Early WROL (Without Rule of Law) Looks Like This

 

I could try to describe the current situation as running on fumes, coasting up a hill, ropes fraying, corks slipping, and so forth, but I just want to provide a couple of tweets from others who have captured the actual decline, rather than my talk-talk.

Here’s one about the NYPD besieged inside of Grand Central Station while the same Marxist rent-a-mob who shows up with whatever signs or flags are the uniform of the day simply bashes and batters their way into the building.  Have you seen this? I am including it as a retweet by Ian Miles Cheong because his comment accurately captures the immediate context, in order to precisely locate this event on the slide into lawlessness.

And here’s plenty of NYPD doing “crowd control” while the same literally foreign-flagged army in our streets hurls American flags to the ground — on Armistice Day; the day after Veterans’ Day.

Some people will be protected, but you are probably not among them.  If you are, Nice!    How’s that government caviar?  For the rest of us, here are our tax dollars at work rolling up a combat veteran suspected of using pepper spray at J6 — three years ago.  No longer serving because he refused the government’s unproven “vaccine” injection for COVID.  Julie Kelly reports:

This is all going to get worse before it gets better.  I’m laying my cards out — no Republican will be elected President in 2024.  That will simply not be allowed.  Well, some Democrat-friendly Judas like Chris Christie, maybe, but that’s only if the Dems really need the camouflage.  I will still vote, and will do some campaign work if I can, but I’m snapping a chalk line right here — this government will no longer tolerate changes in leadership or direction from a bunch of mouth-breathing tools who don’t even have TS clearances, and aren’t read in on the grey book.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 53 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Cheong is right, sorta, and I can excuse his lack of full explanation because he’s a dude living in Malaysia whose entire perspective is filtered through the internet. 

    The settlement to which he refers was . . . typical for our times, but:

    Protesters who were arrested on certain charges — including trespassing, property destruction, assaulting an officer, arson or weapons possession — will be excluded from the settlement. Those who were seen on video blocking police from making arrests may also be ineligible.

    So there’s that. But the larger point stands: the police did not wade in and engage, preferring to wait, gather forces, and push forward away from the entrance without opening the doors. (The video above does not show that sequence.) The crowd was instructed to disperse. I expect that they did not, but probably shouted and hooted and moved along to some other target – like the flags on the poles.

    I don’t know if the person who took down the flags was arrested; I doubt it. The cops, outnumbered, may have declined to risk their safety. A few arrests were made, per reports. 

    My personal opinion: if you attack cops who are arresting someone who took down a flag, you deserve a truncheon to the dome, and if that does not get the point across, and your comrades are intent on swarming the police, it’s weapons free. For the progressives who would insist that this is simply passionate protest, and all lives matter, imagine a horde of neo-Nazis attacking police attempting to arrest someone for taking down a rainbow flag on private property. Shouldn’t be hard to imagine, since we’ve seen endless footage of all these white-supremicist pro-trans-genocide fascists filling the streets chanting “from border to border, coast to coast / there are two genders at the most,” right? I mean, I realize that the rainbow flag is a symbol of liberation, and the American flag an emblem of repression, but just try to grasp the analogy at a basic level. 

    • #1
  2. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    There is a maniacal spirit abroad in the land. The leftist nomenklatu believe they can  stand with it when it’s advantageous, distance themselves when it’s not. They know that the media is generally sympathetic to The Cause, so they will not be overly alarmed by street violence. They can be counted upon to condemn reactionary street violence as an opportunistic escalation whose motivations lack the essential purity of the original protestors, whose zeal and excesses do not reflect the truth of The Cause. But in the end all they have done is let loose the Brown Shirts, and blessed the arrival of chaos. They think it ends with a new order that lets them rule over a better world, but it usually ends with a grinning young man with a gun telling the editor of the paper to hit the bricks, because we’re in charge now. 

    • #2
  3. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    I think that @Amuse account is exactly right.  This is another account I follow, by the way.  Lots of great stuff.

    Sorry for tweet-commenting on a tweet-post:

    • #3
  4. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    But in the end all they have done is let loose the Brown Shirts, and blessed the arrival of chaos.

