The Response to the Launch of Sputnik 1

 

Monday was the 65th anniversary of the launch of the first satellite, Sputnik 1.

It has been called the “shock of the century.” This shock grew over the next few days and was a major crisis for the Eisenhower Administration. For the people working on the Minitrack tracking system of Project Vanguard, there was the problem that it was set up to track satellite signals at the International Geophysical Year approved frequency of 108 MHz. Sputnik sent out signals at 20 and 40 MHz. Thus, the Mintrack system needed to be modified ASAP. Marty Votaw worked for my father on this. He recalled in 2008:

The Vanguard program was run on paid overtime from the beginning of the program. On Wednesday [October 2nd, 1957] at work, a memo came out that said there will be no paid overtime after Friday. And I thought “Phew!” we are going to get some time off.  And Friday came, I went home from work tired, and, we had company that night, I sat down to dinner and the phone rang.  And Roger [Easton] says, “They launched Sputnik.” And I said, “Good, now we know what can be done.” He said, “You don’t understand; we’ve got to track it.”  And I said, “Can I eat supper first?”  He said, “Well, yeah, but come back right afterwards.”

And we worked the next three days without going home. We would go to Blossom Point [where the nearest Minitrack station was located],  we made 40 MHz antennas, we had to set up new antennas for each of the mini-track sites, just a di-pole in each one, and we had to run the cables, and these things are a 100 yards apart, or something, and they had just plowed the fields to get rid of the weeds and it had rained and it was mud and we would go out and work and get these cables laid and get the antennas stuck in the ground and we would get tired and somebody would bring us food and we would eat and we would go back and work some more. Then, we would get tired. We would come back and take our jackets off and roll them up for pillows laid down on the floor of the trailer or the house, or whatever it was, and we would sleep a while. And after three or four hours we would wake up, put our coats on again, and go out and do some more.

And we finally got antennas hooked up and Vick Symus, he was the receiver specialist, so he had to take a mini-track receiver and he had put in a multiplier to get the 40 MHz up to 108. So he got that done, so we had receivers ready, and we began tracking the signal as it came over. And we would get these long strip charts and Roger would say, “Come, on. Let’s take them to the computing place.”  IBM had set up a special computer center and we would go and knock on the door and they wouldn’t let us in, but they would take the records. As I remember, we did that for two weeks.

And, after three days, we got to go home and take a shower and then we went back to work. So, we were working hard throughout the program and there was never any unpaid overtime. The Sputnik launch overtook the memo. So, the stories about a space race, arrived in the newspapers and it was not generated by anybody at NRL. It was not supported by anyone at NRL. NRL’s responses were always based on the program inside and they were always full speed ahead. So, the space race is not a subject that fits into an NRL discussion. Period.

Minitrack.

Marty Votaw (L) and Roger Easton (R) examining Vanguard TV-3 in 2008.

Published in Group Writing
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 39 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I was thinking, the main advantage to “losing” the Russian ISS modules is that, from what I’ve read, theirs have been the most problematic. Among other things, I remember reading something about problems with replacing bad batteries because some Russian idiots had welded steel bars in place OVER them.

    Yes, they’re products of the Russian industrial complex and have quality control issues involved in their construction.

    The downside is that the Russian modules form the back bone of the ISS.

    Zvezda (DOS-8) is the core service module and Zarya (Functional Cargo Block) … Zarya was the first module launched, and flew independently for 2 years waiting for Zvezda to be completed.

    NASA couldnt replace these modules in 10 years – let alone in 2.

    Maybe they’d entertain offers to buy, I hear they might be under some financial pressure these days.

    • #31
  2. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I was thinking, the main advantage to “losing” the Russian ISS modules is that, from what I’ve read, theirs have been the most problematic. Among other things, I remember reading something about problems with replacing bad batteries because some Russian idiots had welded steel bars in place OVER them.

    Yes, they’re products of the Russian industrial complex and have quality control issues involved in their construction.

    The downside is that the Russian modules form the back bone of the ISS.

    Zvezda (DOS-8) is the core service module and Zarya (Functional Cargo Block) … Zarya was the first module launched, and flew independently for 2 years waiting for Zvezda to be completed.

    NASA couldnt replace these modules in 10 years – let alone in 2.

    Maybe they’d entertain offers to buy, I hear they might be under some financial pressure these days.

    Maybe – but too bad the administration really can’t approach the Russians on the issue.

    • #32
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I was thinking, the main advantage to “losing” the Russian ISS modules is that, from what I’ve read, theirs have been the most problematic. Among other things, I remember reading something about problems with replacing bad batteries because some Russian idiots had welded steel bars in place OVER them.

    Yes, they’re products of the Russian industrial complex and have quality control issues involved in their construction.

    The downside is that the Russian modules form the back bone of the ISS.

    Zvezda (DOS-8) is the core service module and Zarya (Functional Cargo Block) … Zarya was the first module launched, and flew independently for 2 years waiting for Zvezda to be completed.

    NASA couldnt replace these modules in 10 years – let alone in 2.

    Maybe they’d entertain offers to buy, I hear they might be under some financial pressure these days.

    Maybe – but too bad the administration really can’t approach the Russians on the issue.

    Elon Musk could write them a check.

