Will They Rebuild Los Angeles?

 

A westward view of the Hurst Fire on January 7. Wikimedia Commons

I’ve watched a lot this week of the tragic events resulting from the wildfires in the Los Angeles area.

This has increased my awareness of some of the details related to the destruction. It appears there has been total mismanagement of the fire prevention capability by federal, state, and local governing authorities. The big state-related issue is the lack of water positioned to fight the fires, and there are also questions about equipment and the actual competency of officials, including those elected at state and local levels.

I have gained an impression over the recent years that environmental and other requirements make garnering permits to build very complicated. Now I understand that insurance companies are refusing to insure homes for fire hazards.

With all these factors operating against the process, why would people actually rebuild homes in these areas, especially in view of the fact that they have a very high risk of fire and no competent government service to respond to that risk? The high taxation for those who reside in California is another factor working against rebuilding.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 111 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Columbo Member
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    A possible reaction?

    A conservative is a former liberal who had their house burned to the ground due to idiotic democrat policies.

    Possible. But from past experience, it seems more likely that they’ll decide they weren’t leftist ENOUGH.

    Sadly true. You can’t fix stupid.

    • #31
  2. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: Now I understand the insurance companies are refusing to insure homes for fire hazards.

    They aren’t “refusing”, they are unable to offer insurance because the government has capped how much they are allowed to charge in premiums, at a level below that which is actuarially sound.

    People don’t get that government-mandated price controls often result in shortages of products and services. 

    • #32
  3. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    I read today that Oregon sent a strike team of fire engines and crews to LA. They were diverted to Sacramento so that they could be inspected for compliance with CA emissions standards

    I’d like to read about that.

    Could you paste the link? Thanks.

    Here is a screenshot.  I can’t figure out how to capture the link.

    • #33
  4. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Bob Thompson: Will They Rebuild Los Angeles?

    The economics tells us that they have so much money invested in the area, that rebuilding will pay off better than taking the loss.

    Some bits to note:

    • In expensive communities like this, the land is an enormous fraction of the home price.  (“Location, location, location.”)  So rebuilding a given house is comparatively less expensive than buying a new one.
    • All their neighbors and in the same boat and are willing to help raise the value of their properties.
    • The aerial photos I’ve seen suggest that the fire went house-to-house, avoiding lawns and residential trees, as the houses were so close together that there was no room for lawns and trees between them. 
    • Which suggests the best protection would be some sort of scheme to reduce the chance of house-to-house fire happening in the future.  (Wall soaking sprinklers?  Flameproof fences?)
    • It’s not difficult to implement some sort of community fire protection, perhaps a reservoir up the hill stocked with seawater pumped from the Pacific.
    • #34
  5. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    • #35
  6. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: Will They Rebuild Los Angeles?

    The economics tells us that they have so much money invested in the area, that rebuilding will pay off better than taking the loss.

    Some bits to note:

    • In expensive communities like this, the land is an enormous fraction of the home price. (“Location, location, location.”) So rebuilding a given house is comparatively less expensive than buying a new one.
    • All their neighbors and in the same boat and are willing to help raise the value of their properties.
    • The aerial photos I’ve seen suggest that the fire went house-to-house, avoiding lawns and residential trees, as the houses were so close together that there was no room for lawns and trees between them.
    • Which suggests the best protection would be some sort of scheme to reduce the chance of house-to-house fire happening in the future. (Wall soaking sprinklers? Flameproof fences?)
    • It’s not difficult to implement some sort of community fire protection, perhaps a reservoir up the hill stocked with seawater pumped from the Pacific.

    While this is clear thinking, imagine how difficult it would be to get approval for a salt water pump, pipe, and reservoir system in California.  Imagine the environmental impact reports that would be required.  It’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

    • #36
  7. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    JoshuaFinch (View Comment):

    It’s brutally ironic that most residents of the Palisades — Billy Crystal and his ilk — are democrats and fund the campaigns of Bass and Newsom. Adam Corolla thinks they will turn Trumpian.

    • #37
  8. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: Will They Rebuild Los Angeles?

    The economics tells us that they have so much money invested in the area, that rebuilding will pay off better than taking the loss.

