The Writing Coach: Don’t Be Fixin’ to Get Ready

 

Editing one’s own writing can be a journey of self-discovery, especially when one edits a fantasy series of over two million words. In that much writing, one is bound to find evidence of one’s writing and thinking foibles. I found two bits in an earlier round of editing, and now I have found another. My character never does things. Instead, he starts to do things.

I started distributing money . . .

No, no, Jack, distribute the money. Don’t start to do it.

Now, I am a Southron, and fixin’ to get ready to do something is not unusual for me. And since my character is not a Southron, I can’t have him fixin’ to get ready. Instead, he starts to do things. But about a million-and-a-half words in, I decided maybe he ought to do things rather than starting to do things. Thus I am editing out many of these starts or false starts and simplifying down to have my character do what he’s supposed to do.

In the current volume I am editing, which has a bit over 110,000 words, I have some version of the word “start” 219 times. I bet I don’t need more than ten of them. The rest are all fixin’ to get ready. And I’m fixin’ to get ready to purge them.

The others started bringing their contributions in and setting them on the table.

Or maybe the others brought their contributions in and set them on the table. That’s one more writing habit to be paranoid about for me. No more fixin’ to get ready or its non-Southron equivalents.

How about you? Have any foibles to add to my writing paranoia list? Notice any of your own bad habits? Have other tales of writing discovery or insights into the human condition?

Published in Work and Hobbies
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 82 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Brady | @HerrForce1 (View Comment):

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Rod Serling used to dictate Twilight Zone scripts into a tape recorder, a relatively new aid to writers at the time, and his secretary would type the dictation into a screenplay format for editing. It’s efficient. But it had the side effect that all of the characters, male and female alike, sounded like Rod Serling arguing with himself.

    Now that’s a good point I hadn’t thought of: the issue of sounding too much like oneself in dialogue.

    I’m prepared to sound more simple-minded than I am.

    Stop laughing.

    • #61
  2. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    I mean, sometimes I think I have a tendency to dilute the impact of my sentences by adding superfluous subjective qualifiers like “I mean”, “I think”, or ” I have a tendency to”.

    I do it to weasel in case it turns out to be wrong.

    Weaseling out of things is what separates man from the animals. Except the weasel. Despite that noble goal, in most sentences “I think” can be assumed.

    Plus we’re not afraid of vacuum cleaners.

    • #62
  3. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Percival (View Comment):
    Stop laughing.

    No.

    • #63
  4. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):
    I also find the more I have an adult beverage while writing, the more pornographic my love scenes become.

    I don’t even drink. Maybe that’s why most of my love scenes are merely implied.

    I pare mine down so they’re mostly suggestive, not graphically explicit . . .

    • #64
  5. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    My mother in law used to say “we’re ready this time” meaning another civil war……the South shall rise again!

    Do you mean the War of Northern Aggression?

    The War Between the States . . .

    • #65
  6. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    “Sally was Southern,  supine and stoned.”

    -1 for missing the Oxford comma . . .

    • #66
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Percival (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    We call that sloth, ya sweet-ice-tea-drinkin’, Oh-Susanna-singin’, layabouts.

    There goes that Northern aggression again.

    Sweet ice tea is an abomination.

    I don’t like sweet tea.  I always get unsweetened when available . . .

    • #67
  8. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    I mean, sometimes I think I have a tendency to dilute the impact of my sentences by adding superfluous subjective qualifiers like “I mean”, “I think”, or ” I have a tendency to”.

    I do it to weasel in case it turns out to be wrong.

    Weaseling out of things is what separates man from the animals. Except the weasel. Despite that noble goal, in most sentences “I think” can be assumed.

    Plus we’re not afraid of vacuum cleaners.

    Ah, the perfect Christmas gift (when accompanied by jewelry) . . .

    • #68
  9. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Stad (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    My mother in law used to say “we’re ready this time” meaning another civil war……the South shall rise again!

    Do you mean the War of Northern Aggression?

    The War Between the States . . .

    Sure, if you want to be neutral about it.

