Kamalisms Are Back!

 

“They” have kept Kamala away from microphones for a while, but she has started speaking again. Here she explores the nature of being undefeated for a high school football team:

And what would a Kamala appearance be without musings on the nature of democracy:

And even Trump approves of her insights on grocery prices:

Finally, did you know that Kamala is not a black name but means “lotus” in Hindi? It’s also the name of the Hindu goddess Lakshmi. Who said Kamala was black?

Published in Election 2024
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 25 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Steve Fast: Who said Kamala was black?

    Kamala does.

    I mean, recently anyway.

    • #1
  2. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Steve Fast: Who said Kamala was black?

    Kamala the Ugandan Giant would like a word with you.

    • #2
  3. Douglas Pratt Coolidge
    Douglas Pratt
    @DouglasPratt

    But Trump is the dangerous fool…

    • #3
  4. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    I bet one of her handlers gave her the line about “even if you lose a game your spirit is still undefeated.”   She just mangled it, because she is drunk (allegedly). 

    • #4
  5. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    Steve Fast:

    she explores the nature of being undefeated for a high school football team:

    This is kind of sweet.  It’s like the message of Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, that a person can be ruined and yet remain spiritually undefeated.  It’s almost (dare I write it) Reaganesque.

    • #5
  6. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    Fascinating report out this morning on NBC News, not a Republican-friendly news source by any means. This is pretty objective reporting on what life is like on “the other side”:

    CHICAGO — Democrats released their party platform document on Sunday, laying out more than 90 pages of policy priorities just one day before its convention kicks off.

    But the party platform was written and voted on by the Democratic National Convention’s Platform Committee before President Joe Biden dropped out of the race, and the document repeatedly highlights the president’s achievements and positions — even when they differ slightly from Vice President Kamala Harris’ comments.

    The platform refers to Biden’s “second term” more than a dozen times, underscoring the unprecedented timing of the top of the ticket shake-up.

    The document was approved by the Platform Committee on July 16, just days before Biden bowed out of the race on July 21. Convention delegates will vote on the platform Monday night, a largely ceremonial procedure.

    “This election is a choice between two very different economic visions for America: Donald Trump, who sees the world from his country club at Mar-a-Lago; and Joe Biden, who sees it from kitchen tables in Scranton like the one he grew up around,” the document says in the economy chapter.

    It’s an interesting glimpse of the disheveled state of the party right now.

    This party platform writing-publishing timeline does add some interesting data to the question of whether Biden was forced out or not. Obviously, for some reason the party needed him to resign from the race. They had to talk him into it. They couldn’t force him in any way. I think that’s a good thing. But it’s also a bit of information in our putting together a picture of Biden’s campaign ending and Harris’s campaign starting. No one could move in terms of adjusting the campaign until he resigned from the campaign officially.

    But more importantly, I know MS Word inside and out, and I know that all modern word processors work the same way. I cannot think of a single reason why the party platform could not have been edited and updated in the roughly thirty days since Biden withdrew from the race. It’s only ninety pages long.

    To me, it looks like there is a lot of incompetence at the top of the party. The party’s leaders don’t even know they lack expertise in some areas, and where they realize they do need it, they don’t know where to get it.

    We’ve all been wondering who is running the show in Washington these past four years. Looking at her campaign, I would bet it has not been Kamala Harris. She is just a camera-ready candidate. She is neither a leader nor an executive.

    • #6
  7. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I bet one of her handlers gave her the line about “even if you lose a game your spirit is still undefeated.” She just mangled it, because she is drunk (allegedly).

    • #7
  8. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Thank you for this short compendium of Kamalaisms. I needed a laugh this morning.

    • #8
  9. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Why are we talking about the difficulty a candidate has in forming coherent sentences?  Why not emphasize the many ways in which Trump is a better candidate than Harris?   

    • #9
  10. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why are we talking about the difficulty a candidate has in forming coherent sentences? Why not emphasize the many ways in which Trump is a better candidate than Harris?

    Agree…go for it The.

    • #10
  11. DMak Member
    DMak
    @DMak

    She’s either drunk most times or the dumbest Indian ever.

    • #11
  12. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Thank you for this short compendium of Kamalaisms. I needed a laugh this morning.

    I always assumed it was humor, but maybe the notice was serious. I was working in the administrative branch of the court system when I saw a poster that said: “From the date below, your lunchtime martinis will be made with gin and not vodka. We would rather have our customers know you are drunk than think you are stupid.

    The sweet spot: Too drunk to drive, but still sober enough to walk. 

    • #12
  13. Steve Fast Member
    Steve Fast
    @SteveFast

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why are we talking about the difficulty a candidate has in forming coherent sentences? Why not emphasize the many ways in which Trump is a better candidate than Harris?

    Why not do both? I’d love to see your analysis of why Trump is better than Kamala.

