I Thought That Was Funny. I Was Mistaken.

 

I felt bad writing a snippy post ridiculing my British friends for elevating such an absurd figure to a position of power.  But it’s so easy – I just can’t help myself.  He was placed in that office by powers beyond the control of the citizens, and there’s nothing they can do about it.  His stupidity is matched only by his arrogance, but the press continually covers for all the ridiculous things he says.  He seems lost, wandering about looking for a camera to smile at.  And rather than standing and waving like he’s supposed to, he’s decided that the world needs saving, and he is just the man to do it.  How did such an dangerous fool end up leading a great country like Britain?  What a joke.  They should be embarrassed.

But then, I saw a clip of President Biden on TV this morning.  And I decided to keep my snippy post to myself.  The absurd spectacle in Britain suddenly felt hauntingly familiar.  It was still ridiculous.  But it was no longer funny.

When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king.  The palace becomes a circus.
– Turkish Proverb

Thanks, President Biden.  You ruined what was going to be a really funny post.  The jokes write themselves.  But it’s only funny if it’s somebody else’s problem.

This is not funny.  So never mind.

Hmph.  Just forget I said anything…

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 56 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Percival (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    It’s just a cheap gag.

    The best kind.

    • #31
  2. Vance Richards Inactive
    Vance Richards
    @VanceRichards

    And King Charles is really just there for ceremonies and tourism. Biden, or at least his advisers, have some actual power.

    • #32
  3. Charles Mark Member
    Charles Mark
    @CharlesMark

    I’ll take this opportunity to record my disdain for the British monarchy, the coronation, and for pageantry in all its forms. I avoided the merest glimpse of the farce by walking on a cliff path with no phone signal for a couple of hours – not too far from where Donald Trump visited earlier this week. At least he was elected. And I’m sure he’ll remember his trip to Ireland in a couple of weeks time, unlike President Biden, who couldn’t remember being here a couple of weeks previously- a visit during which he was showered with cloying sentimentality and sycophancy, and during which he proclaimed that he had “come home”. 

    I did later see a video of our Trudeau- lite Taoiseach (PM) Leo Varadkar, taking a break from killing off free speech in Ireland, and managing to get caught picking his nose on live TV.  

    • #33
  4. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    I have more interest in the British monarchy than I should.  As an institution, I wish it well, but if the Brits were to get rid of it, it wouldn’t bother me that much.

    I read The Telegraph online, and my take is that King Charles is popular at the moment.

    Britain isn’t the only European monarchy, just the best known.  There are seven kingdoms in Europe (pulled off of Wikipedia): Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, and Belgium.

    Spain’s king has gotten some press lately, since the old king abdicated due to corruption.

    Most people outside of those relavent countries can’t name the monarchs of those countries, but can name Great Britain’s.  Part of Charles’s plan for the future is to make Britain’s monarchy more like the European’s, less grand perhaps, with less working royals.

    It’s a peculiar institution, that won’t go away.  And when you break down what working royals actually do in their day to day working lives, I wonder why they do it.  I mean, despite of the way they are feted from event to event, it’s amazingly dull work.

    • #34
  5. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    I have more interest in the British monarchy than I should. As an institution, I wish it well, but if the Brits were to get rid of it, it wouldn’t bother me that much.

    I read The Telegraph online, and my take is that King Charles is popular at the moment.

    Britain isn’t the only European monarchy, just the best known. There are seven kingdoms in Europe (pulled off of Wikipedia): Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, and Belgium.

    Spain’s king has gotten some press lately, since the old king abdicated due to corruption.

    Most people outside of those relavent countries can’t name the monarchs of those countries, but can name Great Britain’s. Part of Charles’s plan for the future is to make Britain’s monarchy more like the European’s, less grand perhaps, with less working royals.

    Not seeing upside.

    Except, I guess, that since he’s never going to measure up to mama, so why not call it a virtue? 

    • #35
  6. Michael G. Gallagher Coolidge
    Michael G. Gallagher
    @MichaelGallagher

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    A quick comment in self defense:

    I thought it would be funny to compare Prince Charles to Joe Biden. Anyone who is compared to Joe Biden is certain to take offense, as would his supporters. Understandable.

    I do think that Charles is not too bright, and that he’s arrogant. I’m not suggesting that he can compete with Biden in either category, and I apologize if my simplistic joke made it sound that way.

    And yes, I know, it’s a little different to have a dangerous fool waving at crowds from balconies, vs having a dangerous fool in charge of the most powerful military in the history of the world.

    And yes, I know, there are many other places that this analogy falls apart.

    It’s just a cheap gag. I apologize to Charles, although this is not the first time he’s been the butt of jokes. Part of the job, I guess. Still, he deserves better.

    I just couldn’t help myself.

     

    • #36
  7. Michael G. Gallagher Coolidge
    Michael G. Gallagher
    @MichaelGallagher

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    A quick comment in self defense:

    I thought it would be funny to compare Prince Charles to Joe Biden. Anyone who is compared to Joe Biden is certain to take offense, as would his supporters. Understandable.

