Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
How Republicans Will Elect Biden 2.0 in 2024
“Biden 2.0” is a stand-in for some Democrat figurehead of the Party of Death and Destruction (D). It could be Biden (D). It could be Harris (D). Maybe gruesome Newsome (D). Doesn’t matter, I predict we’ll have one of them, and it will be because “a majority [or, at least, a plurality] of Republicans want Trump, but the Republican Party says we can’t have him.”
This is a similar dynamic to the Republican’s Taft-Roosevelt split that produced probably the most destructive presidency of the 20th century — Woodrow Wilson (D) — followed closely by FDR (D) and LBJ (D) (notice a pattern?).
Dan Gelernter spelled it out masterfully earlier in the month in Trump Was a Mistake, and now speaks for me in The Coming Split.
But, despite the obvious differences, we’re heading for a 1912-repeat, in which the Republican Party ignores its own voters. The Republican machine has no intention of letting us choose Trump again: He is not a uniparty team player. They’d rather lose an election to the Democrats, their brothers in crime, than win with Trump.
I especially appreciate his points here [emphasis mine]:
I’m sure I’ll be accused of being a shill for the Democrats here, and as far as I’m concerned that’s as credible as being accused of shilling for Russia these days. I’m not suggesting you have to do what I do, either. But I have no intention of supporting a Republican Party that manifestly contravenes the desires of its voters. The RNC can pretend Trump isn’t loved by the base anymore, that he doesn’t have packed rallies everywhere he goes. But I’m not buying it: Talk to Republican voters anywhere outside the Beltway, and it is obvious that he is admired and even loved by those who consider themselves “ordinary” Americans.
Mitch McConnell put cement boots on the Republican party and pushed it into the Potomac with this line: “providing assistance for Ukrainians to defeat the Russians is the number one priority for the United States right now, according to most Republicans.”
In response, I’ll quote a different Mc: “Nuts!” — General McAuliffe
Trump may be our General Patton and the Third Army of his voters the only force that can save America from Biden 2.0.
MAGA!
Published in General
It really feels like the millenials were the harvest.
Once traditions are separated from their source, they become personal preferences. Determining the good and bad becomes subjective. We see that now from the secular cultural Marxists. The party in power determines the good and bad. Like it or not, the secular Marxists are in power. No. Society must have values that transcend the party in power. There is a reason they are hostile towards religion and seek to separate us from our western Judeo-Christian past. Atheist don’t see it, don’t understand it. They can’t see past Trump’s tweets and personality. They think all will be fine if we elect DeSantis. Some think we are a cult. We aren’t. We know God picked imperfect men to save his people. We know we picked an imperfect man but he had great instincts.
No, they were harvesting for years. Their earlier harvests write education theories, teach future teachers in schools of education, teach college courses in other fields, run the College Board, and write the textbooks. That is why even “Christian” private schools didn’t escape this. Their teachers were trained in the lefty teacher mills, too.
The nice thing is is I’m not done yet. I can offer to homeschool my grandkids.
Abeka offers great materials.
You missed Berlinski’s point completely. He did elaborate and said that for most religious people it is the fear of divine punishment that compels them to do right, or at least refrain from doing wrong. The question of whether “Religious people don’t always know what is the right thing ” is irrelevant to his point that atheists have nothing compelling them to refrain from doing wrong even when they know their actions are wrong.
He went on to discuss the parallel between divine punishment and civil punishment, but I don’t have the book handy and can’t be sure I got his points correct.
Oh you’re young! Why did I picture you as old like me. LOL. Good point. It may have to with that generation coming of age. I had not thought of that.
I hit the like button because I liked the first couple of sentences. As I’ve written before I don’t subscribe to Trump as the only possible leader. I know there are more effective leaders. The way you frame it, you’ve made him out to a cult figure, and that will never work out.
I haven’t read Berlinski, but I did write a post along these lines:
https://ricochet.com/1334430/what-we-need-right-now-is-some-more-hellfire-and-damnation/
The goal for Catholics is to increasingly do right to please God and less to avoid punishment, but fear of punishment is always there. As it should be.
