Election Integrity Is All That Matters. And Democrats Know It.

 

Ron DeSantis was born in Jacksonville, FL, and was raised in Dunedin (near Tampa).  His mother was a nurse, and his father installed Nielsen TV boxes.  He went to Yale, where he was captain of their varsity baseball team, leading the team in batting average as a senior.  He worked his way through school, taking jobs as an electrician’s assistant, youth baseball coach, and others. He graduated from Yale with a degree in history, magna cum laude.  He then got his law degree at Harvard, cum laude.  After law school, he volunteered for the Navy, where he won the Bronze Star, among many other accolades.  He was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives at the age of 34, and then decided to run for governor in Florida in 2018.  His opponent in the gubernatorial election was Democrat Andrew Gillum.

Andrew Gillum was born in Miami and raised in Gainesville, FL.  His father worked construction and his mother drove a school bus.  He went to the historically black Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU) in Tallahassee, earning a degree in political science.  His grades were not released.  While still attending college, he was elected to the Tallahassee City Commission at the age of 23.  He served on the City Commission for 10 years until winning the mayoral election in Tallahassee in 2014.  His term as mayor was marred by several corruption scandals involving misuse of funds, conflicts of interest, bribery, etc.  After several years of scandals, he decided to run for governor of Florida in 2018.

When Mr. DeSantis won the election, Mr. Gillum conceded the race that night.  It might not surprise you to learn that a recount was started soon thereafter, and Mr. Gillum withdrew his concession:  “I am replacing my words of concession with an uncompromised and unapologetic call that we count every single vote.”  Right.  Remarkably enough, somehow they could not “find” enough “votes” to “count” in Mr. Gillum’s favor, and Mr. DeSantis ended up winning anyway, by 0.4%.

This is how we ended up with Ron DeSantis as governor of Florida.  Mr. superstar athlete, hardworking brilliant student, Harvard-Yale educated lawyer, Bronze Star winning military veteran – that guy beats Mr. Corrupt Empty Suit.  And he beats him by 0.4%.

Mr. Gillum’s problems with the law have continued.  In March 2020, he was found, unconscious and naked, on the floor of a hotel room in Miami Beach with an overdosed unconscious male sex worker and bags of crystal meth and other drugs.  Presumably his wife was unamused, but no arrests were made.  And then in June 2022, Mr. Gillum was indicted on 21 felony counts, including wire fraud, conspiracy, and making false statements.  Mr. Gillum has declared his innocence, and calls his various corruption investigations “political in nature.”

Remember, Mr. Gillum very nearly beat the most qualified candidate in history for governor just a few years ago.  And he was an unimpressive student at an unimpressive school who has never had a job outside of government, and has been under investigation for corruption for most of his career.  He’s been discussed as the future of the Democratic Party, and has been considered as a possible Vice Presidential candidate.

What if he is the future of the Democratic Party?  Think of who the young stars are on their side.  Where do they find these people?

So Ron DeSantis may run for President.  I hope he does.  I think he would do a good job.

But can he win?  Can any Republican win, against any Democrat?  What if the Democrats manage to find a candidate more qualified than Mr. Corrupt Empty Suit?  Someone that voters might actually choose to vote for?

If our elections are as compromised as they appear to be, it may not matter who the Republicans run.  It already doesn’t matter who the Democrats run.  Obviously.

Immigration matters.  So does the war in Ukraine, and climate laws, and abortion, and lots of other stuff.  But really, nothing really matters other than figuring out how to hold honest elections in this country.  Which is why the Democrat power structure (news media, social media, FBI, Justice Dept, etc.) won’t even let us talk about it.  Any mention of election irregularities is “fact-checked” as “mis-information.”  They won’t let us talk about election integrity because they know how important it is.

So polite Republicans politely look away.  Like they’re supposed to.  After all, they’re nice.  Not like those other Republicans, you see.

I don’t know how our elections can be fixed.  They are broken in many, many ways.

But we’ve got to fix them.  That’s all that matters.

Some Republicans sort of understand that.  Democrats most certainly understand that, and are using their resources accordingly.

Election integrity is the only way Republicans have any chance at all.  Conversely, continued lack of election integrity is the only way that Democrats have any chance at all.  And they know it.

Republicans should be devoting similar resources toward regaining election integrity as Democrats are devoting to destroying it.

It’s all that matters.

