Air Force Releases Private Documents on GOP Candidate

 

It now appears that the United States Air Force can confirm it sent supposedly private personnel information to the Democratic research firm Due Diligence Group. This is fantastic news! We can finally be assured that anything untoward that happened to a current Republican candidate back in the military can be brought out in the open. It is vitally important that any candidate who suffered a sexual assault in the military be forced to discuss that, at least if she is a Republican.

And we know that nothing will be prosecuted by the DOJ. That is because this is not as important as going after a person who might have been at a  Trump Rally on January 6th, even if he or she was never anywhere near the Capitol. Those people are insurrectionists who need to be imprisoned. Leaking files is no big deal, and look what it tells us about candidates.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 23 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    Well, at least they didn’t cover up sexual assaults or neglect to send domestic violence convictions to the NICS allowing a person to purchase a firearm and kill a bunch of people.

    Crap, they did that as well.  I am rapidly concluding that we need to burn all these orgs to the ground and start over from scratch.

    • #1
  2. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Bryan G. Stephens: And we know that nothing will be prosecuted by the DOJ.

    The article left out something vital, namely who is responsible for the leak. If the leaker was a civilian then, yes, it’s up to the DOJ. If the leaker was a member of the military  the prosecuting authority is Lieutenant General Charles L. Plummer, Commanding Officer of Air Force JAG. If the leaker is ex-military, they are subject to recall to the service for courts martial.

     

     

    • #2
  3. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    So what happens if I edit my title back?

    • #3
  4. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    EJHill (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens: And we know that nothing will be prosecuted by the DOJ.

    The article left out something vital, namely who is responsible for the leak. If the leaker was a civilian then, yes, it’s up to the DOJ. If the leaker was a member of the military the prosecuting authority is Lieutenant General Charles L. Plummer, Commanding Officer of Air Force JAG. If the leaker is ex-military, they are subject to recall to the service for courts martial.

     

     

    None of which will happen.

    • #4
  5. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    EJHill (View Comment):
    If the leaker was a member of the military  the prosecuting authority is Lieutenant General Charles L. Plummer, Commanding Officer of Air Force JAG.

    This is not true, in regards to the process. The commander of the individual (the first person in their chain of command on G-series orders), if the individual is currently serving, is the one to refer the matter to his servicing JAG for review and possible prosecution. The article 32 hearing members are who determines the charges.

    • #5
  6. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Bryan G. StephensSo what happens if I edit my title back?

    The fact that the title has been edited indicates it’s about to be promoted. If you edit it back promotion may be cancelled.

    • #6
  7. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Well, the DoD has my records, including health records. 

    • #7
  8. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Instugator: This is not true, in regards to the process.

    Do you honestly think that normal channels will be followed in such a politically charged case?

    • #8
  9. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Alex asks an interesting question. 

    • #9
  10. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    So what happens if I edit my title back?

    At least the URL isn’t changed. 

    • #10
  11. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Alex asks an interesting question.

    Gettin awful sick of government agencies making mistakes with other people’s information. 

    They have procedures, and personnel to burn. Leaked information, lying information requesters, exposed SSNs, this is simply not acceptable to me. 

    If they can’t take care of a citizen’s private information, they should not be allowed to have it. 

    • #11
  12. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    How does one falsely claim “express consent” to release information other than by fraud?

    • #12
  13. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    How does one falsely claim “express consent” to release information other than by fraud?

    Well, if my the person is conservative, they get to do it.

    • #13
  14. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Congressman Bacon, who was targeted, was on Tucker tonight.  It was informative.

    He mentioned that candidate Ruth Jennifer Green was hurt by the release of this material, and lost a close race.

    • #14
  15. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Congressman Bacon, who was targeted, was on Tucker tonight. It was informative.

    He mentioned that candidate Ruth Jennifer Green was hurt by the release of this material, and lost a close race.

    But the 2020 election was fine. 

    This is totally different. 

    • #15
  16. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    TBA (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Alex asks an interesting question.

     

    Gettin awful sick of government agencies making mistakes with other people’s information.