    • #69
  10. Caryn Thatcher
    Caryn
    @Caryn

    Stad (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    “Sally was Southern, supine and stoned.”

    -1 for missing the Oxford comma . . .

    Note that our Gary inserted one in his reply.  Good man, Gary McV.

    • #70
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Brady | @HerrForce1 (View Comment):

    Arahant: How about you? Have any foibles to add to my writing paranoia list? Notice any of your own bad habits? Have other tales of writing discovery or insights into the human condition?

    Run-ons and passive voice lurk about. We do need the passive voice in the right places. But writers use it far too much. My USAF historian training, if nothing else, taught me to hunt passive verbs with ruthless efficiency. “We’re looking for active, past, people!”

     

    Be careful with that ruthless efficiency, unless you’re expecting the Spanish Inquisition.

    • #71
  12. thelonious Member
    thelonious
    @thelonious

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    We call that sloth, ya sweet-ice-tea-drinkin’, Oh-Susanna-singin’, layabouts.

    And Stephen Foster was from Pennsylvania.

    Cincinnati was the furthest south he traveled. He never went south of the Mason-Dixon line. What a poser!

    • #72
  13. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Brady | @ HerrForce1 (View Comment):

    Arahant: How about you? Have any foibles to add to my writing paranoia list? Notice any of your own bad habits? Have other tales of writing discovery or insights into the human condition?

    Run-ons and passive voice lurk about. We do need the passive voice in the right places. But writers use it far too much. My USAF historian training, if nothing else, taught me to hunt passive verbs with ruthless efficiency. “We’re looking for active, past, people!”

     

    Be careful with that ruthless efficiency, unless you’re expecting the Spanish Inquisition.

    No one ever expects, you know, the thing.

    • #73
  14. Brady | @HerrForce1 Coolidge
    Brady | @HerrForce1
    @HerrForce1

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Brady | @ HerrForce1 (View Comment):

    Arahant: How about you? Have any foibles to add to my writing paranoia list? Notice any of your own bad habits? Have other tales of writing discovery or insights into the human condition?

    Run-ons and passive voice lurk about. We do need the passive voice in the right places. But writers use it far too much. My USAF historian training, if nothing else, taught me to hunt passive verbs with ruthless efficiency. “We’re looking for active, past, people!”

     

    Be careful with that ruthless efficiency, unless you’re expecting the Spanish Inquisition.

    I never seem to expect them. 

    • #74
  15. Brickhouse Hank Contributor
    Brickhouse Hank
    @HankRhody

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    […]

    Weaseling out of things is what separates man from the animals. Except the weasel. Despite that noble goal, in most sentences “I think” can be assumed.

    Plus we’re not afraid of vacuum cleaners.

    Two points. One, I suppose I should provide proper attribution, that’s a Home Simpson line. Two, speak for yourself.

    • #75
  16. Brickhouse Hank Contributor
    Brickhouse Hank
    @HankRhody

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Brady | @ HerrForce1 (View Comment):
    Now that’s a good point I hadn’t thought of: the issue of sounding too much like oneself in dialogue.

    Very important. Some of my characters have what might almost be described as verbal tics. One mispronounces words if they are more than about three syllables. Some will never use certain common words. For instance, one will use certain or certainly and never use sure or surely.

    The other half is to picture the character. How would this person talk? Maybe the character is modeled on a friend, acquaintance, or former teacher. Maybe he is taciturn, charming, loquacious? Choose it and keep with it.

    The ideal with this sort of thing is that your dialogue should let the readers know who’s talking without telling you the names. The Wooster & Jeeves stories are particularly good about this.

    “Dash it all, one has to wonder what’s the point of it. I mean, all this bally… bally… balliness of it.”

    “The council entrusted us with the commission —” 

    “Yes, yes, I know. Bung the ring into the volcano and then it’s congratulations and cocktails all around. Still, with the smoke, the ash, and the weight of the blasted circle, it all gets to be a bit much.”

    “If I might take a liberty sir, whilst I cannot bear the burden may I be permitted to carry you?”

