Yuuge Rocket Blew Up; All Systems Goooooo!

 

The second launch of Elon Musk’s SpaceX Starship went very well right up until both parts exploded.  Which is fine, as the major testables occurred nicely, albeit “with issues,” as people say.  The whole assembly took off with every engine firing all the way until the innovative MECO, which in this case stands for “Most Engines Cut-Off,” as the enormous booster kept a couple of engines firing even as the Starship on top of it released the clamps and fired its own engines at full power, propelling itself away from the booster and “blowing” the booster back.

“Innovation” in rockets typically starts as a series of loud booms over several years.  From there, the booster was supposed to turn around, come back, and land gently on the surface of the Gulf of Mexico and then sink, not to be recovered.  Instead, the booster turned around (suspiciously quickly to my eyes), and oriented itself apparently correctly, but clearly had issues, including what looked like a major leak (think of a slow explosion out one side), then blew itself up.  Or perhaps it was commanded to blow up.

Recall that on the first launch, which did not even attempt “hot staging,” the stages failed to separate, the whole thing cartwheeled, and then crucially failed to blow itself up for an agonizing minute or so.  Imagine being the folks in the command center earlier this year as your giant dying rocket spins out of control, heading back to Earth somewhere, and you’re all mashing your self-destruct buttons, but the thing perversely remains in one piece.  Harrowing.  Finally, it did like a good rocket and blew itself to confetti, but everybody from Musk to the FAA was not impressed.  Well, problem solved, and on today’s launch, the booster blew itself up in a timely manner.  Who’s a good rocket?

So the second stage, the “Starship” that looks like an idiot’s idea for a cheap space opera paperback illustration, cranked away from the scene, adding more altitude and velocity.  This went on until it got to something like 145-149 kilometers altitude, if I recall, and then odd signs appeared.  Something spread out and then stopped, it looked normal again for a short while, then something major let go, and the thing obviously self-destructed. Who’s a good Starship?

This is all still in the research phase — hoped-for burnback and landing of the cartoonishly large booster were, uh, “not observed.”  Same for the hoped-for high-energy re-entry, maneuver, and landing of the Starship at a point some hundreds of miles north of Hawaii.  I believe just based on the timeline that the whole thing played out once more entirely above the Gulf of Mexico, so it never even got out over the Atlantic proper.

Yet this was a huge success.  Once again, private industry has launched the world’s largest, most powerful, and arguably most ambitious rocket in the history of man, and in its second time flying, it broke new ground in the things that went right.  Live reports said that the trajectory and speed for both components were nominal, meaning “according to plan,” right up until they weren’t.

The scene was breathtaking in its beauty.  Sunrise on the (fetid, bug-infested, swampy wasteland) southern Texas coast, with a gentle onshore breeze.  The massive rocket stood at its launch station, filled with far sub-zero liquid oxygen and fuel, chilling the air around it to such a degree that a downdraft circulated about the vehicle, creating a local patch of fog slowly trailing hundreds of yards downwind.

Aerial and ground shots captured this magnificent work of technology and its interaction with a picturesque location in vibrant colors, microscopic detail, and stark contrasts. The plain-old drone footage is already art quality. I hope they make a million bucks selling pictures of this rocket that blew up minutes after the photos were taken.  Just stunning.

And brave.  This is the onset of a new gilded age for spaceflight.  These are the good old days.  I called my son in Japan and we watched this live together on Elon Musk’s Twitter (alright, just this once “X”) video streaming.  But that’s another story.

What a raucous time to be alive.  There are terrible threats and horrors sufficient to the day.  If you needed something to pick yourself up from the carnage and human filth, you could do worse than to lift your eyes, if not to Heaven, then to a nice proxy that is a little bit lower, a little more fallible (boom!), and which portends if not a blissful eternity, well, a beautiful and productive future for our kids and their friends.

Thank you, Elon Musk.  Who’s a good billionaire?

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 72 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    BDB: “Innovation” in rockets typically starts out as a series of loud booms over several years.

    Sometimes, it’s that way with other products, too. And software. Definitely, software.

    • #1
  2. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    BDB: Who’s a good rocket?

    LOL!

    • #2
  3. Matt Bartle Member
    Matt Bartle
    @MattBartle

    I noticed that Spacex didn’t broadcast this live on YouTube, although other outfits did. For the official stream you had to go to X. They’ll probably put highlights on YT later. Note: there are several phony SpaceX account on YT that showed some real footage but switched to crypto ads.

     

    • #3
  4. Bryan G. Stephens 🚫 Banned
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    I had tears in my eyes. What a great morning. 

    Watched the NSF NASA Feed on you tube with X on the tablet. NSF was closer to real time. 

    So cool! 

    • #4
  5. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    I like the commentators using the term “RUD”  (Rapid Unplanned Disassembly).   It reminds us that rocket development is hard and failures are expected. 

    • #5
  6. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB: “Innovation” in rockets typically starts out as a series of loud booms over several years.