    • #33
  4. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I was thinking, the main advantage to “losing” the Russian ISS modules is that, from what I’ve read, theirs have been the most problematic. Among other things, I remember reading something about problems with replacing bad batteries because some Russian idiots had welded steel bars in place OVER them.

    Yes, they’re products of the Russian industrial complex and have quality control issues involved in their construction.

    The downside is that the Russian modules form the back bone of the ISS.

    Zvezda (DOS-8) is the core service module and Zarya (Functional Cargo Block) … Zarya was the first module launched, and flew independently for 2 years waiting for Zvezda to be completed.

    NASA couldnt replace these modules in 10 years – let alone in 2.

    Maybe they’d entertain offers to buy, I hear they might be under some financial pressure these days.

    Maybe – but too bad the administration really can’t approach the Russians on the issue.

    Elon Musk could write them a check.

    Yes, and then be denounced as a traitor and Putin sympathizer before the plane lands.

    The check would probably go to Roscosmos – before the funds are distributed out into the Russian aerospace industry. Which in every modern conflict is at the fore front of the war effort.

    • #34
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I was thinking, the main advantage to “losing” the Russian ISS modules is that, from what I’ve read, theirs have been the most problematic. Among other things, I remember reading something about problems with replacing bad batteries because some Russian idiots had welded steel bars in place OVER them.

    Yes, they’re products of the Russian industrial complex and have quality control issues involved in their construction.

    The downside is that the Russian modules form the back bone of the ISS.

    Zvezda (DOS-8) is the core service module and Zarya (Functional Cargo Block) … Zarya was the first module launched, and flew independently for 2 years waiting for Zvezda to be completed.

    NASA couldnt replace these modules in 10 years – let alone in 2.

    Maybe they’d entertain offers to buy, I hear they might be under some financial pressure these days.

    Maybe – but too bad the administration really can’t approach the Russians on the issue.

    Elon Musk could write them a check.

    Yes, and then be denounced as a traitor and Putin sympathizer before the plane lands.

    The check would probably go to Roscosmos – before the funds are distributed out into the Russian aerospace industry. Which in every modern conflict is at the fore front of the war effort.

    Except if part of their problem seems to be that “military” money ends up going into other peoples’ pockets, it wouldn’t really matter that much.  A few more dachas on the Black Sea.  A few more Swiss bank accounts…

    • #35
  6. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Except if part of their problem seems to be that “military” money ends up going into other peoples’ pockets, it wouldn’t really matter that much.  A few more dachas on the Black Sea.  A few more Swiss bank accounts…

    Would it matter?

    Even if the money gets siphoned away in corruption, the fact that a hostile military had resourced that someone provided wouldnt isolate them from charges (criminal, civil or social) … At this this point – looking at the DoJ -Does truth matter?

    I am just thinking that if someone writes a 9 digit check to an organization of the Russian government – the FBI will come knocking…Maybe that’ll change next year…

    • #36
  7. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Except if part of their problem seems to be that “military” money ends up going into other peoples’ pockets, it wouldn’t really matter that much. A few more dachas on the Black Sea. A few more Swiss bank accounts…

    Would it matter?

    Even if the money gets siphoned away in corruption, the fact that a hostile military had resourced that someone provided wouldnt isolate them from charges (criminal, civil or social) … At this this point – looking at the DoJ -Does truth matter?

    I am just thinking that if someone writes a 9 digit check to an organization of the Russian government – the FBI will come knocking…Maybe that’ll change next year…

    The FBI doesn’t have time for petty nine digit checks, they have a whole white nationalist uprising to manufacture.

    • #37
  8. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Except if part of their problem seems to be that “military” money ends up going into other peoples’ pockets, it wouldn’t really matter that much. A few more dachas on the Black Sea. A few more Swiss bank accounts…

    Would it matter?

    Even if the money gets siphoned away in corruption, the fact that a hostile military had resourced that someone provided wouldnt isolate them from charges (criminal, civil or social) … At this this point – looking at the DoJ -Does truth matter?

    I am just thinking that if someone writes a 9 digit check to an organization of the Russian government – the FBI will come knocking…Maybe that’ll change next year…

    The FBI doesn’t have time for petty nine digit checks, they have a whole white nationalist uprising to manufacture.

    Yes. 2 birds 1 stone. If it were Elon – who has expressed support for DeSantis, and his intention to vote Republican. Why not smear him as a Putin Puppet, tie him to DeSantis, Trump and any Senate or Congressional candidate that they could get away with?

    As has been already demonstrated with the Russia Hoax, it takes years to unravel the lie. With an uncooperative media and a disengaged public – a large chunk of the democrat voting block will believe it and be cowed into voting democrat, even when they can see how detrimental democrat policies are. 

    • #38
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Except if part of their problem seems to be that “military” money ends up going into other peoples’ pockets, it wouldn’t really matter that much. A few more dachas on the Black Sea. A few more Swiss bank accounts…

    Would it matter?

    Even if the money gets siphoned away in corruption, the fact that a hostile military had resourced that someone provided wouldnt isolate them from charges (criminal, civil or social) … At this this point – looking at the DoJ -Does truth matter?

    I am just thinking that if someone writes a 9 digit check to an organization of the Russian government – the FBI will come knocking…Maybe that’ll change next year…

    Fine, Musk writes the check to NASA, and NASA writes a check to Russia.

    • #39
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.