No, this is an easy dismissal that misses the point. Sometimes you need an a-hole like Trump when at war with
demonsthe Left. And his instincts are very, very good and he’s shown that he’s on our side (thus, MAGA and America(ns) first).Apparently Ron DeSantis looked like a deer in the headlights in his debate with Charlie Crist (I didn’t watch it myself). He’s proven to be a good governor, but on the national stage he’s an unknown and could be susceptible to the malign influences of the Deep State.
Put not your faith in princes, but judge leaders by their fruits, not their style. Trump accomplished things I never thought I see in my lifetime despite the calumnies and bipartisan forces arrayed against him. I’m not sure DeSantis (or anyone else for that matter) would hold up as well.
From The Federalist:
Read the whole thing:
https://thefederalist.com/2023/01/02/amid-the-ruin-of-modernity-pope-benedict-xvi-championed-a-restoration-of-reason-and-faith/
For a believing Christian who has read about the nature of the punishment(s) Jesus suffered for us the fear of disappointing Him is probably paramount.
No, I don’t frame him as a cult leader but the imperfect leader who fights off the bad guys then must leave because he isn’t pure enough for the people he saved. That idea is borrowed from VDH. Unlike Shane, he wasn’t allowed to finish the job before the purist people wanted to be rid of him. Big mistake.
I also have admitted we have other strong leaders and I don’t want to sacrifice them to the predictable lefty assault as long as we have an unworthy populace willing to fall for the left’s propaganda. The 2022 election sealed it for me. All I see is those on my side chasing the next shiny object with no proof they recognize the real threat.
After this last election I question whether his instincts are very good. After his last election and the fallout certainly makes me question his instincts. You seem to be blind to some of his bad decisions. That tells me people follow him as a cult leader.
I don’t have a good definition for brainwashing. That’s why I asked.
Kevin Hassett, in The Drift, provides plenty of examples of Trump’s instincts as president. He has endured more than most of us have endured since 2015. If it has finally taken its toll, then that would be a shame for him and a damning testimony to our worthless party.
LOL, and this is not cult leader language?
You know if you’re serious about Trumpers making Trump into a cult leader, you’re wrong and really crazy. If you aren’t then you are wrong and being really insulting.
Ex-Cosmo magazine writer: “Propaganda is half-truth, selective truth, and truth out of context. It isn’t just a bunch of lies. And one thing that people don’t recognize about propaganda, when they look at it, look for the things that aren’t there; the things that are invisible. The mother, and the child, was invisible in the Cosmo Girl philosophy ”
This sort of goes to the discussion on this thread, what is the difference between brainwashing, indoctrination, socialization, and propaganda?
Given that quote, I’d pose that healthy socialization/indoctrination seeks to provide honest answers where possible and appropriate*. Peter claims we are all believers part of the royal priesthood, Paul exhorts us to study and show ourselves approved. Those really stood out when I was learning a little about Druidism, because Druidism hides things from their followers – only the high priests have access to hidden knowledge.
Unhealthy seeks to trick or manipulate by hiding information or outright lying.
Now an honest person is not going to be perfect and will have moments of wrong. And even a loving parent will choose manipulation over honesty out of fear. But I think in raising children, we should aim for as honest about things as we can. The euphemisms used for age appropriateness (like birds and the bees) should be solid enough that they can be built on without fixing or unlearning things.
* I do sometimes work with my kids doing the right thing without all the information because that is true to real life. We don’t always have the luxury of making perfectly informed decisions. Everything always comes with some amount of trust.
Ok, sorry. I’ll back off.
Sorry. I probably shouldn’t have said anything. But I just got pissed off.
Righteous pissed-offedness is okay.
It’s ok. I don’t want our disagreement to be personal.
Good. Thanks.
And yet advertisers have been paying premiums to do this since the dawn of television; one would think they would have noticed a distinct lack of impact by now. Its a factor, one that is enhanced through repeated exposure, not a deterministic variable that hypnotizes people.
You also seem to believe the entire notion of totalitarianism (as opposed to authoritarianism) and its inherent dangers is also bunk, as it rests on the same underlying characteristics of the human mind and how it is influenced over time through coercion, saturation, and narrative control.