Just Say No


Nobody seems to know what to do about our illegal immigration crisis. Somehow, no other nation in the world seems helpless to control unlimited, illegal immigration.  Democrats alternately claim it is being handled, and that it is the fault of uncooperative Republicans, who in turn can only agree that “something“ must be done.

It’s time for a Great Reset, to rethink the basics of how we treat illegal immigration.  Here’s an idea: Follow The Law. Just Say No.

It starts with refuting the notion that noncitizens, who have followed none of our rules for legal entry, have a natural right to come here anyway, and we have a corresponding duty to oblige them. Like all other nations, we have no such moral burden.

We make an effort to prevent entry for some. But most immigrants, when they reach American soil, are meekly processed through and provided food, shelter, and transportation into our country, as if that doesn’t incentivize their coming.

Among other obfuscations, open border advocates claim our immigration laws need a complete overhaul to mitigate our ongoing catastrophe. Nobody ever specifies exactly what those new laws are.

Reforms initiated by Democrats when Biden took office included eliminating the Remain in Mexico policy, and anything else with the taint of Trump about them. Predictably, conditions at the border worsened. The only “solution” Democrats have any interest in is amnesty, which is no solution at all.

We have adequate laws in place. Illegal immigration is already illegal. We just need to execute those laws.

Today, the operating principle of our immigration policy is sanctioned asylum fraud. Instead of a good faith effort to legally control our borders, illegal immigrants are coached to state “I am in fear“ and we pretend to believe them.

But accepting the same lie millions of times is simple abuse of asylum.  Asylum, unlike illegal immigration, is a compassionate process administered internationally to provide safe harbor to individuals suffering persecution, or a credible  fear of persecution, due to one of five specific causes: race, religion, nationality, social group, or political standing.

Persons claiming asylum have their cases heard in court. If they prevail, they are granted “indefinite“ asylum with the tacit understanding that the asylum lasts until the threat is removed.

That’s a far cry from the daily mobs at our border, who, understandably, for economic reasons, would rather live in the US than in their home country. It would be wonderful if we could save every person in the world living in poverty by bringing them here, but that’s not the way it works in our world of corrupt socialist autocracies.

But we can, and are, making our own country less safe and free, less fit to be a beacon of liberty under law to others.

In spite of the fact that only a minuscule percentage of the millions of asylum claims made at the border are ever substantiated, border patrol agents are instructed to continue to process them as potential claims with a deferred court hearing and release into the US.

Although the asylum status claims at the border are transparently bogus, the scofflaws rarely face consequences for failure to appear at their subsequent hearing. They will eventually be offered amnesty, then citizenship, then registration as a Democrat, if all works as planned.

There’s a better way, simple and legal. We should require all asylum claims to be made in their home country. Refugee processing centers could be established in the common countries of origin, where applicants would have their status determined. Unaccompanied minors at the border would be sent home.

This would greatly benefit legitimate asylum seekers. They could be assured of their status before beginning the journey to safety. The rest could be politely turned away at the border as the law requires. Word would quickly spread that the rules have changed. The crowds at the border would soon dissipate.

Americans are beginning to appreciate the stress unlimited migration places on our education, medical and judicial systems. Barring a major course correction, it is bound to get much worse.

But we can end the misery if we just have the will to do so. Follow The Law. What a Concept!

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 4 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Steve Fast Coolidge
    Steve Fast

    Imagine that – the president faithfully executing the law.

    • #1
  2. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins

    Slogans are great, aren’t they?  Unfortunately they ignore trade-offs in life.  Might I suggest four alternatives.

    It appears that we have a few options.  First, entirely remove the aslyum statutes from the U.S. Code.  Second, redefine aslyum under the U.S. Code, and build in mini-hearings as to a showing of probable cause before leaving the border, which would likely exclude half of the aslsym seekers, or add a “Remain in Mexico” statute which is what we used under Title 42.  Third, build huge holding facilities to house people inside of the United States.  Fourth, whine and complain like victims.  I suggest the second and third courses of action.  That will require passage in the Senate which has a 60 vote threshold. 

    In December, Senators Thom Tillis and Krysten Sinema were trying to negotiate an agreement on Title 42 paired with relief with “Dreamers” whose parents brought them to the U.S. as children.  I could live with this provided that the Dreamers not be able to sponsor their parents under the rubric of “family unification.”  I would also suggest a new statute that any person who enters the country who is allowed to stay can never become a citizen and be allowed to vote.

    An interesting thing happened in Arizona in the 2022 election.  About a dozen years ago, the voters enacted a statute that said that children raised in Arizona who were brought here illegally could not receive “in state” tuition.  At the last election, the voters changed their minds, and those young people are not able to receive “in state” tuition.

    There is a deal that can be struck to stop the fake aslyum seekers, especially if paired with relief for the “Dreamers.”  (I had a client who was a “Dreamer.”  She was brought here from Mexico when she was 3 years old.  She speaks flawless English.  She is now a Dental Assistant.)

    I would suggest that a third of American voters who be willing to repeal the aslyum laws, and a third of Americans want open borders.  I suggest a path in between, with the aslyum laws being tightened up, but allowing people like my client who was brought here at age 3 to be able to stay, given that the last time she saw Mexico was when she was three years old.

    • #2
  3. Seawriter Contributor

    Declare it an invasion. Capture all illegal immigrants as illegal combatants and hold them as prisoners of war for the duration of the invasion.  In state POW camps. Refuse all efforts by the Federal Government to take custody of them. Offer to release the illegal combatants if they accept repatriation to the border or their country of origin. If they violate parole (return to the state illegally) hold them in solitary confinement as parole violators. 

    They won’t come back to the state they were released from after the state makes public examples of the first few parole violators.

    • #3
  4. Concretevol Thatcher

    Nothing will ever change significantly with this issue.  It’s too political and neither side will give an inch because they can’t stand it if it seems like a “win” for the other side.  

    • #4
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.