    Absolutely.  I’ve been calling these thugs the Democrats’ brownshirts since Obama first recruited a street army in #Occupy.  Since then, it’s been rinse and repeat sessions of identifying talent, running drills, filling gaps, and smashing Western Civilization.

    • #4
  5. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    BDB: I will still vote, and will do some campaign work if I can, but I’m snapping a chalk line right here — this government will no longer tolerate changes in leadership or direction from a bunch of mouth-breathing tools who don’t even have TS clearances, and aren’t read in on the grey book.

    Maybe someday, when it doesn’t matter anymore, the narrative will shift, and everyone will know that American elections have been badly corrupted for a long time, but now that’s old news, and what the [cussword] is wrong with you for thinking it wasn’t necessary to stop the Bad Orange Man or the Yet Unnamed Bad Republican who doesn’t want a people subservient to the wise and benevolent Deep State?

    • #5
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    BDB (View Comment):

    I think that @ Amuse account is exactly right. This is another account I follow, by the way. Lots of great stuff.

    Sorry for tweet-commenting on a tweet-post:

     

    But if it’s some kind of federal thing, wouldn’t they just turn him over to the FBI anyway?

    • #6
  7. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Anarcho tyranny 

    • #7
  8. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change?  Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already. 

    • #8
  9. ctlaw Coolidge
    ctlaw
    @ctlaw

    A lot of the lawsuits you mention have a collusive smell to them.

    • #9
  10. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    My personal opinion: if you attack cops who are arresting someone who took down a flag, you deserve a truncheon to the dome, and if that does not get the point across, and your comrades are intent on swarming the police, it’s weapons free.

    Yes!

    • #10
  11. MWD B612 "Dawg" Inactive
    MWD B612 "Dawg"
    @danok1

    kedavis (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    I think that @ Amuse account is exactly right. This is another account I follow, by the way. Lots of great stuff.

    Sorry for tweet-commenting on a tweet-post:

     

     

    But if it’s some kind of federal thing, wouldn’t they just turn him over to the FBI anyway?

    Well, yes. But he denied the FBI a televised siege and avoided the likelihood of a Ruby Ridge (which by the articles I’ve seen, they were hoping for).

    • #11
  12. Globalitarian Lower Order Misanthropist Inactive
    Globalitarian Lower Order Misanthropist
    @Flicker

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Yes, and Sundance at CTH refers to the number 1 position after Trump as First Loser.

    • #12
  13. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    kedavis (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    I think that @ Amuse account is exactly right. This is another account I follow, by the way. Lots of great stuff.

    Sorry for tweet-commenting on a tweet-post:

    But if it’s some kind of federal thing, wouldn’t they just turn him over to the FBI anyway?

    Of course they will.  But the twp police are not ready with cameras rolling and a plan to kill him in broad daylight.

    Edit:  Dawg’d!

    • #13
  14. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch. 

     

    • #14
  15. EJHill Staff
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Fire hoses. Set them up and turn them on.

    • #15
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch.

     

    Because everyone knows the President has full control over elections in 50 different states…

    • #16
  17. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    • #17
  18. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch.

     

    You are officially not serious about this.  That is just troll-level ignorance.  Please don’t do it here, moderator or no.

    • #18
  19. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    EJHill (View Comment):

    Fire hoses. Set them up and turn them on.

    Amen.

    • #19
  20. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch.

     

    Because everyone knows the President has full control over elections in 50 different states…

    Full control? No, but he has resources to combat fraud. If Trump’s claims are true, then he let himself get rolled.

    • #20
  21. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    More proof that Trump was ineffective at fighting fraud. Why would anyone think he’s going to better the second time around?

    • #21
  22. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch.

     

    Because everyone knows the President has full control over elections in 50 different states…

    Full control? No, but he has resources to combat fraud. If Trump’s claims are true, then he let himself get rolled.

    He did get rolled. Heard of the Russian Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files?  The only question is to what extent election cheating at a federal level involved Trump being rolled.