    I do think that Charles is not too bright, and that he’s arrogant. I’m not suggesting that he can compete with Biden in either category, and I apologize if my simplistic joke made it sound that way.

    And yes, I know, it’s a little different to have a dangerous fool waving at crowds from balconies, vs having a dangerous fool in charge of the most powerful military in the history of the world.

    And yes, I know, there are many other places that this analogy falls apart.

    It’s just a cheap gag. I apologize to Charles, although this is not the first time he’s been the butt of jokes. Part of the job, I guess. Still, he deserves better.

    I just couldn’t help myself.

    @Benmssys 

     

    I have always viewed the modern British royal family as a walking, talking theme park.

     

    I

    • #37
  8. Michael G. Gallagher Coolidge
    Michael G. Gallagher
    @MichaelGallagher

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: “When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king. The palace becomes a circus.
    – Turkish Proverb

    What about a criminal moving into a palace?

    DonG

     

    Then the palace becomes a den of thieves, psychopaths, and pirates-and not the Johnny Depp kind of pirate.

    • #38
  9. Michael G. Gallagher Coolidge
    Michael G. Gallagher
    @MichaelGallagher

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Joker (View Comment):
    Now that Joe has a record to run on, I’m not so sure he can beat Trump.

    The only way that Biden could possibly lose to Trump would be in an election.

    Which seems exceedingly unlikely at this point.

    Democrats are going to do 2020 again, except better. Why would they not?

    @drbastiat & @Joker

     

    If the Democrats steal the 2024 election then people will have to go this route.

    https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/adding-strategic-nonviolence-unconventional-warfare-doctrine

    • #39
  10. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Well, one difference in Charles’ favor is, while he has spent the last 65 or so years waiting to become king, he was thus not harming his nation much at all.

    Whereas Biden has spent those same years grifting for his crime family, influence peddling, and being wrong on every issue he’s addressed.

    Actually, Charles will do less harm as King than he has been doing as Prince.  He is setting aside his environmental activism.

    • #40
  11. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Dr. Bastiat: “When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king.  The palace becomes a circus.
    – Turkish Proverb

    That is a very good proverb.  I’m going to try to remember that.

    • #41
  12. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Dr. Bastiat: “When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king.  The palace becomes a circus.
    – Turkish Proverb

    Priceless . . .

    • #42
  13. Eugene Kriegsmann Member
    Eugene Kriegsmann
    @EugeneKriegsmann

    The little Turkish proverb at the end of the piece is so incredibly appropriate, not only for the British crown in its current form, but also, as pointed out, for the current permutation of the American presidency. The major difference being that the King has almost no real power. He is a symbolic leader, Brandon, unfortunately, holds a great deal of power, more so because of an absurdly puppy-like press, and a party of anti-patriots that chose and elected him.

    Thank you Dr. Bastiat for another remarkable piece. You seem to aim for and inevitably hit the bullseye every time.

    • #43
  14. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Well, one difference in Charles’ favor is, while he has spent the last 65 or so years waiting to become king, he was thus not harming his nation much at all.

    Whereas Biden has spent those same years grifting for his crime family, influence peddling, and being wrong on every issue he’s addressed.

    Actually, Charles will do less harm as King than he has been doing as Prince. He is setting aside his environmental activism.

    My wife watched the coronation and told me that the king has a new carriage.  I asked if it was solar powered. It turns out to be pulled by horses which emit greenhouse gasses.

    • #44
  15. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Well, one difference in Charles’ favor is, while he has spent the last 65 or so years waiting to become king, he was thus not harming his nation much at all.

    Whereas Biden has spent those same years grifting for his crime family, influence peddling, and being wrong on every issue he’s addressed.

    Actually, Charles will do less harm as King than he has been doing as Prince. He is setting aside his environmental activism.

    He has people to do all of that FOR him, now.

    • #45
  16. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Stad (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: “When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king. The palace becomes a circus.
    – Turkish Proverb

    Priceless . . .

    I resemble that comment!

    • #46
  17. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    I have nothing personal against Chuck Windsor but I do not accept the legitimacy of the Hanoverian usurpation.  

    • #47
  18. Fritz Coolidge
    Fritz
    @Fritz

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    I have nothing personal against Chuck Windsor but I do not accept the legitimacy of the Hanoverian usurpation.

    I chuckled at this, and am reminded of the lack of historical accuracy in some news reports, such as the one stating as fact that where Charles’ coronation  was taking place had been the site of the coronations of his “ancestors since 1066.”

    No, those monarchs were mostly predecessors, just a few recent were ancestors.

    • #48
  19. Misthiocracy has never Member
    Misthiocracy has never
    @Misthiocracy

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    I have nothing personal against Chuck Windsor but I do not accept the legitimacy of the Hanoverian usurpation.

    Harold Godwinson or GTFO!

    • #49
  20. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    Misthiocracy has never (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    I have nothing personal against Chuck Windsor but I do not accept the legitimacy of the Hanoverian usurpation.