    Some bits to note:

    • In expensive communities like this, the land is an enormous fraction of the home price. (“Location, location, location.”) So rebuilding a given house is comparatively less expensive than buying a new one.
    • All their neighbors and in the same boat and are willing to help raise the value of their properties.
    • The aerial photos I’ve seen suggest that the fire went house-to-house, avoiding lawns and residential trees, as the houses were so close together that there was no room for lawns and trees between them.
    • Which suggests the best protection would be some sort of scheme to reduce the chance of house-to-house fire happening in the future. (Wall soaking sprinklers? Flameproof fences?)
    • It’s not difficult to implement some sort of community fire protection, perhaps a reservoir up the hill stocked with seawater pumped from the Pacific.

    The rebuild, if it happens,  will undoubtedly be a very interesting multi-year spectacle for interested observers.

    • #38
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Columbo (View Comment):

    DonG (¡Afuera!) (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    The anti progress elements are entrenched so deeply in CA government that I think they will be incapable of rebuilding absent a wholesale replacement of government from top to bottom

    Something will get built, especially the mansions in the hills, but will there be a rebuild of the mostly small single family homes? I don’t think that will happen under California’s smothering regulatory blanket. When most of those houses were originally built, it was the wild west of building. Now it is the opposite.

    The new buyers and the new mansions built will look like Oprah.

    So THAT’S why BLM was hoovering up all that money!

    • #39
  10. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    JoshuaFinch (View Comment):

    It’s brutally ironic that most residents of the Palisades — Billy Crystal and his ilk — are democrats and fund the campaigns of Bass and Newsom. Adam Corolla thinks they will turn Trumpian.

    Maybe a few will, but I expect most will double-down, etc.

     

    • #40
  11. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Is there really a good chance that, next time around, they’ll build it better?

    Like, with working fire hydrants and stuff?

    And maybe raise it all up, so it won’t be under water in a few years like they think it will be.

    A challenge to rebuilding it “better” is that “better” is likely to be much more expensive. Much more expensive is usually not a problem for the uber-rich, but for any remaining near-normies is a problem. 

    Toward the end of the time I lived in coastal Orange County (1968 – 2000), Laguna Beach mandated that any houses rebuilt after a fire, or houses that without a fire were modified in a way that required a building permit, had to be brought up to new fire-resistance standards. Unquestionably a “better” more fire-resistant house. But also those updates added (in the late 1990s) well over $100,000, and often up to $300,000 in extra cost to a construction project on a typical house. 

    As I understand it, the problem with the fire hydrants in Pacific Palisades wasn’t with the hydrants or their plumbing, but with the policy decisions of county and/or state officials not to fill a reservoir that would have fed the hydrants. 

    • #41
  12. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Who is the “They” in will they rebuild LA?

    If it is true that on Jan 1st 2025, big insurers cancelled the fire insurance agreements inside home insurance policies, many  people will not have the wherewithal to rebuild.

    Others will have to fight tooth and nail to have their fire insurance policy agreements honored.

    The celebrity crowd often has the deep pockets to re-build. But with Studio City gone, and much more of the day-to-day screen time offerings coming about due to Netflix, Amazon Prime, and other new content providers, it is hard to figure out what the movie industry will look like.

    I have no doubt that now that Mr and Mrs Super Stars  need massive infusions of monies, many in that crowd will be available for interviews by the TV magazine shows’ Talking Heads. That way,  they can proclaim the reality of how these fires will continue to happen until people understand that the Climate Crisis situation means we must stop eating beef and dairy, chickens and eggs. Plus no more fossil fuel-using cars. Once they succeed in this campaign, Soros will cut them their checks.

    Having watched numerous podcasts put up by people in the Paradise Calif region after that devastating fire of Nov 2018, one reality that even supercedes the monetary implications of re-building is how people descend into an overwhelming state of shock. One woman confessed that for the entire year following the epic event, she found herself unable to get out of bed on most days. On days when she managed that, even taking a brush to her hair or teeth was too much to do. (This was a woman with a relatively affluent lifestyle, so I can only imagine how poorer people fared.) remember in these catastrophic fires, even if your home did survive, you have to wonder if neighbors around you survived. Did friends make it through.

    The fatality counts for these fires are always incredibly low. For one thing, in the world of officialdom, unless there is an actual body available, then that individual didn’t die. (Of course if they had family members who pulled through, or close friends who keep pushing to find out if they did or didn’t make it, those efforts might in seven years bring about a death certificate.)

