Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 40 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Israel Must Reject Calls for ‘Proportionality’
There’s a new buzzword among the Hamas accommodationists and those worried that Israel might defend itself from terror: “Proportionality.”
When it comes to warfare, proportionality is bad policy. The victor in any fight is the one who disproportionally harms the enemy more than the enemy harms them. To wit…
Japan destroyed several US Navy assets in an outlying American territory, then captured a few further-flung territories, brutalizing the populace. America’s disproportionate response starved Japan of food, fuel, and materiel, carpet-bombed its urban cores, dropped two nukes, and killed somewhere between 1 million and 2 million of its people (estimates vary widely). Even then, half the Japanese Imperial Cabinet wanted to fight on. Following Japan’s surrender, we occupied their country, recreated their government in a Western image, imposed a new constitution, and still maintain a military presence nearly 80 years later.
Germany declared war on the UK, Russia, and the US, and devastated much of Europe. The Allies’ disproportionate response was to lay waste to Germany, flattening cities, towns, and villages; annihilating their economy and social structures; starving the people; and, as in Japan, imposing a new government, business, military, and civic life.
What are the proponents of proportionality even asking for? Would they praise Israel for breaking into Gaza without warning, taking civilian hostages, beheading babies, and livestreaming it all for laughs and celebrity approval? Would they have praised the UK for the industrial murder of 6 million random Germans? Of course not.
What would have been a proportional response to 9/11? Kabul didn’t have gleaming skyscrapers to raze or a globally interconnected economy to devastate. If the US had run amok in Kandahar slashing thousands of innocents with box cutters, I don’t see the UN praising us for proportionality.
Those demanding proportionality from Israel do not want proportionality at all. Instead, they do not want Israel to defend itself. They want Hamas to be the victor.
Asking for tit-for-tat responses guarantees a forever war.
Published in Foreign Policy, Military
Some kind of pipeline from Israel, apparently. Along with much of their electrical power and other resources.
In a way it’s kinda nice that Hamas doesn’t want to build their own, that makes it easy for Israel to cut them off.
The source of pretty much all of Gaza’s reliably potable water has been … their hated Jews. For free (to Gazans).
Here’s a 2019 article about … said hated Jews‘ … water company laying the fourth water pipeline:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-lays-fourth-largest-yet-water-pipeline-to-gaza/
Thank you. I think so too. Also about children being
killedmurdered in Gaza.C’mon. You know very well that there is a substantial difference in character between beheading an infant with a big knife while yelling ‘allahu akbar’, and a child being killed because they are too close to a legitimate military target. Particularly, when the child is in close proximity due to the same people cutting off baby’s heads.
That kind of false moral equivalence allows people to say that when the baby killer is shot while attacking a different home later the same day that it makes it all even, because it’s one death on either side.
iow one rule for me and another for thee. Gottit.
It’s disgusting the way those Jews persist in defending themselves. /sarcasm
When Muslims fire weapons from residential areas, Jews must refrain from firing back.
When Muslims store weapons in mosques and schools and apartment buildings, Jews must refrain from blowing them up.
When Israel goes out of their way to kill as many civilians as possible you might have a point. When they are burning children in front of their parents as torture, come back and talk to me.
From the article:
“… about 40% of the domestic water supply is lost on the way to consumers because of Gaza’s outdated infrastructure.”
Here, then, is yet another “Ask youself” type question for you:
WHY is Gaza’s water supply infrastructure “outdated”?
I don’t remember, who was it who claimed that Zafar is an honest interlocutor? That didn’t age well.
The Jewish children whose lives were ended last Saturday in Israel at the hands of Hamas terrorists were MURDERED.
The Gazan children whose lives ended during the past week’s Israeli armed forces’ bombings were KILLED.
EVERY society/culture (since times almost immemorial; well, except for Buddhists, perhaps) understands the MORALITY-related distinctions between the two. Including Muslim societies.
So kindly don’t even try the “
killedmurdered” thingy. Don’t insult your own intelligence by acting like someone who isn’t intelligent enough to know that he won’t get away with insulting his interlocutors’ intelligence.Aged like fine milk left out in the desert sun…
He cloaks his insults in language that seems polite, until you parse it.
Because the Jews didn’t update it for them. Obvs.
Palestinians have no responsibility for themselves or each other. It’s all a failed society because of. . . the Jews.
C’mon Zafar. You’re better than this.
Hey, I’m not the one arguing that sometimes it’s okay to kill children.
I don’t think anyone says it’s okay, except Hamas. The others are saying it might be unavoidable. Especially if the other side tries to use them as shields or weapons.
No, you’re arguing that there’s an equivalence between those who burn babies alive and behead them in front of their parents and the children who are used as human shields by the Islamo-Nazis who committed such atrocities who are not targeted by the Israelis, but are killed incidentally while targeting the Islamo-Nazis. You’re defending the indefensible this way? It’s just terrible moral reasoning.
Just read a headline that Hamas is confiscating people’s car keys so they’re unable to evacuate. These have to be some of the worst people on the planet. And they’re abusive and indifferent to the suffering of their own people! Israel cares more about the lives of the Palestinians than Hamas does.
And Republicans care more about Democrats than Democrat politicians do.
That’s right. I’m not.
When you use direct quotes from the Associated Press handbook you should provide proper citations.
Please point to ANYONE here who has been arguing that “sometimes it’s okay to kill children”. With links to such comments.
Fair point.
Is there anybody here who thinks that Israel killing children in Gaza is unacceptable in these circumstances?
I think it’s unacceptable to murder children in Gaza or anywhere else.
I think Hamas intentionally putting children in harms’ way is disgusting and immoral. Israel is seeking to destroy its mortal enemy, not kill children. Unlike Hamas.
Is that what Israel is doing in. Gaza?
Not that I’ve heard.
Agreed. You should never murder children. You should avoid killing children.
If your enemy insists on hiding behind children it is ok to shoot.
btw, if I rob a bank and hold a hostage in front of me and said hostage gets dies that’s going to be something I am charged with if I survive the outing.
In a bank robbery (civilian) as understood (mostly tv) cops err on the side of not hitting hostages/non-combatants.
War is a little more dynamic than that.
Always worth keeping in mind:
I haven’t seen any legitimate evidence to back claims that Israel is murdering children in Gaza.
Specifically targeting children is unacceptable. If the cowards in Gaza want to hide behind children, in the words of Lovecraft, they are a race more foul and loathsome than the putrid slime that clings to the walls of Hell.
Of course. Because the idiots in charge of the US don’t seem to understand what a siege is.