Rumors and Ruminations: Trump’s Arrest

 

So there’s this big rumor going around: Trump gonna be arrested. I don’t know the specifics and I do not care.

This nakedly political oppression under the color of law is just another step in a long series of abuses and usurpations. We see it every day, especially on days close to an election, but really, it’s everywhere, every day.

I don’t know what will happen. Maybe these headlines get packed away in a box to be deployed at a later date. Maybe there’s just some paper moved. I can’t imagine a perp-walk.  And anyway, I don’t know what I’ll do. Probably nothing. Maybe something.

Say what you will about Trump and how much you don’t like him, and the charges are valid, and there’s this tape you see… whatever. Democrats do not get so much as threatened with anything, whereas Republicans get impeached, investigated, and prosecuted. I do not care about the specifics. It’s the pattern which matters, and which is undeniable.

I don’t expect to convince anybody of anything — I’m hardly convinced myself — and I certainly won’t begrudge the RTs and the NTs their reluctance to get worked up over this on the particulars. The pattern, however, is probably where we will find more common ground on the right.

Today, the knob on an awful machine is set for Trump. Do they dare fire it?

Wars have started for reasons less directly, less visibly, less obviously a casus belli. We may be in the early throes of the collapse of what has been called “the everything bubble” for the last decade. Bad time to strike a match.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 35 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Nathanael Ferguson (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    It amazes me how many conservatives refuse to acknowledge the politicalization of the courts. This was a problem with Tom Delay.

    Correct. It is a case of willful blindness. Heads stuck in the sand to avoid seeing the truth and thus being forced to acknowledge it….

    I envision a boomer-con with a pillow over his head muttering some mantra about wanting to go back to the Bush years.

    • #31
  2. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    This is third world, banana republic type of thing. The country has really fallen. And I say the country because there are enough Democrats who support this. What is their end goal? I guess it draws plenty of donations. I don’t see any other reason.

    I have some mixed feelings, but shouldn’t office-holders even elected ones, be expected to follow the law, perhaps especially about things like classified documents? And what’s the excuse for letting them get away with it if they don’t follow the law?

    Maybe if these things were actually taken seriously and enforced, people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden wouldn’t flout the law so easily.

    Agree on classified documents but on this issue what law has he exactly broken?  From what I understand it was some sort of agreement to not talk about their affair. 

    • #32
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Manny (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    This is third world, banana republic type of thing. The country has really fallen. And I say the country because there are enough Democrats who support this. What is their end goal? I guess it draws plenty of donations. I don’t see any other reason.

    I have some mixed feelings, but shouldn’t office-holders even elected ones, be expected to follow the law, perhaps especially about things like classified documents? And what’s the excuse for letting them get away with it if they don’t follow the law?

    Maybe if these things were actually taken seriously and enforced, people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden wouldn’t flout the law so easily.

    Agree on classified documents but on this issue what law has he exactly broken? From what I understand it was some sort of agreement to not talk about their affair.

    Seems like they’re trying to make the legal issue not that he paid her, but HOW he paid her, from WHAT MONEY she was paid, whatever.  Although, as already mentioned, it was lawyer Michael Cohen who actually did the payment and he’s already been prosecuted/disbarred/etc for supposedly paying her from campaign funds or donations or something.

    All I can figure is that now they’re trying to say that Trump instructed Cohen to pay her from illegal funds or something.  Or maybe that it was a crime that Cohen was reimbursed as a “legal expense” although somehow Hillary calling the Steele Dossier a “legal expense” was fine.

    • #33
  4. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    The left, corporate media and the justice system all exhibit the same issues that they accuse Trump of. 

    Demagogy

    Abuse of Power

    Controlled by a foreign power (How many have ties to the CCP)

     

     

    • #34
  5. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    This is third world, banana republic type of thing. The country has really fallen. And I say the country because there are enough Democrats who support this. What is their end goal? I guess it draws plenty of donations. I don’t see any other reason.

    I have some mixed feelings, but shouldn’t office-holders even elected ones, be expected to follow the law, perhaps especially about things like classified documents? And what’s the excuse for letting them get away with it if they don’t follow the law?

    Maybe if these things were actually taken seriously and enforced, people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden wouldn’t flout the law so easily.

    Agree on classified documents but on this issue what law has he exactly broken? From what I understand it was some sort of agreement to not talk about their affair.

    Seems like they’re trying to make the legal issue not that he paid her, but HOW he paid her, from WHAT MONEY she was paid, whatever. Although, as already mentioned, it was lawyer Michael Cohen who actually did the payment and he’s already been prosecuted/disbarred/etc for supposedly paying her from campaign funds or donations or something.

    All I can figure is that now they’re trying to say that Trump instructed Cohen to pay her from illegal funds or something. Or maybe that it was a crime that Cohen was reimbursed as a “legal expense” although somehow Hillary calling the Steele Dossier a “legal expense” was fine.

    Ok. Thanks. 

    • #35
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.