    • #13
  14. Steve Fast Member
    Steve Fast
    @SteveFast

    Percival (View Comment):

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I bet one of her handlers gave her the line about “even if you lose a game your spirit is still undefeated.” She just mangled it, because she is drunk (allegedly).

    Oh no, she positioned herself very well to succeed. She assumed whatever position was necessary to succeed.

    • #14
  15. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    I am from Western PA – that High School (Aliquippa) is one of the best (and toughest) teams in the state.  They have produced lots of NFL players (Mike Dikta, Darrelle Revis, Ty Law…). I can image the eye-rolling when listening to this dribble.  

    • #15
  16. Steve Fast Member
    Steve Fast
    @SteveFast

    GlennAmurgis (View Comment):

    I am from Western PA – that High School (Aliquippa) is one of the best (and toughest) teams in the state. They have produced lots of NFL players (Mike Dikta, Darrelle Revis, Ty Law…). I can image the eye-rolling when listening to this dribble.

    And she has that grating, kindergarten-teacher tone and mannerisms. And that “coach” is standing beside her.

    • #16
  17. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    cdor (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why are we talking about the difficulty a candidate has in forming coherent sentences? Why not emphasize the many ways in which Trump is a better candidate than Harris?

    Agree…go for it The.

    You almost convinced me to do that, but I decided instead that people here should do as I say, not as I do.  I’m going to instead talk about the many ways in which Kamala is worse than Trump or in which Trump is at times almost as bad as Kamala.  I prefer negativity.  I’m not going to do as much of it here, where there is not much point, as on Twitter and at the WSJ (where I’ve been doing it for a while) where there are more Trump haters and Kamala fans. It’s much more fun that way.  

    • #17
  18. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Django (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Thank you for this short compendium of Kamalaisms. I needed a laugh this morning.

    I always assumed it was humor, but maybe the notice was serious. I was working in the administrative branch of the court system when I saw a poster that said: “From the date below, your lunchtime martinis will be made with gin and not vodka. We would rather have our customers know you are drunk than think you are stupid.

    The sweet spot: Too drunk to drive, but still sober enough to walk.

    Yes, but can she walk AND chew gum at the same time? 

    • #18
  19. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I bet one of her handlers gave her the line about “even if you lose a game your spirit is still undefeated.” She just mangled it, because she is drunk (allegedly).

    Oh no, she positioned herself very well to succeed. She assumed whatever position was necessary to succeed.

    Or just to su…. well, you know.

    • #19
  20. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    • #20
  21. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I bet one of her handlers gave her the line about “even if you lose a game your spirit is still undefeated.” She just mangled it, because she is drunk (allegedly).

    I really think Kamala lives in a different world, a world where her word salads make sense.

    • #21
  22. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    MarciN (View Comment):

    Fascinating report out this morning on NBC News, not a Republican-friendly news source by any means. This is pretty objective reporting on what life is like on “the other side”:

    CHICAGO — Democrats released their party platform document on Sunday, laying out more than 90 pages of policy priorities just one day before its convention kicks off.

    But the party platform was written and voted on by the Democratic National Convention’s Platform Committee before President Joe Biden dropped out of the race, and the document repeatedly highlights the president’s achievements and positions — even when they differ slightly from Vice President Kamala Harris’ comments.

    The platform refers to Biden’s “second term” more than a dozen times, underscoring the unprecedented timing of the top of the ticket shake-up.

    The document was approved by the Platform Committee on July 16, just days before Biden bowed out of the race on July 21. Convention delegates will vote on the platform Monday night, a largely ceremonial procedure.

    “This election is a choice between two very different economic visions for America: Donald Trump, who sees the world from his country club at Mar-a-Lago; and Joe Biden, who sees it from kitchen tables in Scranton like the one he grew up around,” the document says in the economy chapter.

    It’s an interesting glimpse of the disheveled state of the party right now.

    This party platform writing-publishing timeline does add some interesting data to the question of whether Biden was forced out or not. Obviously, for some reason the party needed him to resign from the race. They had to talk him into it. They couldn’t force him in any way. I think that’s a good thing. But it’s also a bit of information in our putting together a picture of Biden’s campaign ending and Harris’s campaign starting. No one could move in terms of adjusting the campaign until he resigned from the campaign officially.

    But more importantly, I know MS Word inside and out, and I know that all modern word processors work the same way. I cannot think of a single reason why the party platform could not have been edited and updated in the roughly thirty days since Biden withdrew from the race. It’s only ninety pages long.

    To me, it looks like there is a lot of incompetence at the top of the party. The party’s leaders don’t even know they lack expertise in some areas, and where they realize they do need it, they don’t know where to get it.

    We’ve all been wondering who is running the show in Washington these past four years. Looking at her campaign, I would bet it hasn’t been Kamala Harris. She is a camera-ready candidate, not a leader or an executive.

    Definitely. Someone other than Joe has been making policy decisions for the last 3+ years.

