We Could Always Try Reading the Text

 

As readers know, I like to study the actual text of the Torah. In no small part, this is because most people of all Judeo-Christian faiths tend to rely on what other people say the text says, instead of reading it themselves and trying to make sense of it directly.

Take, for example, the splitting of the Sea. Everyone knows the story: In view of all the people, Moses raises his staff, and G-d makes the sea split in two. The people walk through, marveling at what they see. The Egyptians, consumed with a battle lust that blinds their better judgment, chase after the Israelites – only to be drowned. The entire event is a visual spectacle. It is at once a demonstration of G-d’s power and the symbolic birthing of a nation. The Exodus has been memorialized in cinematic glory and countless storybooks for children. Everyone knows this version of the story.

There is only one problem: this is not what the text describes.

Here is how it happened:

The Egyptians gave chase to them, and all the chariot horses of Pharaoh, his riders, and his warriors overtook them encamped by the sea. As Pharaoh drew near, the Israelites caught sight of the Egyptians advancing upon them.

This is consistent with the “known” version. But then events take a turn. The people complain, Moses gives them a pep talk, and

Then G-d said to Moses, “Why do you cry out to Me? Tell the Israelites to go forward.”

But they do not do so. Not then. Instead, G-d rearranges the cloud and puts it between the Israelites and the following Egyptians.

The messenger of G-d, who had been going ahead of the Israelites, now moved and followed behind them; and the pillar of cloud shifted from in front of them and took up a place behind them, and it came between the Egyptians and Israelites. Thus there was the cloud with the darkness, and it cast a spell upon the night, so that the one could not come near the other all through the night.

Hold on! The cloud blocks the view of the Egyptians. But it happens at night.

Then, and only then:

Then Moses held out his arm over the sea and G-d drove back the sea with a strong east wind all that night, and turned the sea into dry ground. The waters were split, and the Israelites went into the sea on dry ground, the waters forming a wall for them on their right and on their left.

The splitting of the sea does NOT happen as a visual spectacle at all! There was no sunlight, no mention of any other light source. People could see, if at all, only by moonlight. It could not have been clear at all what was going on.

And there is no evidence the Egyptians knowingly walked into the seabed! Instead, they were following the cloud, blocked from any sight of the splitting of the sea ahead of them. They did not drive forward crazed with bloodlust, or recklessly driven by a death wish, walking between walls of water. And we know it because of what happened afterward:

At the morning watch, G-d looked down upon the Egyptian army from a pillar of fire and cloud, and threw the Egyptian army into panic.

The Egyptian army panicked because they could finally see where they were! The Egyptians had followed the cloud, which had led them into the seabed. But they did not know it!

The whole crossing of the people was at nighttime. So the visual spectacle was not the splitting of the sea or the crossing of the people. The visual spectacle happened when day broke:

Moses held out his arm over the sea, and at daybreak the sea returned to its normal state, and the Egyptians fled at its approach. But G-d hurled the Egyptians into the sea. The waters turned back and covered the chariots and the riders—Pharaoh’s entire army that followed them into the sea; not one of them remained.

And then, at that point, the point of the Exodus – all of it – became clear to the Israelites. It is then – and not at any time before – that they sing songs of praise and gratitude to G-d for their salvation. The realization happened at the same time as the final keystone of the salvation: at daybreak.

Thus G-d delivered Israel that day [this word refers to day and night – see Genesis] from the Egyptians. Israel saw the Egyptians dead on the shore of the sea.

We saw them alive on one side of the sea, and dead on the other. But what happened in between was cloaked in darkness.

To my surprise, I only realized this week that the common understanding was wrong. Even though I have read the Torah for as long as I could read. And I celebrate the Passover Seder every year, with hours of critical discussion. And I still got it wrong.

So the question for you, Dear Reader: Did you know it actually happened at night? Am I the fool?

[an @iwe and @eliyahumasinter work]

P.S. I think the original plan for the splitting of the sea was that it was supposed to happen during daytime. But when the people did not move forward into the sea when they were told to do so, G-d improvised and conducted the Exodus at night, when nobody could be certain of what was going on.

