Trump’s Victory in Two Graphs

 

I’ve done some analysis on the exit polls, comparing the results of Trump/Harris 2024 with Trump/Biden 2020.  I’ve come up with two graphs that you may find interesting. 

Both graphs show Trump’s increased or decreased margin of victory for various groups, with a positive number indicating that Trump did better among that group, and a negative number indicating that he did worse.  As an example, Trump’s margin of victory changed by -5% (i.e. it decreased) among white voters, who he won by a margin of 12% in 2024 (55%-43%) and won by a margin of 17% in 2020 (58%-41%)

The main graph is an attempt to show three groupings on a single graph — race, religion, and sex:

As you can see, Trump lost ground among white voters slightly, was essentially even among black voters (1% improvement), but did far better among Latinos, improving his margin by 25%. 

By religion, Trump’s big gain was among Catholics, improving his margin by 20%.  He also did better among religious “others,” but this is a much smaller group than Catholics.  Catholics are 22% of the electorate, “others” are 10%.

Trump improved marginally among both men and women, but I don’t find the difference between these to be notable.

The polls are from CNN, for 2024 and 2020, respectively.  The polls don’t give crosstabs between Catholics and Latinos.  I expect that Latinos are a substantial part of the overall Catholic vote, but I don’t know how much.

Focusing on these two groups with significant change:

  • Trump did not win Latinos, but improved from a 33% deficit in 2020 (32%-65%) to a mere 8% deficit in 2024 (45%-53%).
  • Trump flipped Catholics, winning by a 15% margin in 2024 (56%-41%) after losing by a 5%  margin in 2020 (47%-52%).

One fairly simple interpretation of these results is that Catholics were more inclined to vote for one of their own, Joe Biden, in 2020.  (This isn’t meant as a criticism, by the way.)

The second graph is sex-by-race, which shows the male-female aspect of Trump’s major improvement among Latinos:

Trump’s margin among Latino men improved by a whopping 33%.  After losing Latino men 36%-59% in 2020, he actually won this group in 2024, 54%-44%.  His improvement among Latino women is also notable, though overshadowed by the huge swing among the men.

There are other ways to parse the electorate, so I don’t want to imply that the Latino and Catholic swings are the only factors of importance.  I do find them notable.

Published in Election 2024
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 49 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot) Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot)
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Freeven (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    The most important issue to women is killing their babies, and this is particularly true of young women.

    This means that they are a remarkably evil group of people, on the whole.

    You and I probably have a different idea of what it means to say a person is “evil.” I think intent matters, and I also think that a great many of these young women who vote with abortion as an important issue aren’t intentionally defending the killing of babies. Rather, they are intending to defend the right to terminate a pregnancy in its early stages — in the first few weeks, before the word “baby” seems like the appropriate term for the developing fetus.

    I think a simple majority of Americans probably think that way, and, speaking only for myself, that doesn’t meet my own definition of “evil.”

    I don’t disagree, but I’m curious about how you would map this thinking onto slavery in the US. Evil? Would your answer change if the slave owner believed blacks were not sub-human?

    I find slavery to be a trivial issue, compared with abortion.  Our country is slaughtering over 1 million babies per year.

    I’ve come to the view that slavery is simply not a big deal, and is not morally wrong.  Biblical teaching is quite clear about this.  From the historical accounts that I’ve read, many slaves in early America were treated quite well.  I’ve seen a report that their life expectancy plunged when slavery was abolished.  I don’t advocate bringing slavery back, but I don’t find it to be a particularly important issue.

    On the other hand, a mother killing her baby is just about the worst thing imaginable, to me.  Not to excuse other murderers, but it is most awful when it’s the victim’s mother, I think.

    This happens in our country over 1 million times a year, according to the latest statistics that I’ve seen.  Babies.

    Do you actually think that slavery is worse than killing a baby?  That would be a strange view, to me.

    Until recently, I could view this horrible situation as having been imposed on us by a small cabal of Supreme Court justices.  No longer.  Now, the opinion of the bulk of my fellow citizens is clear, and I find it terrible.

    I might say, “Lord have mercy.”  But I’ve actually stopped praying for mercy for our country, for the most part.  I’m not praying specifically for judgment and wrath.  I’m praying for His will to be done.