    • #22
  23. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Jim McConnell (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):

    Fascinating report out this morning on NBC News, not a Republican-friendly news source by any means. This is pretty objective reporting on what life is like on “the other side”:

    CHICAGO — Democrats released their party platform document on Sunday, laying out more than 90 pages of policy priorities just one day before its convention kicks off.

    But the party platform was written and voted on by the Democratic National Convention’s Platform Committee before President Joe Biden dropped out of the race, and the document repeatedly highlights the president’s achievements and positions — even when they differ slightly from Vice President Kamala Harris’ comments.

    The platform refers to Biden’s “second term” more than a dozen times, underscoring the unprecedented timing of the top of the ticket shake-up.

    The document was approved by the Platform Committee on July 16, just days before Biden bowed out of the race on July 21. Convention delegates will vote on the platform Monday night, a largely ceremonial procedure.

    “This election is a choice between two very different economic visions for America: Donald Trump, who sees the world from his country club at Mar-a-Lago; and Joe Biden, who sees it from kitchen tables in Scranton like the one he grew up around,” the document says in the economy chapter.

    It’s an interesting glimpse of the disheveled state of the party right now.

    This party platform writing-publishing timeline does add some interesting data to the question of whether Biden was forced out or not. Obviously, for some reason the party needed him to resign from the race. They had to talk him into it. They couldn’t force him in any way. I think that’s a good thing. But it’s also a bit of information in our putting together a picture of Biden’s campaign ending and Harris’s campaign starting. No one could move in terms of adjusting the campaign until he resigned from the campaign officially.

    But more importantly, I know MS Word inside and out, and I know that all modern word processors work the same way. I cannot think of a single reason why the party platform could not have been edited and updated in the roughly thirty days since Biden withdrew from the race. It’s only ninety pages long.

    To me, it looks like there is a lot of incompetence at the top of the party. The party’s leaders don’t even know they lack expertise in some areas, and where they realize they do need it, they don’t know where to get it.

    We’ve all been wondering who is running the show in Washington these past four years. Looking at her campaign, I would bet it hasn’t been Kamala Harris. She is a camera-ready candidate, not a leader or an executive.

    Definitely. Someone other than Joe has been making policy decisions for the last 3+ years.

    Who would Slow Joe listen to, if anyone? Or is he so in the dark that he doesn’t know what is being done in his name? 

    • #23
  24. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    We have no way of knowing who the first woman president of the U.S. was.  DNA is no help.  

    • #24
  25. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Django (View Comment):

    Jim McConnell (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):

    Fascinating report out this morning on NBC News, not a Republican-friendly news source by any means. This is pretty objective reporting on what life is like on “the other side”:

    CHICAGO — Democrats released their party platform document on Sunday, laying out more than 90 pages of policy priorities just one day before its convention kicks off.

    But the party platform was written and voted on by the Democratic National Convention’s Platform Committee before President Joe Biden dropped out of the race, and the document repeatedly highlights the president’s achievements and positions — even when they differ slightly from Vice President Kamala Harris’ comments.

    The platform refers to Biden’s “second term” more than a dozen times, underscoring the unprecedented timing of the top of the ticket shake-up.

    The document was approved by the Platform Committee on July 16, just days before Biden bowed out of the race on July 21. Convention delegates will vote on the platform Monday night, a largely ceremonial procedure.

    “This election is a choice between two very different economic visions for America: Donald Trump, who sees the world from his country club at Mar-a-Lago; and Joe Biden, who sees it from kitchen tables in Scranton like the one he grew up around,” the document says in the economy chapter.

    It’s an interesting glimpse of the disheveled state of the party right now.

    This party platform writing-publishing timeline does add some interesting data to the question of whether Biden was forced out or not. Obviously, for some reason the party needed him to resign from the race. They had to talk him into it. They couldn’t force him in any way. I think that’s a good thing. But it’s also a bit of information in our putting together a picture of Biden’s campaign ending and Harris’s campaign starting. No one could move in terms of adjusting the campaign until he resigned from the campaign officially.

    But more importantly, I know MS Word inside and out, and I know that all modern word processors work the same way. I cannot think of a single reason why the party platform could not have been edited and updated in the roughly thirty days since Biden withdrew from the race. It’s only ninety pages long.

    To me, it looks like there is a lot of incompetence at the top of the party. The party’s leaders don’t even know they lack expertise in some areas, and where they realize they do need it, they don’t know where to get it.

    We’ve all been wondering who is running the show in Washington these past four years. Looking at her campaign, I would bet it hasn’t been Kamala Harris. She is a camera-ready candidate, not a leader or an executive.

    Definitely. Someone other than Joe has been making policy decisions for the last 3+ years.

    Who would Slow Joe listen to, if anyone? Or is he so in the dark that he doesn’t know what is being done in his name?

    And even if he’s told, how quickly does he forget?

    • #25
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.