Lahaina: A Failure of Blue Land Use Policy

 

The Lahaina inferno has drawn out the conspiracy theorists, touting everything from laser rays to artificial fuels. Add in the Gaea cult assigning it to global warming. The truth is likely even more tragic because prosaic. It’s the foreseeable consequence of readily observable folly, lacking only the right conditions to set things in motion. This photo (cribbed from the AP) tells the tale:

This is a view looking south. The built-up area in the background is Lahaina. The unburnt swath of buildings on the near side – apparently protected by a vacant area – give the direction of the wind driving the fire: out of the east, towards the shore.

It’s the sharp line between the buildings and the blackened area that’s a tell for anyone familiar with land use patterns. That doesn’t occur organically, it’s the result of enforced policy. And sure enough, Maui has a directed growth policy incorporating urban growth boundaries (PDF at link). That’s part one of the puzzle: The buildings are crammed together and the prices are driving out the locals. As in California, the supply is artificially constrained and demand is high due to a benevolent climate, in spite of intrusive and stupid government.

Now about those burnt-over black areas. Who was ignorant enough to grow combustible crops right up to housing? No one. Those aren’t crop areas any more. Once upon a time they were sugar cane plantations. But the sugar cane industry closed down in Maui almost seven years ago, and the Lahaina fields were abandoned even earlier, in the ’90s. Hawaiian cane sugar became non-competitive due to rising land prices (i.e., taxes), increased wages (unions and competition from tourism), and the lowering of sugar tariffs.

In a free market, those fields would have been converted to some more economical use. In spite of talk about cattle ranching or biofuels, nothing has happened. The unmanaged land has been overrun with fast-growing, combustible non-native vegetation – largely grasses that support a flash fire – right up to the edge of the built-up area. What might have become more housing and businesses instead turned into a tinder box.

The town and dead of Lahaina were killed with blue land use policies, not death rays.

Published in Environment
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 115 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    And I have no doubt there was a lot of “what could go wrong?” at those land-use meetings.

    • #1
  2. Fritz Coolidge
    Fritz
    @Fritz

    WSJ reports that Hawaii’s power company was focusing on so-called “renewables,” instead of routine maintenance of its ageing powerlines, which were seen on the ground sparking, and probably starting the wildfires, after their poles had been toppled by wind.

    So irony of ironies: to fight climate change’s threats off in the unknowable future,  we must ignore known threats right here and now on the ground.

    • #2
  3. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    Fritz (View Comment):
    WSJ reports that Hawaii’s power company was focusing on so-called “renewables,” instead of routine maintenance of its ageing powerlines, which were seen on the ground sparking, and probably starting the wildfires, after their poles had been toppled by wind.

    There are videos of what was going on, including the speed of the wind, for example:

     

    • #3
  4. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    It is hard to be competent. And when attention is deviated to politically-driven idiocies (from LGBTQ+ in our military in Afghanistan) to Green Energy, core competency is reduced. It takes time for people to retire and expertise to be lost, but once it is lost…. hoo, boy.

     

    I think the OP is quite right. Unintended Consequences of land use policies played a role. Unused land ought to be used. A few dozen head of cattle do quite a number on unrestrained grasses.

     

    Unintended Consequences of deviating the power company from its core competency also hurt. 

    • #4
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    iWe (View Comment):

    It is hard to be competent. And when attention is deviated to politically-driven idiocies (from LGBTQ+ in our military in Afghanistan) to Green Energy, core competency is reduced. It takes time for people to retire and expertise to be lost, but once it is lost…. hoo, boy.

     

    I think the OP is quite right. Unintended Consequences of land use policies played a role. Unused land ought to be used. A few dozen head of cattle do quite a number on unrestrained grasses.

     

    Unintended Consequences of deviating the power company from its core competency also hurt.

    Well, y’see, cattle produce CO2 and methane.  Whereas wildfires….  Shut Up!

    • #5
  6. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    The time to fight a fire is the year before.   Maui has a unreliable water pumping (depends on sketchy power lines).  The city did not have a valid evacuation plan (85 people died in California wildfire, because the town had no plan).  There was no communication plan.   After wildfires, my town focuses on the wildfire boundary.  Fires are going to happen, it is not a matter of “when” not “if”.  At the boundary, you have to clear out all the fuel to create a fire break between nature and housing.  Politicians like the celebrity of attending NetZero conferences instead of the day-to-day of preparation and avoiding problems.

