Denial, Delusion, or Dreaming: Which Describes You Best?

 

For the last several years, people on Ricochet have ranted about the corruption of government, and how little has changed. Now we see many people who continue to propose steps that the government must take to hold despicable members of the administration accountable, despite the overwhelming evidence that nothing will happen.

I’ve said in the past that I am a cock-eyed optimist, and I have been one of those people who has proposed solutions to the current ugly state of affairs. Lately, I’ve also stated that I have mostly given up hope for things to improve. So, here’s my question: why do people continue to hope when it seems that all may be lost? A clue is in the word “may.”

I’ve diagnosed the disease that seems to be running rampant through the conservatives and Republicans (however you wish to identify), and I’ll share them with you here in no particular order:

There are those in denial. These are the folks who refuse to see things just as they are. It’s all good, things will be fine, we are still a democratic Republic, it’s not as bad as it looks. They refuse to acknowledge the facts, just as the Democrats refuse to recognize the truth when it hits them in the head. Denial can be a difficult condition to maintain, particularly when you live among those people who prefer reality to denial. But at least you don’t need to see the ugly truth.

Then there are those who are deluded. These folks are determined to create their own reality and focus on the few things that are working: Kevin McCarthy rounded up Republicans to fight for a lifting of the debt ceiling if expenditures are held in check. Investigations of all kinds are proceeding in order to demand accountability from Joe Biden and his administration. Whistleblowers are speaking out, even in a public forum, against the travesties of our intelligence community. And very little will change.

And finally, there are the dreamers. These are the folks who remember the good ol’ days and the way government used to be (or at least it seemed to be). They recommend solutions that will never happen. They demand that people be held accountable when no one else is interested in accountability. Of all three ailments, this is probably the most difficult to maintain on a site like Ricochet, unless you are a lurker and have nothing to say.

You might say that people are entitled to believe and say whatever they wish when discussing politics, and I agree. Except for one thing: it doesn’t motivate the person to deal with life as it is, which means any of these illnesses will discourage, if not prevent, people from dealing with the facts on the ground. Maybe that situation is good for all of us: maybe we should insulate ourselves from the impossible situation we’ve found ourselves in. It is a survival mentality, helps us get through the disillusionment that sits at our doorstep and threatens to overwhelm us.

Do I have a solution for this dilemma? I don’t. I finally realized, however, that Conservatives are effectively faced with having to go through grief and loss: who are we? What have we become? How do we move on? Most people hate to grieve; it is such a difficult journey to take. But I do know that denial of the truth, delusion about the facts and dreaming of an unlikely future will get us nowhere. I also know that creative solutions can only arise when we allow ourselves to move through grief, strengthen our resolve, and look at our current situation with honesty and clarity.

Otherwise, in one way or another, we will lose.

Published in Domestic Policy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 94 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):
    Yet they didn’t do as well in 2022 in VA. Here the Dobbs decision may have had an impact. Which VA will we see in 2024, 2021 or 2022?

    Great question. It seems like everyday there are positive steps and then they seem to slide back.

    I really think 2022 had to do with the reaction to Dobbs in VA. Unlike elsewhere the Republicans had good candidates in competitive races. They were outspent but that is pretty normal and you would expect given the environment and the their success in 2021 that the republicans would do better. Dobbs was brand new in 2022 and it unsettled things. I am not sure it will be as big an issue in 2024. All this having been said I still think Dobbs was a major victory and worth the hopefully short term electoral pain.

    Ironic, if true. Trump gave us the ability to overturn Roe. Nobody else for 40 years could do that. Then he is blamed for the losses in 2022 because Roe is undone. Sounds like a party of ungrateful jerks to me.

    Trump himself blamed Roe and pro-life republicans for the losses in 2022.

    Post election analysis showed many voted against Trump because they support abortion. At this point, I no longer know what the party stands for.

    I’m not sure which election you are talking about. Trump was pro-abortion his whole life (even partial birth abortion) until he ran for president in 2016 as a republican. Few democrats would have disagreed with him back then.

    And yet, he was the first President to address the March for Life in Person. He done good.

    Trump is a wonderful collection of contradictions. He is certainly responsible for the most success of the prolife side in 50 years.

    There aren’t as many contradictions if you toss out the media/Dem/NT talking points and don’t fall for them. 

    • #91
  2. Raxxalan Member
    Raxxalan
    @Raxxalan

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):
    Yet they didn’t do as well in 2022 in VA. Here the Dobbs decision may have had an impact. Which VA will we see in 2024, 2021 or 2022?

    Great question. It seems like everyday there are positive steps and then they seem to slide back.

