Let’s Play “What Could Possibly Go Wrong?”

 

This could be a regular feature on R>, along the lines of Quote of the Day or Meme of the Day. This game invites you to predict “What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” due to idiotic political proposals on the part of politicians and the voters who elect them. No fair making entries we’re already seeing the effects of, like printing and pumping massive amounts of funny money into the economy. That’s a game of “We Told You So.”

I’ll go first.

There’s a ballot initiative in Colorado that would eliminate the few hunting tags issued every year for cougars. The city dwellers will love this one, just like they did the reintroduction of wolves to Colorado. Because, you see, large areas of mostly uninhabited land (Canada) on which to sustain previously eliminated predators from Colorado are not enough. We must restore Nature to her former pristine glory. That’s the same b-b-b-witch that wants to kill you and everyone you love every chance she gets.

Allowing the mountain lion population to “naturally” expand will likely go wrong for hikers, ranchers, and Colorado’s legendary elk population. So, people who live off the land and actually go into the wilderness on occasion to hike and hunt and even photograph the wildlife will suffer the consequences — not to mention the elk. But, you do you, Blue Colorado.

On the national scene, the Harris administration would enact price controls on food. This entry could be better suited to “We Told You So,” for anyone old enough (or aware of any history) to predict what will happen. We could point to photos of the empty shelves and bread lines in the Soviet era, for example. But, lower food prices sound so good to a certain (large) portion of the electorate because our feminized, perpetually adolescent population lacks the intellectual curiosity to ask, “And then what?” What could possibly go wrong?

Your turn. Entries either local or national may be made and commented upon. Winners will be ranked in the “We Told You So” contest.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 83 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Why is it I only ever hear about Trump’s destructive economic policy proposals from Trump-hating hysterics. People who apparently have never heard the phrase, “actions speak louder than words.” Or, Trump should be taken “seriously, not literally.” America’s enemies seem to understand this about him.

    I absolute believe Donald Trump has more love of country and more economic sense in his little finger than the entire Democrat party. Unlike Democrats, he wants America and Americans to prosper.

    Trump haters are invited to desist from posting on this thread. You’re sucking all the life and fun out of what was meant to mock Democrats and their brain-dead liberal voters. As the Critical Drinker would say, “Go away now.”

    And even if a tariff creates a temporary inconvenience for us, sometimes one must look at the end goal and then ask if there is a less painless way. These “made in China” products are crap. Garden hoses and their attachments are becoming like Christmas tree lights…it is easier to toss them out rather than reuse them more than a year or two. A nozzle breaks and I try to unscrew it from the male end and I can’t, metal on dissimilar metal corrosion. Cut it off and mend the hose with a new male connector and it blows off under pressure. Last year, I tossed out an all metal nozzle that had served me several decades. This week, I couldn’t undo the nozzle I bought last year so I could attach a sprayer- had to get another hose. I hate cheap crap being dumped on us.

     

    And people think that, while the decline took maybe decades, any attempt to reverse it that does not produce INSTANT RESULTS cannot be allowed.

    We let China corner the cheap market on pharmaceuticals and medical devices. What could go wrong? Covid.  Heck, it isn’t unusual to have shortages now of common prescriptions.

    • #61
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Would they do anything different, if they did take account of what can and likely will go wrong? I don’t think so. The left has power, which they could use for many different ends. The obvious outcome of valuing predatory animals over humans and of controlling free exchange by fiat is what attracts them.

    Not the politicians. They’re in it for the destruction and rebuilding in their own twisted images. But, their voters will come to regret it when the grocery shelves are empty.

    There has been a video that went viral this summer that was the commentary of one chicken/egg producer in Great Britain. He was explaining that the giant firms that handle distribution of these products are offering up so little in terms of money per unit that the people raising chickens simply cannot afford to sell them at that price.

    So now citizens in Great Britain are facing an additional 3 million egg per day deficit as the chicken farmers have had to throw in the towel.

    Prior to this, there was already a serious egg shortage in Britain.

    Of course, the Brits can always turn to eating bugs I guess.

     

    And, I suppose it’s illegal for the chicken/egg raisers to just sell directly to their neighbors and community.

    • #62
  3. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Why is it I only ever hear about Trump’s destructive economic policy proposals from Trump-hating hysterics. People who apparently have never heard the phrase, “actions speak louder than words.” Or, Trump should be taken “seriously, not literally.” America’s enemies seem to understand this about him.

    I absolute believe Donald Trump has more love of country and more economic sense in his little finger than the entire Democrat party. Unlike Democrats, he wants America and Americans to prosper.