    Heaven knows that we deserve judgment and wrath.

    • #31
  2. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    It is a testimony to the echoing nullity of Harris that we tend to look at the result as something Trump did, rather than something the Democrats did. While I supported Trump and am delighted with the electoral outcome, I think it’s probably true that the Democrats, that the progressive movement, has simply pushed normal Americans too far in too many ways, and it would have required a far smoother and better liar than Harris — someone on the caliber of a Clinton or Obama — to pull the wool over the voters’ eyes one more time.

    Trump is a tireless campaigner and his patter appeals to a lot of people, even while many of us find it frustrating. I don’t want to minimize his skills. But the woke left is perversely radical, and Harris is a dimwitted woman utterly devoid of charisma and completely unable to deceive the electorate into believing that she is not a creature of that woke left.

    I think America is finally unwilling to be further bullied by elitist clowns.

    Mayor Pete is one of the “smoother and better liars”  

    • #32
  3. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot) Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot)
    @ArizonaPatriot

    This has been an interesting thread so far, but we’ve wandered well off the points made in the OP to discussion of abortion and slavery.  If possible, I’d like to get back to an issue from the OP that we haven’t discussed.

    What are your thoughts about the extremely large margin improvement for Trump among male Latino voters?  It was a 33% swing, from Trump losing this group by 23% in 2020 to winning by 10% in 2024.

    Latino women moved in Trump’s direction too, but by much less than the men.

    One possibility that occurs to me is machismo.  Perhaps male Latino voters remain sufficiently traditional that they just don’t like voting for women.  Personally, I wouldn’t object to this, any more than I object to a Catholic preferring to vote for another Catholic.

    • #33
  4. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    It is a testimony to the echoing nullity of Harris that we tend to look at the result as something Trump did, rather than something the Democrats did. While I supported Trump and am delighted with the electoral outcome, I think it’s probably true that the Democrats, that the progressive movement, has simply pushed normal Americans too far in too many ways, and it would have required a far smoother and better liar than Harris — someone on the caliber of a Clinton or Obama — to pull the wool over the voters’ eyes one more time.

    Trump is a tireless campaigner and his patter appeals to a lot of people, even while many of us find it frustrating. I don’t want to minimize his skills. But the woke left is perversely radical, and Harris is a dimwitted woman utterly devoid of charisma and completely unable to deceive the electorate into believing that she is not a creature of that woke left.

    I think America is finally unwilling to be further bullied by elitist clowns.

    You mean Bill Clinton, right?

    LOL! Bill was a better liar. Hillary was just a liar.

    “What difference, at this point, does it make?” 

    • #34
  5. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    The progressive wing that controls the Dem party keeps accumulating more and more enemies – evangelicals, Catholics, practicing Jews, black men, Latinos, married women, legal immigrants, and on and on. And the Karens that make up the progressive wing are not reproducing, so this can’t end well for them.

    It doesn’t seem to have been a big problem for them so far, since they have access to turn other peoples’ children into Karens.

    Via the takeover of the public (and elite private) schools. 

    • #35
  6. 9thDistrictNeighbor Member
    9thDistrictNeighbor
    @9thDistrictNeighbor

    To say that women want to “kill their babies” is rather harsh.  Young women, especially, have no idea what abortion actually is.  It is sold to them as a pro-woman issue.  They have no idea what a surgical abortion involves. 

    Accurate abortion statistics are hard to come by, but the abortion pill has taken the lead over surgical abortions.  As with the lack of knowledge about surgical abortion, women have been told that the abortion pill will just be like a bad period and not that it comes with very serious side effects, like death from sepsis.  Like Vietnam, we are in hearts and minds territory. 

    • #36
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    The idea of fathers being supportive of their daughters having abortions, is very strange too.  A couple weeks ago, Greg Gutfeld referred to them as needing to start a group, “Fathers Against Grandchildren,” although “the acronym would be unfortunate.”

    • #37
  8. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot) Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot)
    @ArizonaPatriot

    9thDistrictNeighbor (View Comment):

    To say that women want to “kill their babies” is rather harsh. Young women, especially, have no idea what abortion actually is. It is sold to them as a pro-woman issue. They have no idea what a surgical abortion involves.