    I really think 2022 had to do with the reaction to Dobbs in VA. Unlike elsewhere the Republicans had good candidates in competitive races. They were outspent but that is pretty normal and you would expect given the environment and the their success in 2021 that the republicans would do better. Dobbs was brand new in 2022 and it unsettled things. I am not sure it will be as big an issue in 2024. All this having been said I still think Dobbs was a major victory and worth the hopefully short term electoral pain.

    Ironic, if true. Trump gave us the ability to overturn Roe. Nobody else for 40 years could do that. Then he is blamed for the losses in 2022 because Roe is undone. Sounds like a party of ungrateful jerks to me.

    Trump himself blamed Roe and pro-life republicans for the losses in 2022.

    Post election analysis showed many voted against Trump because they support abortion. At this point, I no longer know what the party stands for.

    I’m not sure which election you are talking about. Trump was pro-abortion his whole life (even partial birth abortion) until he ran for president in 2016 as a republican. Few democrats would have disagreed with him back then.

    They loved him until he announced he was running against their anointed one. It is the ideology of the right they really hate.

    This is true but they are also especially hard on people they consider traitors.  I wouldn’t be surprised if that factors into it too.

    • #92
  3. Raxxalan Member
    Raxxalan
    @Raxxalan

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):
    Yet they didn’t do as well in 2022 in VA. Here the Dobbs decision may have had an impact. Which VA will we see in 2024, 2021 or 2022?

    Great question. It seems like everyday there are positive steps and then they seem to slide back.

    I really think 2022 had to do with the reaction to Dobbs in VA. Unlike elsewhere the Republicans had good candidates in competitive races. They were outspent but that is pretty normal and you would expect given the environment and the their success in 2021 that the republicans would do better. Dobbs was brand new in 2022 and it unsettled things. I am not sure it will be as big an issue in 2024. All this having been said I still think Dobbs was a major victory and worth the hopefully short term electoral pain.

    Ironic, if true. Trump gave us the ability to overturn Roe. Nobody else for 40 years could do that. Then he is blamed for the losses in 2022 because Roe is undone. Sounds like a party of ungrateful jerks to me.

    Trump himself blamed Roe and pro-life republicans for the losses in 2022.

    Post election analysis showed many voted against Trump because they support abortion. At this point, I no longer know what the party stands for.

    I’m not sure which election you are talking about. Trump was pro-abortion his whole life (even partial birth abortion) until he ran for president in 2016 as a republican. Few democrats would have disagreed with him back then.

    And yet, he was the first President to address the March for Life in Person. He done good.

    Trump is a wonderful collection of contradictions. He is certainly responsible for the most success of the prolife side in 50 years.

    There aren’t as many contradictions if you toss out the media/Dem/NT talking points and don’t fall for them.

    I am not sure I completely agree with that.  I think Trump’s contradictions may be one of his better qualities.  Like the fact he is a billionaire but really does have a common touch.

    • #93
  4. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):
    Yet they didn’t do as well in 2022 in VA. Here the Dobbs decision may have had an impact. Which VA will we see in 2024, 2021 or 2022?

    Great question. It seems like everyday there are positive steps and then they seem to slide back.

    I really think 2022 had to do with the reaction to Dobbs in VA. Unlike elsewhere the Republicans had good candidates in competitive races. They were outspent but that is pretty normal and you would expect given the environment and the their success in 2021 that the republicans would do better. Dobbs was brand new in 2022 and it unsettled things. I am not sure it will be as big an issue in 2024. All this having been said I still think Dobbs was a major victory and worth the hopefully short term electoral pain.

    Ironic, if true. Trump gave us the ability to overturn Roe. Nobody else for 40 years could do that. Then he is blamed for the losses in 2022 because Roe is undone. Sounds like a party of ungrateful jerks to me.

    Trump himself blamed Roe and pro-life republicans for the losses in 2022.

    Post election analysis showed many voted against Trump because they support abortion. At this point, I no longer know what the party stands for.

    I’m not sure which election you are talking about. Trump was pro-abortion his whole life (even partial birth abortion) until he ran for president in 2016 as a republican. Few democrats would have disagreed with him back then.

    And yet, he was the first President to address the March for Life in Person. He done good.

    Trump is a wonderful collection of contradictions. He is certainly responsible for the most success of the prolife side in 50 years.

    There aren’t as many contradictions if you toss out the media/Dem/NT talking points and don’t fall for them.

    I am not sure I completely agree with that. I think Trump’s contradictions may be one of his better qualities. Like the fact he is a billionaire but really does have a common touch.

    That isn’t a contradiction the lefty media and democrats mention.

    • #94
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.