    Trump haters are invited to desist from posting on this thread. You’re sucking all the life and fun out of what was meant to mock Democrats and their brain-dead liberal voters. As the Critical Drinker would say, “Go away now.”

    Maybe you needed to have specified in your post that comments critical of Trump weren’t allowed.

    • #63
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Why is it I only ever hear about Trump’s destructive economic policy proposals from Trump-hating hysterics. People who apparently have never heard the phrase, “actions speak louder than words.” Or, Trump should be taken “seriously, not literally.” America’s enemies seem to understand this about him.

    I absolute believe Donald Trump has more love of country and more economic sense in his little finger than the entire Democrat party. Unlike Democrats, he wants America and Americans to prosper.

    Trump haters are invited to desist from posting on this thread. You’re sucking all the life and fun out of what was meant to mock Democrats and their brain-dead liberal voters. As the Critical Drinker would say, “Go away now.”

    And even if a tariff creates a temporary inconvenience for us, sometimes one must look at the end goal and then ask if there is a less painless way. These “made in China” products are crap. Garden hoses and their attachments are becoming like Christmas tree lights…it is easier to toss them out rather than reuse them more than a year or two. A nozzle breaks and I try to unscrew it from the male end and I can’t, metal on dissimilar metal corrosion. Cut it off and mend the hose with a new male connector and it blows off under pressure. Last year, I tossed out an all metal nozzle that had served me several decades. This week, I couldn’t undo the nozzle I bought last year so I could attach a sprayer- had to get another hose. I hate cheap crap being dumped on us.

     

    And people think that, while the decline took maybe decades, any attempt to reverse it that does not produce INSTANT RESULTS cannot be allowed.

    We let China corner the cheap market on pharmaceuticals and medical devices. What could go wrong? Covid. Heck, it isn’t unusual to have shortages now of common prescriptions.

    One more example.  Which is another problem that developed over decades.  But the Yarobs and others insist that if US pharmaceutical companies cannot instantly have new production in place to take over, tariffs etc cannot be allowed.

    • #64
  5. Chuck Coolidge
    Chuck
    @Chuckles

    My Chinese DIL refers to ’em as “evil deer.”  She really doesn’t like them because they eat everything.  I see lots of them on my property – male & female.  (I took this picture from the deck at our house, it was a momma and a fawn.)

    Had to stop for a couple of stupid fawn not long ago – they didn’t know which way to go!  And there are so many:  Returning from church I always see a number and it isn’t unusual to slow down for them.  But last I looked farmers could write their own deer permits and there was no limit if they were damaging crops.  My neighbor totaled his car on one.

    • #65
  6. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    kedavis (View Comment):
    But the Yarobs and others insist that if US pharmaceutical companies cannot instantly have new production in place to take over, tariffs etc cannot be allowed.

    Why do you think he insists on that?  I could have missed it along with many other things that I miss, but I didn’t notice him saying that.  

    • #66
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    But the Yarobs and others insist that if US pharmaceutical companies cannot instantly have new production in place to take over, tariffs etc cannot be allowed.

    Why do you think he insists on that? I could have missed it along with many other things that I miss, but I didn’t notice him saying that.

    Because the complaint is that suddenly putting tariffs on Chinese imports would be a huge burden on people, especially “the poor,” that wouldn’t even potentially ease up until US production is available.  Which could take decades, same as it took to get to where we are now.

    • #67
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Chuck (View Comment):

    My Chinese DIL refers to ’em as “evil deer.” She really doesn’t like them because they eat everything. I see lots of them on my property – male & female. (I took this picture from the deck at our house, it was a momma and a fawn.)

    I could see North Koreans being upset about deer, since they would be competing for the same grass and weeds as food.  :-)

    • #68
  9. Headedwest Inactive
    Headedwest
    @Headedwest

    The Reticulator (View Comment)

    Back in the 80s one irate farmer wrote a letter to the editor suggesting that the Air National Guard base use helicopter gunships to thin out the deer. Nobody took him up on the idea, but the problem hasn’t lessened since then.

    Here in Texas there are several companies like this one who hunt the major nuisance wild boars from helicopters, sometimes using machine guns. Local landowners gladly grant permission.

    • #69
  10. Yarob Coolidge
    Yarob
    @Yarob

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    But the Yarobs and others insist that if US pharmaceutical companies cannot instantly have new production in place to take over, tariffs etc cannot be allowed.

    Why do you think he insists on that? I could have missed it along with many other things that I miss, but I didn’t notice him saying that.