    • #6
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    The time to fight a fire is the year before. Maui has a unreliable water pumping (depends on sketchy power lines). The city did not have a valid evacuation plan (85 people died in California wildfire, because the town had no plan). There was no communication plan. After wildfires, my town focuses on the wildfire boundary. Fires are going to happen, it is not a matter of “when” not “if”. At the boundary, you have to clear out all the fuel to create a fire break between nature and housing. Politicians like the celebrity of attending NetZero conferences instead of the day-to-day of preparation and avoiding problems.

    Plus they don’t get kudos for prevention measures if there’s no wildfire, but they ALWAYS get kudos for being “green.”

    • #7
  8. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    kedavis (View Comment):

    iWe (View Comment):

    It is hard to be competent. And when attention is deviated to politically-driven idiocies (from LGBTQ+ in our military in Afghanistan) to Green Energy, core competency is reduced. It takes time for people to retire and expertise to be lost, but once it is lost…. hoo, boy.

    I think the OP is quite right. Unintended Consequences of land use policies played a role. Unused land ought to be used. A few dozen head of cattle do quite a number on unrestrained grasses.

    Unintended Consequences of deviating the power company from its core competency also hurt.

    Well, y’see, cattle produce CO2 and methane. Whereas wildfires…. Shut Up!

    So…anti-cowfartism caused this, essentially.

    I’m not trying for a glib affect here, more an incredulous reaction. Maybe they never considered cattle in the area, but all of this comes from the same type of thinking. It may be different here, depending on the ownership of these former sugar cane plantations.

    • #8
  9. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Okay let’s delve into the Sherlock Holmes realm of logic.

    When investigaing a crime, we must notice if the dog barked (or did not bark.)

    We who have the horrid experience of dealing with a state-proclaimed drought lasting over a decade have questions.

    Apologies in advance if the following seems “conspiracy theorist” but:

    here in Calif we had a historic, never to be discovered in prior years through the study of tree rings,  10 or 12 year drought.

    Now Point One: over in the high Sierras, ever single year starting in November, whenever a rain or snow storm became possible, the ski resort owners filled the skies with their leased planes.

    Those fleets of planes then liberally sprayed the skies in a manner known as cloud seeding.

    The result: an amplification of the minor storms into major snow storms. This allows for maximum skiing.

    This technology has been around since at least the late 1940’s. When members of the public started asking their elected officials here in Calif about “Why can’t cloud seeding be used to end a drought” the main response was “It causes harm to humans.”

    However, again refer to Point One above. If it cloud seeding is such a danger, why is it allowed simply so people of all kinds can trek up to the Sierras and spend time skiing?

    Anyway that query about employing cloud seeding was first made in the period of 2000 to 2005.

    Additionally it would be noted that there needs to be ample cloud cover for it to work.

    This is balderdash. On the morning of the 2nd Saturday of Sept, 2015, there was plenty of heavy duty cloud cover in my area of Lake County Calif. (Not in other areas – but across mine.) Had planes been deployed to cloud seed, with the winds coming from the north, the fire f to the south of me would have been vanquished before it got out of hand.

    As it was, it became to date the most destructive fire in Calif in terms of property. Close to 90K acres burned. (The Apr 1906 fires after the San Fran earthquake took 24K lives, so the “Valley fire” with 7 or 8 fatalities didn’t affect too many people.)

    Since June 1st 2023  there have been a full 15 days of heavy duty clouds when we could have relief from drought. I imagine the same situation  is true of Maui.

    Like the dog that would not bark, the planes that will not cloud seed tell me everything I need to know about how dis-interested the HigherUps are in terms of decreasing droughts and thus ending these destructive fires.

    • #9
  10. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Chris O (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    iWe (View Comment):

    It is hard to be competent. And when attention is deviated to politically-driven idiocies (from LGBTQ+ in our military in Afghanistan) to Green Energy, core competency is reduced. It takes time for people to retire and expertise to be lost, but once it is lost…. hoo, boy.

    I think the OP is quite right. Unintended Consequences of land use policies played a role. Unused land ought to be used. A few dozen head of cattle do quite a number on unrestrained grasses.

    Unintended Consequences of deviating the power company from its core competency also hurt.

    Well, y’see, cattle produce CO2 and methane. Whereas wildfires…. Shut Up!

    So…anti-cowfartism caused this, essentially.

    I’m not trying for a glib affect here, more an incredulous reaction. Maybe they never considered cattle in the area, but all of this comes from the same type of thinking. It may be different here, depending on the ownership of these former sugar cane plantations.

