A Sad Day in the Diocese of Tyler, Texas

 

I woke up this morning to this email link from LifeSiteNews.

Pope Francis has removed our good and faithful bishop, Joseph Strickland. This is devastating news to me and to all of us in the Diocese of Tyler, Texas. Bishop Strickland is one of the few bishops in the USA who actually practice what they preach. I’m so angry right now I don’t know what to say.

From the email link:

Bishop Joseph Strickland is being cruelly removed from his diocese by Pope Francis, despite being America’s most faithful shepherd.

This merciless attack on Catholic orthodoxy by Pope Francis demands a prayerful response today, so please sign our petition pledging to pray for Bishop Strickland as Pope Francis removes him from the Diocese of Tyler, Texas. We will be presenting Bishop Strickland with your prayer pledges, so sign up now!

The most stunning thing is that Bp. Strickland’s Diocese of Tyler has one of the highest vocations per capita in the United States.

Bp. Strickland has led the diocese for over ten years and been lauded by faithful Catholics for his promotion of love for Christ in the Eucharist and traditional Catholic teachings. But he is now being cancelled for, among other things, defending the Catholic Church against error.

The Vatican has had Bp. Strickland in their crosshairs for sometime, not least because, like St. Paul corrected St. Peter, Strickland publicly corrected several heterodox statements from Pope Francis.

Known as ”America’s bishop”, he has been outspoken in defending life and family, and has insisted that Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament be respected, which led him to refuse to give pro-abortion politicians Holy Communion.

Bp. Strickland has been fearless in his fight for fidelity to the teachings of the Catholic Church. In a recent episode of The Bishop Strickland Show, presented by LifeSiteNews, Bishop Strickland states that he is willing to suffer martyrdom, red or white, for defending the truths of the Catholic faith.

His unwavering dedication to promoting Jesus Christ and His Truth has had a profound impact on the lives of countless individuals.

We stand with Bishop Joseph Strickland, his love for Christ in the Eucharist, his devotion to Our Lady and the selfless work he has undertaken to foster greater fidelity among the clergy and even the Pope.

Please share this petition TODAY with your friends and family. We must pray for Bishop Strickland in this most painful trial.

I encourage all the Catholics on Ricochet and others of goodwill to sign the petition at the link and let Pope Francis know he has made a terrible mistake. Thank you and please pray for Bishop Strickland.

.

Published in Religion and Philosophy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 223 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Mad Gerald Coolidge
    Mad Gerald
    @Jose

    Percival (View Comment):
    So, asking if the Pope is Catholic is no longer a punchline. It is now an honest inquiry.

    1Jn 2:19  They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us. 

    • #31
  2. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    From the outside looking in, just as an American on the planet, I like it better when the Pope is not a communist.

    • #32
  3. Scott Wilmot Member
    Scott Wilmot
    @ScottWilmot

    The Code of Canon Law identifies four ways diocesan bishops can lose their office: death, transfer, resignation, or criminal penalty.

    All we know so far is that Bishop Strickland was removed at “the will of the pope”.

    • #33
  4. Scott Wilmot Member
    Scott Wilmot
    @ScottWilmot

    Happy to see Bishop Athanasius Schneider stand up for Bishop Strickland.

    Editor’s Note: The following is the official English statement from Bishop Athanasius Schneider, auxiliary of Astana, Kazakhstan, in response to the news that Pope Francis has removed Bishop Joseph Strickland from his Diocese of Tyler. A Spanish version can be found here.

    (LifeSiteNews) –– “The one charge which is now sure to secure severe punishment is the careful keeping of the traditions of the Fathers.” These words of St. Basil (Ep. 243) can most aptly illustrate the deposition of the Bishop of Tyler, Texas, U.S.A., His Excellency Joseph E. Strickland.

    The deposition of Bishop Joseph E. Strickland signifies a black day for the Catholic Church of our day.

    We are witnessing a blatant injustice towards a bishop who did his duty in preaching and defending with parrhesia the immutable Catholic faith and morals and in promoting the sacredness of the liturgy, especially in the immemorial traditional rite of the Mass.