P.P.S. All through the time in Egypt, the people had no idea what was going on. They were buffeted by external forces, and never once really understood G-d’s Plan. Which is why at no time during any of the plagues did the people give thanks to G-d for helping them. It was only at the very end, with the benefit of hindsight, that the plan became clear and the reason for all the hardships could be understood and appreciated. And that is when the people express gratitude with the Song by the Sea. Hindsight is where we can most easily see G-d’s hand at work.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 9 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    I don’t get it.  The distinction that the hike across the Red Sea was at night and not in the daytime does not seem to diminish or change the essence of the narrative. 

    It was also a miracle that Charleton Heston brought those waves down on Yul Bryner’s guys without any CGI!!

    • #1
  2. Mad Gerald Coolidge
    Mad Gerald
    @Jose

    I did not realize that this happened at night.  Thanks for this post.

    • #2
  3. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    I don’t get it. The distinction that the hike across the Red Sea was at night and not in the daytime does not seem to diminish or change the essence of the narrative.

    It was also a miracle that Charleton Heston brought those waves down on Yul Bryner’s guys without any CGI!!

    And I can tell you how! (Sorry, iWe…your theological point is vastly more important than a description of 1956-era special effects.) In what’s now Paramount’s parking lot, De Mille’s special effects team had three swimming-pool sized water ponds built, two large full ones flanking a long, narrow empty one. On cue, cameras rolled while the two outer pools were pumped to the point of overflowing into the narrow channel between them. Two walls of water crashed downwards until the middle pool was also full. 

    Then they printed the film backwards. Now a solid body of water suddenly splits, and the center drops to the bottom while water rushes upwards. The Red Sea is parted!

    • #3
  4. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    I don’t get it. The distinction that the hike across the Red Sea was at night and not in the daytime does not seem to diminish or change the essence of the narrative.

    It was also a miracle that Charleton Heston brought those waves down on Yul Bryner’s guys without any CGI!!

    And I can tell you how! (Sorry, iWe…your theological point is vastly more important than a description of 1956-era special effects.) In what’s now Paramount’s parking lot, De Mille’s special effects team had three swimming-pool sized water ponds built, two large full ones flanking a long, narrow empty one. On cue, cameras rolled while the two outer pools were pumped to the point of overflowing into the narrow channel between them. Two walls of water crashed downwards until the middle pool was also full.

    Then they printed the film backwards. Now a solid body of water suddenly splits, and the center drops to the bottom while water rushes upwards. The Red Sea is parted!

    Yes. That was explained to us when I took my family on a tour of Universal Studios in 1978. Thanks!

    • #4
  5. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    I don’t get it. The distinction that the hike across the Red Sea was at night and not in the daytime does not seem to diminish or change the essence of the narrative.

    It was also a miracle that Charleton Heston brought those waves down on Yul Bryner’s guys without any CGI!!

    And I can tell you how! (Sorry, iWe…your theological point is vastly more important than a description of 1956-era special effects.) In what’s now Paramount’s parking lot, De Mille’s special effects team had three swimming-pool sized water ponds built, two large full ones flanking a long, narrow empty one. On cue, cameras rolled while the two outer pools were pumped to the point of overflowing into the narrow channel between them. Two walls of water crashed downwards until the middle pool was also full.

    Then they printed the film backwards. Now a solid body of water suddenly splits, and the center drops to the bottom while water rushes upwards. The Red Sea is parted!

    • #5
  6. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    I’ve read Exodus numerous times.  Did not catch it.  De Mille’s visuals are imprinted in my head.

    Great post!

    • #6
  7. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Old Bathos (View Comment):
    I don’t get it.  The distinction that the hike across the Red Sea was at night and not in the daytime does not seem to diminish or change the essence of the narrative. 

    It tells us that the Israelites lacked the courage to go during the day (the people were really incapable of initiative). That the Egyptians did not rush heedlessly into the seabed. So we learn more about the state of mind of both camps – and that G-d’s earlier commandment to enter the water was not followed.

     

    • #7
  8. Eridemus Coolidge
    Eridemus
    @Eridemus

    Actually the sky looks pretty dark in that movie version, and the producers probably didn’t want to stray too far. Maybe the idea of “daylight” was in the memories of the viewers who were looking more at the water effect. 

    • #8
  9. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Eridemus (View Comment):

    Actually the sky looks pretty dark in that movie version, and the producers probably didn’t want to stray too far. Maybe the idea of “daylight” was in the memories of the viewers who were looking more at the water effect.

    The whole scene shows that it is, or starts, in daylight. The sky darkens quickly, however.

    • #9
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.