A Matter Of Class

 

The media cultists and pundits, whose duty it is to explain the doings of the world to a much more simple-minded citizenry, are having a hard time translating the Second Coming of Trump in a way that they are comfortable with. It was not hard for them the first time around. It is never hard for them to talk down to us, knowing we will never quite grasp the insight they patiently but condescendingly share. I believe that they had in their collective mind visions of Andrew Jackson’s first inauguration, which saw a wash of back-woods types end up partying in the White House in their dirty shirts and muddy boots. But for fear that we common types were not well-read enough to know the reference, they just stuck with crude, rude and Russian collusion.

This time it is much harder to discount the election results as a stunning, one-off upset due to right-wing trickery, some easily fooled serfs in backward fly-over territory and, of course, Russian “disinformation”. There was, of course, no whiskey-fueled trashing of the White House as in Jackson’s time. As before, formal balls stretched well into the night.

This time the confused pundit element will try and give a false air of acceptance while still trying to decide how those of the “working class” could have deserted so dramatically the patricians of both political parties. There will continue to be articles written and strategy sessions held, based mostly on understanding and appealing to all the perceived “classes,” especially the “middle class”.

Before I launch into my own narrow-minded description of American “classes,” I will admit that I don’t hold much with traditional views of social classes. Mostly they are invented and maintained to divide and serve the purpose of those doing the defining. “Middle class” I see as mostly a socialist term, even if we all know that there certainly is a vast stretch of people in the middle of society who seem to share much. In truth, as that national treasure Thomas Sowell has shown many times, there is quite a bit of movement (both up and down) between the economic classifications due to the economic liberty we enjoy as a free society.

My classifications are based mostly on behavior. In other words, they are cultural. They are about values, not income brackets, race or sex (I will try as hard as possible to keep from using the socially approved term “gender”) or even location. I hold a faint but persistent hope that our current political season has shown a decisive turn back toward those values, that culture, that character.

One of the aspects of that character places value on the work and worth of an individual. It might seem absurd to many for a construction worker or a shirt-tailed rancher to be considered in the same “class” as Donald Trump or Elon Musk. But not if they are reminded that these all are productive individuals who advance or lose in large part by their own work, decisions, initiative and, sometimes, just plain stubborn luck.

The character upon which this nation was founded and has grown is not a content, quiet or submissive one. By nature, it is neither compliant nor fearful. But it is, by nature, productive. It produces results. Things are built; problems are addressed and solved so that production (of whatever sort) moves on. It values competence and achievement. It judges by result.

Another national treasure, Victor Davis Hanson, refers to those who live by this character as the “muscular class”. They live by actions and not vague promises. They do not want false guarantees but opportunities and the freedom to pursue them.

Those who are constantly trying to “explain” the rise of Trump have little “feel” for these people. They cannot be understood within the collective ideology. If they wear a shirt and tie or a hard hat, their hearts tell them that the farm, the store, the company, the nation cannot grow and prosper without individuals who possess the ethic of producing and achieving.

So after decades of being marginalized or just plain ignored by elites and politicos of both parties, they have found a voice outside of the “established order” that feels like them. And the reach of that voice stretches across all the perceived “classes” imagined by the pundits and social planners.

What is shared might well be the same ethos that, in the 1770s, brought together single-plot farmers of the middle colonies, shipping magnates in Boston, New England fishermen, city merchants of Philadelphia and Overmountain settlers of the Carolinas. I tend to think of it as a culture of Liberty.

It is a culture which felt every pleb, serf and peon has a soul, a spirit with purpose and potential. And yes, every millionaire and billionaire as well. And it holds that each has the right to the opportunity of approaching that potential through their own merit and effort.

That is the “class” that characterizes the heart of American survival.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 12 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Jimmy Carter Member
    Jimmy Carter
    @JimmyCarter

    Now, If We could get back to teaching self-reliance to the next generations, We’d be in business.

    • #1
  2. Nohaaj Coolidge
    Nohaaj
    @Nohaaj

    Ole, your posts continue to be a masterpiece of prose and insight.