    I’m so sad you cannot see this, Chris.

    The cow fart theorists and the plantations turned-over-to-weed theorists not only are right but they have in their humility  not yet got around to explaining that these two methods of increasing Global Climate crises  have caused the planet (which we call Gaia) to become smarter. The planet’s latest fire storms are now  employed by the rich to do the bidding of the rich!

    I guess the cow fart/plantations-converted-to-weeds theorists are too humble to mention the intelligence of this latest wild fire:

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1691985186265698413

    • #10
  11. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):
    I’m so sad you cannot see this, Chris.

    One thing at a time.

    • #11
  12. Doug Watt Moderator
    Doug Watt
    @DougWatt

    Power companies around the US are far too focused on renewable energy at the expense of maintaining their current infrastructure.

    Goats are very effective at removing undesirable combustible plant growth.

    By the way wind turbines have some fire danger issues.

     

    • #12
  13. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):
    Like the dog that would not bark, the planes that will not cloud seed tell me everything I need to know about how dis-interested the HigherUps are in terms of decreasing droughts and thus ending these destructive fires.

    The Hawaiian weather is extremely predictable, which is why the islands are resorts. On Maui, the wet side is the Hana Coast, where they grow house plants as big as houses. The north shore gets the waves, that’s where the surfers hang out. The west, where Lahaina and the big resorts are located, is the dry side. They are there because it’s dry, sunbathers don’t like cloud cover, and they wouldn’t thank you for trying to change it. Of course things can go to extremes, as this year, and then a hurricane blows by to the south, and…

    And Carol, the planes orbiting in your sky are there because the airmen from Travis have to log their flight hours to keep their ratings, not because they are seeding clouds or spreading chemtrails.

    • #13
  14. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Chris O (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    iWe (View Comment):

    It is hard to be competent. And when attention is deviated to politically-driven idiocies (from LGBTQ+ in our military in Afghanistan) to Green Energy, core competency is reduced. It takes time for people to retire and expertise to be lost, but once it is lost…. hoo, boy.

    I think the OP is quite right. Unintended Consequences of land use policies played a role. Unused land ought to be used. A few dozen head of cattle do quite a number on unrestrained grasses.

    Unintended Consequences of deviating the power company from its core competency also hurt.

    Well, y’see, cattle produce CO2 and methane. Whereas wildfires…. Shut Up!

    So…anti-cowfartism caused this, essentially.

    I’m not trying for a glib affect here, more an incredulous reaction. Maybe they never considered cattle in the area, but all of this comes from the same type of thinking. It may be different here, depending on the ownership of these former sugar cane plantations.

    It’s worth looking into.  But even if they wanted to do something sensible, like put some cattle there or even keep the grasses down by regular cutting, they may have been stymied by the same land use policies.

    • #14
  15. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    kedavis (View Comment):
    It’s worth looking into.  But even if they wanted to do something sensible, like put some cattle there or even keep the grasses down by regular cutting, they may have been stymied by the same land use policies.

    Whatever board was in charge of it held up a plan $190 million dollar plan to clear vegetation around powerlines with no action for four years. They discussed it again recently, so there’s that.

    I don’t know if anyone petitioned for re-zoning or if the land changed hands, but if there was action to be taken, it’s not unreasonable to assume government dereliction in the matter.

    • #15
  16. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):
    Like the dog that would not bark, the planes that will not cloud seed tell me everything I need to know about how dis-interested the HigherUps are in terms of decreasing droughts and thus ending these destructive fires.

    most of California is a desert.  there is snow in the mountains because of the elevation causing air to cool and precipitate.  The physics does not care about dogs barking.

    • #16
  17. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Locke On: The Lahaina inferno has drawn out the conspiracy theorists, touting everything from laser rays to artificial fuels. Add in the Gaea cult assigning it to global warming.

    All I gots to say is the evidence for conspiracy is better than the evidence for global warming killing those people.

    • #17
  18. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    Power companies around the US are far too focused on renewable energy at the expense of maintaining existing their current infrastructure.

    Goats are very effective at removing undesirable combustible plant growth.

    By the way wind turbines have some fire danger issues.

    Comment removed per suggestion of On Locke

    With apologies to On Locke and to Doug Watt

    • #18
  19. Ekosj Member
    Ekosj
    @Ekosj

    How does a city that sits right next to the ocean not have water to extinguish fires?