    That’s because I didn’t say it. I didn’t mention pharmaceuticals or pharmaceutical companies at all. I didn’t mention production or production schedules either. Strange.

    • #70
  11. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Headedwest (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment)

    Back in the 80s one irate farmer wrote a letter to the editor suggesting that the Air National Guard base use helicopter gunships to thin out the deer. Nobody took him up on the idea, but the problem hasn’t lessened since then.

    Here in Texas there are several companies like this one who hunt the major nuisance wild boars from helicopters, sometimes using machine guns. Local landowners gladly grant permission.

    I like it! Clever name, too: HeliBacon.  

    I wonder if any of them operate around Kerrville and Fredericksburg.  In 2017 (I think) I rode my bike on back roads from Kerrville to Fredericksburg.  At one point where a stream ran over the road I stopped to take a look, then took off and lifted my feet in the air to ride through.  (Wet feet in wet shoes tend to chafe, so I like to keep them dry.)  In February 2020 I rode the route in the reverse direction, and as I came over the small rise before the creek I saw that the stream bed was muddy and water was not flowing, and there were little frying-pan sized feral piglets everywhere.   There was nothing to do but ride through.  The piglets scattered.  As I rode through I spotted a couple of sows well off to the side.  At least I think they were sows and not boars.  I didn’t slow down to inspect more closely.  A woman near Anhuac had been killed by a wild boar a few weeks before, and I kept that in mind.  It looked like they could stand to be thinned out.  

    • #71
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Yarob (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    But the Yarobs and others insist that if US pharmaceutical companies cannot instantly have new production in place to take over, tariffs etc cannot be allowed.

    Why do you think he insists on that? I could have missed it along with many other things that I miss, but I didn’t notice him saying that.

    That’s because I didn’t say it. I didn’t mention pharmaceuticals or pharmaceutical companies at all. I didn’t mention production or production schedules either. Strange.

    Obviously it’s not just about pharmaceuticals, although that was one issue mentioned.  It would apply to steel and everything else.

    • #72
  13. Yarob Coolidge
    Yarob
    @Yarob

    @westernchauvinist

    No, I’m not nice. Especially to people who hijack my thread and use it to exercise hatred against the one man/party standing in the way of the people determined to destroy everything I love […]

    Your post stated, “This game invites you to predict “What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” due to idiotic political proposals on the part of politicians and the voters who elect them.” I accepted your invitation and nominated an idiotic policy proposal made by a politician. If you were determined to exclude idiotic policy proposals made by Trump you should have said so in your post, because changing the rules post facto is really not on.

    • #73
  14. Yarob Coolidge
    Yarob
    @Yarob

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    I dismiss Yorabs Trump quote because it has no context and no citation. For all we know, it is a second-hand quote.

    Happy to oblige: Trump Mercilessly Mocked Over Frighteningly False Tariff Claim (yahoo.com).

    • #74
  15. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Yarob (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    I dismiss Yorabs Trump quote because it has no context and no citation. For all we know, it is a second-hand quote.

    Happy to oblige: Trump Mercilessly Mocked Over Frighteningly False Tariff Claim (yahoo.com).

    Technically he is correct. How is a tariff imposed?  Hmm

    You are referring to a possible side affect of tariffs, the foreign goods cost more so fewer goods are sold reducing the profit for the producer. Apples and oranges.

    Again, Trump didn’t consider the tariffs as a way to expand the government’s income but  a way to give him negotiating leverage. For the threat to be real, he had to use them. That is why he was able to make trade agreements more fair for the US.

    • #75
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Yarob (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    I dismiss Yorabs Trump quote because it has no context and no citation. For all we know, it is a second-hand quote.

    Happy to oblige: Trump Mercilessly Mocked Over Frighteningly False Tariff Claim (yahoo.com).

    Technically he is correct. How is a tariff imposed? Hmm

    You are referring to a possible side affect of tariffs, the foreign goods cost more so fewer goods are sold reducing the profit for the producer. Apples and oranges.

    Again, Biden didn’t consider the tariffs as a way to expand the government’s income but a way to give him negotiating leverage. For the threat to be real, he had to use them. That is why he was able to make trade agreements more fair for the US.

    Biden –> Trump.

    • #76
  17. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Yarob (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    I dismiss Yorabs Trump quote because it has no context and no citation. For all we know, it is a second-hand quote.

    Happy to oblige: Trump Mercilessly Mocked Over Frighteningly False Tariff Claim (yahoo.com).

    Technically he is correct. How is a tariff imposed? Hmm

    You are referring to a possible side affect of tariffs, the foreign goods cost more so fewer goods are sold reducing the profit for the producer. Apples and oranges.

