The Final Numbers from Arizona (13 Days After Election Edition)

 

You guys: On Monday, November 21, all counties in the state of Arizona finally finished counting the Election Day votes. And it only took them 13 days. In fact, two of the contests were so close that automatic recounts were triggered. Those won’t begin until after December 5 … another 14 days away.

Want to restore trust in the process, Arizona? Reform the bad election laws. For the last time, let’s go to the big board…

Governor

Candidate Percentage Vote Total
Kari Lake (R) 49.7% 1,270,774
√ Katie Hobbs (D) 50.3% 1,287,890

U.S. Senator (race called for Sen. Kelly, Friday, Nov. 11)

Candidate Percentage Vote Total
Blake Masters (R) 46.5% 1,190,643
√ Mark Kelly (D) 51.4% 1,315,771

Secretary of State (race called for Adrian Fontes, Friday, Nov. 11)

Candidate Percentage Vote Total
Mark Finchem (R) 47.6% 1,200,411
√ Adrian Fontes (D) 52.4% 1,320,618

Attorney General

Candidate Percentage Vote Total
Abe Hamadeh (R) 50.0% 1,254,102
* Kris Mayes (D) 50.0% 1,254,612

Treasurer (race called for Kimberly Yee, Saturday, Nov. 12)

Candidate Percentage Vote Total
√ Kimberly Yee (R) 55.7% 1,390,135
Martin Quezada (D) 44.3% 1,107,036

Superintendent of Public Instruction

Candidate Percentage Vote Total
* Tom Horne (R) 50.2% 1,255,977
Kathy Hoffman (D) 49.8% 1,247,009

None of the percentages shifted over the past week. Of course, these numbers are unofficial until certified on December 5. But we’re not out of the weeds yet!

An automatic recount is triggered when opposing candidates finish within 0.5 percent of the total votes. This applies to two races: Attorney General and Superintendent of Public Instruction. In the first, Kris Mayes (D) defeated Abe Hamadeh (R) by a mere 510 votes. In the second, Tom Horne (R) defeated incumbent Kathy Hoffman (D) by 8,968 votes.

Also, Arizona’s current Attorney General, Mark Brnovich (R), has demanded that Maricopa County officials provide a report on the tabulation machine problems on Election Day. By November 28, the county must detail the specific problems related to the printers at each polling location and how poll workers were trained.

Please note that your humble author sat next to Mark Brnovich in government class at Shadow Mountain High School. We would pass National Review issues back and forth, and drive our liberal teacher crazy with our anti-communist tirades. At the time, I worked as a highly acclaimed bag boy at Safeway. One afternoon, after we annoyed the teacher in class, he came into the store and bought a 12-pack of Meister Brau (a very, very cheap beer). After that, we called him “Meister Brau”; he didn’t like that either.

P.S. I worked with AG candidate Hamadeh at the Goldwater Institute, and AG candidate Mayes was my editor at Arizona State’s student newspaper. Knowing me is apparently a job requirement.

Previous Arizona Election Posts:

The Wednesday Wrap-up

The Tuesday Wrap-up

The Monday Wrap-up

The Sunday Wrap-up

The Saturday Wrap-up

The Friday Wrap-up

Published in Elections
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 220 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    https://spectator.org/arizonas-election-bungle/

     Did the 2022 midterms turn Arizona blue, or at a minimum, purple? Is Arizona where the “stop the steal” movement went to die? Did the midterm election show the toxicity of a Trump endorsement in local general-election races? And how is it that Florida, a state with three times the population of Arizona, can have its votes counted before you go to bed on election night, but it takes Arizona almost two weeks?

    • #211
  2. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    I dont understand why its even controversial. I think it’s been proven beyond any doubt that the 2020 election was stolen. The left even agrees with Donald Trump on this point.

    No, it has not been proven beyond any doubt that the 2020 election was stolen. In fact, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that while there were the usual shenanigans, there is no fraud shown sufficient that it would have changed the result in any state, per former Attorney General William Barr.

    The people who disputed the 2020 election lost all statewide elections in the five battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin except for Ron Johnson who was running against a Bernie Sanders supporter and Walker who is going into a runoff.

     

    No. Its impossible to prove anything beyond doubt when a reasonable investigation was not permitted. This is the key difference. Democrats invent a tale of woe, alleging all manor of conspiracy in the 2016 election, and the congress spends thousands of man hours, millions of dollars hunting every rumor down, every allegation has been disproved.

    Republicans have a problem with an election result, the courts wont hear the case – there are no subpoenas, no testimony or data gathered. 

    Mens rea. How would the guilty man react? Investigate everything in my election? Or spend million on lawyers to make sure no document is ever examined, no clerk is ever questioned? Who’s acted guilty?