    Accurate abortion statistics are hard to come by, but the abortion pill has taken the lead over surgical abortions. As with the lack of knowledge about surgical abortion, women have been told that the abortion pill will just be like a bad period and not that it comes with very serious side effects, like death from sepsis. Like Vietnam, we are in hearts and minds territory.

    I disagree with this.  I think that women know exactly what abortion is.

    But hey, maybe women really are as ignorant as you claim.  If so, this is worse for one’s general opinion of the fairer sex, isn’t it?

    My recommendation is to stop making excuses for murderers.

    • #38
  9. Terence Smith Coolidge
    Terence Smith
    @TerrySmith

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Freeven (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    The most important issue to women is killing their babies, and this is particularly true of young women.

    This means that they are a remarkably evil group of people, on the whole.

    You and I probably have a different idea of what it means to say a person is “evil.” I think intent matters, and I also think that a great many of these young women who vote with abortion as an important issue aren’t intentionally defending the killing of babies. Rather, they are intending to defend the right to terminate a pregnancy in its early stages — in the first few weeks, before the word “baby” seems like the appropriate term for the developing fetus.

    I think a simple majority of Americans probably think that way, and, speaking only for myself, that doesn’t meet my own definition of “evil.”

    I don’t disagree, but I’m curious about how you would map this thinking onto slavery in the US. Evil? Would your answer change if the slave owner believed blacks were not sub-human?

    The parallel question as regards slavery, and my response to it, would be this:

    Were slave owners necessarily “evil” people?

    I would answer in the negative. I can easily imagine that there were people who were brought up believing, taking for granted, that the ownership of slaves was natural and appropriate, something justified by the respective natures of the slave owner and the slave. I wouldn’t consider such people to be evil simply by virtue (if I may use that word) of their views regarding the ownership of slaves. Of course, they may earn the title for other reasons, for cruelty, treachery, etc.

    Certainly an argument could be made that the concept of slavery is itself evil. I’d argue that, even if one made that assertion, one might still argue that those unaware of the evilness of slavery weren’t necessarily evil people for practicing it.

    Yes couldn’t agree more. While the moral law may be written on our hearts most of us need a good deal of explanation and  persuasion to recognize it.  We also need a good deal or support to abide by it when it goes against our immediate interest. Those young women are not any more evil than the rest of us.  They are stuck in a culture with some really bad ideas.

    Hey, when I think of evil people in this country,  I tend to think of the sociopaths  that infest our political class. I suppose to our credit we haven’t yet elevated a Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, or Pol Pot.

    • #39
  10. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot) Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patriot)
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    The progressive wing that controls the Dem party keeps accumulating more and more enemies – evangelicals, Catholics, practicing Jews, black men, Latinos, married women, legal immigrants, and on and on. And the Karens that make up the progressive wing are not reproducing, so this can’t end well for them.

    Jews and black men are among the strongest constituencies for the Democrats, Steve.

    This is shown in the exit poll data linked in the OP.  Black men favored Harris by 58%, 78%-20%.  Jews favored Harris by the exact same margin, 58%, 79%-21%.  The only group that was more supportive of Harris was black women, by 85%, 92%-7%.

    Jews, in particular, are the very worst group in terms of supporting abortion, at least according to the Pew Research poll that I recall (here).  Jews supported abortion by 68%, 83%-15%.

    This is a trend that I see among people who consider themselves conservative.  They think that Jews and black men are on their side.  It is delusional.

    • #40
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    The progressive wing that controls the Dem party keeps accumulating more and more enemies – evangelicals, Catholics, practicing Jews, black men, Latinos, married women, legal immigrants, and on and on. And the Karens that make up the progressive wing are not reproducing, so this can’t end well for them.

    Jews and black men are among the strongest constituencies for the Democrats, Steve.

    This is shown in the exit poll data linked in the OP. Black men favored Harris by 58%, 78%-20%. Jews favored Harris by the exact same margin, 58%, 79%-21%. The only group that was more supportive of Harris was black women, by 85%, 92%-7%.