    Like JC, I agree that much of the recent college grads have a sense of entitlement, that does not include the grit, determination and character to simply Produce.  

    But, for sure, you have IMO, perfectly summarized and described the Class of Americans I identify with.

    The self reliant, independent, productive American. Proud of my family, my Country and my God.

     

     

    • #2
  3. Juno Delta Whiskey Coolidge
    Juno Delta Whiskey
    @Cato

    You might even call it the “American Class”

    • #3
  4. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    There are myriad jobs needed to be done to keep a society running. 

    “It is a culture which felt every pleb, serf and peon has a soul, a spirit with purpose and potential. And yes, every millionaire and billionaire as well. And it holds that each has the right to the opportunity of approaching that potential through their own merit and effort.

    That is the “class” that characterizes the heart of American survival.”

    Every job can be done with a nonchalance of mediocrity or with an intense energy of pride and excellence…of achievement. Trump has always shown a great appreciation for people of all financial levels. He understands through his construction career the skill and hard work that so many people provide for our country. He truly loves our country and us, his fellow American. He shows it and we know it. So how does one define that “class”?

    • #4
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    cdor (View Comment):

    There are myriad jobs needed to be done to keep a society running.

    “It is a culture which felt every pleb, serf and peon has a soul, a spirit with purpose and potential. And yes, every millionaire and billionaire as well. And it holds that each has the right to the opportunity of approaching that potential through their own merit and effort.

    That is the “class” that characterizes the heart of American survival.”

    Every job can be done with a nonchalance of mediocrity or with an intense energy of pride and excellence…of achievement. Trump has always shown a great appreciation for people of all financial levels. He understands through his construction career the skill and hard work that so many people provide for our country. He truly loves our country and us, his fellow American. He shows it and we know it. So how does one define that “class”?

    People who are involved with building the buildings, would understand such things more than people who just live/work in buildings.

    Which is one of the reasons why it’s so amusing to see the interviews with women who say that a world without men would be just great.

    • #5
  6. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Jimmy Carter (View Comment):

    Now, If We could get back to teaching self-reliance to the next generations, We’d be in business.

    When I was in high school in the 1960s, in our high school English class, we were required to read and discuss Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay of that title (Self Reliance-1841). A rousing essay indeed. The essence of America. Therein we see such as Trump and Musk and Ramaswamy. And the passengers of Flight 93. And Carrie Underwood. 

    I think that was a common assignment in those days. Now, I suspect it is not. 

    • #6
  7. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Juno Delta Whiskey (View Comment):

    You might even call it the “American Class”

    And there is wide gulf between the “American Class” and the rest of the population.  

    • #7
  8. Juno Delta Whiskey Coolidge
    Juno Delta Whiskey
    @Cato

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Juno Delta Whiskey (View Comment):

    You might even call it the “American Class”

    And there is wide gulf between the “American Class” and the rest of the population.

    Perhaps. But the door is always wide open for those who wish to join.

    • #8
  9. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    For centuries, it was common for upper classes to think of your their souls as being closer to heaven then those plebs. 

    • #9
  10. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    For centuries, it was common for upper classes to think of your their souls as being closer to heaven then those plebs.

    It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. — Douay-Rheims Mark 10:25 

    • #10
  11. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    For centuries, it was common for upper classes to think of your their souls as being closer to heaven then those plebs.

    It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. — Douay-Rheims Mark 10:25

    I always wanted to ask Jesus if he meant a regular businessman or a tax collector when he said that and I want to ask the Apostles why only Mark wrote about it. 

    • #11
  12. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    For centuries, it was common for upper classes to think of your their souls as being closer to heaven then those plebs.

    It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. — Douay-Rheims Mark 10:25

    I always wanted to ask Jesus if he meant a regular businessman or a tax collector when he said that and I want to ask the Apostles why only Mark wrote about it.

    I think he meant a rich man. It is very clear language. Mark is writing from Peter’s sermons, so the emphasis probably came from Peter. As the owner of a fishing boat in a previous life, Peter was more wealthy than the average, and employer and business owner. Maybe that was why it stuck with him.

    • #12
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.