    Read the rest by clicking on the tweet.

    • #34
  5. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    Maybe ACNA will welcome him.   Anglicans love Truth.

    • #35
  6. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Maybe ACNA will welcome him. Anglicans love Truth.

    Welcome whom? Francis?

    • #36
  7. Scott Wilmot Member
    Scott Wilmot
    @ScottWilmot

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Maybe ACNA will welcome him. Anglicans love Truth.

    This will never happen. Bishop Strickland was run off because he is Catholic. He is a successor to the Apostles. The Anglicans do not have this. But thanks for the ridiculous comment anyways.

    • #37
  8. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    How big is the front door on that church? How many square theses?

    Don’t have a clue what this means. If this is snark or Church bashing keep it to yourself.

    I assume he was referring to Luther’s posting his theses.

    • #38
  9. Scott Wilmot Member
    Scott Wilmot
    @ScottWilmot

    Jim McConnell (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    How big is the front door on that church? How many square theses?

    Don’t have a clue what this means. If this is snark or Church bashing keep it to yourself.

    I assume he was referring to Luther’s posting his theses.

    Maybe. Still not sure how that is relevant.

    • #39
  10. Doug Watt Member
    Doug Watt
    @DougWatt

    At one time uncommon disobedience was a common virtue for those in the Catholic Church that were opposed to Pope John Paul II and Pope Bendict XVI. Now the demand for obedience to Pope Francis from those that were disobedient in the past is the clarion call.

    The Hyperinflation of the Papacy:

    Note then how many Catholics today put the cart before the horse: rather than the pope manifesting his own revelation from God, he is actually at the end of the process, receiving what has been given to him by his predecessors, protecting it, and, if necessary, settling disputes that arise among the episcopate. He is not creating new teachings or even charged with “developing” them.

    It might appear from what I’ve written thus far that I don’t think the papacy is important or vital to the life of the Church. That’s not true; if that were the case, I’d still be Protestant, or perhaps become Eastern Orthodox. The papacy, properly understood, is vitally important. It’s the “fail-safe” in the system; it keeps the Church from diverging from the deposit of faith when the bishops as a whole fail to defend it properly. As can be seen by the multitudinous and contradictory teachings of the Protestants and the failure of the Eastern Orthodox to maintain certain orthodox teachings, the papacy is necessary.

    But the most dangerous heresies are not those that reject the truth; they are the ones that distort the truth. By keeping some of the truth, they are more attractive. It’s true that the papacy is important, even necessary, but it’s not true that it is the most important aspect of Catholicism. It’s true that the pope must protect the faith, but it’s not true that he creates it. The pope should not dominate the faith, but should be its humble servant. Catholics then must thread the needle between a rejection of the papacy and a hyperinflation of it.

    Every Catholic should understand that they are either orthodox in their Catholic faith, or they are not.

    • #40
  11. Scott Wilmot Member
    Scott Wilmot
    @ScottWilmot

    That is a good article Doug; thanks.

    The dichotomy you shared is very simple to understand but many don’t know what is orthodox or heterodox – including many bishops. It is very sad.

    • #41
  12. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    I have heard that Holy Spirit jive talk from so many con-men pushing ludicrous heresies that every time I hear it my audio nerves automatically insert the un- before holy. May the Lord continue to bless you Bishop Strickland, and through you His Church.

    • #42
  13. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    I’m really saddened by this. An explanation has to come out eventually and it better be good. 

    But have faith Scott. All things will lead to good. This might free up Bishop Strickland to pursue more evangelical endeavors and effect more people than his diocese. 

    • #43
  14. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Modus Ponens (View Comment):

    Another take on the situation.

    I don’t have time for this right now but wanted to say that Michael Loften is a really smart guy (a PhD I think but not sure if he’s a theologian or Church historian) and contributor to Catholic Answers. He’s definitely on the conservative side.  He’s got published books you can find on Amazon. I am very curious to see what he says. 