    Sometimes, it’s that way with other products, too. And software. Definitely, software.

    “We’ll find the bugs in beta test.”

    • #6
  7. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Percival (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB: “Innovation” in rockets typically starts out as a series of loud booms over several years.

    Sometimes, it’s that way with other products, too. And software. Definitely, software.

    “We’ll find the bugs in beta test.”

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    • #7
  8. Bunsen Coolidge
    Bunsen
    @Bunsen

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I like the commentators using the term “RUD” (Rapid Unplanned Disassembly). It reminds us that rocket development is hard and failures are expected.

    I really love the polite way of saying unexpected boom.  Just like “I just did a rapid dismount of my horse ahead of schedule”

    • #8
  9. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    BDB (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB: “Innovation” in rockets typically starts out as a series of loud booms over several years.

    Sometimes, it’s that way with other products, too. And software. Definitely, software.

    “We’ll find the bugs in beta test.”

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Elon Musk ain’t no dope.

    • #9
  10. Clavius Thatcher
    Clavius
    @Clavius

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I like the commentators using the term “RUD” (Rapid Unplanned Disassembly). It reminds us that rocket development is hard and failures are expected.

    I believe it is Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly, but I also like the use of that term.

    • #10
  11. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    • #11
  12. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    The annoying thing would be the mid-flight reboots while they install updates.  

    • #12
  13. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    I like the commentators using the term “RUD” (Rapid Unplanned Disassembly). It reminds us that rocket development is hard and failures are expected.

    Some organizations (businesses, universities, etc.) are beginning to experience RUD.  

    • #13
  14. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    The annoying thing would be the mid-flight reboots while they install updates.

    • #14
  15. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Percival (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    The annoying thing would be the mid-flight reboots while they install updates.

    Imagine that in a submarine.

    • #15
  16. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    Slo-mo replays of the booster kaboom show that it was the result of the flight termination system triggering (afaik, it’s autonomous – the ‘A’ in AFTS – there is no magic red destruct button). I have to go back and watch in detail, but just before the destruct it was losing engines, all on one side. My guess: once all remaining live engines were on one side, the booster lost control authority, which was a trigger criterion for the AFTS. Cause of engine failure unclear without the telemetry, possibly result of hot-staging damage or a too-torquey flip maneuver.

    The second stage RUD was too far down range to see anything other than an anomalous plume followed by detonation.

    Glorious launch and result, though. Well worth getting up a somewhat ridiculous hour. Will rewatch with the wife on the big screen with the sound system turned up! Onward to flight 3.

    • #16
  17. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    The annoying thing would be the mid-flight reboots while they install updates.

    Imagine that in a submarine.

    • #17
  18. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    The annoying thing would be the mid-flight reboots while they install updates.

    Boy, if they don’t get those engines re-started, we won’t reach orbit until tomorrow!

    • #18
  19. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    If SpaceX were Micro-Soft, there would have been paying passengers on both of these rockets.

    Truth!

    The annoying thing would be the mid-flight reboots while they install updates.

    Imagine that in a submarine.

    At 1 baud. If that.

    • #19
  20. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    • #20
  21. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    It was unmanned for a reason, CarolJoy. They’ve got a lot of testing to do.

    It can be argued that one learns more from a failure than from a success.

    • #21
  22. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    I hope no one does. 

    • #22
  23. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    I’ll bet that number is zero.

    Another SpaceX product is the Falcon line of rockets, which reliably and profitably delivers cargo to orbit several times per month.  The whole Starship line is a new product being tested the same way Falcon was — destructive iteration.  This is the shortest path from idea to reliable product.

    • #23
  24. Jimmy Carter Member
    Jimmy Carter
    @JimmyCarter

    Great post.

     One of My favorite pictures:

     

    • #24
  25. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Jimmy Carter (View Comment):

    Great post.

    One of My favorite pictures:

     

    Beautiful.  Atlas V?

    • #25
  26. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    I hope no one does.

    Probably not allowed by the contracts anyway.

    • #26
  27. GPentelie Coolidge
    GPentelie
    @GPentelie

    Four more magnificently beautiful shots here:

    • #27
  28. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    MECO, which in this case stands for “Most Engines Cut-Off,”

    Hah! What’s SECO, then? Sux Entirely ‘Cause Oops

    • #28
  29. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    I don’t get it – slow ocean travel on small ships is good, fast travel on big ships bad?

    This isn’t one guy spending is money on a mad folly, it’s American enterprise maintaining an edge in an industry that will shape the future. 

    • #29
  30. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    So we have moved from having the mega rich sponsor the behemoths of the ocean, like the Titanic, to the mega rich now creating behemoths of the skies.

    I am wondering how many of the people who have paid in advance to be on Musk’s future ventures in space want their money back NOW!

    I don’t get it – slow ocean travel on small ships is good, fast travel on big ships bad?

    This isn’t one guy spending is money on a mad folly, it’s American enterprise maintaining an edge in an industry that will shape the future.

    I thought it was about Titanic sinking and Starship blowing up.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.