    They have procedures, and personnel to burn. Leaked information, lying information requesters, exposed SSNs, this is simply not acceptable to me.

    If they can’t take care of a citizen’s private information, they should not be allowed to have it.

    I’m even more disappointed in the lack of followup by Congress.  Congress funds the agencies that make these “mistakes.” 

    Late in the Clinton administrations, I got a polling call from someone representing Nick Smith, our congressional representative, who had always seemed to be a conservative. I may have contributed a minor amount to one or two of his campaigns.  She wanted to know which issues I thought were most important for Congress to deal with, and listed ten of them for me to pick from.  I picked one not on the list: corruption.

    “Oh, my,” was her response. I don’t remember if anything else was said, but that was the end of the conversation and the end of any support Nick Smith was getting from me. 

    (You may remember that the Clinton administration was one scandal after another, though the scandal news had eventually died down.  Clinton had made it through the impeachment process by this time.)

    • #16
  17. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    Here is a follow on this story

    GOP lawmakers seek investigation of ‘unauthorized’ disclosure of their Air Force records – POLITICO

     

    • #17
  18. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    GlennAmurgis (View Comment):

    Here is a follow on this story

    GOP lawmakers seek investigation of ‘unauthorized’ disclosure of their Air Force records – POLITICO

     

    “I understand the evidence has been turned over to the Department of Justice and I expect those who break the law to be prosecuted,” Bacon said in a statement to POLITICO. “This was more than just ‘dirty tricks’ by Democrat operatives, but likely violations of the law.”

    Nothing will happen. The DOJ will absolutely not go after anyone. 

    I thought our last President was a threat to democracy. Isn’t this a threat?

    • #18
  19. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    GlennAmurgis (View Comment):

    Here is a follow on this story

    GOP lawmakers seek investigation of ‘unauthorized’ disclosure of their Air Force records – POLITICO

     

    “I understand the evidence has been turned over to the Department of Justice and I expect those who break the law to be prosecuted,” Bacon said in a statement to POLITICO. “This was more than just ‘dirty tricks’ by Democrat operatives, but likely violations of the law.”

    Nothing will happen. The DOJ will absolutely not go after anyone.

    I thought our last President was a threat to democracy. Isn’t this a threat?

    Corporate media and many in GOPe is more aligned with the permanent bureaucracy to care about these stories. 

    How many of those covering DC has relationships/friends who are part of the bureaucracy?

     

    • #19
  20. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    This has a feel of only 2 years left to arrest tyranny. Not that tyranny is ever defeated. Only that if we don’t do something over the next 2 years to arrest it, then revolution –whenever that can be in the far future –will be the only remedy.

    • #20
  21. Al French Moderator
    Al French
    @AlFrench

    EJHill (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens: And we know that nothing will be prosecuted by the DOJ.

    The article left out something vital, namely who is responsible for the leak. If the leaker was a civilian then, yes, it’s up to the DOJ. If the leaker was a member of the military the prosecuting authority is Lieutenant General Charles L. Plummer, Commanding Officer of Air Force JAG. If the leaker is ex-military, they are subject to recall to the service for courts martial.

     

     

    The prosecuting authority is the miscreant’s commanding general. JAG has administrative control over his subordinates but, in these circumstances, not operational control.

    • #21
  22. Al French Moderator
    Al French
    @AlFrench

    Instugator (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):
    If the leaker was a member of the military the prosecuting authority is Lieutenant General Charles L. Plummer, Commanding Officer of Air Force JAG.

    This is not true, in regards to the process. The commander of the individual (the first person in their chain of command on G-series orders), if the individual is currently serving, is the one to refer the matter to his servicing JAG for review and possible prosecution. The article 32 hearing members are who determines the charges.

    This is correct, and more precise than my observation.

    • #22
  23. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Rodin (View Comment):

    This has a feel of only 2 years left to arrest tyranny. Not that tyranny is ever defeated. Only that if we don’t do something over the next 2 years to arrest it, then revolution –whenever that can be in the far future –will be the only remedy.

    After watching tyranny “arrest” Trump, I suspect you are a little optimistic.

    • #23
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.