    Again, Biden didn’t consider the tariffs as a way to expand the government’s income but a way to give him negotiating leverage. For the threat to be real, he had to use them. That is why he was able to make trade agreements more fair for the US.

    Biden –> Trump.

    Thanks. Correction made. Was watching news while I type.

    • #77
  18. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Yarob (View Comment):

    @ westernchauvinist

    No, I’m not nice. Especially to people who hijack my thread and use it to exercise hatred against the one man/party standing in the way of the people determined to destroy everything I love […]

    Your post stated, “This game invites you to predict “What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” due to idiotic political proposals on the part of politicians and the voters who elect them.” I accepted your invitation and nominated an idiotic policy proposal made by a politician. If you were determined to exclude idiotic policy proposals made by Trump you should have said so in your post, because changing the rules post facto is really not on.

    Noted. Consider everything I ever post on R> going forward to be off limits to you and others who choose to direct their fire at “the one man/party standing in the way of the people determined to destroy everything I love.” I will devise a footnote to that effect. 

    Apparently I was under the misapprehension that a “center right” website would invite people to take their shots at the target-rich gallery on the Left. 

    • #78
  19. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    Apparently I was under the misapprehension that a “center right” website would invite people to take their shots at the target-rich gallery on the Left. 

    A lot of shooting galleries also provide guidance on how not to shoot yourself.   

    • #79
  20. Yarob Coolidge
    Yarob
    @Yarob

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    Apparently I was under the misapprehension that a “center right” website would invite people to take their shots at the target-rich gallery on the Left.

    If you believed that Ricochet prohibited criticism of Trump and permitted only censure and denunciation of his leftist enemies, yes, that was a misapprehension. But that’s not your only misapprehension, as you also appear to believe you exercise some kind of authority or control over when and on what subjects Ricochet subscribers may elect to comment. I assure you this is not the case. Fin.

    • #80
  21. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Yarob (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    Apparently I was under the misapprehension that a “center right” website would invite people to take their shots at the target-rich gallery on the Left.

    If you believed that Ricochet prohibited criticism of Trump and permitted only censure and denunciation of his leftist enemies, yes, that was a misapprehension. But that’s not your only misapprehension, as you also appear to believe you exercise some kind of authority or control over when and on what subjects Ricochet subscribers may elect to comment. I assure you this is not the case. Fin.

    It’s been more of a R> cultural courtesy in the past that the post author may redirect the conversation to align with the author’s intent. Especially when certain commenters are known for hijacking every thread that makes it to the Main Feed to indulge their obsessive Trump hatred.

    I note you’re new to R>. Unless you’ve taken up a pseudonym, Gary?

    • #81
  22. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I note you’re new to R>. Unless you’ve taken up a pseudonym, Gary?

    If you think he’s like Gary, your powers of observation need a little work.   Gary was completely incapable of changing his spots, and Yarob has so far shown only limited ability to change his stripes.   

    • #82
  23. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Yarob (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Why is it I only ever hear about Trump’s destructive economic policy proposals from Trump-hating hysterics.

    I disclaim your description of me as a “Trump-hating hysteric.” It’s true that I despise the loathsome con man, but I do so in rational, measured terms. The answer to your question is, because someone here should tell the truth about those destructive economic policy proposals. His supporters won’t, but I will. It is a burden I have reluctantly accepted for the duration of the 2024 campaign.

    I absolute believe Donald Trump has more love of country and more economic sense in his little finger than the entire Democrat party. Unlike Democrats, he wants America and Americans to prosper.

    Trump is an economic illiterate, as evidenced by his recent statement that “A tariff is a tax on a foreign country. That’s the way it is. And a lot of people like to say, ‘Oh, it’s a tax on us.’ No, no, no, it’s a tax on a foreign country.” The abysmal ignorance on display therein about what tariffs are and who pays them is staggering, just mind-blowing in someone once responsible to some degree for the economic health of the country. It’s a child’s view of tariffs, and a stupid child at that.

    Trump haters are invited to desist from posting on this thread. You’re sucking all the life and fun out of what was meant to mock Democrats and their brain-dead liberal voters. As the Critical Drinker would say, “Go away now.”

    No and no. Ricochet’s Trump supporters are invited to set up a GoFundMe to reward me appropriately for the enlightening and stimulating contributions I make to their remedial education in economics.

    You stated that the person buying a product pays the tariff. I showed that it was shared between the buyer and the seller. You’re the person who needs remedial education in economics.

    • #83
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.