    So victims of these fires not only lose their homes, and often their jobs but never know what happened to people they knew and loved.

    In the Paradise Calif fire of Nov 20128, officialdom discouraged looking thru ruble for bodies as the local dental office had burned to the ground. Their attitude was “If we cannot identify the body, we don’t count it as a fatality anyway.”

    Also convenient to those who like to put such matters behind them is how fires incinerate bodies so they are mere piles of ash. The half dozen tow truck drivers hired after the Paradise blaze  who went on the record of a local guy’s podcast  explained the experiences they had while pulling out the frames of hundreds of cars found burnt up and on the road. Their experiences were extremely depressing. Their reports focused on how in vehicle after vehicle, there were mounds of ash in the driver’s seat and often in the passenger seats or on floorboards. After a few months of exposure, then YouTube pulled all that content.

    • #42
  13. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    I read today that Oregon sent a strike team of fire engines and crews to LA. They were diverted to Sacramento so that they could be inspected for compliance with CA emissions standards.

    They should have headed back for Oregon.

    Can’t say I don’t agree with you.

    • #43
  14. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):

    DonG (¡Afuera!) (View Comment):

    I am opposed to government tax-payer bailouts for L.A., North Carolina, and Florida.

    @ dong, I am usually in accord with your comments. And while I too am sensitive to the idea of reflexive “tax-payer bailouts”, and I might even agree that consideration of government spending on local problems requires a very strict standard, I just want to point out that one of the three things you list is not like the others.

    L.A. and Florida are both regions that have been settled only because of extraordinary efforts of terraforming. Without air conditioning, and lots of water-manipulation, neither of these places would be hospitable for the kind of massive settlement that we have there.

    If you want to chance the hurricanes in Florida or the dryness of Southern California, fine. Terraform away. But when things go wrong you have to have taken your situation there into a count, and planned for it. Both are beautiful places, but they are inherently dangerous and precarious because of the climate and weather there. Settle there, enjoy yourselves, but you have to take measures to protect yourselves from the inevitable, which happens like clockwork.

    The North Carolina disaster is different. What happened there was unprecedented. Those people made their bet in that area with zero expectation that something like this could happen to them.

    If the Taxpayers were ever going to be called upon to help out from national funds (and I agree that this is problematic in every case), I would be much more sympathetic to this claim.

    No one is safe from what is happening, Scarecrow.

    There is not a spot on the map of the USA where a tremendous drought cannot be orchestrated. Or a massive tornado. Or a fire. (You did notice, I hope, the array of “wild fires” that all started in Canada in multiple places which had experienced decent winter rain falls. Canada, not California.)

    I am close friends with a man who has investigated over 60 “wild fire” sites here in Calif, the Pacific Northwest and Lahaina. He has put together photographic evidence of how houses are dust, but trees a mere 12 to 15 feet from the type of intense heat needed to melt even the cast iron wood burning stove are still standing. Not  only does the public clamor to attend his presentations, but he has retired FD people showing up as well to offer the information they have collected.

    • #44
  15. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Yes, of course they will. I suspect that it will be similar to Maui, including who are the largest predatory buyers of property.

    Cash will do the talking.  

    • #45
  16. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    DonG (¡Afuera!) (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    The anti progress elements are entrenched so deeply in CA government that I think they will be incapable of rebuilding absent a wholesale replacement of government from top to bottom

    Something will get built, especially the mansions in the hills, but will there be a rebuild of the mostly small single family homes? I don’t think that will happen under California’s smothering regulatory blanket. When most of those houses were originally built, it was the wild west of building. Now it is the opposite.

    The replacement ratio will probably be 4 units for every pre-disaster home.  

    • #46
  17. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    A possible reaction?

    A conservative is a former liberal who had their house burned to the ground due to idiotic democrat policies.

    Possible. But from past experience, it seems more likely that they’ll decide they weren’t leftist ENOUGH.

    They are often red-pilled for about 2 elections.  

    • #47
  18. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    This is going to be the 21st Century’s counterpart to the San Francisco Earthquake. If Los Angeles is unlucky and the winds keep up and shift the wrong direction a good chunk of the city will burn. Much more than has been burned already.

    Maybe a better comparison is the Chicago fire of 1871.

