Questions for Kamala

 

If any journalist ever gets the opportunity to ask questions of our current Vice President and Democratic Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris, I offer the following suggestions:

  1. Since you and your party strongly favor easy access to abortion as a fundamental healthcare right, have you ever had an abortion?
  2. If so, would you say that you credit your professional success to your ability to have an abortion?
  3. If you were so fortunate not to find yourself in need of an abortion as an unmarried career woman—until you married at age 49—would you please share your secret to avoiding an unwanted pregnancy with American voters, particularly younger women (or “people with child-bearing capacity,” if we want to be inclusive)?
  4. If you are offended by these questions, why should a prominent female politician be uncomfortable when asked how a significant policy preference (easy abortion access) has influenced her own life?
  5. Is it because the actual act of abortion is inherently gruesome and disreputable when it’s personalized, and not merely an abstract idea euphemistically described as “reproductive rights”?

Given the popularity of free abortions and vasectomies at the Democratic National Convention, these questions should be right at the top of voters’ and journalists’ minds. Or maybe it’s just me. Either way, some people are wondering whether abortion has been an integral part of Kamala Harris’ story of political success.

Feel free to add your own questions for Kamala in the comments.

Published in Abortion
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 22 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Steve Fast Member
    Steve Fast
    @SteveFast

    Lilly B: If you were so fortunate not to find yourself in need of an abortion as an unmarried career woman, until you married at age 49, would you please share your secret to avoiding an unwanted pregnancy with American voters, particularly younger women (or people with child-bearing capacity, if we want to be inclusive)?

    I fear the answer to this one would violate the Code of Conduct.

    • #1
  2. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    I’d pay to have someone ask those questions.  Anyone f0r passing the hat to bribe someone to do so? Or maybe we start a Go Fund Me.

    • #2
  3. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Lilly B:

    • Since you and your party strongly favor easy access to abortion as a fundamental healthcare right, have you ever had an abortion? 
    • If so, would you say that you credit your professional success to your ability to have an abortion?
    •  

    If you consider abortion to be important to women’s professional success, do you distinguish that from child sacrifice practiced by Aztecs, various ancient tribes in the Middle East and various other groups in ancient history? If so, how?

    • #3
  4. The Scarecrow Thatcher
    The Scarecrow
    @TheScarecrow

    There were eight cases in Minnesota during your running mate’s administration where babies who survived an abortion and were delivered alive were left to die on the table. Is there a time limit of some kind for this? Would you support a doctor killing an inconvenient one year old child if the mother wished it? If not, why not? What is the difference?

    • #4
  5. Fritz Coolidge
    Fritz
    @Fritz

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):

    There were eight cases in Minnesota during your running mate’s administration where babies who survived an abortion and were delivered alive were left to die on the table. Is there a time limit of some kind for this? Would you support a doctor killing an inconvenient one year old child if the mother wished it? If not, why not? What is the difference?

    Wow. Great question. Democrats these days seem to be, or at least aspire to be, the death party.

    • #5
  6. Andrew Troutman Coolidge
    Andrew Troutman
    @Dotorimuk

    Why is it important to abort babies?

    • #6
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Abortion aside, are we sure we should be discouraging leftist men from getting vasectomies?

    • #7
  8. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Abortion aside, are we sure we should be discouraging leftist men from getting vasectomies?

    Maybe the question for Kamala is whether the DNC and its partners are trying to save her future administration from the costs of her proposed $6000 tax credit for infants. Fewer infants, fewer tax credits? 

    • #8
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Abortion aside, are we sure we should be discouraging leftist men from getting vasectomies?

    Maybe the question for Kamala is whether the DNC and its partners are trying to save her future administration from the costs of her proposed $6000 tax credit for infants. Fewer infants, fewer tax credits?

    So now they’re “Deficit Hawks!”  (Again?)

    • #9
  10. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Also, why are the pro-Democrat, pro-Kamala, pro-“choice” online ads and posts always highlighting the plight of married blonde women who really wanted another child, but who sadly face serious health complications for themselves from carrying a doomed baby to full-term? Alternately, these ads and posts pretend that most abortion procedures are related to ectopic pregnancies. What percentage of abortions actually result from these circumstances?

    How many women who get abortions would have preferred to continue their pregnancies to full-term, but felt pressured to kill their own babies by the father of the child, by friends, or by their own families because the conventional wisdom is that unplanned babies need not be born? How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    • #10
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    People need to see more movies.  Such as 1970’s “Airport.”

    Couldn’t find a video clip…

     

    Barry Nelson: I didn’t know you were so fond of old women.

    Dean Martin:  I prefer the younger ones.

    Nelson: So I heard.

    Martin: But opportunities don’t last forever. Pretty soon, you and I’ll have to settle for the not so young ones.

    Nelson: I already have for quite some time.

    Martin: That’s right. You always played it right straight down the line. No mucking around on layovers.

    Nelson: Helen was a stewardess flying DC-4s. That’s how we met. She knew what was going on, so when we got married I made her a promise, the obvious one. I’ve always kept it.

    Martin: I guess all those kids you had helped.

    Nelson: Maybe.

    Martin: How many have you got, six?