    • #19
  20. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    Ekosj (View Comment):

    How does a city that sits right next to the ocean not have water to extinguish fires?

    When it doesn’t have salt water pumps, or the power to run them.

    To the extent there were disaster preps made, they appear to have addressed the last disaster: tsunami. E.g., the training response to the warning sirens, if they had been sounded, was to run inland, IOW, straight into the fire in this case.

    • #20
  21. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):
    The future that PG& E is promising us is so bright that we will have to wear shades!

    Carol, what does PG&E have to do with Lahaina? Maybe you could make your own post on the topic, instead of hijacking this one.

    • #21
  22. WI Con Member
    WI Con
    @WICon

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    The time to fight a fire is the year before. Maui has a unreliable water pumping (depends on sketchy power lines). The city did not have a valid evacuation plan (85 people died in California wildfire, because the town had no plan). There was no communication plan. After wildfires, my town focuses on the wildfire boundary. Fires are going to happen, it is not a matter of “when” not “if”. At the boundary, you have to clear out all the fuel to create a fire break between nature and housing. Politicians like the celebrity of attending NetZero conferences instead of the day-to-day of preparation and avoiding problems.

    I read of the water district/utility department being slow to approve more water releases from the reservoirs. I’d be curious to know if there system of firew hydrants were off that fresh water reservoir or is there was a salt water w/ diesel pump options? Seems like an easy process to pressurize the system of hydrants with sea water (flush it with fresh water later to prevent corrosion). It’s frustrating to view this loss of life and destruction while seeing it right on the ocean. 

    • #22
  23. Globalitarian Misanthropist Coolidge
    Globalitarian Misanthropist
    @Flicker

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    Power companies around the US are far too focused on renewable energy at the expense of maintaining existing their current infrastructure.

    Goats are very effective at removing undesirable combustible plant growth.

    By the way wind turbines have some fire danger issues.

    The thing is, and this is not to devalue the info you are sharing, the utility companies across the nation are quite happy to tell the public that because of said companies desire to lower the earth’s carbon footprint, then they now need to buy energy from sources that are perfectly pristinely GREEN.

    Consider my beloved utility company: Pacific Gas and Electric.

    Like its colleagues in Southern Calif, it has raised its rates some 230% over last year’s.

    The libs in Calif are okay with this, as this means people most likely are now using fewer appliances. if some people end up dying of heat stroke this summer because even thinking of turning on the AC will cost you an extra 100 bucks a week, well so be it. (They probably were elderly and were going to die anyway.)

    Anyway PG& E is saying that they have to charge what they charge, because they want only earth-friendly sources for the energy they sell us.

    Why would anyone not believe them? Just because the state of Calif handed them 50 million bucks in order for the company to retrofit their pipelines in such a way that no communities would be blown up, and they instead wisely invested that money in their top executives bonuses, and then part of the city of Burlingame blew up – why would that lead to public mistrust?

    Or just because they put together a 13.9 billion dollar compensation fund for the 3000 to 4200 people who died in the Camp fire, 2018, plus those who lost their homes and businesses and they then plundered wisely used 90% of that money to pay for the overhead of administering the fund, again, why would we mistrust them?

    And should we examine things a year or two from now and discover that despite their pledge that the reason for utility bills going sky high had nothing to do with them purchasing more exotic and cleaner fuels only lo and behold: they somehow managed to also have record profits, why would that lead us to mistrust them?

    The future that PG& E is promising us is so bright that we will have to wear shades!

    Can you cite a source for the misspending?

    Added: On second thought, explain put that in a post?

    • #23
  24. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    WI Con (View Comment):
    I read of the water district/utility department being slow to approve more water releases from the reservoirs. I’d be curious to know if there system of firew hydrants were off that fresh water reservoir or is there was a salt water w/ diesel pump options?

    From what I’ve read, there was no reservoir as such. The local fresh water source was a combination of pumped wells from aquifers, and some drawn from fresh water streams. The streams were depleted due to the drought that was part of the disaster cause, and there are reports (I haven’t seen confirmation) that a local water official wouldn’t allow their use anyway. The whole matter became moot when the power source for pumping disappeared when the distribution lines were either blown down (see video above) or burned. I haven’t seen anything about diesel generators or pumps.

    • #24
  25. Ekosj Member
    Ekosj
    @Ekosj

    Locke On (View Comment):

    Ekosj (View Comment):

    How does a city that sits right next to the ocean not have water to extinguish fires?