Just ask Ron DeSantis, the star athlete / decorated military veteran / brilliant scholar / Harvard-Yale lawyer, who darn near lost an election to Mr. Corrupt Empty Suit.  (In this particular case, I refer to Mr. Gillum, not Mr. Biden.)

Heck, ask Mr. Corrupt Empty Suit himself.  Either one of them.  They understand, too.

Election integrity is all that matters.

We can’t fix any of our other problems until we fix that.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 85 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat:

    Election integrity is all that matters.

    Better plan for Election Integrity Priority One: Destroy all voting machines that use any software at all; volunteers at each precinct count ballots by hand, watched by other volunteers, media, webcams, Republican observers, and Democrat observers.

    Good plan for Election Integrity Priority One: Take the federal government’s advice and destroy all voting machines that have internal modems.

    See “G. K. Chesterton’s Take on Electronic Voting Machines,” an introduction to the need for better security in election technology (available here in a Microsoft Word version).

    How about paper ballots, hand counted.

    That’s the Better Plan.

    The use of electronic voting machines is pure insanity. How in the world did they become legal? The addition of a network port is even worse.

    No one in his right mind will trust election results as long as these machines exist.

    Why, you conspiracy theorist!

    I mean–you conspiracy theorist who agrees with every Democrat before November 2020, with the RNC, with the Elections Assistance Commission, and with G. K. Chesterton!

    • #31
  2. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    One small “breath of fresh air” for people in Michigan –

    • #32
  3. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    GOPinc does not care.

    After the 2020 election, I would have to agree with you.

    • #33
  4. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    I’m watching the Fetterman race with amazement. WTH? Who would even consider voting for that guy? If he wins, I will not believe the vote was free and fair. No way.

    In a recent poll 14% of respondents said that Fetterman’s stroke makes them *more* likely to vote for him.   They must be Democrats.  God help us.

    • #34
  5. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat:

    Election integrity is all that matters.

    Better plan for Election Integrity Priority One: Destroy all voting machines that use any software at all; volunteers at each precinct count ballots by hand, watched by other volunteers, media, webcams, Republican observers, and Democrat observers.

    Good plan for Election Integrity Priority One: Take the federal government’s advice and destroy all voting machines that have internal modems.

    See “G. K. Chesterton’s Take on Electronic Voting Machines,” an introduction to the need for better security in election technology (available here in a Microsoft Word version).

    How about paper ballots, hand counted.

    That’s the Better Plan.

    The use of electronic voting machines is pure insanity. How in the world did they become legal? The addition of a network port is even worse.

    No one in his right mind will trust election results as long as these machines exist.

     

    I want paper ballots and to eliminate anonymous voting.  Let’s have people put a thumbprint on the paper and lick the corner.   Being pseudo-anonymous is good enough.

    • #35
  6. genferei Member
    genferei
    @genferei

    Just to note that to the extent I’m a fan of DeSantis it is despite his being a Yale-Harvard-REMF with almost zero private sector experience. I don’t blame him for taking every opportunity to become part of the ruling class – it is the classic middle class dream, after all. But I can’t help thinking the country would be better off fewer Harvard lawyers and more FAMU graduates in the halls of power. Not that there is any excuse for getting a political science degree. So Gillum is disqualified on that basis alone. His subsequent behavior just confirms what his choice of major demonstrates…

    • #36
  7. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):
    I want paper ballots and to eliminate anonymous voting.  Let’s have people put a thumbprint on the paper and lick the corner.   Being pseudo-anonymous is good enough.

    Yes to paper ballots.  No to eliminate anonymous voting.

    I’ve seen unions (collectivists) intimidate people into voting their way when ballots weren’t secret.  Evil.  Once a “machine” has public ballots, that machine won’t need to manufacture fake ballots to get the fraudulent results it wants.

    Anonymity is also one of the barriers that has prevented any implementation of internet voting.  Thank the Lord for that.

    You’ve harped on this before.  Makes me think you are a progressive agent.

    • #37
  8. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat:

    Election integrity is all that matters.

    Better plan for Election Integrity Priority One: Destroy all voting machines that use any software at all; volunteers at each precinct count ballots by hand, watched by other volunteers, media, webcams, Republican observers, and Democrat observers.

    Good plan for Election Integrity Priority One: Take the federal government’s advice and destroy all voting machines that have internal modems.