    Nelson:  No, seven. Four we planned. Three we didn’t.

    Martin: The ones you didn’t plan, did you ever consider doing anything about them, before they were born?

    Nelson: No. Let me tell you something. I love all seven of them. But the three we didn’t plan… boy, they turned out to be something real special.

    • #11
  12. Buckpasser Member
    Buckpasser
    @Buckpasser

    Lilly B

    If any journalist ever gets the opportunity to ask questions of our current Vice President and Democratic Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris

    I’m not sure what you mean by “journalist”.  If it’s the self identifying kind, they will take that opportunity to ask things like; What’s your favorite color?

    • #12
  13. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Lilly B:

    If any journalist ever gets the opportunity to ask questions of our current Vice President and Democratic Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris

    I’m not sure what you mean by “journalist”. If it’s the self identifying kind, they will take that opportunity to ask things like; What’s your favorite color?

    She’d probably say “blue” and then cackle uncontrollably. 

    • #13
  14. Steven Seward Member
    Steven Seward
    @StevenSeward

    This is a pretty brilliant post!  The questions are honest and go right to the core.

    • #14
  15. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    I would ask her the cost of a college education has exceeded the rate of inflation for decades.  What do you think the driver of this cost is? Are the Universities “price-gouging”?

    • #15
  16. Brian Watt Member
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    GlennAmurgis (View Comment):

    I would ask her the cost of a college education has exceeded the rate of inflation for decades. What do you think the driver of this cost is? Are the Universities “price-gouging”?

    It’s pronounced “gauging”…sheesh.

    • #16
  17. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    And why do they suppose letting men completely off the hook for any responsibility for women and the children they conceive is a good thing for women, children, or for that matter, men themselves?

    • #17
  18. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    And why do they suppose letting men completely off the hook for any responsibility for women and the children they conceive is a good thing for women, children, or for that matter, men themselves?

    If it’s all about the women for them, then they don’t care about men getting off the hook TOO.

    • #18
  19. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    And why do they suppose letting men completely off the hook for any responsibility for women and the children they conceive is a good thing for women, children, or for that matter, men themselves?

    Maybe this is the right time to add questions for the “Second Gentleman” Doug Emhoff? Did he get the nanny pregnant, and if so, what happened to the baby? Again, if all their answers are “no,” then they should have no trouble answering.

    • #19
  20. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    And why do they suppose letting men completely off the hook for any responsibility for women and the children they conceive is a good thing for women, children, or for that matter, men themselves?

    If it’s all about the women for them, then they don’t care about men getting off the hook TOO.

    Except feminism isn’t really about women and our female nature. It’s a denial of female nature in attempt to make women. . . more like men.

    There’s a spectrum of female nature (I have more masculine traits than many women, which was what made engineering appealing to me), but generally women want to be cherished and protected by men and to nurture a family. Feminists deny this in favor of the aggressive, competitive, career-orientated nature of men. Which is why lefty women are generally the most miserable, unsatisfied women you’ll meet. 

    • #20
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    And why do they suppose letting men completely off the hook for any responsibility for women and the children they conceive is a good thing for women, children, or for that matter, men themselves?

    If it’s all about the women for them, then they don’t care about men getting off the hook TOO.

    Except feminism isn’t really about women and our female nature. It’s a denial of female nature in attempt to make women. . . more like men.

    There’s a spectrum of female nature (I have more masculine traits than many women, which was what made engineering appealing to me), but generally women want to be cherished and protected by men and to nurture a family. Feminists deny this in favor of the aggressive, competitive, career-orientated nature of men. Which is why lefty women are generally the most miserable, unsatisfied women you’ll meet.

    Of course I know that, but it’s not the point I was making.  If those women don’t want to be “burdened” by having a baby, it doesn’t matter to them if they’re un-burdening the men too.  Even if she was able to get court-ordered child support etc, she would still be more “burdened” than him.  And even if she was going to give up the baby to the man, and not deal with support etc, she would still be more “burdened,” in her own eyes anyway, by having to carry it and give birth.  “Against her will.”

     

    • #21
  22. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    How do feminists reconcile this brutal treatment of women and their natural creative capacity with the so-called “fight for women’s rights”?

    And why do they suppose letting men completely off the hook for any responsibility for women and the children they conceive is a good thing for women, children, or for that matter, men themselves?

    If it’s all about the women for them, then they don’t care about men getting off the hook TOO.

    Except feminism isn’t really about women and our female nature. It’s a denial of female nature in attempt to make women. . . more like men.

    There’s a spectrum of female nature (I have more masculine traits than many women, which was what made engineering appealing to me), but generally women want to be cherished and protected by men and to nurture a family. Feminists deny this in favor of the aggressive, competitive, career-orientated nature of men. Which is why lefty women are generally the most miserable, unsatisfied women you’ll meet.

    Yes. You get it. I was hoping you’d chime into this post. In my quick review, I think you might be the only woman to comment. I am really giving some thought to why women aren’t weighing in. Is it just that the Ricochet audience is mostly men, or have I annoyed the ladies? I know this post is a bit too confrontational, which is not my nature, but I am so tired of the way that we discuss and debate abortion in this country.  

    • #22
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.