Where Do We Go from Here?

 

If one spends some time examining what has happened between the lead-up to the 2016 election and since then, as it regards Donald Trump, I think it is really difficult to pin any serious wrongdoing, much less actions involving criminal intent on him.

It is very interesting how the media helped Trump with publicity during the 2016 Republican primary campaign, then turned immediately into almost totally biased opposition after that. He still won that election, although the Democrats flailed about in severe election denial. Most already existing mainstream media has been anti-Trump since his election in 2016. Trump has had significant support in alternative media sources.

Democrats, aided by anti-Trump turncoat Republicans, worked throughout Trump’s term to bring him down, mostly with false information and accusations of wrongdoing, nothing ever proven, including claims that Trump’s actions and statements about the 2020 election and during the January 6 protests and riot involved inciting insurrection. Let’s refer to these anti-Trump-Agenda types as Globalists.

There are others, who may actually support Trump’s agenda but don’t like how he conducts himself, they don’t like his personality, so they tend to turn to other Republicans who actually either support the Globalists or do little to oppose them. Trump’s clarion call is to Make America Great Again (MAGA). Globalists’ falsely label MAGA as fascist, a term that describes forms of national socialism. MAGA does promote America’s national sovereignty but certainly not socialism. Trump’s agenda for MAGA has a number of issues to be addressed; trade, border control, and military conflict, lead that list. But his four years in office reveal we are in a real fight for the freedoms Americans are guaranteed under the US Constitution against the Oligarchs pushing for one world government.

Meanwhile, we were learning so many dark things about Democrats in general, and even some Republicans, and our federal bureaucracy, but without generating any inquiry interests in the various departments and agencies of the government. A picture depicting a severe and almost total political divide between the Republicans (Trump-led) and the Democrats (Obama-led) emerged in the 2020 and 2022 elections.

The Globalist movement led by the World Economic Forum (WEF) benefits from a century of groundwork by the Socialists and Communists in America culminating in the last 40 years with the hollowing out of America’s traditional institutions. The MAGA agenda is arrayed in opposition to the Global Socialists (Globalists) and strives to restore the integrity of our emptied traditional institutions.  The weapons are money, political power, disinformation, and knowledge. I’m using knowledge here as complete and truthful information as opposed to propaganda and indoctrination.

There are plenty of issues, viewpoints, and characters that will be part of the coming period.

Pay attention and enjoy the ride.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 69 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I don’t think that any of them will meet the absolute standards that you have set for forth, but many will come close.  Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the good.

    Uh…

    Everything Moves Towards Communism All Of The Time™

    • #61
  2. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    @ garyrobbins Is there a candidate in the field of possibles who will carry forward the populist agenda that the patriotic Americans have shown they want carried out?

    Doggone nearly every Republican.

    This must include a total rejection of the climate change movement to abandon fossil fuels unless the adoption of nuclear fuel as a replacement in adopted. It also must include a rejection of any moves to support a globalist agenda, in other words, there must be support for continued American national sovereignty without exception.

    I don’t think that any of them will meet the absolute standards that you have set for forth, but many will come close. Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the good.

    You do. You have.

    It is Pretty much the basis of almost every single post that you have on ricochet is making the perfect the enemy of the good.

    Your denial on this is so high it is amazing.

    BINGO

    • #62
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I take issue with your notion that any candidate “must include a rejection of any moves to support a globalist agenda, in other words, there my be support for continued American national sovereignity without exception.”  Um, what does that mean?  That frankly sounds conspriatorial, using the word “globalist.”  Does that mean that we have to stand by while Russia rolls over Ukraine?  If so, count me out.  

    Further proof that you don’t study public policy. 

    • #63
  4. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson: The Globalist movement led by the World Economic Forum (WEF) benefits from a century of groundwork by the Socialists and Communists in America culminating in the last 40 years with the hollowing out of America’s traditional institutions.

    i.e.

    https://ricochet.com/podcast/federalist-radio-hour/a-lonely-america-is-a-broken-america/

     

     

    The first thought this brought to mind is this is why they go after the family.

    I cannot recommend that interview enough.

    • #64
  5. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I take issue with your notion that any candidate “must include a rejection of any moves to support a globalist agenda, in other words, there my be support for continued American national sovereignity without exception.” Um, what does that mean? That frankly sounds conspriatorial, using the word “globalist.” Does that mean that we have to stand by while Russia rolls over Ukraine? If so, count me out.

    Further proof that you don’t study public policy.

    Exactly. @garyrobbins Notice that a justification for American action in that conflict is not part of Gary’s argument.

    • #65
  6. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I came up with a fairly simple definition of globalism, but I can’t recall it at this moment.

    • #66
  7. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Replying to“@getpaidwriteI am neither conventionally right nor left, but I agree with your point. The woke mind virus has thoroughly penetrated entertainment and is pushing civilization towards suicide. There needs to be a counter-narrative.”

    The above is a statement by Elon Musk about the current state of cultural affairs in America.  The populist movement is our very first political effort to address this issue and the funding by big donors of Establishment GOP candidates, and efforts to turn more populists candidates towards GOP Establishment goals, needs to be countered and resisted.

    This makes me wonder if the current populist movement is really representing the middle of the political spectrum in America and we have allowed the Left to control the narrative by convincing the less aware through propaganda that the we are somehow representing the evil of those labeled far right from the past, i.e. the Fascists.

    I never recognize myself in the  descriptions of my political posture leveled at us by the Left and the MSM.

    • #67
  8. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I take issue with your notion that any candidate “must include a rejection of any moves to support a globalist agenda, in other words, there my be support for continued American national sovereignity without exception.”  Um, what does that mean?  That frankly sounds conspriatorial, using the word “globalist.” 

    I know I’m repetitive on this, but you think exactly like all of the Principles First crowd.

    • #68
  9. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    This must include a total rejection of the climate change movement to abandon fossil fuels unless the adoption of nuclear fuel as a replacement in adopted. It also must include a rejection of any moves to support a globalist agenda, in other words, there must be support for continued American national sovereignty without exception.

    I don’t think that any of them will meet the absolute standards that you have set for forth, but many will come close. Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the good.

    Why would they need to fudge anything about these two requirements? We all know that the current climate change movement agenda cannot be followed without serious reductions in American economic activity resulting in reductions of our standard of living. Do you support that as a feature for an acceptable candidate?

    I mostly agree with you about climate change. While there is nominal climate change, it can be managed without destroying our country.

    I take issue with your notion that any candidate “must include a rejection of any moves to support a globalist agenda, in other words, there my be support for continued American national sovereignity without exception.” Um, what does that mean? That frankly sounds conspriatorial, using the word “globalist.” Does that mean that we have to stand by while Russia rolls over Ukraine? If so, count me out.

    Here’s CNN using their intelligence analyst to go after the free speech support advocated by Elon Musk since it will allow all to express their views on the Ukraine conflict, a clip from RedState:

    CNN Calls Freedom of Speech ‘Nonsense’ in Moronic Rant

    • #69
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.