What About Nikki Haley?


Kurt Schlichter writes a brutal takedown of Nikki Haley as the right’s version of Kamala. While I think he goes too far in comparing her to the awful Kamala, his article crystallized in my mind some concerns I have about Haley.

She didn’t have any real accomplishments as governor. Yes, she is pro-life, anti-alphabet gang, in favor of low taxes, etc., etc. But did she have any signature achievements as governor? After a little internet research (i.e., Wikipedia), I couldn’t find much.

Schlichter also criticizes her for not having any strong policy proposals. Her campaign announcement was a gauzy, saccharine video. Maybe she’ll come out with some good proposals, but combined with her lack of achievements as governor, this could be a major weakness.

She agrees with a lot of leftist hoaxes (e.g., George Floyd was a saint, that garage door pull really was a noose, and others) as John Hinderaker observes. And Gavin Sample. It seems that she wants media approval more than standing for what’s right.

Although I sort of agreed with removing the Confederate flag in South Carolina, I felt she threw the Republican legislators under the bus time and again as she implied they were still old-school racists while she was the enlightened one who got rid of the flag.

I’m not deeply bothered that she is running after saying she wouldn’t run against Trump. Politicians say that kind of stuff all the time. Yes, it would have been a little smarter on her part to think ahead and not make that kind of promise, but it’s par for the course.

On the plus side, she was a tough, well-spoken UN ambassador. She was effective in denouncing the crooks and thugs that run that body.  So maybe she does better implementing someone else’s policy rather than being at the top herself.

She is also well-spoken and quick on her feet with good one-liners (“it hurts more when you kick them with heels”).  She would be great in a debate with Dementia Joe. When a reporter from Christianity Today asked if she wanted her parents to convert to Christianity, she said, “What I hope is that my parents do what’s right for them,” which is a great way of not answering a very personal question.

If DeSantis doesn’t run or flames out and if Haley comes up with strong policy proposals, I could support her. She doesn’t have Trump’s baggage, so she would be easier to elect in the general. But I’m not terribly excited about her and have some concerns.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 121 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Hoyacon Member

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    I really like Nikki Haley’s idea of a cognitive ability test for presidential candidate who are over the age of 75.

    And possibly for US Senate candidates.

    And current members of the Senate. See DiFi.

    By all means let’s take the vote out of the hands of the populace.

    Since an Amendment would be necessary, the people would have their say through their elected representatives, both on the Federal and State level.

    Those pushing this, including Haley, were not doing so with mention of a constitutional amendment.

    I wish she hadn’t said it. I wish all candidates would confine themselves to talking about what is actually legally do-able and not talk about how they wish things were.

    To me, it’s just a reminder that a pol is a pol.  She perceives her age as a political advantage, and this is just an offshoot of that.  Whatever it takes.

    • #121
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.