About Last Night

 

I made no bold predictions about the midterms, but I do feel vindicated in one sense. I have repeatedly made the argument on these pages, both in posts and especially in the comments, that the past is dead. Just like Marley. Deader than a doornail.

If you predicated any thoughts about the election with, “Well, the last time these numbers looked like this THAT happened…” Nope. It’s all irrelevant.

Remember this: Electorates change. Issues change. Candidates change. Those snapshots in time we rely on to fuel “the conventional wisdom” are absolutely worthless.

The ’80s did not call. Neither did the ’90s. They can’t. They’re dead.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 20 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    But we are conditioned to see patterns, because if we see them, we can try to predict the future. To simply throw up our hands and say, we just don’t know–well, it makes us feel vulnerable. Plus it would put a lot of people out of a job . . . 

    • #1
  2. Blondie Thatcher
    Blondie
    @Blondie

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):
    Plus it would put a lot of people out of a job . . . 

    Maybe that’s not a bad idea. 

    • #2
  3. She Member
    She
    @She

    I wish history were irrelevant.  It wouild make life so much simpler.

    Sadly, and in spite of the most strident efforts of the Left to render it so, it is not.

    That doesn’t mean that we can, or should, waste our time navel-gazing and trying to recreate the past.  Sometimes, the best thing to do is learn from it, and let it go.  But that starts with ‘learning from it.’  

    Which implies, ‘recognizing it.’

    • #3
  4. Victor Tango Kilo Member
    Victor Tango Kilo
    @VtheK

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    • #4
  5. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    He’s dead, Jim.

    • #5
  6. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    You mean it’s no longer a trial separation between the rulers and the ruled? Now it’s permanent? 

    • #6
  7. Victor Tango Kilo Member
    Victor Tango Kilo
    @VtheK

    Consider this:

    If the Democrats had lost last night, then both parties would have lost faith in the electoral process.

    This would be deeply destabilizing to the Deep State.

    The Biden Administration has been running a Top Secret voting initiative through the Deep State that they refuse to release information about.

    After review of the Civil Rights Division documents responsive to your request, the Division has identified (15) pages of material representing the STRATEGIC PLAN for the Implementation of Executive Order 14019, Promoting Access to Voting. I have determined that these materials are to be withheld in full pursuant to Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, 551(b)(5), which pertains to certain inter- and intra-agency records protected by civil discovery privileges, in this instance the deliberative process and presidential communications privileges.

    And

    On July 12, 2021, the Justice Department held a “listening session” with outside activists working on voting rights. The group included dozens of people, all of them from left-leaning groups. There were 10 from the American Civil Liberties Union, five from the Campaign Legal Center, three from Demos, three from the Southern Poverty Law Center, five from the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, two from Black Lives Matter, and many others.

    It’s rather suspicious, if you ask me.

     

    • #7
  8. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    Let’s schedule a meeting at Ft. Sumter.

    • #8
  9. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    Let’s schedule a meeting at Ft. Sumter.

    Why? 

    • #9
  10. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    Let’s schedule a meeting at Ft. Sumter.

    Why?

    Why not?

    • #10
  11. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Columbo (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    Let’s schedule a meeting at Ft. Sumter.

    Why?

    Why not?

    Because I’d like to win.  Abraham Lincoln let the Confederacy schedule a meeting there because he wanted to win.  

    • #11
  12. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    National Divorce back on the table, babies.

    Let’s schedule a meeting at Ft. Sumter.

    Why?

    Why not?

    Because I’d like to win. Abraham Lincoln let the Confederacy schedule a meeting there because he wanted to win.

    It’s over. We didn’t win big this year and we should have. Forgetabout winning any more.

    • #12
  13. EJHill+ Podcaster
    EJHill+
    @EJHill

    PS – Thanks to all of you that visited our little chat/Zoomapalooza. Hope I wasn’t too annoying. I doubt that I will ever try to host like that again. 

    • #13
  14. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    So is America 

    • #14
  15. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    National divorce. Why not?

    Simple. Because I am a citizen of the United States, the greatest nation in the history of Mankind, and I belong in Minnesota, Florida, New York, California, Washington, and every other state in our great union. I’m not going to go through Gott-damned passport control to stand on the top of the Empire State Building, or show my visa on the train that goes from LA to Santa Barbara or the plane to visit my relatives in AZ.  Because I’m not going to entertain some fantastical idea of post-America utopia where everyone’s sorted out so no one disagrees about anything ever anymore, and somehow – magically! – our international strength is either undiminished or irrelevant. Or, China gets to rule the seas, in which case, whatevs. 

    People want to check out, I understand. Tend your garden. If you want to give up, give up. Just commit to the bit and stay out of conversations about what needs to be done, and what we can do, and where, and how.  Miserabilism is boring and unhelpful, and spoiler alert: there won’t be a national divorce. Man up and kick some shins. 

    • #15
  16. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    National divorce. Why not?

    Simple. Because I am a citizen of the United States, the greatest nation in the history of Mankind, and I belong in Minnesota, Florida, New York, California, Washington, and every other state in our great union. I’m not going to go through Gott-damned passport control to stand on the top of the Empire State Building, or show my visa on the train that goes from LA to Santa Barbara or the plane to visit my relatives in AZ. Because I’m not going to entertain some fantastical idea of post-America utopia where everyone’s sorted out so no one disagrees about anything ever anymore, and somehow – magically! – our international strength is either undiminished or irrelevant. Or, China gets to rule the seas, in which case, whatevs.