    Earthquakes will usually kill more people.  They’re sudden, and you spend more time on the aftermath.  And of course, since predicting an earthquake is harder, you’re not warning people to evacuate beforehand.

    Typically, modern disasters in first world countries result in much fewer casualties than an equivalent event in poorer countries, or anywhere 100+ years ago.

    Also casualties from the San Francisco earthquake was estimated at 3,000 and the Chicago fire at 300.

    So far, I’ve heard that there have been 10 casualties from this event in Los Angeles.  It will probably go higher, but probably not that much higher.

    I’m not going to feel too sorry for the rich people that lost their property in this.  In addition to voting for the people who are running this mess, and who probably won’t let them rebuild, they probably contributed campaign funds to them.  They have more influence and should bear some of the moral responsibility for that influence.

    My sympathy is for the middle economic class without insurance through no fault of their own.  Even then, though, if they were listening they would have left California by now.  Enough of their neighbors have.

    • #48
  19. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    The celebrity crowd often has the deep pockets to re-build. But with Studio City gone, and much more of the day-to-day screen time offerings coming about due to Netflix, Amazon Prime, and other new content providers, it is hard to figure out what the movie industry will look like.

    Not much different.  The trade unions that typically work on a movie set have priced themselves out of the market.

    The Hollywood set lives in Hollywood out of habit.  And you still go to Hollywood to pitch a movie and get funding.  But the actual labor of making the movie is done outside of California, and maybe out of the country.

    • #49
  20. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Some of the officials involved say now and here is not the time nor the place to raise issues about environmental actions affecting the water supply or budget actions related to fire prevention. When would it be appropriate to raise these issues.

    After they are reelected.

    No, then it’ll be old news, let it go. Whats wrong with you? Maybe in 10 years, after everyone in office now, has retired – and the scapegoats have been thoroughly discredited will there be a commission which after years of testimony, study and reflection, will issue recommendations, which will be promptly shelved.

    No, I dont think LA will rebuild – at least not for years under current regulatory conditions. They’ll need major reforms just to get things ‘normal-ish’ again…

    This is the death of LA, the uber rich who were burned out don’t have to rebuild – they can relocate. They’ll bulldoze the lot and sell it, and disperse out into the world…Without those uber rich driving the LA retail economy. In reality, these top flight actors that lost their homes can live anywhere in the world, Spain, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Argentina,  Chile… The world has lots of near tropical coastlines for these people to enjoy.

    • #50
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Is there really a good chance that, next time around, they’ll build it better?

    Like, with working fire hydrants and stuff?

    And maybe raise it all up, so it won’t be under water in a few years like they think it will be.

    A challenge to rebuilding it “better” is that “better” is likely to be much more expensive. Much more expensive is usually not a problem for the uber-rich, but for any remaining near-normies is a problem.

    Toward the end of the time I lived in coastal Orange County (1968 – 2000), Laguna Beach mandated that any houses rebuilt after a fire, or houses that without a fire were modified in a way that required a building permit, had to be brought up to new fire-resistance standards. Unquestionably a “better” more fire-resistant house. But also those updates added (in the late 1990s) well over $100,000, and often up to $300,000 in extra cost to a construction project on a typical house.

    As some note, there are trade-offs.  But I would expect that if you’re rebuilding from scratch, the incremental cost of improved fire protection would be less than retrofitting existing homes to the same level.  Also cheaper to rebuild with more fire hydrants than to add them later – along with increased pipeline capacity to supply them, etc.

    • #51
  22. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    I read today that Oregon sent a strike team of fire engines and crews to LA. They were diverted to Sacramento so that they could be inspected for compliance with CA emissions standards.

    They should have headed back for Oregon.

    Can’t say I don’t agree with you.

    Latest I’ve heard is that when they’re ready to head back, they have to be inspected AGAIN, and if they don’t pass they’ll have to STAY until they do.

    Insane.

    • #52
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    A possible reaction?

    A conservative is a former liberal who had their house burned to the ground due to idiotic democrat policies.

    Possible. But from past experience, it seems more likely that they’ll decide they weren’t leftist ENOUGH.

    They are often red-pilled for about 2 elections.

    The way I usually describe that kind of thing, is that people think that once someone like a Trump gets things going smoothly, they think they can just swap in a Newsom or Obama or whatever to feel better about themselves and get more free stuff, assuming that everything else will just continue on without change.