    See “G. K. Chesterton’s Take on Electronic Voting Machines,” an introduction to the need for better security in election technology (available here in a Microsoft Word version).

    How about paper ballots, hand counted.

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    • #38
  9. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    I don’t doubt it, but manual means would seem less conducive to mass fraud. 

    I want one-day voting (Italians do it on a Sunday apparently), paper ballots, and ink-dipped fingers (although I hear from a friend that domestic engineers might know how to get the ink off. . .). 

    • #39
  10. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):
    I want paper ballots and to eliminate anonymous voting. Let’s have people put a thumbprint on the paper and lick the corner. Being pseudo-anonymous is good enough.

    Yes to paper ballots. No to eliminate anonymous voting.

    I’ve seen unions (collectivists) intimidate people into voting their way when ballots weren’t secret. Evil. Once a “machine” has public ballots, that machine won’t need to manufacture fake ballots to get the fraudulent results it wants.

    Anonymity is also one of the barriers that has prevented any implementation of internet voting. Thank the Lord for that.

    You’ve harped on this before. Makes me think you are a progressive agent.

    Has to be secret for sure. 

    We should stop absentee ballots except for military or away in school.

     

    • #40
  11. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    I don’t doubt it, but manual means would seem less conducive to mass fraud. 

    I want one-day voting (Italians do it on a Sunday apparently), paper ballots, and ink-dipped fingers (although I hear from a friend that domestic engineers might know how to get the ink off. . .). 

    • #41
  12. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Dr. Bastiat: But can he win?  Can any Republican win, against any Democrat? 

    If the Democrats can push the worst politician in 100 years over the finish line, they can get a brick elected President.

    Oh wait, they did that in 2020 . . .

    • #42
  13. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    I’m pretty sure that I hold the Ricochet record for the most posts which:

    1. Get over 50 likes
    2. Are not promoted to the main feed

    I wonder why that is?

    • #43
  14. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    Why not use something like a scantron?  It is an electronic ballot scanner that has no software and just reports totals.

    • #44
  15. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: Mr. Gillum’s problems with the law have continued. In March of 2020, he was found, unconscious and naked, on the floor of a hotel room in Miami Beach with an overdosed unconscious male sex worker and bags of crystal meth and other drugs. Presumably his wife was unamused, but no arrests were made.

    What a guy, what a guy!! Reminds me a bit of Mayor Marion Barry of DC infamy.

    And I know this isn’t aligned with the OP, but is it possible that people vote for the empty suit because they don’t like what De Santis is selling?

    Members of the Oppressor Class certainly don’t like it. 

    • #45
  16. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    I don’t doubt it, but manual means would seem less conducive to mass fraud.

    I want one-day voting (Italians do it on a Sunday apparently), paper ballots, and ink-dipped fingers (although I hear from a friend that domestic engineers might know how to get the ink off. . .).

    I disagree on one-day voting. But I do think the maximum should be 2 weeks before the election. Even then, one should vote in person at an authorized and manned polling station, just like on election day. By allowing that reasonable amount of time-span to vote most needs for mail-in voting would be eliminated. Mail-in voting is absolutely the worst. There must be a way to maintain chain of custody and to insure proper legal citizenship.

    • #46
  17. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    I’m pretty sure that I hold the Ricochet record for the most posts which:

    1. Get over 50 likes
    2. Are not promoted to the main feed

    I wonder why that is?

    So an hour after I make this comment, the post gets promoted to the main feed.

    Somebody is trying to make me look like a whiny brat.

    With some success, I might add…

    • #47
  18. Victor Tango Kilo Member
    Victor Tango Kilo
    @VtheK

    Joker (View Comment):
    Dem “interest groups” spent heavy to sue Dem states to allow unlimited mail-in, extended early voting, relaxed rules for provisional ballots, signature verification, ID requirements, postmark slack – you name the contrived emergency (cheating) measures.

    And Republicans did very little to fight it. Heck, the governor of Georgia had already agreed to most of that long before COVID.  From 2019:

    Under the new law, polling places cannot be changed 60 days before an election, and it will take longer for people who choose not to vote to be removed from the state’s voter registration list.

    The law also blocks county election officials from rejecting absentee ballots because of mismatched signatures, and when information on a voter registration application doesn’t match other government databases, the voter will remain on the rolls.