    People want to check out, I understand. Tend your garden. If you want to give up, give up. Just commit to the bit and stay out of conversations about what needs to be done, and what we can do, and where, and how. Miserabilism is boring and unhelpful, and spoiler alert: there won’t be a national divorce. Man up and kick some shins.

    Agreed.

    The empire of America is needed.

    • #16
  17. Justin Other Lawyer Coolidge
    Justin Other Lawyer
    @DouglasMyers

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    National divorce. Why not?

    Simple. Because I am a citizen of the United States, the greatest nation in the history of Mankind, and I belong in Minnesota, Florida, New York, California, Washington, and every other state in our great union. I’m not going to go through Gott-damned passport control to stand on the top of the Empire State Building, or show my visa on the train that goes from LA to Santa Barbara or the plane to visit my relatives in AZ. Because I’m not going to entertain some fantastical idea of post-America utopia where everyone’s sorted out so no one disagrees about anything ever anymore, and somehow – magically! – our international strength is either undiminished or irrelevant. Or, China gets to rule the seas, in which case, whatevs.

    People want to check out, I understand. Tend your garden. If you want to give up, give up. Just commit to the bit and stay out of conversations about what needs to be done, and what we can do, and where, and how. Miserabilism is boring and unhelpful, and spoiler alert: there won’t be a national divorce. Man up and kick some shins.

    Excellent. Thanks. 

    • #17
  18. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    National divorce. Why not?

    Simple. Because I am a citizen of the United States, the greatest nation in the history of Mankind, and I belong in Minnesota, Florida, New York, California, Washington, and every other state in our great union. I’m not going to go through Gott-damned passport control to stand on the top of the Empire State Building, or show my visa on the train that goes from LA to Santa Barbara or the plane to visit my relatives in AZ. Because I’m not going to entertain some fantastical idea of post-America utopia where everyone’s sorted out so no one disagrees about anything ever anymore, and somehow – magically! – our international strength is either undiminished or irrelevant. Or, China gets to rule the seas, in which case, whatevs.

    People want to check out, I understand. Tend your garden. If you want to give up, give up. Just commit to the bit and stay out of conversations about what needs to be done, and what we can do, and where, and how. Miserabilism is boring and unhelpful, and spoiler alert: there won’t be a national divorce. Man up and kick some shins.

    You are correct there be no divorce.  We tried that during the civil war when the party in power (GOP) forced their will on the part that wanted to be free (Democrats).  This time the party in power is the Democrats and they will force their will on those that want to live free (Republicans).  Currently they are just economically destroying them but if forced to it they will jail them or kill them out right.  History does sort of repeat.  No there will be no divorce.  The party that owns the country, that runs the country, the Democrats will have their way and destroy those that resist too much.  

    During the civil war the parties used “slavery” as the excuse for the war.  This time it will be something like “LGBT+ rights” to give cover for the aggression.  Provided conservatives bother to fight at all.  Which they mostly don’t so maybe they will just die off and be replaced by a better class of citizen from the Democrats point of view.

     

     

     

    • #18
  19. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    National divorce. Why not?

    Simple. Because I am a citizen of the United States, the greatest nation in the history of Mankind, and I belong in Minnesota, Florida, New York, California, Washington, and every other state in our great union. I’m not going to go through Gott-damned passport control to stand on the top of the Empire State Building, or show my visa on the train that goes from LA to Santa Barbara or the plane to visit my relatives in AZ. Because I’m not going to entertain some fantastical idea of post-America utopia where everyone’s sorted out so no one disagrees about anything ever anymore, and somehow – magically! – our international strength is either undiminished or irrelevant. Or, China gets to rule the seas, in which case, whatevs.

    People want to check out, I understand. Tend your garden. If you want to give up, give up. Just commit to the bit and stay out of conversations about what needs to be done, and what we can do, and where, and how. Miserabilism is boring and unhelpful, and spoiler alert: there won’t be a national divorce. Man up and kick some shins.

    Agreed.

    The empire of America is needed.

    The America empire is fading.  We will kill it on green energy and environmentalism.  

    • #19
  20. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    National divorce. Why not?

    Simple. Because I am a citizen of the United States, the greatest nation in the history of Mankind, and I belong in Minnesota, Florida, New York, California, Washington, and every other state in our great union. I’m not going to go through Gott-damned passport control to stand on the top of the Empire State Building, or show my visa on the train that goes from LA to Santa Barbara or the plane to visit my relatives in AZ. Because I’m not going to entertain some fantastical idea of post-America utopia where everyone’s sorted out so no one disagrees about anything ever anymore, and somehow – magically! – our international strength is either undiminished or irrelevant. Or, China gets to rule the seas, in which case, whatevs.

    People want to check out, I understand. Tend your garden. If you want to give up, give up. Just commit to the bit and stay out of conversations about what needs to be done, and what we can do, and where, and how. Miserabilism is boring and unhelpful, and spoiler alert: there won’t be a national divorce. Man up and kick some shins.

    Amen.

    • #20
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.