To Kill an Infant

 

I believe that abortion is infanticide.  Perhaps technically a child needs to be born to be an infant, but I don’t see a discontinuity between a living human being in the womb and a living human being outside the womb.  We are all in a continuum from conception to aged death, from the inception of life to our last breath.

But I acknowledge there is a linguistic precision between a fetus and an infant.

So once a fetus has exited the womb and becomes an infant, it would be proper to say that killing the infant is certainly infanticide.  Could anyone in this day and age have the ethics to allow the killing of a born infant?

The answer to that is a resounding yes210 Democrats voted to kill a born infant, a living infant that has survived an abortion attempt.  210 Democrats support infanticide.

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act requires that, when a baby is born alive following an abortion, health care practitioners must exercise the same degree of professional skill and care that would be offered to any other child born alive at the same gestational age.

The child is alive.  It will have moving arms and legs, may try to let out a cry, and certainly express some sort of distress.  Can anyone with a human heart not try to save its life?

Yes!

The Democrats and like-minded people expect—no stipulate through law—that such an infant be allowed to die.  What does it mean “allowed to die”?  It means to just leave it without the comfort and nutrition that any natural parent would provide to any infant.  Would an infant not born of an abortion, fully healthy, live very long if it were not cared for?  Of course not.

There is no difference between an infant born of a botched abortion and one born wanted by his or her parents.

To allow a newborn to die is infanticide.  It is no different than the ancient pagans who left their unwanted infants in the forest to die.  Frank Pavone, head of Priests for Life, condemned those that voted against it.

“The pro-abortion Democrats, on the other hand, can no longer hide their extremism. The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act has nothing to do with abortion, other than calling for life-saving care for newborns who survive this brutal procedure. It’s a life-saving bill, but not an abortion restriction. Democrats voted against it. They voted against saving the lives of the most vulnerable,” he told LifeNews.

Mind you, even the pro-abortion Republicans voted to save the lives of the born alive.  This was a strict party-line vote with only two Democrats voting for saving the infants.  It passed 220-210, only to be abandoned in the Democrat-controlled Senate or vetoed by our pro-abortion Democrat president.

Published in Healthcare
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 69 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Manny (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    It can only be explained by demonic activity.

    Lucifer disagrees. He says that humanity creates its own evil and he merely observes. He did help Robert Jphnson make blues music though.

    It all started at the fall of man in the Garden, Henry. Satan was there.

    Firstly, it is Jewish parable and not a thing that actually happened. Secondly, why does G-d wish to deny knowledge to humanity?

    I thought I showed you why that argument is wrong. I guess you forgot. God gave us knowledge of what the fruit entailed. He did not deny us knowledge. He denied us use of that knowledge. He set up a moral barrier on on taking that fruit. That is comparable to murder. We have knowledge of how to murder someone: shoot them, strangle them, bash their skull in. Though we know of that knowledge, there is a moral barrier in partaking of that knowledge. Murder is wrong, and you should not do it. Do you agree?

    No I do not. We felt shame when we ate the fruit and we became conscious of our nakedness. That shame came from knowledge.

    Also, I made the case for infanticide here.

    https://ricochet.com/598112/isnt-some-infanticide-good/

    • #61
  2. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    This shows where we are – all grinning demonically that they can kill babies born alive.

    The Babylon Bee plays off the fact that butchers also wear white. 

    https://babylonbee.com/news/democrat-womens-caucus-wears-white-butcher-coats-in-support-of-abortion 

     

    • #62
  3. Hugh Inactive
    Hugh
    @Hugh

    Percival (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    It can only be explained by demonic activity.

    Lucifer disagrees. He says that humanity creates its own evil and he merely observes. He did help Robert Jphnson make blues music though.

    It all started at the fall of man in the Garden, Henry. Satan was there.

    Firstly, it is Jewish parable and not a thing that actually happened. Secondly, why does G-d wish to deny knowledge to humanity?

    Who can say what in Genesis, parable or not, actually happened. I’m trying to envision God passing on to the ancients the physics behind the creation of the universe. Just like physics is over most people’s heads today as 7000 years ago, parables were easily learned and repeated then as now. There is only so much you are capable of and entitled to know. Faith provides the rest.

    I once read a science fiction story where the question was put “What is the value of a precise explanation to proximate minds?”

    Now I’m off to explain electromagnetism to a four year old.

    use Power Rangers vidoes.  its easier

    • #63
  4. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    This shows where we are – all grinning demonically that they can kill babies born alive.

    Dressed in Dem KKK white. 

    • #64
  5. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    How did the Left ever come up with the term “abortion care” to mean killing children. Isn’t “abortion care” the saving of the life of the child born alive from an abortion. The Left lives in a world without meaning or truth.

    I have not heard it yet but does not surprise me. It’s downright Orwellian.

    Yes and it is exactly what the Democratic Women’s Conference tweeted – see comment #55

    Oh I see now. I passed right over it to the picture. Abortion care…Pffft. 

    • #65
  6. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    It can only be explained by demonic activity.

    Lucifer disagrees. He says that humanity creates its own evil and he merely observes. He did help Robert Jphnson make blues music though.

    It all started at the fall of man in the Garden, Henry. Satan was there.

    Firstly, it is Jewish parable and not a thing that actually happened. Secondly, why does G-d wish to deny knowledge to humanity?

    I thought I showed you why that argument is wrong. I guess you forgot. God gave us knowledge of what the fruit entailed. He did not deny us knowledge. He denied us use of that knowledge. He set up a moral barrier on on taking that fruit. That is comparable to murder. We have knowledge of how to murder someone: shoot them, strangle them, bash their skull in. Though we know of that knowledge, there is a moral barrier in partaking of that knowledge. Murder is wrong, and you should not do it. Do you agree?

    No I do not. We felt shame when we ate the fruit and we became conscious of our nakedness. That shame came from knowledge.

    Also, I made the case for infanticide here.

    https://ricochet.com/598112/isnt-some-infanticide-good/

    Well Henry, the best that I can do is passionately disagree and say that is not on the side of our better angels. 

    • #66
  7. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    This shows where we are – all grinning demonically that they can kill babies born alive.

     

    The Babylon Bee plays off the fact that butchers also wear white.

    https://babylonbee.com/news/democrat-womens-caucus-wears-white-butcher-coats-in-support-of-abortion

     

    That was excellent. 

    • #67
  8. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    This shows where we are – all grinning demonically that they can kill babies born alive.

     

    Dressed in Dem KKK white.

    Ouch.

    The herd of hunched-over, white-clad crones then danced and shimmied around a large boiling cauldron, waved sharp metal cleavers in the air, and screeched a sacred feminine moon chant to appease Molech before shuffling awkwardly into the Capitol like a flock of broken ducks.

    • #68
  9. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):

    How did the Left ever come up with the term “abortion care” to mean killing children. Isn’t “abortion care” the saving of the life of the child born alive from an abortion. The Left lives in a world without meaning or truth.

    Well, it implies that someone is caring about something.  What all exactly is left to the imagination of the hearer.

    • #69
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.