Trump Supporters Reveal Jurors Names and Addresses

 

A Telegraph article says that Trump supporters have revealed the names and addresses of the Georgia grand jury that indicted him. That is scurrilous behavior, though I would make one exception. At one point in the proceedings, the jury foreperson went public and talked about her fantasizing swearing Trump in. If a juror chooses not to be anonymous, then so be it.

But this shows how many norms are being broken over the out-of-control prosecutors who are obviously politically motivated, using laws to indict Trump that they weren’t designed to do.

There are precautions the government can take to hide the identity of jurors. It’s been done before in organized crime and terrorist trials and they can be done in the case of Trump.

Yet, while the jurors in the Derek Chauvin case had their identities hidden, the fear that their names would be revealed if they found Chauvin innocent was present, and I have no doubt that that influenced their decision. It would have ruined their lives. Even if it were a hung jury resulting in a mistrial, the jurors would have been in danger.

Things are getting uglier. It’s going to get worse.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 32 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    • #1
  2. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Sadly we have come to a time that I have no intention of ever being a juror.  It is not just Trump but with BLM and the current set of the world.  If forced about the only thing I could do is whatever let me get through it with least amount of pain.

    • #2
  3. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    Sadly we have come to a time that I have no intention of ever being a juror.  It is not just Trump but with BLM and the current set of the world.  If forced about the only thing I could do is whatever let me get through it with least amount of pain.

    Being a juror is OK on a nobody case, but it is crazy to be a juror with a high-profile case.  What kind of person would not opt out?  And, you can always opt out.

    • #3
  4. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    The truth is the ditzy DA was in such a hurry to get the indictment out that they screwed up twice. First, they prepared it before the grand jury delivered the pre-ordained verdict and posted then deleted it then lied about it. Next, they rushed the same indictment out once the verdict was in. They rushed it out so quickly they forgot to mark out the jurors’ names. Yep, the Democrat clown show screwed up and released the jurors’ names. Trump’s team will use it to argue his due process was tainted..

    • #4
  5. No Caesar Thatcher
    No Caesar
    @NoCaesar

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    Always assume the Press is biased for the Left in everything they write (and don’t write).  Then if there is an exception you can be pleasantly surprised.

    • #5
  6. Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer Member
    Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer
    @ape2ag

    Al Sparks:

    There are precautions the government can take to hide the identity of jurors. It’s been done before in organized crime and terrorist trials and they can be done in the case of Trump.

    The names were included with the publicly released indictment.  There seem to be differing reports as to whether that was an error on the part of the DA’s office or if that is standard practice in Georgia.

    • #6
  7. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    Sadly we have come to a time that I have no intention of ever being a juror. It is not just Trump but with BLM and the current set of the world. If forced about the only thing I could do is whatever let me get through it with least amount of pain.

    Being a juror is OK on a nobody case, but it is crazy to be a juror with a high-profile case. What kind of person would not opt out? And, you can always opt out.

    You just said a crazy person.

    • #7
  8. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    The short article says that Fulton County published the names.   There is your problem.

    • #8
  9. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer (View Comment):

    Al Sparks:

    There are precautions the government can take to hide the identity of jurors. It’s been done before in organized crime and terrorist trials and they can be done in the case of Trump.

    The names were included with the publicly released indictment. There seem to be differing reports as to whether that was an error on the part of the DA’s office or if that is standard practice in Georgia.

    Judging from their lies, I assume they screwed up.

    • #9
  10. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    The grand jury members’ names were published by Ms. Willis’s office (or another clerk error), I believe, and later unpublished. 

    • #10
  11. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Chris O (View Comment):

    The grand jury members’ names were published by Ms. Willis’s office (or another clerk error), I believe, and later unpublished.

    Is unpublished like unsaying?

    • #11
  12. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    The short article says that Fulton County published the names. There is your problem.

    Not exactly. The problem is … Who? Trump supporters. It was Trump supporters! Those bad people!

    And it remains in the headline here.

    It’s like saying “Eagles fans threw snowballs at Santa Clause” Not Six Drunks at Veteran’s Stadium Threw Snowballs 

    I hope that helps.

     

    • #12
  13. StChristopher Member
    StChristopher
    @JohnBerg

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    Can you explain what happened or link to an article with accurate information?  

    If anyone leaked information regarding the identity of jurors that is reprehensible.

    • #13
  14. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    StChristopher (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    Can you explain what happened or link to an article with accurate information?

    If anyone leaked information regarding the identity of jurors that is reprehensible.

    I don’t understand. I don’t think you understood what I was saying either. It’s a mystery…

    • #14
  15. Doug Watt Moderator
    Doug Watt
    @DougWatt

    The names of grand jurors are included in criminal indictments in the State of Georgia.

    From an AP Report:

    Like others, Taxel (law professor) said including the names affords defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury and also provides public transparency into the criminal process.