    • #22
  23. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    BDB (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    My falling out with the GOP is directly related to their response to January 6th, and the rigging of the 20 election. They allowed the Democrats to rig the election, and when their own base begged them to stop it, they ignored them. Why? Well, the easy answer is they wanted rid of Trump and this way they can say he was voted out of office. They acted as cowards. There is an old, but very true saw that says what gets rewarded gets repeated and the Dems were able to rig an election, use political violence to their end, and censor conservatives using the government. Heck, they used the government to undermine a Presidency and suffered no consequences.

    What gets rewarded gets repeated. So, they did it again in 22…and still nothing. Why would they change? Anyone who thinks that they won’t do the same in 24 is deluded. Honestly the election is similar to the GOP debates that Trump hasn’t attended…some theater with not bearing on the outcome that has been decided already.

    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch.

     

    You are officially not serious about this. That is just troll-level ignorance. Please don’t do it here, moderator or no.

    This isn’t trolling, it’s in response to your line in the original post, ” I’m laying my cards out — no Republican will be elected President in 2024.  That will simply not be allowed. “, and David Broussard’s comment above. I happen to agree with you – I don’t think a Republican will be elected president in 2024 either, but I think that because it looks like the GOP is going to nominate an elderly eccentric entertainer who galvanizes the Democrats . The country, poll after poll, is telling both parties that it doesn’t like their frontrunners, and both parties seem disinclined to listen. Don’t get me wrong – if we are stuck with a Biden/Trump rematch, I hope Trump wins because Biden is just a disaster, but frankly I would rather both parties get someone else.

    • #23
  24. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    More proof that Trump was ineffective at fighting fraud. Why would anyone think he’s going to better the second time around?

    Proof, at least, that he was largely ineffective at fighting the Deep State–due in large part to its being bigger and more corrupt than we knew.

    Did I miss the part where someone said Trump was going to be better at fighting fraud this time?

    • #24
  25. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020? Trump. If the election was stolen (I don’t think it was, though I don’t think it was a fair election given the hoaxes the media promoted), it was stolen on his watch. 

    I hesitate to even respond here because this level of willful ignorance and misinterpreting what I said is amazing.

    I did not say it was stolen, I said it was rigged.  Heck, they bragged about it in Newsweek after the election.  Now they are “worried” that the coalition that secured the 20 election is being fractured by the GOP. From that article:

    A once-robust alliance of federal agencies, tech companies, election officials and researchers that worked together to thwart foreign propaganda and disinformation has fragmented after years of sustained Republican attacks.

    The GOP offensive started during the 2020 election as public critiques and has since escalated into lawsuits, governmental inquiries and public relations campaigns that have succeeded in stopping almost all coordination between the government and social media platforms.

    I suppose it shouldn’t be surprising that the party of totalitarianism sees the government controlling elections and social media as the solution to everything…as long as THEY are controlling everything.

    So, first off, as others have said, no President controls every aspect of the gov’t, and more so, Republican Presidents control even less as the bureaucracy always opposes them. Next, we do not have a single election in the US, nor does the Federal gov’t even run any of the over 3,300 elections in the US as each county (and county-equivalent) runs their elections independently. Even the States don’t always have the ability to call rogue counties to heel when they violate the State laws.  For example, Harris County tried to implement drive-thru voting in 20, and it was actually difficult for the Governor to stop them. 

    So, the President doesn’t control any election and is limited to very specific actions that they can take as a candidate.  When a PA Rep brought suit about the absentee ballot changes in PA, the courts refused to hear the case saying that no injury had occurred, and then after the election said that it should have been challenged before the election because now it was too late.  Nice double-speak when you can get away with it, luckily for them, there are plenty of media propagandists who will lie about the lawsuits to protect them.

    The idea that the Federal government was telling social media companies to shut down conversations they didn’t like should piss everyone off…amazingly so many people seem to think it was just fine.  That they all appear to want Trump to lose seems to be the motivating factor.

    • #25
  26. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    More proof that Trump was ineffective at fighting fraud. Why would anyone think he’s going to better the second time around?

    Proof, at least, that he was largely ineffective at fighting the Deep State–due in large part to its being bigger and more corrupt than we knew.

    Did I miss the part where someone said Trump was going to be better at fighting fraud this time?