    • #76
  17. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    The ideal with this sort of thing is that your dialogue should let the readers know who’s talking without telling you the names. The Wooster & Jeeves stories are particularly good about this.

    “Dash it all, one has to wonder what’s the point of it. I mean, all this bally… bally… balliness of it.”

    “The council entrusted us with the commission —” 

    “Yes, yes, I know. Bung the ring into the volcano and then it’s congratulations and cocktails all around. Still, with the smoke, the ash, and the weight of the blasted circle, it all gets to be a bit much.”

    “If I might take a liberty sir, whilst I cannot bear the burden may I be permitted to carry you?”

    Jeeves and Wooster as Samwise and Frodo? Love it!

    • #77
  18. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    […]

    Weaseling out of things is what separates man from the animals. Except the weasel. Despite that noble goal, in most sentences “I think” can be assumed.

    Plus we’re not afraid of vacuum cleaners.

    Two points. One, I suppose I should provide proper attribution, that’s a Home Simpson line. Two, speak for yourself.

    I kn ew it was a Homer Simpson line.

     

    The “We’re not afraid of vacuum cleaners” is also stolen from a  standup comic., but I have no memory of which one.  

    I think it’s the same guy from whom I stole  “I saw one of those bumperstickers that says ‘One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day’.  C’mon – your WHOLE day?”

    • #78
  19. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment):

    The ideal with this sort of thing is that your dialogue should let the readers know who’s talking without telling you the names. The Wooster & Jeeves stories are particularly good about this.

    “Dash it all, one has to wonder what’s the point of it. I mean, all this bally… bally… balliness of it.”

    “The council entrusted us with the commission —”

    “Yes, yes, I know. Bung the ring into the volcano and then it’s congratulations and cocktails all around. Still, with the smoke, the ash, and the weight of the blasted circle, it all gets to be a bit much.”

    “If I might take a liberty sir, whilst I cannot bear the burden may I be permitted to carry you?”

    Jeeves and Wooster as Samwise and Frodo? Love it!

    Sometimes you can subtly shift reader expectations. I’ll invent a new Rhody custom at big family meals, like Thanksgiving. The oldest one speaks first. That way, the order of speaking, as well as the general intonation, ought to spell out who’s who: 

    “Boys, we have always been against excess. But a good friend of mine once said that fine beer is not a sin, but a Lutheran beverage. In moderation, of course.”

    “Then let us truly follow in the path of Wittenburg…”

    “There are stars in heaven whose names we will never know. However, there are European actresses who have inspired the stars…mostly the male ones, to do crazy stuff…”

    “Fusion at the corporal level is only the mirror-image descendant of balance within the nucleus…”

    “So, who’s up for a beer?”

    “I am!”  “I am!”  “I am!”

    Author’s note: I am including Caleb as second only to Dan himself, because Caleb was briefly a Ricochet member. 

    • #79
  20. Eb Snider Member
    Eb Snider
    @EbSnider

    I think of too many things simultaneously and then find out I’ve inserted different things into the same sentence. The result is something that makes no sense or loses the reader. I have to edit all the time and make typos. But I’m an amateur anyway.

    • #80
  21. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Caryn (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    “Sally was Southern, supine and stoned.”

    -1 for missing the Oxford comma . . .

    Note that our Gary inserted one in his reply. Good man, Gary McV.

    Definitely . . .

    • #81
  22. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Steve Fast (View Comment):
    Never denigrate the verb “fixin’ to.”

    I’m not denigrating it. Simply suggesting that I overuse it and its equivalents. And why would I do that? Because I’m a Southron. As a writer, one attempts to avoid bad habits. I’m fixin’ to get ready to do that.

    It’s an incredibly valuable word and can’t be replaced by any other word or phrase. It describes the action taking place between the moment when the intention to do something arises and the moment when the doing begins. I don’t know how Northerners or Left-Coasters can talk without it.

    “I’m planning to do X.”

    “I intend to do Y.”

    Just the observation of a Northern Left-Coaster…

    • #82
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.