    “Pragmatically, a defendant can’t challenge an aspect of an indictment they can’t examine, including who makes up the grand jury that indicts them,” she said.

    Adam Hames, a former Georgia assistant attorney general, likewise said that it’s “common practice to list the names of the grand jurors on the indictment.” Even though grand jury proceedings are generally secret, he said, including the grand jurors’ names allows the defense to present a challenge if necessary.

    The names are available, that does not mean their addresses are available. Doxing addresses is a dicey business whether it is the media, prosecutor, or a supporter of the accused that has been indicted. I don’t recommend becoming a person of interest if your IP address involves revealing the addresses of Grand Jury members, if something happens to a member of the Grand Jury you might have to hire your own attorney.

    • #15
  16. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    StChristopher (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    Can you explain what happened or link to an article with accurate information?

    If anyone leaked information regarding the identity of jurors that is reprehensible.

    Don’t need to. Several posted the indictment on twitter and commented at the time.

    • #16
  17. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    The names of grand jurors are included in criminal indictments in the State of Georgia.

    From an AP Report:

    Like others, Taxel (law professor) said including the names affords defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury and also provides public transparency into the criminal process.

    “Pragmatically, a defendant can’t challenge an aspect of an indictment they can’t examine, including who makes up the grand jury that indicts them,” she said.

    Adam Hames, a former Georgia assistant attorney general, likewise said that it’s “common practice to list the names of the grand jurors on the indictment.” Even though grand jury proceedings are generally secret, he said, including the grand jurors’ names allows the defense to present a challenge if necessary.

    The names are available, that does not mean their addresses are available. Doxing addresses is a dicey business whether it is the media, prosecutor, or a supporter of the accused that has been indicted. I don’t recommend becoming a person of interest if your IP address involves revealing the addresses of Grand Jury members, if something happens to a member of the Grand Jury you might have to hire your own attorney.

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    • #17
  18. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    The names of grand jurors are included in criminal indictments in the State of Georgia.

    From an AP Report:

    Like others, Taxel (law professor) said including the names affords defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury and also provides public transparency into the criminal process.

    “Pragmatically, a defendant can’t challenge an aspect of an indictment they can’t examine, including who makes up the grand jury that indicts them,” she said.

    Adam Hames, a former Georgia assistant attorney general, likewise said that it’s “common practice to list the names of the grand jurors on the indictment.” Even though grand jury proceedings are generally secret, he said, including the grand jurors’ names allows the defense to present a challenge if necessary.

    The names are available, that does not mean their addresses are available. Doxing addresses is a dicey business whether it is the media, prosecutor, or a supporter of the accused that has been indicted. I don’t recommend becoming a person of interest if your IP address involves revealing the addresses of Grand Jury members, if something happens to a member of the Grand Jury you might have to hire your own attorney.

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book? 

    • #18
  19. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    The names of grand jurors are included in criminal indictments in the State of Georgia.

    From an AP Report:

    Like others, Taxel (law professor) said including the names affords defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury and also provides public transparency into the criminal process.

    “Pragmatically, a defendant can’t challenge an aspect of an indictment they can’t examine, including who makes up the grand jury that indicts them,” she said.

    Adam Hames, a former Georgia assistant attorney general, likewise said that it’s “common practice to list the names of the grand jurors on the indictment.” Even though grand jury proceedings are generally secret, he said, including the grand jurors’ names allows the defense to present a challenge if necessary.

    The names are available, that does not mean their addresses are available. Doxing addresses is a dicey business whether it is the media, prosecutor, or a supporter of the accused that has been indicted. I don’t recommend becoming a person of interest if your IP address involves revealing the addresses of Grand Jury members, if something happens to a member of the Grand Jury you might have to hire your own attorney.

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book?

    Just Google a name and see what you get.

    • #19
  20. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book?

    Just Google a name and see what you get.

    I googled Alexander Hamilton and got a whole bunch of stuff. But it didn’t tell me if the people in Fulton County list their numbers in a phone book, nor if the people on the grand jury do so.  

    • #20
  21. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    If someone’s address is recorded publicly, then sure – anyone so motivated can go look it up in the phone book. 

    What should we think of the motivation of someone who looks up a juror’s address and publishes it? That’s different in many ways from simply living with the fact of the public record.

    • #21
  22. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book?

    Just Google a name and see what you get.

    I googled Alexander Hamilton and got a whole bunch of stuff. But it didn’t tell me if the people in Fulton County list their numbers in a phone book, nor if the people on the grand jury do so.

    I also googled for my own phone number.  No luck. I found my name is associated with some old landline numbers that we discontinued years ago, but not the phone number that I’ve used for the last 13 years.

    • #22
  23. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book?

    Just Google a name and see what you get.

    I googled Alexander Hamilton and got a whole bunch of stuff. But it didn’t tell me if the people in Fulton County list their numbers in a phone book, nor if the people on the grand jury do so.