    Jews, in particular, are the very worst group in terms of supporting abortion, at least according to the Pew Research poll that I recall (here). Jews supported abortion by 68%, 83%-15%.

    This is a trend that I see among people who consider themselves conservative. They think that Jews and black men are on their side. It is delusional.

    But it does bear out the historical idea that if the Democrats don’t get at least 90+% of the black vote – men AND women – they lose.

    • #41
  12. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    This is a trend that I see among people who consider themselves conservative.  They think that Jews and black men are on their side.  It is delusional.

    I don’t think many conservatives “think that Jews and black men are on their side” politically, Jerry. I do think that many of us believe that Jewish Americans and black Americans are constituencies that we can try to win over, and should try to win over. They represent a fertile mission field, if you will, for conservative/Republican recruiting.

    • #42
  13. Eb Snider Member
    Eb Snider
    @EbSnider

    Thanks for putting together this data. It is helpful

    • #43
  14. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    For anyone who is looking into the important data involving the numbers of people who cast ballots in Nov 2020 and the people who cast ballots in 2024, this is a most salient consideration:

    Candace Owens posted a graph in her recent show  on how the number of ballots cast on 2016, vs number of ballots cast on Nov 2020, vs the number of ballots cast on Nov 2024.

    Her chart “This is an amazing chart,” begins at the 9:38 mark.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqfcCXHuiyg&t=3134s

    Over on “X” people are discussing this fact, that all the legions of fact checkers somehow missed the massive increase of ballot numbers across the 2 elections from 2016 vs 2020. Yet every single time someone mentioned that there was something “off” about the 2020 election, then  they were slammed for their stupidity. And now there is this suspicious drop in ballots cast on Nov 5th 2024.

    A typical “X” comment on the missing ballots from Tuesday’s count:Steve on “X”, user ID:  @lonelyrang

    *********************** REWARD ***********************

    20 million voters from the 2020 election are missing and presumed dead. Any information leading to the whereabouts of these missing voters will be helpful in proving fraud in the 2020 election. Thank you.

      417 Views

    #####

    • #44
  15. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Your excellent work is admirable, Jerry. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

    But can I add that from discussions that  I have noticed, white women voted for Trump at a 52% percentage? I have heard so often how the problem in this country is the women, when in my own circles on social media accounts I have had friends whose husbands divorced them for supporting Trump.

    • #45
  16. Steve Fast Member
    Steve Fast
    @SteveFast

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    This is a trend that I see among people who consider themselves conservative. They think that Jews and black men are on their side. It is delusional.

    I don’t think many conservatives “think that Jews and black men are on their side” politically, Jerry. I do think that many of us believe that Jewish Americans and black Americans are constituencies that we can try to win over, and should try to win over. They represent a fertile mission field, if you will, for conservative/Republican recruiting.

    And these are constituencies that Trump has started to win over. His percentages went up in each group. Voting shifts don’t happen instantly.

    • #46
  17. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    It is possible that the figure for the Jewish vote refers principally to religious Jews.  “Jewish” is not a racial or ethnic category in the exit polls, but is a religious category.  It’s possible that a secular Jew might choose “Other” or “None” as a religious category.

    https://x.com/nachamasol/status/1854560592767705170

    More Jewish vote data. Here are two heavily Orthodox Jewish districts in Teaneck, NJ. Voted overwhelmingly for Trump. Note: these are also highly educated neighborhoods.

     

    Image

    • #47
  18. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Fox News’ Exit Poll shows that Donald Trump has received a record 43% of the Jewish vote in New York, the highest share for a Republican presidential candidate in decades.

    https://x.com/search?q=jewish%20votes%20for%20trump&src=typed_query

     

    Image

    • #48
  19. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    This is a trend that I see among people who consider themselves conservative. They think that Jews and black men are on their side. It is delusional.

    I don’t think many conservatives “think that Jews and black men are on their side” politically, Jerry. I do think that many of us believe that Jewish Americans and black Americans are constituencies that we can try to win over, and should try to win over. They represent a fertile mission field, if you will, for conservative/Republican recruiting.

    And these are constituencies that Trump has started to win over. His percentages went up in each group. Voting shifts don’t happen instantly.

    Or completely 

    • #49
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.