Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
What’s the Appropriate Punishment for the Art Vandals?
The latest from the “let’s ruin art to make a statement” crowd.
The Johannes Vermeer masterpiece “Girl with a Pearl Earring” on Thursday became the latest artwork targeted by climate activists in a protest at the Mauritshuis museum in The Hague. The priceless work reportedly was not damaged.
A video posted on Twitter showed one man pouring a can of what appear to be tomatoes over another man who appeared to attempt to glue his head to the world famous painting.
So far, the targeted works of art seem to have survived. However, what if one of these idiots actually destroys a painting, say the Mona Lisa? Would it be too much to ask for the death penalty? If not the death penalty, how about life in prison?
This raises an interesting argument. Life is valuable, and no doubt the life of a climate activist (as despicable as they are) is more valuable than any inanimate object.
Or is it? Can there be some things that are more valuable than a human life? Are there some priceless objects that if lost forever, would be a detriment to humanity?
I’m dying to know your thoughts . . .
Published in General
It is an act of nihilism. Those people should be sent to prison for 20 years. See how their nihilist this king works there
“We’re an insurgent resistance movement funded by billionaires and fully supported by the corporate media, all major political parties, the government bureaucracy and the police. Our radical agenda is being enacted by governments worldwide. So, obviously protest vandalism is absolutely essential.”
These “rebels” are getting treated a lot better than Canadian truckers were.
This looks like a form of hostage-taking: “See that beloved thing over there? The thing that has nothing whatsoever to do with me or my pet political project? Well, I’m going to destroy it if you don’t give me what I want! Blahrefdjfdkfdddsdgr! Hear me roar! Ban meat, or the broad with the pearl earring gets it!”
In reality, though, these people seem to be targeting art they know is protected. Because they don’t actually want to destroy the art (George Soros wouldn’t allow that); they just want to make a scene. The authorities — who are sympathetic to the cause to begin with — are willing to put up with the shenanigans, so long as nothing is really ruined.
I confess that this whole trend, like the trend of people befouling food on the shelves at grocery store, convinces me that the pendulum of community enforcement has swung too far in the laissez-faire direction.
Becoming more of a laissez-saigner kind of guy.
Here’s what this moron has to say about it.
Dumping a bucket of tar over her head and applying a liberal coating of feathers would do her absolutely no damage whatsoever either – depending on the temperature of the tar.
Many of these people seem to be Gaia worshippers.
I think that museums cover the artwork with glass or plexiglass. The Norman Rockwell museum used to use an electric eye that would set off an alarm if you leaned in too far or tried to touch the works. The only way this stops is when the perpetrators are actually punished.
I can’t find the link but there was an article about a week ago to the effect that in the attack on the van Gogh painting, the museum administrators knew in advance that it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it. It went on to say that art museum will not get the grants that are their lifeblood if they don’t show proper Wokeness, and that the curators for the most part care a lot of about politics than about art.
At best.
It’s good ‘ol Maoism. “Death to the four olds!”
The press, cameras ready, just so happened to be standing respectfully behind the rope barrier.
This isn’t the article I was looking for, but still very relevant: How moral panic has debased art criticism.
Funny. I thought it was college-level education that had debased art criticism.
Found the piece I was looking for: The Gramscian march through arts institutions–and arts funding.
I’m with you Percival. This is the exact type of infraction that tar and feathers would resolve to the satisfaction of all.
By being shot
I think what Stad is suggesting is that their deepest wish to become one with their God should be granted post haste.
I’m afraid this is probably right.
Furthermore, these museums have large numbers of security guards. They could stop such acts of vandalism very quickly–if they wanted to.
The administrators and other personnel were already pretty damn “woke”, and the rot began long ago.
I haven’t read the article – sorry – but I just have to say that art criticism has been debased for about a century.
I’m trying to bring it back.
You would think that some of the folks in the museums enjoying the art might inflict some punishment. It’s not like those performing these acts are physically imposing.
How about shutting down all the museums for a few years at least? They have all been damaged by the wokesters running them.
Tarring and feathering was actually very painful. The hot tar burned when applied, and pulling the feathers off ripped the skin.
So yes, let’s tar and feather the SOBs . . .
I think it is time for patrons of the arts to rise up against these activists.
A solid beat-down would not go amiss.
Just warm enough to be viscous. We’ll put it on with a trowel.
This is one of the more memorable scenes from the HBO John Adams series. It’s hard to find any humor in tar and feathering after seeing it.
If I have a trowel in my hand, I’m not gonna need the tar.
Lately I’ve been thinking of the elevating benefits of pressing.
A temperate and well-monitored pressing can change many minds.