    When the Legislature passed the measure last month, Kemp said in a written statement that the measure “modernizes Georgia’s voting system and ensures our elections remain secure, accessible, and fair.”

    • #48
  19. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    cdor (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    I don’t doubt it, but manual means would seem less conducive to mass fraud.

    I want one-day voting (Italians do it on a Sunday apparently), paper ballots, and ink-dipped fingers (although I hear from a friend that domestic engineers might know how to get the ink off. . .).

    I disagree on one-day voting. But I do think the maximum should be 2 weeks before the election. Even then, one should vote in person at an authorized and manned polling station, just like on election day. By allowing that reasonable amount of time-span to vote most needs for mail-in voting would be eliminated. Mail-in voting is absolutely the worst. There must be a way to maintain chain of custody and to insure proper legal citizenship.

    Keeping all the usual polling stations open for 2 weeks would be a pretty big strain on especially volunteers who do much of it now.  If there is going to be 2 weeks of early voting, it would need to be far more limited to like the Secretary Of State offices etc.  If they have 2 weeks to do it, there’s not much reason why it should have to be within walking distance of everyone’s home etc.  If they have to only walk a short distance, they can plan to do it on Election Day.  Or not at all.

    • #49
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    I’m pretty sure that I hold the Ricochet record for the most posts which:

    1. Get over 50 likes
    2. Are not promoted to the main feed

    I wonder why that is?

    So an hour after I make this comment, the post gets promoted to the main feed.

    Somebody is trying to make me look like a whiny brat.

    With some success, I might add…

    Maybe they were waiting for you to have 52 likes.  :-)

    • #50
  21. Victor Tango Kilo Member
    Victor Tango Kilo
    @VtheK

    genferei (View Comment):
    I can’t help thinking the country would be better off fewer Harvard lawyers and more FAMU graduates in the halls of power.

    Yes, a century of rule by the Ivy League has only made us $30 Trillion in debt, up to our elbows in pointless and costly foreign wars,  paying for the defense of wealthy countries, complete corruption of government and finance, and a cultural rot that is more toxic than any of the foregoing.

    Then again, the current dementia ridden marionette installed in the white house was educated at U-Delaware and is a complete disaster.

    • #51
  22. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    Joker (View Comment):
    Dem “interest groups” spent heavy to sue Dem states to allow unlimited mail-in, extended early voting, relaxed rules for provisional ballots, signature verification, ID requirements, postmark slack – you name the contrived emergency (cheating) measures.

    And Republicans did very little to fight it. Heck, the governor of Georgia had already agreed to most of that long before COVID. From 2019:

    Under the new law, polling places cannot be changed 60 days before an election, and it will take longer for people who choose not to vote to be removed from the state’s voter registration list.

    The law also blocks county election officials from rejecting absentee ballots because of mismatched signatures, and when information on a voter registration application doesn’t match other government databases, the voter will remain on the rolls.

    When the Legislature passed the measure last month, Kemp said in a written statement that the measure “modernizes Georgia’s voting system and ensures our elections remain secure, accessible, and fair.”

    The bigger problems with Georgia, as far as I could tell, seemed to come from an “agreement” with Stacey Abrams that violated state law and should have been ignored.

    • #52
  23. davenr321 Coolidge
    davenr321
    @davenr321

    I see US political Competency as either all about being able to do the minimum on your own OR doing the maximum as a tool of you political party. It has zero to do with integrity, morals, or even ethics (maybe, ask the lawyers).

    sometimes we get overachievers on both accounts (Bill Clinton, for example). 

    • #53
  24. BastiatJunior Member
    BastiatJunior
    @BastiatJunior

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    I’m pretty sure that I hold the Ricochet record for the most posts which:

    1. Get over 50 likes
    2. Are not promoted to the main feed

    I wonder why that is?

    So an hour after I make this comment, the post gets promoted to the main feed.

    Somebody is trying to make me look like a whiny brat.

    With some success, I might add…

    Maybe they were waiting for you to have 52 likes. :-)

    Sometimes, it’s just an oversight.  I had one in the high twenties that didn’t get promoted.  When I asked the editors about it, they apologized and promoted the post.

    I had one not too long ago with 42 likes didn’t get promoted.  In that post, I picked a fight with the Never-Trumpers.  I think the editors don’t like that very much.

    Is there a common thread among those of yours that didn’t get promoted?

