Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 40 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The Bastiat Error
Our esteemed colleague and inestimable commentator Dr. Bastiat recently opined eloquently about what seemed to him to be surprising distinctions on the left, such that claims or appearances of socialist ideology are in conflict with actual behavior.
Conservatives are defined by a fairly consistent shared ideological disposition regarding the relationship between government and the governed. We try to see the left in terms of a coherent ideology. There isn’t one. The error is to miss the fact that the left is simply a collection of cultivated resentments against existing realities, for which it is politically useful to offer glorious but entirely fictitious alternatives, always subject to change. Technically, socialism has never failed because the habits of resentment that justified some rendition of the typically bogus solutions done in its name are never assuaged. “Socialism” is the amoeboid consequence of resentment. Its only consistent feature is the creation of a central power capable of destroying hateful reality, including human nature itself.
Here are examples of what “socialism” really means:
1) Adam did better in school than Bobby and went on to get a PhD in Diversity Studies and then got tenure at a third-tier college. He has tried to be politically active but has never had any meaningful connections. Bobby was not dumb, just not interested in academics. He apprenticed as a plumber after high school, later started his own service company, and then founded a plumbing supply wholesaler that now serves the entire tri-state area. The Governor asked Bobby to serve on an advisory panel on business and employment growth.
Socialism is about Bobby NEVER having more wealth and status than Adam.
2) Bethany was raised by a single mom. Her marriage to Doug lasted two years because even though he had a good income as a broker, he never stopped being a selfish frat boy. Both Doug and her estranged Dad liked to talk about how tough it was to make it in the “real world.” When she hears Republican politicians talk about how wonderful markets and competition are, all she hears are the untrustworthy men in her life. She wants security, guarantees, no harsh competition, and an authority of some kind to rein in all rogue male behavior.
Socialism is about listening to Bethany and promising to mandate a world consistent with her sensibilities, or at least craft rhetoric consistent with those sensibilities.
3) Julian was fired from his after-school job for telling off the manager. He attended college classes but never graduated. There he learned that the system was rigged by the powerful and that America was really a conspiracy by the powerful against the poor and minorities. To boot, it is also destroying the planet. At age 29, his work history and educational background were closing off more and more opportunities as time passed. He got some part-time work and some funding as a “community organizer” with an activist group. He realized he was never going to get rich, so why not act to pull down those who are rich because they sure as hell did not earn or deserve it? He is active in Antifa.
Socialism provides the mirage of a positive, just goal accruing from Julian’s purely destructive inclinations.
4) Susan is a vegan. She has crystals, dream-catchers, and icons of various Eastern religions in her room. She has tried yoga, tantric sex (with an incompetent partner), various meditation and natural healing strategies, and uses a wide variety of herbal and mushroom supplements. For Susan, the consumer economy is the rape of the spiritual health of our planet and fossil fuels are the ultimate injury—violently dragged out of the ground to kill on the surface.
Socialism for Susan is about curtailing all industrial activity and making the health of the ecosystem our main, if not our only, priority.
5) Steve is a Washington DC attorney. He has built a firm that has both the lobbying skills to direct federal spending to his clients and then handle the complex nuts and bolts of federal contracting. The more Washington gets involved in daily life, the more it spends to solve problems it may have actually created, the more money Steve makes.
Socialism for Steve is cha-ching, baby!
This list is by no means exhaustive. If you are frustrated by certain business practices or costly behaviors that are amenable to a legislative or common law solution you may be a conservative. However, if you think that the entire industry in question should be subjected to nuisance lawsuits, eliminated by fiat, subject to collective authority or nationalized you are a “socialist.” If you regard normal sexuality as oppressive, you are a “socialist.” The common factor is a resentment or disordered desire to replace reality by means of unchecked political power rather than use the system to improve or achieve better trade-offs.
Published in Economy
So, I think we agree. Right?
These are people who are dissatisfied with their lives, blame “the system”, become jealous and resentful, and then find themselves fellow travelers with other anti-American forces, like professed socialists. Even if they don’t understand what socialism really is – they’re just disaffected radicals.
Most of your examples fit that description.
I think. Right?
Great post!
The title could use some work, though, IMHO…
I think we should create a fund that would cover the transportation costs for them to relocate to the socialist paradise of their choosing. I am old enough to recall the discontent of the 1960’s, and in my reflection the conservatives then had the axiom of “America, Love it or Leave it”. At the time I thought that was a bit harsh, however I think if it had been practiced many of the current social discontents (I’m looking at you Academia) could have been exported, and thus greatly reducing the current acrimony. Certainly they would not have had the ability to proselytize two generations of mushy brained youth that capitalism is the root of all evil.
So my question is, is it too late to given some of these folks their dream ticket the regime of their desires?
We were calling it “extraordinary rendition” when we were grabbing them and bringing them back here. What should we call it when we grab them and drop them off where they belong?
A good beginning?
I think that’s right.
There have always been a certain number of “celebrities” who promised hat if so-and-so were elected, they would move to ______. But we never seem to lose them. I wonder why.
Higher taxes in most other countries could be a biggie.
Lenin, Hitler, and Castro would fit into that concept.
I wonder what France would be like today if Napoleon had not risen to power to crush the Jacobin nutballs. Haiti long needed that kind of leader because the hate, violence, and resentment have never ended there. It is fitting that one of the (now wealthy) founders of BLM claims to be a voodoo priestess, the traditional Haitian religion of vengeance.
The downside of the American Dream (that any kid can grow up to be an astronaut of POTUS) is that we are all technically guilty of not achieving more than we have done and so the desire to find some external culprit for personal failure is intensified, ideally nominal villains who are more talented, harder-working, wealthier and better-looking.
The irony is that a formal class system offers an excuse for being in a low-status position but when it is removed, we kinda want it back to have someone to blame. At the same time, the “elite” is trying to perpetuate itself as a class using credentials from elite schools while pretending to be the voice of egalitarian ambitions having taken over what was once the political party of working people and the non-elite. Very unsettled, unstable times.
I’ve wondered the same thing. How long could that have continued? Surely not long. But who knows…