Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Doctor Dunno?
Given my earlier post on the misguided French effort to crack down on (potentially lifesaving) e-cigarettes, I found this (from the American Council on Science and Health) to be interesting reading:
A survey of general practitioners in the UK and Sweden revealed that a sizable fraction of them wrongly believed that it’s the nicotine in cigarette smoke that harms health. The online survey was undertaken by UK tobacco giant BAT, and they got responses from 100 British and 120 Swedish physicians. (The study itself is not yet available to non-subscribers of the journal, but can be found here ).
An amazing 40 percent asserted that nicotine was the primary or second-most dangerous toxicant in cigarette smoke. They are wrong, however: in fact, it is the nicotine that is largely responsible for smoking’s deadly addictive power, although the mixture of the alkaloid with numerous other tobacco smoke constituents enhances its hold on smokers. Nicotine in the doses obtained from cigarettes is not harmful per se; the toxic and carcinogenic chemicals that kill over half of chronic smokers prematurely are in the volatile gas phase and, to some extent, in the solids (“tar”) also inhaled thousands of times over the course of decades.
ACSH’s Dr. Gilbert Ross advises that this belief is not a mere gap in training of no major significance: “The myth accepted by this large group of supposedly well-educated clinicians has the potential to be of major consequence in their ability to assist smokers in their often-desperate attempts to quit the deadly addiction. If they believe that nicotine is the deadly substance in smoke, they will be reluctant at best to advise smokers to use alternative, low-risk nicotine delivery systems to get them smoke-free. These include smokeless tobacco such as snus, and e-cigarettes. Hopefully, the doctors themselves and the medical educational authorities in Europe, as well as here, will become more cognizant of this problem and take measures to correct such mis-impressions, for the good of public health, especially for smokers.”
A small online survey and all that, but nevertheless…
Published in General
I have heard (though I have no citation to back it up) that pipe smokers live longer than non-smokers, statistically-speaking.
In my (limited) experience, the risk of tobacco addiction is tiny if one takes up smoking after one is already an adult. People only seem to become addicted if they start smoking when they’re a teenager (and the brain is still developing).
Adults who never smoked as kids are able to enjoy an occasional smoke without needing a smoke.
For many decades now I have been saying that I am going to start smoking when I am 85 just because I can. As someone who doesn’t have the will power to pass up a french fry on a parking lot, it is a good thing I never started smoking. (You know what I mean, the french fry falls on the ground and you think about picking it up.) I enjoy the buzz and ambience of a good cigar with a fine distilled spirit but hate waking up with an ash tray tongue. If someone comes up with an e-cigar that can provide the complex pleasure encompassed in a fine cigar, I am on board.
An amazing 40 percent asserted that nicotine was the primary or second-most dangerous toxicant in cigarette smoke.The other sixty percent were outside on their smoke break.
One name for anyone who believes that doctors are the personification of pure impartial rational scientific thought: Ignaz Semmelweiss.
You mean it’s not nicotine? Shut up, no way!
But it was funded by a big tobacco company, which means it’s clearly a lie.