    • #44
  15. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Modus Ponens (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):
    I’ve never heard of that man, but he sure seems like a blowhard to me. I got to the point in the video where he linked Bishop Strickland with men like Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Eric Simmons, Matt Gaspers, etc., as if this was a bad thing. He had lots and lots of innuendo and 1 anonymous letter and 1 signed letter from priests in the diocese. I’m not buying it. I’ve lived in the diocese for 6 years and have given thanks throughout this time that we have a bishop who is actually Catholic. To think that Strickland is removed and men like Cupich, McElroy, Gregory, Tobin, etc., remain is mind boggling.

    He’s a Doctoral Student in Theology and has many videos debunking some of the false charges being made against Pope Francis. Sometimes he might go too far in his defense, but he’s one of the few people providing a contrasting view to the neverending stream of negative coverage. I’d recommend at least looking at some of his other stuff before writing him off.

    I haven’t seen him speak on Pope Francis but he’s conservative in his theology.

    Edit: I just did a super quick search and he does defend Pope Francis more than I’m comfortable with. But I haven’t listened to anything. I have seen him defend Latin rite Christianity against Eastern Orthodox claims. I believe he spent some time in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

    • #45
  16. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    Though it shouldn’t that way, the Catholic Church is becoming just like the military and business:  the nail that sticks out is quickly pounded down.

    • #46
  17. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    What does “staying home” even look like? You shouldn’t stay away from the Mass for any reason.

    • #47
  18. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    What does “staying home” even look like? You shouldn’t stay away from the Mass for any reason.

    What does passively doing nothing and watching the Catholic Church’s reputation continue its downward slide look like?

    • #48
  19. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    That is not an option. To deliberately miss mass is a mortal sin.

    That does bring to question just how Catholics are supposed to keep, defend, or reform their faith when the designated authorities are the ones perverting or betraying it.  That’s a genuine question, not snark; could someone explain this to the Protestants and cultural Protestants in the room?

    • #49
  20. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    Manny (View Comment):
    An explanation has to come out eventually and it better be good. 

    The Church is good at keeping secrets.  Too good.

    • #50
  21. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Manny (View Comment):

    Modus Ponens (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):
    I’ve never heard of that man, but he sure seems like a blowhard to me. I got to the point in the video where he linked Bishop Strickland with men like Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Eric Simmons, Matt Gaspers, etc., as if this was a bad thing. He had lots and lots of innuendo and 1 anonymous letter and 1 signed letter from priests in the diocese. I’m not buying it. I’ve lived in the diocese for 6 years and have given thanks throughout this time that we have a bishop who is actually Catholic. To think that Strickland is removed and men like Cupich, McElroy, Gregory, Tobin, etc., remain is mind boggling.

    He’s a Doctoral Student in Theology and has many videos debunking some of the false charges being made against Pope Francis. Sometimes he might go too far in his defense, but he’s one of the few people providing a contrasting view to the neverending stream of negative coverage. I’d recommend at least looking at some of his other stuff before writing him off.

    I haven’t seen him speak on Pope Francis but he’s conservative in his theology.

    Edit: I just did a super quick search and he does defend Pope Francis more than I’m comfortable with. But I haven’t listened to anything. I have seen him defend Latin rite Christianity against Eastern Orthodox claims. I believe he spent some time in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

    I listen to his show frequently. He is critical of Pope Francis at times, but frankly not as much as I am. I think he tries to look for the charitable explanation when possible. That’s not as satisfying to me as criticizing Pope Francis, but I think he does provide a rare voice of moderation on the subject of this pope.

    • #51
  22. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    That is not an option. To deliberately miss mass is a mortal sin.

    That does bring to question just how Catholics are supposed to keep, defend, or reform their faith when the designated authorities are the ones perverting or betraying it. That’s a genuine question, not snark; could someone explain this to the Protestants and cultural Protestants in the room?

    It’s worth remembering that when King Henry VIII demanded fealty from the Catholic bishops in England, all but one, John Fisher, acquiesced. (and John Fisher lost his head). So poor leadership is hardly a novel thing in the long history of the Church – she is composed of human members as well as being divine (I think that the fact she has survived for two thousand years despite human failings is a testament to her divine aspect). But we do have a Catechism, and good clergy – actually, the younger priests coming up tend to be more solid and orthodox now than before. To me, Pope Francis is the last gasp of the “Spirit” of Vatican II crowd –  they’re getting old and dying off.