    • #54
  25. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Donald Trump-rejected by a goodly number of traditional Republicans— defeated the most corrupt Democrat to run for the Presidency in my lifetime, and perhaps ever.

    It can be done.

    Can you prove that Hillary is more corrupt than Joe?

    No. But I could prove that she’s more competent at being corrupt given a certain volume of words that I won’t expend.

    She really is. It’s like a priority that her whole team has thought through at all times.

    • #55
  26. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):
    I can’t help thinking the country would be better off fewer Harvard lawyers and more FAMU graduates in the halls of power.

    Yes, a century of rule by the Ivy League has only made us $30 Trillion in debt, up to our elbows in pointless and costly foreign wars, paying for the defense of wealthy countries, complete corruption of government and finance, and a cultural rot that is more toxic than any of the foregoing.

    Then again, the current dementia ridden marionette installed in the white house was educated at U-Delaware and is a complete disaster.

    Too many GOP and GOPe dim bulbs don’t grasp almost any of this. You have got to adjust your mental model of has happened and is happening.

    • #56
  27. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    I’m pretty sure that I hold the Ricochet record for the most posts which:

    1. Get over 50 likes
    2. Are not promoted to the main feed

    I wonder why that is?

    So an hour after I make this comment, the post gets promoted to the main feed.

    Somebody is trying to make me look like a whiny brat.

    With some success, I might add…

    Hey Doc, we love ya right here on the member feed.

    • #57
  28. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    kedavis (View Comment):

    cdor (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    I don’t doubt it, but manual means would seem less conducive to mass fraud.

    I want one-day voting (Italians do it on a Sunday apparently), paper ballots, and ink-dipped fingers (although I hear from a friend that domestic engineers might know how to get the ink off. . .).

    I disagree on one-day voting. But I do think the maximum should be 2 weeks before the election. Even then, one should vote in person at an authorized and manned polling station, just like on election day. By allowing that reasonable amount of time-span to vote most needs for mail-in voting would be eliminated. Mail-in voting is absolutely the worst. There must be a way to maintain chain of custody and to insure proper legal citizenship.

    Keeping all the usual polling stations open for 2 weeks would be a pretty big strain on especially volunteers who do much of it now. If there is going to be 2 weeks of early voting, it would need to be far more limited to like the Secretary Of State offices etc. If they have 2 weeks to do it, there’s not much reason why it should have to be within walking distance of everyone’s home etc. If they have to only walk a short distance, they can plan to do it on Election Day. Or not at all.

    I will happily offer you a compromise…ONE week. They do it in Missouri, surely they could do it in a much hipper place, like California.

    • #58
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    cdor (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    cdor (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):

    Sadly, paper ballots can result in fraud, too. My grandfather told me from personal experience as a poll worker, poll workers could and did invalidate paper ballots with extraneous marks (like voting for both candidates) with a pencil lead hidden beneath a thumbnail or fingernail.

    Paper ballots can be forged and stuffed into ballot boxes, as well.

    I don’t doubt it, but manual means would seem less conducive to mass fraud.

    I want one-day voting (Italians do it on a Sunday apparently), paper ballots, and ink-dipped fingers (although I hear from a friend that domestic engineers might know how to get the ink off. . .).

    I disagree on one-day voting. But I do think the maximum should be 2 weeks before the election. Even then, one should vote in person at an authorized and manned polling station, just like on election day. By allowing that reasonable amount of time-span to vote most needs for mail-in voting would be eliminated. Mail-in voting is absolutely the worst. There must be a way to maintain chain of custody and to insure proper legal citizenship.

    Keeping all the usual polling stations open for 2 weeks would be a pretty big strain on especially volunteers who do much of it now. If there is going to be 2 weeks of early voting, it would need to be far more limited to like the Secretary Of State offices etc. If they have 2 weeks to do it, there’s not much reason why it should have to be within walking distance of everyone’s home etc. If they have to only walk a short distance, they can plan to do it on Election Day. Or not at all.

    I will happily offer you a compromise…ONE week. They do it in Missouri, surely they could do it in a much hipper place, like California.

    Maybe.  But asking people – especially volunteers – to set up and operate polling stations for a week, versus a day, is still asking a lot.

    • #59
  30. Chuck Coolidge
    Chuck
    @Chuckles

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    So an hour after I make this comment, the post gets promoted to the main feed.

    Maybe it was already in the works and you just need to wait a little longer?  Yeah, right.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.