be abolished:
O’Sullivan’s Law in action.
True (I’m acquainted with the founders). The rot set in when it was sold.
via Instapundit:
https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1886647920566636637?mx=2
Smells just like the Biden holding company maze.
Far more complex than the Biden Corn Maze.
That’s because Joe didn’t set it up, nor did he need to “solve” it.
Just going to leave this here. USAID grants halted. Politico unable to make payroll. Interesting.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1886936128420274446
That is fascinating. Maybe even interesting. We’ll see.
A friend just recommended DataRepublican. Now that makes two.
You’re going to date two Republicans? Does your wife know? Do the Republicans know about the other one?
Good summary of things. I also like the idea of the title. Just simply cut things.
It seems the Trump admin has built up some momentum too. As soon as he does something, before there can be outrage whipped up he’s on to the next thing. The rapid fire approach to just getting rid of leftist infrastructure within the government is bold but necessary. I suppose the most obvious way to deal with the knot. Previous Republican efforts seemed to just play along.
Confirmed. Funded to the tune of $8.2 million. That’s going to be a budget hurdle for Politico.
So using government to fund and distribute media. I didn’t suspect Politico of that, but good to know. Keep uncovering these things. There’s probably more funding networks we don’t know about. At least the right has a better idea of where to look
Wow!
FIFY.
Saw a great comment on the revelation that the federal government has apparently purchased $8,000,000 in subscriptions to Politico: “That’s a lot a money just to read what you wrote.”
It’s also a First Amendment problem that needs fixing.
I haven’t seen any dollar amounts, but some USAID money has been going to Ukraine, it seems. Much of that is good and proper, and a reason why such programs should continue when USAID starts up again, hopefully soon. However, one item that was mentioned was “funding for independent journalism” (or something very close to that). Any journalism that is funded by a US government program is not independent journalism. Same problem there as with funding Politico.
They take screenshots to be used on their resumes when they apply for promotions in he Ministry of Truth.
Times have changed. In the last century, I was in a coalition that paid a PR firm a lot of money to promote our rather obscure pet issue. They got zero media traction. Meanwhile, I bought drinks for certain authors and editors and offered a fun spin and some Capitol Hill gossip (true) and Voila! the message got planted. I sacrificed time, treasure, physical and moral health for the client. Now you just need some 20-something kid to put some crap in the right Twitter feed to reach every lazy employee of the entire MSM.