    I can’t do much about Pope Francis. I can be focused on my own parish, where I am blessed to have a solid priest.

    • #52
  23. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    What does “staying home” even look like? You shouldn’t stay away from the Mass for any reason.

    What does passively doing nothing and watching the Catholic Church’s reputation continue its downward slide look like?

    Who said anything about “passively doing nothing”? And why would you refrain from worshipping God with the highest form of worship, the Mass, for any reason? Why would you recommend grave sin, which is what missing Mass is?

    Are you Catholic? If not, then I can understand your recommendation, because you simply don’t understand the significance of what you’re recommending. If you are Catholic, your advice is so heterodox as to make Pope Francis look solid by comparison.

    • #53
  24. Rodin Moderator
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    A “breaking” is coming. Institutions will re-form and realign in ways we cannot foresee. 

    • #54
  25. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    I saw the Michael Lofton video and saw some other videos on Strickland concerning the investigation, and I have to conclude that the Bishop has been either supporting sedevacantism or unaware he has been supporting people that support sedevacantism.  His removal does not appear to have anything to do with his support of the Latin Mass.  This is sad because we need conservative voices but one can be radical in a progressive way and one can also be radical in a conservative way.  

    • #55
  26. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    What does “staying home” even look like? You shouldn’t stay away from the Mass for any reason.

    What does passively doing nothing and watching the Catholic Church’s reputation continue its downward slide look like?

    Passively? Staying away from mass is precisely a passive capitulation to the downward side, and Francis’ dearest wish. Bishop Strickland’s sterling record of producing vocations and donations is an implicit rebuke of Francis’ weaknesses in these areas. 

    In 2007, then Cardinal Bergoglio made his mark by his leading role in creation of the “Aparecida Document“, a document that drew the attention of George Weigel in a 2012 First Things article as a powerful defense of a vibrant evangelism and stalwart defense of the integrity of the Eucharist, of protecting Eucharistic coherence, especially with regard to communing politicians with public records against life issues. Weigel returns to the topic in 2021:

    Thanks to the efforts of the future pope and others, the Aparecida Document remains an exemplary description of what it means to be the Church of the New Evangelization—and not only in Latin America. Paragraph 436 of the Aparecida Document is of particular interest in the United States today:

    We hope that legislators, heads of government, and health professionals, conscious of the dignity of human life and of the rootedness of the family in our peoples, will defend and protect it from the abominable crimes of abortion and euthanasia; that is their responsibility. . . . We must adhere to “eucharistic coherence,” that is, be conscious that they [i.e., legislators, heads of government, and health professionals] cannot receive holy communion and at the same time act with deeds or words against the commandments, particularly when abortion, euthanasia, and other grave crimes against life and the family are encouraged.

    Now Francis is reduced to confused neologisms as he tests the defenses of His Church for weak points he can exploit from his position of privilege. Privileges rooted in the very tradition and Deposit of Faith that he derides as rigidity. 

    Francis would like it very much if the traditionalists and conservatives toddled off, stayed away, leaving the Church in the hands of its most fickle and least obedient members. Francis is not the Church, and he is mortal. He, too, shall pass. May the Lord have mercy on his soul.

    • #56
  27. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Manny (View Comment):

    I saw the Michael Lofton video and saw some other videos on Strickland concerning the investigation, and I have to conclude that the Bishop has been either supporting sedevacantism or unaware he has been supporting people that support sedevacantism. His removal does not appear to have anything to do with his support of the Latin Mass. This is sad because we need conservative voices but one can be radical in a progressive way and one can also be radical in a conservative way.

    Agreed. I have learned to not trust some sources on the Right, LifeSite News being one I avoid now.

    • #57
  28. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Modus Ponens (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):
    I’ve never heard of that man, but he sure seems like a blowhard to me. I got to the point in the video where he linked Bishop Strickland with men like Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Eric Simmons, Matt Gaspers, etc., as if this was a bad thing. He had lots and lots of innuendo and 1 anonymous letter and 1 signed letter from priests in the diocese. I’m not buying it. I’ve lived in the diocese for 6 years and have given thanks throughout this time that we have a bishop who is actually Catholic. To think that Strickland is removed and men like Cupich, McElroy, Gregory, Tobin, etc., remain is mind boggling.