    • #53
  24. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Al Sparks (View Comment):
    ’m not going to feel too sorry for the rich people that lost their property in this.  In addition to voting for the people who are running this mess, and who probably won’t let them rebuild,

    Rich people can buy waivers.

    • #54
  25. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

     

    If it is true that on Jan 1st 2025, big insurers cancelled the fire insurance agreements inside home insurance policies.

     

    It’s not true.

     

     

    Also convenient to those who like to put such matters behind them is how fires incinerate bodies so they are mere piles of ash. The half dozen tow truck drivers hired after the Paradise blaze who went on the record of a local guy’s podcast explained the experiences they had while pulling out the frames of hundreds of cars found burnt up and on the road. Their experiences were extremely depressing. Their reports focused on how in vehicle after vehicle, there were mounds of ash in the driver’s seat and often in the passenger seats or on floorboards. After a few months of exposure, then YouTube pulled all that content.

    So people just stayed in their cars and burned?  They didn’t get out?  And that seems realistic to you?

    A fire hot enough to reduce a human body to “ash” left the seat intact for these piles of ashes to be found on?

    Alternative hypothesis – the “mounds of ash”  were the remnants of the  upholstery of the seats found among the wire frames left over from  where the seats were.

     

     

    • #55
  26. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    kedavis (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    A possible reaction?

    A conservative is a former liberal who had their house burned to the ground due to idiotic democrat policies.

    Possible. But from past experience, it seems more likely that they’ll decide they weren’t leftist ENOUGH.

    They are often red-pilled for about 2 elections.

    The way I usually describe that kind of thing, is that people think that once someone like a Trump gets things going smoothly, they think they can just swap in a Newsom or Obama or whatever to feel better about themselves and get more free stuff, assuming that everything else will just continue on without change.

    Its ok, It’ll all work out for the democrats. They’ve insured they’ll get re-elected with the invasion of illegals willing to vote for them.

    The real problem for the democrats will be fundraising. Fraud can only get you so far – what? Nearly 1/2 of the democrats big donors lost their homes in this fire? Mid terms, Governor’s election could all be sucking a lot of wind in the fundraisers for the next decade.

    • #56
  27. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    I read today that Oregon sent a strike team of fire engines and crews to LA. They were diverted to Sacramento so that they could be inspected for compliance with CA emissions standards

    I’d like to read about that.

    Could you paste the link? Thanks.

    Here is a screenshot. I can’t figure out how to capture the link.

    Here’s the link: https://x.com/LarsLarsonShow/status/1877411906224533676

    • #57
  28. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    I read today that Oregon sent a strike team of fire engines and crews to LA. They were diverted to Sacramento so that they could be inspected for compliance with CA emissions standards

    I’d like to read about that.

    Could you paste the link? Thanks.

    Here is a screenshot. I can’t figure out how to capture the link.

    Here’s the link: https://x.com/LarsLarsonShow/status/1877411906224533676

    I just read the article that Lars Larson links to.  I mentions that Oregon firefighters are going to California to help.  Maybe something is wrong with my eyes tonight.  I read the article three times and cannot see where there is any mention of the firefighters being delayed by inspectors of any sort in California. 

    • #58
  29. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    I read today that Oregon sent a strike team of fire engines and crews to LA. They were diverted to Sacramento so that they could be inspected for compliance with CA emissions standards

    I’d like to read about that.

    Could you paste the link? Thanks.

    Here is a screenshot. I can’t figure out how to capture the link.

    Here’s the link: https://x.com/LarsLarsonShow/status/1877411906224533676

    I just read the article that Lars Larson links to. I mentions that Oregon firefighters are going to California to help. Maybe something is wrong with my eyes tonight. I read the article three times and cannot see where there is any mention of the firefighters being delayed by inspectors of any sort in California.

    The linked article was written Jan 8. The X posting was written Jan 9. The problem did not occur until after the linked article was posted.  

    • #59
  30. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    Seawriter (View Comment):
    The linked article was written Jan 8. The X posting was written Jan 9. The problem did not occur until after the linked article was posted.  

    Well, it’s fair to ask where this information is coming from.  I can believe that California has a Kafkaesque bureaucracy that would require those inspections, and may be even require them to divert to Sacramento for them, but it could also just be a rumor that’s accepted as fact, precisely because it seems plausible.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.