    It can’t be that hard to do since it popped up so quickly. You know who is good at that? Lefties.

    • #23
  24. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book?

    Just Google a name and see what you get.

    I googled Alexander Hamilton and got a whole bunch of stuff. But it didn’t tell me if the people in Fulton County list their numbers in a phone book, nor if the people on the grand jury do so.

    It don’t be that hard to do since it popped up so quickly. You know who is good at that? Lefties.

    It is really hard to figure out how one thing follows from another in what you’re saying. Maybe I should quit guessing and give up on it.

    • #24
  25. Stina Inactive
    Stina
    @CM

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    The names of grand jurors are included in criminal indictments in the State of Georgia.

    From an AP Report:

    Like others, Taxel (law professor) said including the names affords defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury and also provides public transparency into the criminal process.

    “Pragmatically, a defendant can’t challenge an aspect of an indictment they can’t examine, including who makes up the grand jury that indicts them,” she said.

    Adam Hames, a former Georgia assistant attorney general, likewise said that it’s “common practice to list the names of the grand jurors on the indictment.” Even though grand jury proceedings are generally secret, he said, including the grand jurors’ names allows the defense to present a challenge if necessary.

    The names are available, that does not mean their addresses are available. Doxing addresses is a dicey business whether it is the media, prosecutor, or a supporter of the accused that has been indicted. I don’t recommend becoming a person of interest if your IP address involves revealing the addresses of Grand Jury members, if something happens to a member of the Grand Jury you might have to hire your own attorney.

    This seems to suggest Trump’s defense team is allowed to investigate the grand jury jurors and just publishing the names makes certain information readily available. Doxing is largely about revealing that which is hidden, regardless of how well. A man going by a pseudonym but isn’t using a vpn should not have his identity revealed because it was clearly his intent to keep that hidden. Someone with their number or address unlisted is also trying to maintain privacy. It isn’t up to the public to break that for them.

    If the names were provided and there was no law breaking in the retrieval of addresses, then this is just public information gathering and collating.

    • #25
  26. Stina Inactive
    Stina
    @CM

    Barfly (View Comment):

    If someone’s address is recorded publicly, then sure – anyone so motivated can go look it up in the phone book.

    What should we think of the motivation of someone who looks up a juror’s address and publishes it? That’s different in many ways from simply living with the fact of the public record.

    But this is public information. I’m not interested in adjudicating the reasons for the public collating if it, but anyone with half an interest is capable of making themselves the same list.

    Doxing is usually retrieval of information that was intentionally made private, regardless of how well concealed it is. 

    • #26
  27. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    Franco (View Comment):

    Bad headline and you fell for it.

    You probably don’t even know how duped you were and just pass it along.

    It was pretty obvious in the article since the mentioned “Trump supporters” 3x by the first paragraph.

    Can you figure it out now?

     

    Don’t post anything relating to UK……..it’s propaganda?

    • #27
  28. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Wouldn’t be too hard to find. All you need is a Fulton County phone book. I don’t think “doxing” is an accurate term.

    Have you checked to see if the people in Fulton County list their phone numbers in a phone book?

    Just Google a name and see what you get.

    I googled Alexander Hamilton and got a whole bunch of stuff. But it didn’t tell me if the people in Fulton County list their numbers in a phone book, nor if the people on the grand jury do so.

    It don’t be that hard to do since it popped up so quickly. You know who is good at that? Lefties.

    It is really hard to figure out how one thing follows from another in what you’re saying. Maybe I should quit guessing and give up on it.

    1. My comments after my bedtime can be hard to follow.

    2. Apple pencil’s ability to translate my cursive into text is proof AI isn’t going to lord over us anytime soon. 

    3.  The info appeared rather quickly after the DA exposed the names so it can’t be hard to find. 

    4. Doxing is a radical leftie pastime and they have had a lot of practice. Our side isn’t much into it. It is the left that wants its side to assault the doxed. 

    5. A false flag event by a leftie so they can paint Trump supporters as violent kooks wouldn’t surprise me. 

    • #28
  29. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    AP Fact check:

    CLAIM: Officials in Fulton County, Georgia, forgot to redact the names of the grand jurors who indicted former President Donald Trump this week in relation to his actions following the 2020 election.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. It is standard that indictments in Georgia include the names of the grand jurors, in part because it provides defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury, legal experts told The Associated Press.

    • #29
  30. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    EJHill (View Comment):

    AP Fact check:

    CLAIM: Officials in Fulton County, Georgia, forgot to redact the names of the grand jurors who indicted former President Donald Trump this week in relation to his actions following the 2020 election.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. It is standard that indictments in Georgia include the names of the grand jurors, in part because it provides defendants the opportunity to challenge the composition of the grand jury, legal experts told The Associated Press.

    Interesting point, and lucky for Trump.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.