    He’s a Doctoral Student in Theology and has many videos debunking some of the false charges being made against Pope Francis. Sometimes he might go too far in his defense, but he’s one of the few people providing a contrasting view to the neverending stream of negative coverage. I’d recommend at least looking at some of his other stuff before writing him off.

    I haven’t seen him speak on Pope Francis but he’s conservative in his theology.

    Edit: I just did a super quick search and he does defend Pope Francis more than I’m comfortable with. But I haven’t listened to anything. I have seen him defend Latin rite Christianity against Eastern Orthodox claims. I believe he spent some time in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

    I listen to his show frequently. He is critical of Pope Francis at times, but frankly not as much as I am. I think he tries to look for the charitable explanation when possible. That’s not as satisfying to me as criticizing Pope Francis, but I think he does provide a rare voice of moderation on the subject of this pope.

    Actually I didn’t realize I had bought his Answering Orthodoxy: A Catholic Response to Attacks from the East and I was flipping through it yesterday.  Rather I realized I bought it; I didn’t realize he was the author.

    • #58
  29. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    Manny (View Comment):

    I saw the Michael Lofton video and saw some other videos on Strickland concerning the investigation, and I have to conclude that the Bishop has been either supporting sedevacantism or unaware he has been supporting people that support sedevacantism. His removal does not appear to have anything to do with his support of the Latin Mass. This is sad because we need conservative voices but one can be radical in a progressive way and one can also be radical in a conservative way.

    Bishop Strickland is no sedevacantist, someone who holds that the office of Pope is vacant. I have heard him denounce that nonsense on multiple occasions in no uncertain terms, and sedevacantism was not a part of the vague references to financial issues and his refusal to suppress the Traditional Latin Mass by his Archbishop. Financially, his diocese is on a strong footing. On the TLM, he is quite public on his refusal to do injury to faithful members of his flock in pretty much those words.

    • #59
  30. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Everyone should stay home, even if the replacement is a good guy. Let him report back to the pope that the flock defies his action.

    That is not an option. To deliberately miss mass is a mortal sin.

    That does bring to question just how Catholics are supposed to keep, defend, or reform their faith when the designated authorities are the ones perverting or betraying it. That’s a genuine question, not snark; could someone explain this to the Protestants and cultural Protestants in the room?

    It’s worth remembering that when King Henry VIII demanded fealty from the Catholic bishops in England, all but one, John Fisher, acquiesced. (and John Fisher lost his head). So poor leadership is hardly a novel thing in the long history of the Church – she is composed of human members as well as being divine (I think that the fact she has survived for two thousand years despite human failings is a testament to her divine aspect). But we do have a Catechism, and good clergy – actually, the younger priests coming up tend to be more solid and orthodox now than before. To me, Pope Francis is the last gasp of the “Spirit” of Vatican II crowd – they’re getting old and dying off.

    I can’t do much about Pope Francis. I can be focused on my own parish, where I am blessed to have a solid priest.

    Okay, but what do you do if the local priest is bad?  Or if the good priest is forcibly removed and replaced by a bad one?  The Henry VIII example actually demonstrates my point, in that the lay Catholics seemingly had no way to resist an assault on their faith after the designated authorities betrayed them-what can Catholics do under these circumstances to resist the corruption of their faith?  It sounds like they would literally be damned if they do (go along with the corruption by attending Masses that either directly or indirectly promote heresy) or don’t (committing a Mortal Sin by not attending a compromised Mass, and instead worshipping as far as they can at their homes with other dissident Catholics)?

    In other words, what can lay Catholics do right now to resist the Wokification of the Catholic Church, without endangering their souls in accordance with their beliefs?  The only avenue I can perceive within the limited knowledge I have is that they can move to another diocese, and even that option can be systematically nullified if the Pope persists in purging dissenting Bishops. 

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.