    Harold Godwinson or GTFO!

    Leaving out the profanity, well said.  If you go back far enough, there’s always someone who usurped the established order.

    And you don’t have to go as far back as Godwinson.  There’s Oliver Cromwell, and soon after the monarchy was reestablished, the Glorious Revolution that brought in William of Orange.

    • #50
  21. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    I have more interest in the British monarchy than I should. As an institution, I wish it well, but if the Brits were to get rid of it, it wouldn’t bother me that much.

    I read The Telegraph online, and my take is that King Charles is popular at the moment.

    Britain isn’t the only European monarchy, just the best known. There are seven kingdoms in Europe (pulled off of Wikipedia): Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, and Belgium.

    Spain’s king has gotten some press lately, since the old king abdicated due to corruption.

    Most people outside of those relavent countries can’t name the monarchs of those countries, but can name Great Britain’s. Part of Charles’s plan for the future is to make Britain’s monarchy more like the European’s, less grand perhaps, with less working royals.

    It’s a peculiar institution, that won’t go away. And when you break down what working royals actually do in their day to day working lives, I wonder why they do it. I mean, despite of the way they are feted from event to event, it’s amazingly dull work.

    How is aiding and abetting the WEF, the UN, and the WHO dull work?

    And even if it was, the pay is rather delightful. Holding on the tens of billions of dollars plus vast amounts of delicious real estate certainly offsets even the dullest of assignments.

    • #51
  22. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    How is aiding and abetting the WEF, the UN, and the WHO dull work?

    And even if it was, the pay is rather delightful. Holding on the tens of billions of dollars plus vast amounts of delicious real estate certainly offsets even the dullest of assignments.

    First, I’m not just referring to the King.  The supporting players don’t get visited by the various government ministers with their red boxes including weekly visits by the Prime Minister.

    Their daily regimen consists of going to local fairs, charitable events, and factories where they make an innocuous speech and then cut a ribbon.  Rinse and repeat.  During these events they make pleasant conversation with the attendees.  They are expert in the art of conversation without saying anything of substance.  Princess Anne is known for the number of these events, sometimes doing 2-3 a day, talking with strangers who bow and curtsy and who they are not likely to meet again.  It goes on and on.

    “Aiding and abetting the WEF, the UN, and the WHO ” is maybe 2% of their schedule.  Those state visits that get so much attention?  That’s included in the two percent.

    It’s 98% dull.

    • #52
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    How is aiding and abetting the WEF, the UN, and the WHO dull work?

    And even if it was, the pay is rather delightful. Holding on the tens of billions of dollars plus vast amounts of delicious real estate certainly offsets even the dullest of assignments.

    First, I’m not just referring to the King. The supporting players don’t get visited by the various government ministers with their red boxes including weekly visits by the Prime Minister.

    Their daily regimen consists of going to local fairs, charitable events, and factories where they make an innocuous speech and then cut a ribbon. Rinse and repeat. During these events they make pleasant conversation with the attendees. They are expert in the art of conversation without saying anything of substance. Princess Anne is known for the number of these events, sometimes doing 2-3 a day, talking with strangers who bow and curtsy and who they are not likely to meet again. It goes on and on.

    “Aiding and abetting the WEF, the UN, and the WHO ” is maybe 2% of their schedule. Those state visits that get so much attention? That’s included in the two percent.

    It’s 98% dull.

     

    The most relevant portion begins at 8:27 but DM doesn’t allow for pre-positioning.  (In fact it’s all good, of course.)

     

    • #53
  24. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Oh, and:

     

    • #54
  25. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    kedavis (View Comment):

    The most relevant portion begins at 8:27 but DM doesn’t allow for pre-positioning.  (In fact it’s all good, of course.)

     

    Uh, of course.  Monty Python, and Brit television humor in general isn’t my cup of tea.  I’m more interested in upper class rapier wit.

    I might be interested in a little Jeeves and Wooster and just about anything Hugh Laurie does.  House did have its comedic elements to it thanks to Laurie.  As the Brits like to say, he’s brilliant.

    But getting back to Python, John Cleese was recently asked about the coronation and he said he couldn’t stop laughing because of the pomp and the various silly robes everyone was wearing.  On the other hand, when he’s in a serious vein, he defends the monarchy.

    • #55
  26. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    The most relevant portion begins at 8:27 but DM doesn’t allow for pre-positioning. (In fact it’s all good, of course.)

     

    Uh, of course. Monty Python, and Brit television humor in general isn’t my cup of tea. I’m more interested in upper class rapier wit.

    I might be interested in a little Jeeves and Wooster and just about anything Hugh Laurie does. House did have its comedic elements to it thanks to Laurie. As the Brits like to say, he’s brilliant.

    But getting back to Python, John Cleese was recently asked about the coronation and he said he couldn’t stop laughing because of the pomp and the various silly robes everyone was wearing. On the other hand, when he’s in a serious vein, he defends the monarchy.

    Cleese was the royal in the second clip.

    • #56
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.