9/11: We are Still Losing

 

We lost the war to transform Afghanistan and the Arab world.  Our leadership class still refuses to accept the truth that the Islamist ideologues continue to make material and ideological war upon us and our allies. We cannot bear to fully accept that Iran is making war in Yemen, Lebanon, Gaza, Ukraine, and Syria with plans to attack other targets–including us.

We are not permitted to notice, much less discuss, the fundamental problems of trying to integrate Muslim populations into secular Western culture.

The sheer idiocy of George Bush’s use of “the Religion of Peace” rather than a demand for Islam to renounce doctrines of jihad, to John Kerry’s capitulation diplomacy on behalf of Obama’s sophomoric policy vision, to Joe Biden’s sudden weird, disastrous surrender in Afghanistan… We have never had a clear-headed response to the reality and the challenge of Islam.

There is no “moderate” Islam.  There is no “reformation” in the works. By its very nature, its traditions, and ideology, borne of the core documents expounding on the “Perfect Example,” will in every age drag adherents back into an orthodoxy wholly and increasingly unsuited to a world constructed under Western influence.  The model secular state built by Atatürk has given way to the Islamic nationalism of Erdogan. The Middle East is a disaster because Islam there has only produced peace when under the rule of a militarily strong empire—the set of faux Western constitutional democracies and other imitation Western models (the fascism of the Bathists, the socialist dictatorship of Gaddafi). They were literally founded on sand, and produced chaos that fostered yearning for the security, procrustean certainties (and the tyranny) of Shariah.

The still unlearned lesson of 9/11 is that there still is a war that we do not even fully admit is underway.  Islam remains surprised and pleased that we have not pressed its inherent internal weaknesses nor struck back proportionately and consistently to its excesses even as we accept many of its worst to live among us without question or challenge.

Happy 9/11!

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 62 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Susan Quinn Member
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    If the GOPs knew how to play the game, his name never would have been spoken again without being called the Liar, Harry Reid.

    But if we gave that title to everyone who’d earned it, every Dem would have that introduction.

    • #61
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jim McConnell (View Comment):
    I think of the friendship between President Reagan and Tip O’Neil as a time of happy and respectful bi-partisanship.

    I think there’s an aspect of “bipartisanship” inherent in the idea that, even if agreement can’t be reached, it’s still possible to negotiate without perceiving or portraying the opposition as monstrous and evil.

    What I think we are losing is the idea that there can be multiple legitimate perspectives on many contentious issues, legitimate in the sense that generally decent fellow Americans might hold them without marking themselves as people no longer worthy of respect or consideration.

    That only works if the parties offer ideas and viewpoints within a recognizable spectrum other than “the other guy is a hate-filled Nazi.” Harry Reed, Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden do not acknowledge that the other side can have a position crafted in good faith. Scaring blacks and convincing women they will be forced to get pregnant, saving the planet, etc are all extremist, fear-based positions which make it tough to then turn around and say the other side is a decent bunch of guys we can work with.

    They do that demonization because it works with 20% to 30% of their base who, to say it politely, are on the left-hand side of the bell curve and vote on emotion. As you say, it’s hard to turn around and say “hey, it was an election campaign” as Heels-Up once did.

    Or “it worked, didn’t it?” like Harry Reid.

    If the GOPs knew how to play the game, his name never would have been spoken again without being called the Liar, Harry Reid.

    It’s not a small group, what with Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell and so many others.

    • #62
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.