    No, it’s just that I don’t see why the GOP is set to nominate a person who has already demonstrated that they can’t fight fraud effectively. What, is he going to be magically better at it this time around?!

    • #26
  27. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    More proof that Trump was ineffective at fighting fraud. Why would anyone think he’s going to better the second time around?

    Proof, at least, that he was largely ineffective at fighting the Deep State–due in large part to its being bigger and more corrupt than we knew.

    Did I miss the part where someone said Trump was going to be better at fighting fraud this time?

    No, it’s just that I don’t see why the GOP is set to nominate a person who has already demonstrated that they can’t fight fraud effectively. What, is he going to be magically better at it this time around?!

    Because of reasons.  Maybe some bad ones.

    And maybe some merely understandable ones–like “I was all ready to move on, and then you jerks told me I wasn’t even allowed to vote for Trump; well, I’ll show you!”

    And maybe some good ones, like “There is now a struggle between the Constitution and the Deep State; only one can survive, and only one candidate for President is clearly involved in this fight and is also on the right side of it.”

    • #27
  28. EJHill Staff
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    RE: vote fraud

    There are over 3K individual county or parish boards of election. They are not monitored by their states. They are monitored by people appointed by the political parties, issues committees and individuals representing independent candidates.

    If the observer rules are like Ohio’s you wonder why they even have them.

    https://www.sos.state.oh.us/globalassets/elections/directives/2022/eom/dir2022-13-ch09.pdf

    • #28
  29. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    More proof that Trump was ineffective at fighting fraud. Why would anyone think he’s going to better the second time around?

    Proof, at least, that he was largely ineffective at fighting the Deep State–due in large part to its being bigger and more corrupt than we knew.

    Did I miss the part where someone said Trump was going to be better at fighting fraud this time?

    No, it’s just that I don’t see why the GOP is set to nominate a person who has already demonstrated that they can’t fight fraud effectively. What, is he going to be magically better at it this time around?!

    Because of reasons. Maybe some bad ones.

    And maybe some merely understandable ones–like “I was all ready to move on, and then you jerks told me I wasn’t even allowed to vote for Trump; well, I’ll show you!”

    And maybe some good ones, like “There is now a struggle between the Constitution and the Deep State; only one can survive, and only one candidate for President is clearly involved in this fight and is also on the right side of it.”

    That’s a fair response. I agree with you about the struggle between the Constitution and the Deep State, though I would perhaps prefer the term “institutionalized Leftism”, because that seems to be its most toxic aspect. I just don’t think Trump is the person to nominate, because 1. Democrats will crawl over broken glass to vote against him; and 2. He’s an old fart, and we need someone younger and with a potential for 8 years to fight against this. 

    • #29
  30. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):
    Who was in charge of the government in 2020?

    The Deep State, to a rather large extent. See the Russia Collusion Hoax and the Twitter Files.

    More proof that Trump was ineffective at fighting fraud. Why would anyone think he’s going to better the second time around?

    Proof, at least, that he was largely ineffective at fighting the Deep State–due in large part to its being bigger and more corrupt than we knew.

    Did I miss the part where someone said Trump was going to be better at fighting fraud this time?

    No, it’s just that I don’t see why the GOP is set to nominate a person who has already demonstrated that they can’t fight fraud effectively. What, is he going to be magically better at it this time around?!

    Because of reasons. Maybe some bad ones.

    And maybe some merely understandable ones–like “I was all ready to move on, and then you jerks told me I wasn’t even allowed to vote for Trump; well, I’ll show you!”

    And maybe some good ones, like “There is now a struggle between the Constitution and the Deep State; only one can survive, and only one candidate for President is clearly involved in this fight and is also on the right side of it.”

    That’s a fair response. I agree with you about the struggle between the Constitution and the Deep State, though I would perhaps prefer the term “institutionalized Leftism”, because that seems to be its most toxic aspect. I just don’t think Trump is the person to nominate, because 1. Democrats will crawl over broken glass to vote against him; and 2. He’s an old fart, and we need someone younger and with a potential for 8 years to fight against this.

    Is any other candidate clearly involved in the same fight and also on the right side of it?

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.