    When it doesn’t have salt water pumps, or the power to run them.

    To the extent there were disaster preps made, they appear to have addressed the last disaster: tsunami. E.g., the training response to the warning sirens, if they had been sounded, was to run inland, IOW, straight into the fire in this case.

    So it’s the classic failure to observe the 6 P’s…

    Proper Planning Prevents  Piss-Poor Performance

    • #25
  26. Globalitarian Misanthropist Coolidge
    Globalitarian Misanthropist
    @Flicker

    Or, people preserving personal property  pay price.

    • #26
  27. BDB Coolidge
    BDB
    @BDB

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Now Point One: over in the high Sierras, ever single year starting in November, whenever a rain or snow storm became possible, the ski resort owners filled the skies with their leased planes.

    Those fleets of planes then liberally sprayed the skies in a manner known as cloud seeding.

    Link?

    • #27
  28. Globalitarian Misanthropist Coolidge
    Globalitarian Misanthropist
    @Flicker

    You know what I can’t get over?  First let me tell you how pleased I am with memes that say ‘Conspiracy theories are just spoilers,” and the like.

    What I can’t get past in the “this is just a normal thing” thinking, is that the WEF had the chutzpah to say that Maui was going to be the first smart-technology island in the world, and then a few months ago the government of Maui stated that Maui was going to be rebuilt with a green, no-fossil-fuels infrastructure.  And then a couple of months later a freak fire destroys the entire historic town from people who would not sell to high-rise condo developers.  (And the mayor — or is it the governor — says he’ll use eminent domain to take dozens of acres to build a Maui memorial to those lost in Lahaina, either as an open space or for high-density housing — like high-rise condos.)

    • #28
  29. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    The time to fight a fire is the year before. Maui has a unreliable water pumping (depends on sketchy power lines). The city did not have a valid evacuation plan (85 people died in California wildfire, because the town had no plan). There was no communication plan. After wildfires, my town focuses on the wildfire boundary. Fires are going to happen, it is not a matter of “when” not “if”. At the boundary, you have to clear out all the fuel to create a fire break between nature and housing. Politicians like the celebrity of attending NetZero conferences instead of the day-to-day of preparation and avoiding problems.

    I wonder how the EVs did during the fire?  

    • #29
  30. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Okay let’s delve into the Sherlock Holmes realm of logic.

    When investigaing a crime, we must notice if the dog barked (or did not bark.)

    We who have the horrid experience of dealing with a state-proclaimed drought lasting over a decade have questions.

    Apologies in advance if the following seems “conspiracy theorist” but:

    here in Calif we had a historic, never to be discovered in prior years through the study of tree rings, 10 or 12 year drought.

    Now Point One: over in the high Sierras, ever single year starting in November, whenever a rain or snow storm became possible, the ski resort owners filled the skies with their leased planes.

    Those fleets of planes then liberally sprayed the skies in a manner known as cloud seeding.

    The result: an amplification of the minor storms into major snow storms. This allows for maximum skiing.

    This technology has been around since at least the late 1940’s. When members of the public started asking their elected officials here in Calif about “Why can’t cloud seeding be used to end a drought” the main response was “It causes harm to humans.”

    However, again refer to Point One above. If it cloud seeding is such a danger, why is it allowed simply so people of all kinds can trek up to the Sierras and spend time skiing?

    Anyway that query about employing cloud seeding was first made in the period of 2000 to 2005.

    Additionally it would be noted that there needs to be ample cloud cover for it to work.

    This is balderdash. On the morning of the 2nd Saturday of Sept, 2015, there was plenty of heavy duty cloud cover in my area of Lake County Calif. (Not in other areas – but across mine.) Had planes been deployed to cloud seed, with the winds coming from the north, the fire f to the south of me would have been vanquished before it got out of hand.

    As it was, it became to date the most destructive fire in Calif in terms of property. Close to 90K acres burned. (The Apr 1906 fires after the San Fran earthquake took 24K lives, so the “Valley fire” with 7 or 8 fatalities didn’t affect too many people.)

    Since June 1st 2023 there have been a full 15 days of heavy duty clouds when we could have relief from drought. I imagine the same situation is true of Maui.

    Like the dog that would not bark, the planes that will not cloud seed tell me everything I need to know about how dis-interested the HigherUps are in terms of decreasing droughts and thus ending these destructive fires.

    The demographics of skiers are very different than that of urban homeless and street gangs.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.