    In my mind, its uncontroversial to say the 2020 election was stolen. Fair and Square.

    • #212
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    I dont understand why its even controversial. I think it’s been proven beyond any doubt that the 2020 election was stolen. The left even agrees with Donald Trump on this point.

    No, it has not been proven beyond any doubt that the 2020 election was stolen. In fact, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that while there were the usual shenanigans, there is no fraud shown sufficient that it would have changed the result in any state, per former Attorney General William Barr.

    The people who disputed the 2020 election lost all statewide elections in the five battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin except for Ron Johnson who was running against a Bernie Sanders supporter and Walker who is going into a runoff.

     

    No. Its impossible to prove anything beyond doubt when a reasonable investigation was not permitted. This is the key difference. Democrats invent a tale of woe, alleging all manor of conspiracy in the 2016 election, and the congress spends thousands of man hours, millions of dollars hunting every rumor down, every allegation has been disproved.

    Republicans have a problem with an election result, the courts wont hear the case – there are no subpoenas, no testimony or data gathered.

    Mens rea. How would the guilty man react? Investigate everything in my election? Or spend million on lawyers to make sure no document is ever examined, no clerk is ever questioned? Who’s acted guilty?

    In my mind, its uncontroversial to say the 2020 election was stolen. Fair and Square.

    I guess it’s possible to make the “fair and square” claim, but to me judges who won’t hear cases maybe because they don’t want Antifa showing up at their homes with torches and pitchforks, doesn’t make it “fair and square.”

    • #213
  4. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    In fact, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that while there were the usual shenanigans, there is no fraud shown sufficient that it would have changed the result in any state . . . .

    Is it not bad enough that we have proof of illegalities exceeding the Biden margin of victory in the swing states?

    Is it not bad enough that the illegalities in question tend to be fraud-enabling even when they are not fraud as such?

    Is it not bad enough that certainly illegalities almost certainly flipped swing states, whether or not they were fraud as such?

    • #214
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    In fact, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that while there were the usual shenanigans, there is no fraud shown sufficient that it would have changed the result in any state . . . .

    Is it not bad enough that we have proof of illegalities exceeding the Biden margin of victory in the swing states?

    Is it not bad enough that the illegalities in question tend to be fraud-enabling even when they are not fraud as such?

    Is it not bad enough that certainly illegalities almost certainly flipped swing states, whether or not they were fraud as such?

    And chain-of-custody in many places wasn’t even good enough to qualify as a joke.

    • #215
  6. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    In fact, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that while there were the usual shenanigans, there is no fraud shown sufficient that it would have changed the result in any state . . . .

    Is it not bad enough that we have proof of illegalities exceeding the Biden margin of victory in the swing states?

    Is it not bad enough that the illegalities in question tend to be fraud-enabling even when they are not fraud as such?

    Is it not bad enough that certainly illegalities almost certainly flipped swing states, whether or not they were fraud as such?

    To me this is key.

    Dropboxes were against WI election law. Therefore, all those ballots were invalid even though they got counted. They should not have been.  That was enough to flip the state. 

    To call me a “denier” because of that is living in one’s own denial. 

    • #216
  7. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    In fact, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that while there were the usual shenanigans, there is no fraud shown sufficient that it would have changed the result in any state . . . .

    Is it not bad enough that we have proof of illegalities exceeding the Biden margin of victory in the swing states?

    Is it not bad enough that the illegalities in question tend to be fraud-enabling even when they are not fraud as such?

    Is it not bad enough that certainly illegalities almost certainly flipped swing states, whether or not they were fraud as such?

    To me this is key.

    Dropboxes were against WI election law. Therefore, all those ballots were invalid even though they got counted. They should not have been. That was enough to flip the state.

    To call me a “denier” because of that is living in one’s own denial.

    Outdoor dropboxes, but yes.

    (Indoors at the city clerk’s office are prolly ok, though I’d have to review my notes to be sure of anything.)

    • #217
  8. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Leaving our neighborhood on Thanksgiving, we passed a car with Arizona plates and a Kari Lake bumper sticker. I don’t know exactly which house it was going to, but it was closest to a house that had a Bernie yard sign last election. Would have liked to have been a guest if things got political. 

    • #218
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary, the scope of what you study around politics and government is way too narrow.

    Listen to the Brietbart podcast or something.

    • #219
  10. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Moderator Note:

    Ad hominem comment redacted

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Gary, the scope of what you study around politics and government is way too narrow.

    Listen to the Brietbart podcast or something.

    All he does is find evidence, however suspect, to support his predilections. [redacted]

    • #220
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.